Why hate crime laws are a joke!

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Socialismbegone, Jun 19, 2004.

  1. Socialismbegone
    Online

    Socialismbegone Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    A hypothetical story to prove hate crimes are nothing more than liberals pandering to minorities.Let us say that there is a white woman having coffee with her black friend in the house of their best other friend who witnesses this whole situation and lives to testify in court what took place.A black man and a white man kick the door in where the women are sitting.They both have 38 specials.The white man before he shoots the black woman says,I hate you you mother fu&%^ng ni%$er bitch.He then empties the revolver 6 times into her and she is dead.The black man then shoots the white woman 6 times without saying a word and the white woman is dead.The 3rd woman testifies and the jury finds the white man did a more heinous crime and deserves to serve more of a sentence because he said he hated his victim.
    Is there really such a thing as a love crime?I think guidlines should be well defined in murders where everyone gets as harsh a sentence as possible with no exceptions.Why when Clinton,Kennedy or any other liberal politician tried to get hate crime legislation did they only hit on white on minority hate crime.If you look into statistics,you are far more likely to be a victim of black on white serious crime than white on black crimes of that nature.How often do you hear of black men raping white women?All the time!!!!!How often do you hear of white men raping black women?Hardly ever!!!!Isn't that a hate crime epedemic that has to be a priority in the Kerry campaign platform?
     
  2. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    38,212
    Thanks Received:
    7,829
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +11,776
    You've missed the popint entirely. First off, the black man wouldn't get as harsh of treatment killing the white woman because liberals think all whites are racists, and that we owe blacks some type of debt. Second, the white guy would get punished to full extent of the law because he killed the black woman, and we all know, whites aren't allowed to do ANYTHING against a "minority".

    But you were right about one thing, the term "hate crime" is nothing more than liberals pandering to, and whoring themselves out for, the minority vote.
     
  3. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    I don't object to the general idea that a person's mental state is relevant to the criminal nature of their actions.

    But "hate crimes" are nothing but an attempt to nail white men and elevate the almighty black to god-like status. The truth is that blacks commit crimes against US, not the other way around. But the liberal media likes to make "whitey" look like the bad guy.
     
  4. Captain_Steel
    Offline

    Captain_Steel Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    202
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    a suburb of Los Angeles, California
    Ratings:
    +4
     
  5. 5stringJeff
    Offline

    5stringJeff Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    9,990
    Thanks Received:
    536
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Puyallup, WA
    Ratings:
    +540
    I'm opposed to hate crime laws because they dole out harsher punishments based on your beliefs and thoughts, which are protected by the Bill of Rights. Whether a person murders someone because of their race, their sexual orientation, their sex... or because they tried to rip them off in a drug deal, or they thought the person was rich and wanted to mug them - it doesn't matter. Murder is murder, and should not be punished based on the race of the victim or perpetrator.
     
  6. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    I agree with you Jeff. This differentiated law is a joke.
     
  7. nycflasher
    Offline

    nycflasher Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,078
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    CT
    Ratings:
    +14
    OMG. Do you hear that?
    Listen carefully.
    It's the seldom heard sound of me agreeing with you and Jeff.
    Murder is murder. I can't argue with that.
    Though murdering someone because of the color of their skin or sexual preference is about as low as it gets in my book.
     
  8. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    And if I murder you because you looked at me wrong? Still low. Murder NOT GOOD.
     
  9. nycflasher
    Offline

    nycflasher Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2004
    Messages:
    3,078
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    CT
    Ratings:
    +14
    Yeah. I guess some people feel the need to differentiate between the Hitlers and the Mansons. When really, they deserve eachother. Quite simply.
     
  10. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Both were/are scary. Hitler was ABLE to act on his evil, longer, with greater results.

    That is the nature of evil. That is where preemption comes in.

    Weird, life is a circle and we're back to the war.
     

Share This Page