Why Obama Will Lose

May be a rout...

A slim win by Romney will do though.

The best the dems have on Romney is dog-cruelty, hazing, and Bain.

"If thats the worst I've done - I've lived a pretty good life."
 
May be a rout...

A slim win by Romney will do though.

The best the dems have on Romney is dog-cruelty, hazing, and Bain.

"If thats the worst I've done - I've lived a pretty good life."

No doubt

expect to hear from the MSM and the left, more cries of racism and how the Republicans
are so extreme- while the OWS riots and plans to blow up bridges
and Papa Obama appoints radicals to posts and positions
:eusa_whistle:

Same leftist crap
Different day
 
Last edited:
Your experience does not reflect the
country at large

The Hill 7/23

It found that 66 percent believe paltry job growth and slow economic recovery is the result of bad policy.
34 percent say Obama is the most to blame
23 percent who say Congress is the culprit.

18 percent cite former President George W. Bush.

All that time and ads by Papa Obama to blame
everybody else- but it is not working

No wonder his campaign ran a deficit the other month

Again

Why Obama Will Lose?
Because he deserves to...

First, that Hill Poll was kind of dubious, since nearly every other poll on the subject has found more fault with Dubya.

Second, 34% doesn't win you an election.
 
failed presidents usually lose in the 2nd term elections
omazma is one ofTHE WORST prez in American history
 
Your experience does not reflect the
country at large

The Hill 7/23

It found that 66 percent believe paltry job growth and slow economic recovery is the result of bad policy.
34 percent say Obama is the most to blame
23 percent who say Congress is the culprit.

18 percent cite former President George W. Bush.

All that time and ads by Papa Obama to blame
everybody else- but it is not working

No wonder his campaign ran a deficit the other month

Again

Why Obama Will Lose?
Because he deserves to...

First, that Hill Poll was kind of dubious, since nearly every other poll on the subject has found more fault with Dubya.

Second, 34% doesn't win you an election.

No but the majority blaming Papa Obama for the bad
economy- which they should

does

and the blame Bush is becoming increasingly, ineffective

Looks like the Left will have to get busy with the old standards, the racism card
and the extreme right card

Looks like you got a lot of work ahead of you Joe
Friendly note
the "ex -republican" thing is not working

Really when one considers that Papa Obama and his radical left supporters
are even to the left on economic issues of presidents like John F. Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and Ronald Reagan

The claim rings hollow
It has no "street" creds


Really Scott Brown's ad says it well

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqDIjGsBEP8"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oqDIjGsBEP8[/ame]
 
Last edited:
failed presidents usually lose in the 2nd term elections
omazma is one ofTHE WORST prez in American history

Some day you'll master literacy...

Actually, presidents RARELY lose their bids for second terms.

Rarer still is turning out a party after it has only held the White House for one term. The last time that happened was 1980. The last time before that was 1892. And even that was questionable because the 1888 election had all sorts of hair on it.
 
[

First, that Hill Poll was kind of dubious, since nearly every other poll on the subject has found more fault with Dubya.

Second, 34% doesn't win you an election.

No but the majority blaming Papa Obama for the bad
economy- which they should

does
url]

34% isn't a majority, Clem. Mom needed to teach that before she declared you the Validictorian of your Home Skule.
 
[

First, that Hill Poll was kind of dubious, since nearly every other poll on the subject has found more fault with Dubya.

Second, 34% doesn't win you an election.

No but the majority blaming Papa Obama for the bad
economy- which they should

does
url]

34% isn't a majority, Clem. Mom needed to teach that before she declared you the Validictorian of your Home Skule.

One word - plurality
He has it in that poll
looked it up

So yes a relative "majority" in that poll blaming him
Granted it is subtle, but with a little effort, you should get it.


Again liberals should stay away from math.
Stick with the stuff you are good at....

Fake claims of racism, right extremism and
dubious claims that Papa Obama is just a "moderate"


:eusa_whistle:
 
Last edited:
No but the majority blaming Papa Obama for the bad
economy- which they should

does
url]

34% isn't a majority, Clem. Mom needed to teach that before she declared you the Validictorian of your Home Skule.

One word - plurality
He has it in that poll
looked it up

So yes a relative "majority" in that poll blaming him
Granted it is subtle, but with a little effort, you should get it.

Again liberals should stay away from math.
Stick with the stuff you are good at....

Fake claims of racism, right extremism and
dubious claims that Papa Obama is just a "moderate"

:eusa_whistle:

The majority blames either Congress or Bush... Sorry, man. Learn to deal.
 
34% isn't a majority, Clem. Mom needed to teach that before she declared you the Validictorian of your Home Skule.

One word - plurality
He has it in that poll
looked it up

So yes a relative "majority" in that poll blaming him
Granted it is subtle, but with a little effort, you should get it.

Again liberals should stay away from math.
Stick with the stuff you are good at....

Fake claims of racism, right extremism and
dubious claims that Papa Obama is just a "moderate"

:eusa_whistle:

The majority blames either Congress or Bush... Sorry, man. Learn to deal.

Too funny ....

Actually it is not "either"- either implies they are separate or not cumulative.
You need to say the majority together blame Congress and Bush or
The majority (again relative) blames Bush and Congress.

But the majority blames one person more than anyone else
and who would that person be?-- Papa Obama

As you say
Sorry, man. Learn to deal
oh and learn some math

Like I said
liberals should stay away from math.
Stick with the stuff you are good at....

Fake claims of racism, right extremism and
dubious claims that Papa Obama is just a "moderate"

Much more subjective and allow for "creative"
interpretations
:eusa_angel:
 
Last edited:
Congress run by Republicans and Bush... Sorry, man, the fact is, only about 34% are hard core Obama Haters, and you jokers won't win with just 34%.

Especially not with a mutant like Romney... The man is as creepy as a funeral director.
 
Congress run by Republicans and Bush... Sorry, man, the fact is, only about 34% are hard core Obama Haters, and you jokers won't win with just 34%.

McCain took 45% in 2008 when the Nation was in love w/ hope and change.

Now people know about Obama.
 
Congress run by Republicans and Bush... Sorry, man, the fact is, only about 34% are hard core Obama Haters, and you jokers won't win with just 34%.

McCain took 45% in 2008 when the Nation was in love w/ hope and change.

Now people know about Obama.

Yes, they do.

And Romney isn't breaching 45% in most polls. He's really not expanding beyond what McCain got.

And that's kind of the point. People who voted for Obama still will.

I voted for McCain, but I won't vote for the Weird Mormon Robot. I think we need to throw up a fence around Utah to keep them in until they can be "deprogrammed".
 
James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute notes that the only two presidents to face re-election with the consumer-confidence numbers Obama has to show for himself were Jimmy Carter and the first George Bush — both one-termers.

In 2012, what is the incumbent going to do — talk about somebody else’s tax returns for the next 109 days?
Probably

Romney needs to prove that he is eligible to be President of the United States by releasing his tax returns, because if his Swiss bank account was granted amnesty by the IRS then that would disqualify him from holding office.
 
Congress run by Republicans and Bush... Sorry, man, the fact is, only about 34% are hard core Obama Haters, and you jokers won't win with just 34%.

Especially not with a mutant like Romney... The man is as creepy as a funeral director.

That 34% had nothing to do with the vote
Really, the math thing for you is getting embarrassing
:eusa_angel:

Creepy?
whatever helps you sleep at night


7/24 USA Today-Gallup poll, 63 percent viewed Romney’s business background as a strength in handling the country’s economic woes, versus 29 percent who viewed it negatively.

All that money Papa Obama spent on ads against Romney so far
and it is not working

Boy, that guy spends money poorly
 
Last edited:
Why
are you trying to come over to my house, unannounced again?

Some people can not just take "no" for an answer
Please keep your perverted thoughts to yourself

:eusa_whistle:
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top