william the wie
Gold Member
- Nov 18, 2009
- 16,667
- 2,402
- 280
Given population trends in India and China I find a 200 million man army from India more credible than for China.
Likewise logistics favor India over China. Landing troops and supplies in the Sudan in order to use barge traffic down the Nile to get to Syria is not the Biblical path of the army of Armageddon but the only sensible path for the Chinese army. India on the other hand can use relatively safe nukes to get into Central Asia where China is building infrastructure and use OPM to get to Israel.
India which has a much stronger naval tradition and better navy than China can block China from using its least stupid path to Israel
China's western border is the second highest mountain range in the world and to get to those mountains you have to go through one of the worst deserts in the world. The original name tali makin meant "You go in, you don't come out"
A break out from India to central Asia would be a nightmare but that would still be ten times easier than what China would have to deal with. Persia is supposed to be trashed well before the return of Christ. India could get a secure route to Israel by landing troops in the Persian Gulf and use the biblical route to Israel. The Chinese navy is not good enough to interfere with Indian naval operations in the Indian Ocean where India has always dominated all other navies except for the French, Portuguese and British and then only when the colonial breakout happened during a succession war among the Mughals.
So, why the persistence of the notion that the 200 million man army is of course China?
Likewise logistics favor India over China. Landing troops and supplies in the Sudan in order to use barge traffic down the Nile to get to Syria is not the Biblical path of the army of Armageddon but the only sensible path for the Chinese army. India on the other hand can use relatively safe nukes to get into Central Asia where China is building infrastructure and use OPM to get to Israel.
India which has a much stronger naval tradition and better navy than China can block China from using its least stupid path to Israel
China's western border is the second highest mountain range in the world and to get to those mountains you have to go through one of the worst deserts in the world. The original name tali makin meant "You go in, you don't come out"
A break out from India to central Asia would be a nightmare but that would still be ten times easier than what China would have to deal with. Persia is supposed to be trashed well before the return of Christ. India could get a secure route to Israel by landing troops in the Persian Gulf and use the biblical route to Israel. The Chinese navy is not good enough to interfere with Indian naval operations in the Indian Ocean where India has always dominated all other navies except for the French, Portuguese and British and then only when the colonial breakout happened during a succession war among the Mughals.
So, why the persistence of the notion that the 200 million man army is of course China?