Why should other taxpayers have to subsidize gay mating?

[bripat9643]

Spanking you if you didn't do what you were told was an appropriate way to teach the reality of liberalism to you

My mother agreed. It also taught that life has rules and other people have needs of their own. Imagine that, and in your case you'll have to since you were never taught that.

How does that make you different from a Nazi?

Very different. They were like you, thinking only of themselves, but at least even they, unlike you, could see the need for society and that their fellow citizens mattered.

Now you're changing the subject. Nazis believe that society has rules that you are bound to follow, don't they? Nazis claimed their rules were for the good of the German volk, just as you claim your rules are for the good of America.

Nazis liked dog and children, that doesn't make people who like dogs and children Nazis. Grow up, Bri-piss.

Isn't that the theory that says conservatives are racist because that numskull in South Carolina who killed 9 people is a "conservative?"

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You've proven nothing of the kind, and not Jews, Zionists, which can all be sent to an island as well, history shows that's possible eh? Fuckin' pussies...

Yeah, and we put people of Japanese ancestry in concentration camps during the war. You so-called "liberals" never change your spots, do you?

During wartime mistakes are made eh? That's life, lesson learned.

it seems liberals are always making these "mistakes." However, I don't think they were mistakes. They were just examples of liberals giving in to their natural inclinations.

Our natural inclination is to let people like you continue to exist, and that's a damn shame actually.

That's been tried before. Why did you ask why bripat called you a Nazi again? Get it now?

Point being, liberals are too nice for their own good.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

My mother agreed. It also taught that life has rules and other people have needs of their own. Imagine that, and in your case you'll have to since you were never taught that.

How does that make you different from a Nazi?

Very different. They were like you, thinking only of themselves, but at least even they, unlike you, could see the need for society and that their fellow citizens mattered.

Now you're changing the subject. Nazis believe that society has rules that you are bound to follow, don't they? Nazis claimed their rules were for the good of the German volk, just as you claim your rules are for the good of America.

Nazis liked dog and children, that doesn't make people who like dogs and children Nazis. Grow up, Bri-piss.

Isn't that the theory that says conservatives are racist because that numskull in South Carolina who killed 9 people is a "conservative?"

Conservatives are racist because conservatives are racist. All humans are.

 

[kaz]

Yep, forcing people to do what they don't want to do is what liberalism is all about. Only the truly servile and totalitarian would gloat about something like that.

You dolt. Our country was founded on the ideal that Congress can raise taxes. From the earliest days, people were forced to pay taxes for things they didn't agree with.

That's not an "ideal," numskull. They viewed it as a painful necessity, not something desirable. This country was founded on the ideal of liberty, that men should be free to pursue their own ends, rather than, as liberals believe, men are the means for rulers to pursue their ends.

Getting back to the point you're now trying to deflect from .... from our earliest days, people had to pay tax for something they didn't agree with. That's inherent in collecting taxes. Without realizing it, you called the founding fathers, "Liberal."

Glad to see, in your heart, you believe this country was founded on Liberalism.

The difference is the founding fathers believed in taxes for the "general good." That means everyone benefits. Roads, military, they are available for all. Sure some use them more than others and some value them more than others, but everyone does benefit from them. Socialists like you support the opposite, the specific good. Taking money from one person and giving it to another. That specific good comes at the direct expense of other citizens, it harms them. That was not the system our forefathers set up

You have no idea what liberals believe, you never ask, you only tell, and you're dead wrong of course.

The only consistency in your posts is the dearth of content

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You dolt. Our country was founded on the ideal that Congress can raise taxes. From the earliest days, people were forced to pay taxes for things they didn't agree with.

That's not an "ideal," numskull. They viewed it as a painful necessity, not something desirable. This country was founded on the ideal of liberty, that men should be free to pursue their own ends, rather than, as liberals believe, men are the means for rulers to pursue their ends.

Liberty comes from Liberalism and Liberals, dumbass.

True, classic liberalism. Today we are called libertarians. You are an authoritarian leftist. You are no more liberal than North Korea is a Democratic Republic

You are nothing like a liberal, and nothing like the Founders. They would have voted you off the island. They already had selfish real children to deal with.

So I agree with them on almost everything and you agree with them on nothing, which makes you one of them and me not. Got it

Nazis hated liberals. There's not much we could have agreed upon, but there is some.

 

[kaz]

Spanking you if you didn't do what you were told was an appropriate way to teach the reality of liberalism to you

My mother agreed. It also taught me that life has rules and other people have needs of their own, it's not just about you. Imagine that, and in your case you'll have to since you were never taught that.

How does your "need" impose an obligation on me?

The obligation is the social contract, and we've discussed this many times, that you were born to. You don't live on an island, of one.

You don't believe in a social contract, you believe in a socialist contract. The former is caring about one's fellow man, the latter is dominating them

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You dolt. Our country was founded on the ideal that Congress can raise taxes. From the earliest days, people were forced to pay taxes for things they didn't agree with.

That's not an "ideal," numskull. They viewed it as a painful necessity, not something desirable. This country was founded on the ideal of liberty, that men should be free to pursue their own ends, rather than, as liberals believe, men are the means for rulers to pursue their ends.

Getting back to the point you're now trying to deflect from .... from our earliest days, people had to pay tax for something they didn't agree with. That's inherent in collecting taxes. Without realizing it, you called the founding fathers, "Liberal."

Glad to see, in your heart, you believe this country was founded on Liberalism.

The difference is the founding fathers believed in taxes for the "general good." That means everyone benefits. Roads, military, they are available for all. Sure some use them more than others and some value them more than others, but everyone does benefit from them. Socialists like you support the opposite, the specific good. Taking money from one person and giving it to another. That specific good comes at the direct expense of other citizens, it harms them. That was not the system our forefathers set up

You have no idea what liberals believe, you never ask, you only tell, and you're dead wrong of course.

The only consistency in your posts is the dearth of content

Death, Taxes, and Change. Those you can count on...

 

[kaz]

Yeah, and we put people of Japanese ancestry in concentration camps during the war. You so-called "liberals" never change your spots, do you?

During wartime mistakes are made eh? That's life, lesson learned.

it seems liberals are always making these "mistakes." However, I don't think they were mistakes. They were just examples of liberals giving in to their natural inclinations.

Our natural inclination is to let people like you continue to exist, and that's a damn shame actually.

That's been tried before. Why did you ask why bripat called you a Nazi again? Get it now?

Point being, liberals are too nice for their own good.

Nice? What world do you live in that you think liberals are "nice?"

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Spanking you if you didn't do what you were told was an appropriate way to teach the reality of liberalism to you

My mother agreed. It also taught me that life has rules and other people have needs of their own, it's not just about you. Imagine that, and in your case you'll have to since you were never taught that.

How does your "need" impose an obligation on me?

The obligation is the social contract, and we've discussed this many times, that you were born to. You don't live on an island, of one.

You don't believe in a social contract, you believe in a socialist contract. The former is caring about one's fellow man, the latter is dominating them

Case in point, you never ask, just tell, and you're wrong of course.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

During wartime mistakes are made eh? That's life, lesson learned.

it seems liberals are always making these "mistakes." However, I don't think they were mistakes. They were just examples of liberals giving in to their natural inclinations.

Our natural inclination is to let people like you continue to exist, and that's a damn shame actually.

That's been tried before. Why did you ask why bripat called you a Nazi again? Get it now?

Point being, liberals are too nice for their own good.

Nice? What world do you live in that you think liberals are "nice?"

This one, although that's not a requirement.

 

[kaz]

How does that make you different from a Nazi?

Very different. They were like you, thinking only of themselves, but at least even they, unlike you, could see the need for society and that their fellow citizens mattered.

Now you're changing the subject. Nazis believe that society has rules that you are bound to follow, don't they? Nazis claimed their rules were for the good of the German volk, just as you claim your rules are for the good of America.

Nazis liked dog and children, that doesn't make people who like dogs and children Nazis. Grow up, Bri-piss.

Isn't that the theory that says conservatives are racist because that numskull in South Carolina who killed 9 people is a "conservative?"

Conservatives are racist because conservatives are racist. All humans are.

Do all humans hate Jews too or is that just you?

 

[kaz]

That's not an "ideal," numskull. They viewed it as a painful necessity, not something desirable. This country was founded on the ideal of liberty, that men should be free to pursue their own ends, rather than, as liberals believe, men are the means for rulers to pursue their ends.

Getting back to the point you're now trying to deflect from .... from our earliest days, people had to pay tax for something they didn't agree with. That's inherent in collecting taxes. Without realizing it, you called the founding fathers, "Liberal."

Glad to see, in your heart, you believe this country was founded on Liberalism.

The difference is the founding fathers believed in taxes for the "general good." That means everyone benefits. Roads, military, they are available for all. Sure some use them more than others and some value them more than others, but everyone does benefit from them. Socialists like you support the opposite, the specific good. Taking money from one person and giving it to another. That specific good comes at the direct expense of other citizens, it harms them. That was not the system our forefathers set up

You have no idea what liberals believe, you never ask, you only tell, and you're dead wrong of course.

The only consistency in your posts is the dearth of content

Death, Taxes, and Change. Those you can count on...

Those and you not being able to back up your argument

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Very different. They were like you, thinking only of themselves, but at least even they, unlike you, could see the need for society and that their fellow citizens mattered.

Now you're changing the subject. Nazis believe that society has rules that you are bound to follow, don't they? Nazis claimed their rules were for the good of the German volk, just as you claim your rules are for the good of America.

Nazis liked dog and children, that doesn't make people who like dogs and children Nazis. Grow up, Bri-piss.

Isn't that the theory that says conservatives are racist because that numskull in South Carolina who killed 9 people is a "conservative?"

Conservatives are racist because conservatives are racist. All humans are.

Do all humans hate Jews too or is that just you?

All humans are racist, and I hate Zionists, and all religions of course.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Getting back to the point you're now trying to deflect from .... from our earliest days, people had to pay tax for something they didn't agree with. That's inherent in collecting taxes. Without realizing it, you called the founding fathers, "Liberal."

Glad to see, in your heart, you believe this country was founded on Liberalism.

The difference is the founding fathers believed in taxes for the "general good." That means everyone benefits. Roads, military, they are available for all. Sure some use them more than others and some value them more than others, but everyone does benefit from them. Socialists like you support the opposite, the specific good. Taking money from one person and giving it to another. That specific good comes at the direct expense of other citizens, it harms them. That was not the system our forefathers set up

You have no idea what liberals believe, you never ask, you only tell, and you're dead wrong of course.

The only consistency in your posts is the dearth of content

Death, Taxes, and Change. Those you can count on...

Those and you not being able to back up your argument

I never make one I can't, that's you.

 

[Seawytch]

I don't see the word upset. Annoy is hardly the same as upset. Besides...I know it did annoy you.

I didn't quote the word upset. This is exactly what I said you would do and why I said I wouldn't waste my time.

QED, just remember this going forward, and it turns out you are the liar. Welshing on a bet, pathetic. You have now made clear what you are

Nope. You used the word upset. It's not even a synonym for annoyed.

You're so scared to debate me you have to stretch for reasons not to? Don't respond instead of trying to find a pussy way out.

The SCOTUS ruling annoyed you didn't it?

You know what quotes mean and neither of us used them. You are a liar with no integrity. Straight up, ho, you are

You said upset. Your original statement said upset. Annoy isn't upset...not even a synonym.

I was annoyed at the ruling and I won, so I know it annoyed you. It didn't upset you, but it DID annoy you.

Stop responding if you don't want to debate me, pussy.

Oh, and keep subsidizing my gay mating too.

When I didn't quote the word upset and you didn't either, you knew exactly what that meant. You are a liar and you have no honor

I'm sorry. Simple oversight. "Upset" was specified. I said annoyed....which you are.

I never for a second thought you'd be upset. Annoyed at the ruling, yes...which you are but I never assumed "upset" like Key, Bripat or Sil.

 

[kaz]

Spanking you if you didn't do what you were told was an appropriate way to teach the reality of liberalism to you

My mother agreed. It also taught me that life has rules and other people have needs of their own, it's not just about you. Imagine that, and in your case you'll have to since you were never taught that.

How does your "need" impose an obligation on me?

The obligation is the social contract, and we've discussed this many times, that you were born to. You don't live on an island, of one.

You don't believe in a social contract, you believe in a socialist contract. The former is caring about one's fellow man, the latter is dominating them

Case in point, you never ask, just tell, and you're wrong of course.

Give me an example of how you do that, how do you ask without telling, you know, for my education

 

[kaz]

The difference is the founding fathers believed in taxes for the "general good." That means everyone benefits. Roads, military, they are available for all. Sure some use them more than others and some value them more than others, but everyone does benefit from them. Socialists like you support the opposite, the specific good. Taking money from one person and giving it to another. That specific good comes at the direct expense of other citizens, it harms them. That was not the system our forefathers set up

You have no idea what liberals believe, you never ask, you only tell, and you're dead wrong of course.

The only consistency in your posts is the dearth of content

Death, Taxes, and Change. Those you can count on...

Those and you not being able to back up your argument

I never make one I can't, that's you.

Telling me you can back up your arguments isn't backing them up

 

[PaintMyHouse]

My mother agreed. It also taught me that life has rules and other people have needs of their own, it's not just about you. Imagine that, and in your case you'll have to since you were never taught that.

How does your "need" impose an obligation on me?

The obligation is the social contract, and we've discussed this many times, that you were born to. You don't live on an island, of one.

You don't believe in a social contract, you believe in a socialist contract. The former is caring about one's fellow man, the latter is dominating them

Case in point, you never ask, just tell, and you're wrong of course.

Give me an example of how you ask without telling for my education

Hey Kaz, what's your favorite version of an economy? And, seen any good movies lately?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You have no idea what liberals believe, you never ask, you only tell, and you're dead wrong of course.

The only consistency in your posts is the dearth of content

Death, Taxes, and Change. Those you can count on...

Those and you not being able to back up your argument

I never make one I can't, that's you.

Telling me you can back up your arguments isn't backing them up

That's correct. Good on you.

 

[kaz]

I didn't quote the word upset. This is exactly what I said you would do and why I said I wouldn't waste my time.

QED, just remember this going forward, and it turns out you are the liar. Welshing on a bet, pathetic. You have now made clear what you are

Nope. You used the word upset. It's not even a synonym for annoyed.

You're so scared to debate me you have to stretch for reasons not to? Don't respond instead of trying to find a pussy way out.

The SCOTUS ruling annoyed you didn't it?

You know what quotes mean and neither of us used them. You are a liar with no integrity. Straight up, ho, you are

You said upset. Your original statement said upset. Annoy isn't upset...not even a synonym.

I was annoyed at the ruling and I won, so I know it annoyed you. It didn't upset you, but it DID annoy you.

Stop responding if you don't want to debate me, pussy.

Oh, and keep subsidizing my gay mating too.

When I didn't quote the word upset and you didn't either, you knew exactly what that meant. You are a liar and you have no honor

I'm sorry. Simple oversight. "Upset" was specified. I said annoyed....which you are.

I never for a second thought you'd be upset. Annoyed at the ruling, yes...which you are but I never assumed "upset" like Key, Bripat or Sil.

Spin, spin, spin, you have no integrity. You made a bet, now you're reneging on it. I don't care about your being banned for two weeks. You were just being a bitch and nagging me for something you remembered doing thinking it was going to be too hard to find in the search engine with thousands of posts. I tried to blow you off, but you kept being a ho. So I just wanted some consequence for that. I thought you'd Welsh, I told you that. You did. Just admit it for what it is. You lost, you aren't honoring the bet