Roadrunner
Roadrunner
There is and was no local zoning out in these boonies.Local zoning works
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is and was no local zoning out in these boonies.Local zoning works
the epa can fine you for making changes, changes that you got approved from the governmentEveryone knows that there are too many regulations, right?
Well, WHY is the gov't at all levels telling Americans how and where we can build our homes? There are requirements when it comes to the structure, and the distance between floor joists, and the wiring, and electrical outlets, and plumbing, and toilets, and drywall, and concrete/cement mixtures, and SO many other things.
Why shouldn't someone be able to build a home wherever he pleases however he pleases?
So, should all regulations regarding the construction of private homes be eliminated?
Please explain your vote if you choose to vote in the poll.
Not necessarily. Suppose you live near and earthquake fault line. The local codes could more appropriately address concerns over earth quakes, but such overkill would not necessarily be prudent for a structure far from earthquake danger.not my argument at all. i'm just confused why a local edict is more acceptable than a federal one. the end result is the same.Would you then favor the elimination of all building codes and regulations?why? why do you find local intrusion and infringement on your freedoms more palatable than a federal law doing the same thing?Local zoning works
again, the key being "local"
I believe in certain national standards.Local zoning works
perhaps. but it's not as if a federal law could not make special rules for certain areas.Not necessarily. Suppose you live near and earthquake fault line. The local codes could more appropriately address concerns over earth quakes, but such overkill would not necessarily be prudent for a structure far from earthquake danger.not my argument at all. i'm just confused why a local edict is more acceptable than a federal one. the end result is the same.Would you then favor the elimination of all building codes and regulations?why? why do you find local intrusion and infringement on your freedoms more palatable than a federal law doing the same thing?Local zoning works
again, the key being "local"
You will find that the federal regulations deal with standards and material safety. How much should that beam support? Will this bolt hold? What about the chemical make up of that drywall? These are the purview of federal regulations.Zoning laws are passed on a local level. It's easy to address your displeasure in county meetings. The average Joe isn't aware of fireproof and safe construction materials so there are laws in place. Some areas authorize mobile homes and some don't. If you want to live in a tee-pee you can buy a patch of woods and live in it. Local laws usually make sense. When you get to the federal level is when things often become confusing and incoherent and it's almost impossible to reason with the feds.
Well yes! The federal government should have 'special regulations' for 'special circumstances'. Someone wants to build a 40,000 square foot house on a mangrove stand, there should be regulations to prevent that. Someone wants to build a beachfront home in the tidal area? When that house fails (as they always do), the federal government should have the last say, before the wreckage of that home becomes a hazard to navigation.perhaps. but it's not as if a federal law could not make special rules for certain areas.Not necessarily. Suppose you live near and earthquake fault line. The local codes could more appropriately address concerns over earth quakes, but such overkill would not necessarily be prudent for a structure far from earthquake danger.not my argument at all. i'm just confused why a local edict is more acceptable than a federal one. the end result is the same.Would you then favor the elimination of all building codes and regulations?why? why do you find local intrusion and infringement on your freedoms more palatable than a federal law doing the same thing?again, the key being "local"
Thanks for providing usmb with the dumb post of the dayI had my dream home built about ten years ago. If there weren't standards, the builders could have had a field day with providing me with substandard work but charging me premium prices.
Regulations are fine for they protect the consumer from shoddy work. Codes are there to check that the work meets specifications that are continually being updated for our safety.
And I am thankful for those codes.
Commie! Why are you taking away our freedom!Should you be able to build a fire trap in the middle of a neighborhood? How about raw sewage from your toilet into your front yard? How about never cutting your grass, which allows for all kinds of vermin to live in it and become disease carrying pests for your neighbors?
I'm not thrilled with federal regulations on the subject, but I can see the need for state fire codes and local codes, simply because people suck and there is always a lowest common denominator in the neighborhood who won't do the right thing until forced to.
Do you think that building codes should be eliminated? Which set of codes would you start with? Be specific.Thanks for providing usmb with the dumb post of the dayI had my dream home built about ten years ago. If there weren't standards, the builders could have had a field day with providing me with substandard work but charging me premium prices.
Regulations are fine for they protect the consumer from shoddy work. Codes are there to check that the work meets specifications that are continually being updated for our safety.
And I am thankful for those codes.
Without building codes you'd have no idea what you're getting when you buy a house. For example, you want to trust the electrical work burried in walls by an electriction who didn't have to adhere to any building codes? I wouldn't.
Have a friend with an older home that predates some of the local codes. At the time it was built there were no requirements to have hot and cold shutoff valves under the kitchen or bathroom sinks, and ditto for all the H and C water pipes throughout the house. Thus if he wants to try to fix a leaky bathroom faucet he has to shut off water to the entire house.
Why do you think the comment dumb?Thanks for providing usmb with the dumb post of the dayI had my dream home built about ten years ago. If there weren't standards, the builders could have had a field day with providing me with substandard work but charging me premium prices.
Regulations are fine for they protect the consumer from shoddy work. Codes are there to check that the work meets specifications that are continually being updated for our safety.
And I am thankful for those codes.
regulations are like Police ... nobody wants them until they NEED them.
Tents and outhouses for everyone, anywhere they want them ... section 8 Project housing in every neighborhood, Bums living in boxes right next door, shittin' on your front yard... it's all good, he aint heavy, he's your brother ..
yeah, right