Why Isn't Darwin Banned from Schools and Libraries?

Is anyone shocked that a Creationist/Christian is calling for book bannings?
 
:lol:

I've never seen a book by Darwin in a school library. Nor have I ever heard of a school teacher assigning a Darwin book to read.
That’s because you’ve never been in a library nor have ever listened to an instructor.

:lol:

I've spent more time in school libraries than you've spent whining about liberals on the internet.
Surfing porn does not qualify as library time.

:lol:

It's adorable how dedicated to trolling your own thread you are.

Should I take your refusal to discuss your own topic as an admission that you're in over your head?
 
:lol:

I've never seen a book by Darwin in a school library. Nor have I ever heard of a school teacher assigning a Darwin book to read.

My child is now in college.

She was never assigned a single book about Darwin to read.

But she was assigned Huck Finn and Little House on the Prairie. And enjoyed them both.
 
:lol:

I've never seen a book by Darwin in a school library. Nor have I ever heard of a school teacher assigning a Darwin book to read.
That’s because you’ve never been in a library nor have ever listened to an instructor.

:lol:

I've spent more time in school libraries than you've spent whining about liberals on the internet.
Surfing porn does not qualify as library time.

:lol:

It's adorable how dedicated to trolling your own thread you are.

Should I take your refusal to discuss your own topic as an admission that you're in over your head?

You act like this is something new and unique he is doing with this thread of his
 
:lol:

I've never seen a book by Darwin in a school library. Nor have I ever heard of a school teacher assigning a Darwin book to read.
That’s because you’ve never been in a library nor have ever listened to an instructor.

:lol:

I've spent more time in school libraries than you've spent whining about liberals on the internet.
Surfing porn does not qualify as library time.

:lol:

It's adorable how dedicated to trolling your own thread you are.

Should I take your refusal to discuss your own topic as an admission that you're in over your head?

You act like this is something new and unique he is doing with this thread of his

Of course not. It's exactly what I expected.
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
In what school(s) is Darwinism taught?
I've been to a dozen colleges and universities over a twenty-year span and never once had to read about Darwin, Mein Kamp or The Communist Manifest, now the Anarchist Cookbook...
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
In what schools is Darwinism taught?

"Darwinism" isn't a thing, and isn't taught anywhere.

Evolution is taught in every science class.
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
In what schools is Darwinism taught?

"Darwinism" isn't a thing, and isn't taught anywhere.

Evolution is taught in every science class.
If you take them yes...Well, chemistry never mentioned him. Maybe cause I had a lesbian teacher.
 
That’s because you’ve never been in a library nor have ever listened to an instructor.

:lol:

I've spent more time in school libraries than you've spent whining about liberals on the internet.
Surfing porn does not qualify as library time.

:lol:

It's adorable how dedicated to trolling your own thread you are.

Should I take your refusal to discuss your own topic as an admission that you're in over your head?

You act like this is something new and unique he is doing with this thread of his

Of course not. It's exactly what I expected.
You Leftards are such stooges. You take the bait every time.

Los Angeles Public Library : Charles Darwin's works. by Darwin, Charles
 
:lol:

I've spent more time in school libraries than you've spent whining about liberals on the internet.
Surfing porn does not qualify as library time.

:lol:

It's adorable how dedicated to trolling your own thread you are.

Should I take your refusal to discuss your own topic as an admission that you're in over your head?

You act like this is something new and unique he is doing with this thread of his

Of course not. It's exactly what I expected.
You Leftards are such stooges. You take the bait every time.

Los Angeles Public Library : Charles Darwin's works. by Darwin, Charles

Hmmm I didn't know that the Los Angeles Public Library is a school library.
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
In what schools is Darwinism taught?

"Darwinism" isn't a thing, and isn't taught anywhere.

Evolution is taught in every science class.

Perhaps Darwin comes up in discussion of the history of the repression of science in the United States as in the Scopes Monkey Trials.

Does anyone doubt that what Weatherby really wants- and believes- is a return to 'traditional' approach to science- like this law?

The Butler Act was a 1925 Tennessee law prohibiting public school teachers from denying the Biblical account of mankind's origin. I
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?
Darwin never said nor implied any such thing. All humans were descended from a common ancestor, according to Darwin. Adaptation lead to variations in skin color. Not a increase (or decrease) in intelligence.
 
:lol:

I've spent more time in school libraries than you've spent whining about liberals on the internet.
Surfing porn does not qualify as library time.

:lol:

It's adorable how dedicated to trolling your own thread you are.

Should I take your refusal to discuss your own topic as an admission that you're in over your head?

You act like this is something new and unique he is doing with this thread of his

Of course not. It's exactly what I expected.
You Leftards are such stooges. You take the bait every time.

Los Angeles Public Library : Charles Darwin's works. by Darwin, Charles

:lol:

That's not a school, fuckwit. You understand that, right?
 
Surfing porn does not qualify as library time.

:lol:

It's adorable how dedicated to trolling your own thread you are.

Should I take your refusal to discuss your own topic as an admission that you're in over your head?

You act like this is something new and unique he is doing with this thread of his

Of course not. It's exactly what I expected.
You Leftards are such stooges. You take the bait every time.

Los Angeles Public Library : Charles Darwin's works. by Darwin, Charles

:lol:

That's not a school, fuckwit. You understand that, right?

Bet the Los Angels Public Library has Huck Finn too.....
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
Be patient. Just a little more Republican gerrymandering required.





A list of books currently banned by the Left in various sites was provided in the OP.


Your attempt to turn this around, fails.
All book banning is stupid. I was simply answering the question posed in the title.



But the point you raise is important. Republicans are not the ones banning books, "liberals" are.
 
Little House on the Prairie, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Sawyer, Uncle Toms Cabin.... all racist and offensive according to the Left.

YET:

Darwin and his evolutionary ideas, the awful depiction of Australian Aborigines and people from Africa being closer to apes than light-skinned people, should be immediately banned from schools, libraries, etc.

In the 1900s, public schools students in America were shockingly taught, based on Darwinian evolution (an inherently racist philosophy), that the “Caucasians” were supposedly the “highest” “race.” In this age of political correctness, why is there not outcry about Darwin's books?

View attachment 201690 View attachment 201691 View attachment 201692 View attachment 201693
Be patient. Just a little more Republican gerrymandering required.





A list of books currently banned by the Left in various sites was provided in the OP.


Your attempt to turn this around, fails.
All book banning is stupid. I was simply answering the question posed in the title.



But the point you raise is important. Republicans are not the ones banning books, "liberals" are.

Not true.
The censorship debates don't start in college. Elementary school parents aren't happy with LGBTQ-friendly books
 

Forum List

Back
Top