Why the alt-left and alt-right are often fooled...a lack of critical thinking.

shockedcanadian

Diamond Member
Aug 6, 2012
28,130
24,916
2,405
Just my opinion. I am willing to entertain some offbeat ideas, without question, circumstances are often not as they are presented. We see it again with this Tom Arnold fiasco on CNN. I mean really, how does he even think to try this?

It's more prominent with the alt-left right now due to the excessive and undying effort of the socialists in the media who have tried to take down the President, even before he was elected. However, all fall for it to some degree.

People just don't have critical thinking skills. The world has become all energy and emotion, no cerebral effort. We can all apply emotion, but the Genesis of the argument has to be logical and based on problem solving.

Thanks for your time, just my theory.
 
Last edited:
Just my opinion. I am willing to entertain some offbeat ideas, without question, circumstances are often not as they are presented. We see it again with this Tom Arnold fiasco on CNN. I mean really, how does he even think to try this?

It's more prominent with the alt-left right now due to the excessive and undying effort of the socialists in the media who have tried to take down the President, even before he was elected. However, all fall for it to some degree.

People just don't have critical thinking skills. The world has become all energy and emotion, no cerebral effort. We can all apply emotion, but the Genesis of the argument has to be logical and based on problem solving.

Thanks for your time, just my theory.
Not to hijack, but I am curious as to how you define "alt-right" and "alt-left". Everywhere is look, there are differences.
 
Just my opinion. I am willing to entertain some offbeat ideas, without question, circumstances are often not as they are presented. We see it again with this Tom Arnold fiasco on CNN. I mean really, how does he even think to try this?

It's more prominent with the alt-left right now due to the excessive and undying effort of the socialists in the media who have tried to take down the President, even before he was elected. However, all fall for it to some degree.

People just don't have critical thinking skills. The world has become all energy and emotion, no cerebral effort. We can all apply emotion, but the Genesis of the argument has to be logical and based on problem solving.

Thanks for your time, just my theory.
Not to hijack, but I am curious as to how you define "alt-right" and "alt-left". Everywhere is look, there are differences.


Well, I suppose it's hard to define. I just consider the extent of a conspiracy and the overall general belief system being really far on one side, and consistently far regardless of the issue. They embrace really unusual and unfounded views, especially those which defy the government official line. Extreme conspiracies, multiplied exponentially as being the only accepted line by them. So when any view is presented from those they believe, they just take it at face value, a knee jerk reaction before all information is available.

I believe conspiracies exist, but they are rare. Some embrace those theories first before others, which I find abnormal.
 
Just my opinion. I am willing to entertain some offbeat ideas, without question, circumstances are often not as they are presented. We see it again with this Tom Arnold fiasco on CNN. I mean really, how does he even think to try this?

It's more prominent with the alt-left right now due to the excessive and undying effort of the socialists in the media who have tried to take down the President, even before he was elected. However, all fall for it to some degree.

People just don't have critical thinking skills. The world has become all energy and emotion, no cerebral effort. We can all apply emotion, but the Genesis of the argument has to be logical and based on problem solving.

Thanks for your time, just my theory.
Not to hijack, but I am curious as to how you define "alt-right" and "alt-left". Everywhere is look, there are differences.


Well, I suppose it's hard to define. I just consider the extent of a conspiracy and the overall general belief system being really far on one side, and consistently far regardless of the issue. They embrace really unusual and unfounded views, especially those which defy the government official line. Extreme conspiracies, multiplied exponentially as being the only accepted line by them. So when any view is presented from those they believe, they just take it at face value, a knee jerk reaction before all information is available.

I believe conspiracies exist, but they are rare. Some embrace those theories first before others, which I find abnormal.
Agreed 100%. And the conspiracy theories typically align perfectly with beliefs they already hold.
 
The alt white exists because they are 90% white.

There is no alt left.
 

Forum List

Back
Top