This question seems to escape most people, who can't see the forest for the trees. The ONLY legitimate government interest in civil marriage is the protection and welfare of children. That is why the marriage "contract" was invented; to create a system of rewards and responsibilities which encourages stable family units.
Unfortunately, this system has been compromised over the years by people who want enjoy the rewards without the responsibilities (no-fault divorce being a prime example.) Combined with a rising illegitimacy rate, this is making a mockery of marriage. Is there any reason to be married over than perceived tax benefits?
Unfortunately, this system has been compromised over the years by people who want enjoy the rewards without the responsibilities (no-fault divorce being a prime example.) Combined with a rising illegitimacy rate, this is making a mockery of marriage. Is there any reason to be married over than perceived tax benefits?