All book banning is stupid. I was simply answering the question posed in the title.Be patient. Just a little more Republican gerrymandering required.Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.
YET:
Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.
In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?
View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
A list of books currently banned by the Left in various sites was provided in the OP.
Your attempt to turn this around, fails.
But the point you raise is important. Republicans are not the ones banning books, "liberals" are.
Not true.
The censorship debates don't start in college. Elementary school parents aren't happy with LGBTQ-friendly books
Your desire to indoctrinate children in your ideology is noted.
That being said, a "leaning" as described by a left leaning magazine is not very convincing. I also note that they did not include ANY over all numbers such as what percentage of parents think that some "books should be banned" they ONLY reported the numbers on LBQT characters.