agencies wanting to know how much ammunition I have. Could be rather interesting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You're an ignorant paranoid lunatic.
and your not paranoid?....watch out there may be a White Republican hiding in your house....
I keep about a thousand rounds on hand. That works out to under 100 rounds per weapon.
I don't feel I need to fire 500 rounds to remain competent. If I fire 6 rounds and see only 1 hole, firing more ammo only serves to burn gas and cash for a trip to the candy store.
My 7.7's cost about $2/round last time, the .308's about a buck. Yeah I can fire cheaper military rounds in the .308, but I want to know where the gun is shooting with my normal round.
The shotguns don't get fired regularly, but get cleaned and oiled about every 6 months.
I am so glad you finally came out of your liberal hiding place I bet you feel better now?i know this question has been asked not sure if it has been fully addressed.
So here it goes.
A firearms owner to be responsible should at all times remain proficient with all his firearms, this would require a large amount of ammo
i go to the range at least once a month and shoot 600 to a thousand rounds per firearm i take to the range.
I take at least 5 firearms with me because no firearm is the same as another one even if they are the same make and model and caliber of firearm.
Now you add that amount of rounds that i use on the range plus the amount that is above my minimum level cut off point. (my minimum level is a 500 rounds per firearm.) it would not be hard to see why i would need a lot of ammo.
Now if there is a restriction of the amount of ammo you can have, how as a responsible firearms owner stay proficient and continue to be responsible?
Do other gun owners understand the point i am trying to make?
I show how a responsible gun owner should be and liberals say nothing. I guess with liberals their argument is total bull shit
I'm not a liberal, but I'll respond.
You sound like one of those fat rednecks who gets out of breathe lugging his guns and ammo 20 yards to the bench at the range. Then sits on his ass, uses the rests to shoot off of, at paper targets, while sipping coffee and/or alcohol between shots. Then leave...and feel good thinking you are prepared to take on a tyrranical government or zombie attack.
Big deal. You pulled the trigger over and over a bunch of times, ALL shots being done at your resting heart rate with no sensory overload.
In other words, you're training for a controlled, calm environment, like a shooting competition.
I bet you...know wait, I KNOW you didn't do any type of sensory overload training. Shooting on the move. I KNOW you didn't do any kind of shooting with high physical exertion (called "excercise") involved. No heart rate training. None of that.
You sat your fat ass down, fire off hundreds of rounds in comfort, left, called it a day and said you are now "ready".
So...no. Shooting 1,000 rounds of mindless repetition is NOT equal to shooting 100 rounds under stress conditions. And you didn't...and dont'...train like that.
(BigReb is now in a panic, searching for a backwoods militia group he can join, or, he'll be one of those folks who pays $2,000 to attend a 5 day tactical camp for civilians run by former military and police, who are more than happy to take his money).
A few years back when I was competing heavily, I would put 20,000 rounds a year downrange, no problem.
Did you fire those rounds out of 30 - 100 round magazines?
i know this question has been asked not sure if it has been fully addressed.
So here it goes.
A firearms owner to be responsible should at all times remain proficient with all his firearms, this would require a large amount of ammo
i go to the range at least once a month and shoot 600 to a thousand rounds per firearm i take to the range.
I take at least 5 firearms with me because no firearm is the same as another one even if they are the same make and model and caliber of firearm.
Now you add that amount of rounds that i use on the range plus the amount that is above my minimum level cut off point. (my minimum level is a 500 rounds per firearm.) it would not be hard to see why i would need a lot of ammo.
Now if there is a restriction of the amount of ammo you can have, how as a responsible firearms owner stay proficient and continue to be responsible?
Do other gun owners understand the point i am trying to make?
I show how a responsible gun owner should be and liberals say nothing. I guess with liberals their argument is total bull shit
I'm not a liberal, but I'll respond.
You sound like one of those fat rednecks who gets out of breathe lugging his guns and ammo 20 yards to the bench at the range. Then sits on his ass, uses the rests to shoot off of, at paper targets, while sipping coffee and/or alcohol between shots. Then leave...and feel good thinking you are prepared to take on a tyrranical government or zombie attack.
Big deal. You pulled the trigger over and over a bunch of times, ALL shots being done at your resting heart rate with no sensory overload.
In other words, you're training for a controlled, calm environment, like a shooting competition.
I bet you...know wait, I KNOW you didn't do any type of sensory overload training. Shooting on the move. I KNOW you didn't do any kind of shooting with high physical exertion (called "excercise") involved. No heart rate training. None of that.
You sat your fat ass down, fire off hundreds of rounds in comfort, left, called it a day and said you are now "ready".
So...no. Shooting 1,000 rounds of mindless repetition is NOT equal to shooting 100 rounds under stress conditions. And you didn't...and dont'...train like that.
(BigReb is now in a panic, searching for a backwoods militia group he can join, or, he'll be one of those folks who pays $2,000 to attend a 5 day tactical camp for civilians run by former military and police, who are more than happy to take his money).
I don't have any assault rifles. I may get one soon though.Nobody is saying how much ammo you can have. What they ARE saying is how much ammo you can have in your weapon prior to having to reload.
Even when I was in the military and part of the Security Forces, we didn't use high round magazines for practice, we used normal ones, because that was the kind we'd be carrying out on patrol.
I need exactly the same type of magazines the military has. When I was in the Air Force we used the same magazine at the range that we would carry while on duty. 30 round magazines. We carried 3 30 rounds magazines in a pouch and one magazine in the rifle.
Do you REALLY need 30-100 rounds per magazine?
What were you shooting? An assault rifle?
In the Navy, we used 15 round magazines, because otherwise the 9mm wouldn't fit in the holster.
I think you're lying. Any other AF security types out there who can verify they went on patrol with 30 round magazines?
I don't have any assault rifles. I may get one soon though.I need exactly the same type of magazines the military has. When I was in the Air Force we used the same magazine at the range that we would carry while on duty. 30 round magazines. We carried 3 30 rounds magazines in a pouch and one magazine in the rifle.
What were you shooting? An assault rifle?
In the Navy, we used 15 round magazines, because otherwise the 9mm wouldn't fit in the holster.
I think you're lying. Any other AF security types out there who can verify they went on patrol with 30 round magazines?
It cost around 5000.00
I do however have bolt actions and semi automatics rifles a number of semi automatic hand guns and 6 revolvers. One of which is my most prized firearm Smith & Wesson M 1917 45 acp revolver.
You're an ignorant paranoid lunatic.
and your not paranoid?....watch out there may be a White Republican hiding in your house....
I like your Christmas avatar. I remember many years ago when Sears called them "facial massagers"...
I am so glad you finally came out of your liberal hiding place I bet you feel better now?I show how a responsible gun owner should be and liberals say nothing. I guess with liberals their argument is total bull shit
I'm not a liberal, but I'll respond.
You sound like one of those fat rednecks who gets out of breathe lugging his guns and ammo 20 yards to the bench at the range. Then sits on his ass, uses the rests to shoot off of, at paper targets, while sipping coffee and/or alcohol between shots. Then leave...and feel good thinking you are prepared to take on a tyrranical government or zombie attack.
Big deal. You pulled the trigger over and over a bunch of times, ALL shots being done at your resting heart rate with no sensory overload.
In other words, you're training for a controlled, calm environment, like a shooting competition.
I bet you...know wait, I KNOW you didn't do any type of sensory overload training. Shooting on the move. I KNOW you didn't do any kind of shooting with high physical exertion (called "excercise") involved. No heart rate training. None of that.
You sat your fat ass down, fire off hundreds of rounds in comfort, left, called it a day and said you are now "ready".
So...no. Shooting 1,000 rounds of mindless repetition is NOT equal to shooting 100 rounds under stress conditions. And you didn't...and dont'...train like that.
(BigReb is now in a panic, searching for a backwoods militia group he can join, or, he'll be one of those folks who pays $2,000 to attend a 5 day tactical camp for civilians run by former military and police, who are more than happy to take his money).
He's doesn't know what my training consist of. I do reaction shooting target identification/ combat tactical training some months and others I just plink around.I am so glad you finally came out of your liberal hiding place I bet you feel better now?I'm not a liberal, but I'll respond.
You sound like one of those fat rednecks who gets out of breathe lugging his guns and ammo 20 yards to the bench at the range. Then sits on his ass, uses the rests to shoot off of, at paper targets, while sipping coffee and/or alcohol between shots. Then leave...and feel good thinking you are prepared to take on a tyrranical government or zombie attack.
Big deal. You pulled the trigger over and over a bunch of times, ALL shots being done at your resting heart rate with no sensory overload.
In other words, you're training for a controlled, calm environment, like a shooting competition.
I bet you...know wait, I KNOW you didn't do any type of sensory overload training. Shooting on the move. I KNOW you didn't do any kind of shooting with high physical exertion (called "excercise") involved. No heart rate training. None of that.
You sat your fat ass down, fire off hundreds of rounds in comfort, left, called it a day and said you are now "ready".
So...no. Shooting 1,000 rounds of mindless repetition is NOT equal to shooting 100 rounds under stress conditions. And you didn't...and dont'...train like that.
(BigReb is now in a panic, searching for a backwoods militia group he can join, or, he'll be one of those folks who pays $2,000 to attend a 5 day tactical camp for civilians run by former military and police, who are more than happy to take his money).
Left or right, Democrat or Rebubican, lib or con, matters not. This post is spot on correct and you chose to attack the person and not the argument.
I don't have any assault rifles. I may get one soon though.What were you shooting? An assault rifle?
In the Navy, we used 15 round magazines, because otherwise the 9mm wouldn't fit in the holster.
I think you're lying. Any other AF security types out there who can verify they went on patrol with 30 round magazines?
It cost around 5000.00
I do however have bolt actions and semi automatics rifles a number of semi automatic hand guns and 6 revolvers. One of which is my most prized firearm Smith & Wesson M 1917 45 acp revolver.
What did you put 30 round magazines into while you were on patrol with the AF?
Why so much ammo?
?
A few years back when I was competing heavily, I would put 20,000 rounds a year downrange, no problem.
Did you fire those rounds out of 30 - 100 round magazines?
When practicing for 3 Gun competition, yes. Also, when hunting wild hogs. I also use a 20 round magazine for my short range varmint rifle.
I recall taking friends, sometimes first time shooters, to the range. They ALWAYS said the AR15 was the most fun to shoot. It would have been with a 30 round magazine. I find that interesting.
I don't use 100 round drums. Too unreliable.
I don't have any assault rifles. I may get one soon though.
It cost around 5000.00
I do however have bolt actions and semi automatics rifles a number of semi automatic hand guns and 6 revolvers. One of which is my most prized firearm Smith & Wesson M 1917 45 acp revolver.
What did you put 30 round magazines into while you were on patrol with the AF?
This is what we carried on our web belts we never carried a side arm.