- Thread starter
- #3,021
Non-sequitur which in no way supports your moronic claim that members of Congress have the right to vote on bills.I take it from this you still have no fucking clue what the difference is between a right and a privilege.You voted for a hard core Marxist, well done on that. You're a true patriot, not. And you're definitely a clown, you chose your avatar wellAnd you voted for that clown to be president.LOL, you're such a clown. But you already know that. Your avatar is so accurate, it screams you're an idiot. And this is one of your stupid liberal tricks
Of course it is, they were elected to Congress, idiot. How do they not have a "right" to vote against a budget bill? What does that even mean?
Positive rights are an oxymoron, and you're just the clown for the moron job
Getting to vote in Congress is a privilege, not a right. It's a pity you're not capable of understanding that. Barring a threat to others, rights can't be taken away. Meanwhile, members of Congress can be removed from office. That wouldn't be permissible if getting to vote in Congress was a right.
And while my avatar is that of a Republican clown, your posts continuously prove incontrovertibly that you're a fucking imbecile.
Positive rights are privileges, not rights. Only negative rights are rights
Going to congress is neither a privilege nor a right. You have to earn it. You have the right to run if you're eligible, but from there you have to be picked by the voters.
However, once they do that, they have the right to vote on bills. It's what the job is, moron. Of course congressmen have the right to vote on bills. They earned that right by being elected.
And seriously, that's your argument? That Obama can get whatever he wants because congressmen don't have a right to vote no? What does that even mean? They have to vote yes? If they don't it doesn't pass. And how does your privilege argument not apply to Obama? How does he by your own reasoning have a right to his budget?