rtwngAvngr
Senior Member
- Jan 5, 2004
- 15,755
- 513
- 48
- Banned
- #41
You give creedence to the charter but not resolutions. that's selective. Your brand of selectivity just happens to favor tyrants in this case.IControlThePast said:You're just stuck in a loop, and you've probably got there by assumptions. Which part am I selectively enforcing? I'm not enforcing any of it. You can't pick and chose which parts of the UN you like and enforce those. You can't pick and chose which US laws you like and decide not to enforce the rest.
reread the thread. Please don't reuse my fifty cent vocab words. Be original.You want to provide any evidence for your petulant assertions here, or do you only have straw men arguments for responses?
I believe the many violated resolutions by saddam greatly influenced the decisions of our congress.So you think that Congress would have decided differently if the (false) intelligence said Iran or SA instead of Iraq?
You have denigrated their efforts, thinking somehow pointing out their manpower contributions indicates they're not REALLY helping out, or something. I'm not really sure what's going on in your constipated psyche.Another straw man argument and assumption. If anyone is denigrating them, it's you. I just said we couldn't get enough of them to meet a good manpower ratio for us. You said we got 30. Now do you still disagree that 30 is not enough to meet that ratio, or do you think our allies aren't doing everything they can to help us, in which case you are denigrating their efforts.
I have some issues with the patriot act, But leftist libs like you are not for freedom. You're for the tyranny of the self proclaimed cultural socialist elite.So you think most people in the Republican party are tyrants? People who want to restrict individual liberty by say, the Patriot Act, or the new Flag Burning Amendment, or who don't believe in legal personal drug use, or assisted suicide, or exactly what the ACLU stands for are tyrants? I expected to only hear this from liberals.
I'm just saying economic freedom is a human rights issue. We should all have the right to give and recieve goods and services for a price we set ourselves.You're missing some thinking in there. Freedom involves freedom to be able to have a life not well lived or defined in that manner by Christianity, through personal choice. Do you deny that Mill's harm principle actually gives more personal freedom than Christianity?
You're the disgrace here, ninny.Suprise, another straw man and assumption lacking any evidence whatsoever. I would hope most other Republicans aren't as much of a disgrace as you.
So then, why, to the extreme, are we not attacking ourselves for violating the charter? We aren't even holding it against ourselves.
You're an idiot.