Why does Palestine have a right to exist?

----------------------------------------------------------

Aw, c'mon, we all know that's not going to happen. The best the Palestinians can hope for is a state in Gaza and most of the West Bank but without the major settlements and without Jerusalem if they renounce all violence, all claims on Israel and the right of return. When you consider that the alternative is to just continue the way things are or to see the land annexed by Israel, Jordan and Egypt, that's pretty good.
no , and im not delusional too .

have u seen those ppl in Gaza!!!!
they have no med-aids,no food, no nothing!
and Gaza-strip isnt large at all.

but those ppl there, stand infront of all these massacres.
they are fearless..

no one can take them down ..
60 yrs and they are still there, fighthing !
 
thus the denial of the events goes on....history is always related to modern events is it not?
no, the event happened, but Isreal wasnt really responsible for it
the phalanges were
one might be able to argue that Israel shouldnt have allowed them to enter, but you can not blame Israel for what they did
 
no, the event happened, but Isreal wasnt really responsible for it
the phalanges were
one might be able to argue that Israel shouldnt have allowed them to enter, but you can not blame Israel for what they did

that is where we differ.....you can blame anyone for their role in mass killings...how can you make that statement....
 
no , and im not delusional too .

have u seen those ppl in Gaza!!!!
they have no med-aids,no food, no nothing!
and Gaza-strip isnt large at all.

but those ppl there, stand infront of all these massacres.
they are fearless..

no one can take them down ..
60 yrs and they are still there, fighthing !
yeah, still fighting, and their children still dying, all because they hate the jews more than they love their children
 
The Arabs have always been ignorant, lazy bastards roaming around in a barren wilderness.Israel is a beautiful, cultivated, and educated country now that the Arabs have lost control and the Arabs don't like it.:eusa_whistle:
 
no , and im not delusional too .

have u seen those ppl in Gaza!!!!
they have no med-aids,no food, no nothing!
and Gaza-strip isnt large at all.

but those ppl there, stand infront of all these massacres.
they are fearless..

no one can take them down ..
60 yrs and they are still there, fighthing !

----------------------------------------------------------------------

And after 60 years what have they proved? That they're very good at suffering and dying but not very good at winning. What's their goal in life,to die well or to live well? If the latter, it's time to accept the fact that they are never going to win and then make the best deal they can with Israel despite the fact that they will not get everything they want. What you see in Gaza is not a heroic stand, but a grotesque spectacle of masochistic exhibitionism. A hero protects his family, he does not keep them on top of a high value target during a bombing raid the way Rayyan did. What an obscene and disgusting waste of life that was! And you find that heroic? You think wasting lives that way will lead you to victory?
 
so I'm always confused as to when "the US should step in and stop it"? Saddam did plenty of "mass killings" and we are dogs for stepping in and stopping it. Now we are dogs for not stepping in and stopping Israel.. Go figure. Kerry On
 
Now, I didn't get to answer the second part:

The people who identify themselves today are indigenous to Arabia - NOT Israel/Palestine. There may have been generations of families living in Palestine for centuries who are Arab Muslim (I believe their population around the time of the formation of British Palestine was close to 200,000), but they are still living in Israel today - they are Arab-Israelis. There are over 1 million of them. They have the same freedoms as Jewish Israelis do - they can even serve in Israel's Kenesset.



Palestine only existed as a name difference between Israel and Palestine. It was still Israel, just under a different name. The people of Iran are Persians, not Iranian. The people of Iraq are Arabs, not Iraqis.

According to what I've read, the indigenous Jewish population of Palestine in 1917 was about 2% of the population.

Most of those small percentage of the population of Jews at that time had been living in Palestine for centuries...possibly in some cases their families had been living there since the LAST time it had been called Isreal.

They lived in peace with the dominate Arab population for centuries.

As did most of the Kibbutzen which FIRST came to Palestine. Most of t6hose people were SOCIALISTS more than religionists.

Those early Jewish "pioneers" bought the land legally from the Palestinians (or in many cases from the Ottonmans who often had the title). And then they were sensitive to the needs of the (often ) tenant farmers who'd been working that land for generations, too. They worked in peqace with those Palestinians, folks. They were not imperialists, and the were a great model of what should have been done in that land, in my opinion.

The problems of Jews v Arabs really started after the Balfour Declaration because (quite naturally, I think) the Arabs were not happy to hear that Britian and the Europeans Zionist community were deciding the fate of their Palestinian society without at least consulting the indigenous people (the Arab Palestinians).

And so once the mandate was in place the Arabs protests against this policy started.

Between 1918 and 1948, the British policy about Jews from Europe immigrating fibrilated. Sometimes the Brits allowed immigrants in, and then the Arabs rioted, sometime they Brits did not, and then the Palestinian Jews rioted. (anyone ever read "Ship of Fools" ?)

There was never any time, post the Balfour declaration, when the Arab community in Palestine was NOT protesting to the Brits and the League of Nation about this arrogant policy of European colonialization of their land.

All this racist blather about those people NOT being a Palestinian community that thought of itself as unique and Palestinian is NOT supported by the history of that place.
 
Last edited:
And, why do the Arabs need yet another country? What's wrong with the ones they have?

A question like that actually shows us an example of ethnocentrism.

One could just as easily ask why EUROPEANS thought they needed another country in Palestine.

Of course we know the answer to that, don't we?

They needed another country because they were only too happy to give the European Jews someplace to go.

Now had the Europeans given the Jews Germany or France, everyone would realize how wrong that is...

..but since the Europeans had been colonializing the rest of the world for 500 years, they really imagined that it was their RIGHT to give those European colonists a bit of land in ASIA.
 
Last edited:
The Palestinian people really must develop a new strategy.

Right now they are pawns of war-mongers...as are, I might add, the Isreali people.

Damned shame, too.
 
so I'm always confused as to when "the US should step in and stop it"? Saddam did plenty of "mass killings" and we are dogs for stepping in and stopping it. Now we are dogs for not stepping in and stopping Israel.. Go figure. Kerry On

I think Palistine needs its own state and they should be allowed to move freely within their borders.

I'm torn on this one. I feel sorry for Isreal because they have to deal with radical arabs, but I also think they could do some things that would curb some of the violence. Its almost like they prefer the tension.

I saw a story about some Palistinian kid in a wheelchair. Because of the barricades, instead of having to wheel himself 20 feet to school, he has to go a mile around the block.

So Isreal, stop sending new Jewish settlers into areas you know will cause problems.

But then if they are lobbing morters into your territory from their side, anihilate them for doing it.

Hard to say for sure because neither seem 100% innocent, so clearly seperation is the only way to know who's causing the problem. Then if one of them does something to the other and it is unprovoked, we know who's to blame.

But, just like the neo con's in America started a war in Iraq for $, I think Isreal is controlled/owned/run by some of the same men. For example, look into who owns our Federal Reserve. I think you will find that Jewish foreigners own some of it.

And I know this guy does a lot of lobbying for Israel here in the US.

Sheldon Adelson - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
The death toll in Gaza continues to rise. The carnage is everywhere – city streets, a mosque, hospitals, police stations, a jail, a university bus stop, a plastics factory, a television station. It seems impossible, unacceptable, to step back to analyze the situation while bodies remain buried under the rubble, while parents continue to search for their missing children, while doctors continue to labor to stitch burned and broken bodies back together without sufficient medicine or equipment. The hospitals are running short even of electricity—the Israeli blockade has denied them fuel to run the generators. It is an ironic twist on the legacy of Israel’s involvement in an earlier massacre – in the Sabra and Shatila camps, in Lebanon back in 1982, it was the Israeli soldiers who lit the flairs, lighting the night sky so their Lebanese allies could continue to kill.

continued here:
Editorial Digest: Keeping You Informed!
"while bodies remain buried under the rubble, while parents continue to search for their missing children, while doctors continue..." I would've added: while the Palestinians have yet to demand HAMAS stopped rattling the cage of the tiger by lobbing bombs into Israel.

but hey, I'm just a fair kinda guy
 
the op is talking about the killings of refugees in the early 1980's by the christian group the phalanges.

of course no one wants to discussion these massacures...it reveals a very dark side of this "conflict" that israel would not like to discuss. how they allowed the phalanges to slaughtered the people of these camps and how the us stood by and did nothing.

i knew this would be brought up sooner or later....i will be interested to see the denial of this begin....

hmmm, I wonder why the Christians wanted to slaughter their neighbors?

Oh yeah...
During the course of the fighting, alliances shifted rapidly and unpredictably. By the end of the war, nearly every party had allied with and subsequently betrayed every other party at least once.

The 1980s were especially bleak: much of Beirut lay in ruins as a result of the 1976 Karantina massacre carried out by Lebanese Christian militias, the Syrian Army shelling of Christian neighborhoods in 1978 and 1981, and the Israeli invasion that evicted the PLO from the country.


A number of atrocities and terrorist acts were committed by the Lebanese Christian Phalange as well as Palestinians and Israelis, all of whom participated in the war. These included the Damour massacre in which Palestinians massacred Christian inhabitants of the coastal town 20 miles south of Beirut, and the Sabra and Chatila massacre where Christian Phalange forces massacred civilians and refugees during three days,..
 
so I'm always confused as to when "the US should step in and stop it"? Saddam did plenty of "mass killings" and we are dogs for stepping in and stopping it. Now we are dogs for not stepping in and stopping Israel.. Go figure. Kerry On

Saddam was indiscriminately targeting civilians and engaging in what would be considered genocide...and WE DID NOT step in. We went in much later..afterwards.

The Palestinians elected leaders HAMAS are doing the same thing.

Israel's targets are not civilians, but it is acknowledged by Israel herself that civilians get in the way of her attacks on HAMAS, but what other option has HAMAS left Israel? To just lay back and allow bombs to fall from the sky...bombs coming from GAZA?
 
The Palestinian people really must develop a new strategy.

Right now they are pawns of war-mongers...as are, I might add, the Isreali people.

Damned shame, too.

good point about the Palestinians, but let's get real. The Israeli leaders responding are not war mongers. They are responding to war mongers. This is not to say there are NO war mongers in the Israeli government but if they were in charge the the HAMAS hiding behind Palestinian civilians would be wiped out in a matter of a few days.
 
I think Palistine needs its own state and they should be allowed to move freely within their borders.

I'm torn on this one. I feel sorry for Isreal because they have to deal with radical arabs, but I also think they could do some things that would curb some of the violence. Its almost like they prefer the tension.

I saw a story about some Palistinian kid....

''''

So Isreal, stop sending new Jewish settlers into areas you know will cause problems.

What areas are you talking about? Since the Palestinians signed a deal with Israel, and Arafat and the other terrorist leaders were allowed in GAZA and WEST BANK, what areas has Israel allowed settlers?

Please list the areas so we know the what, when and where ...that you want to stop.
 
Last edited:
José;970684 said:
Instead of denying History America should be learning from it…

If anything, to prevent it from repeating itself… this time with America on the receiving end of the violence/land grab…

Well... who cares about History at this point in time anyway?? too late to do anything.

The best thing anglos can do by now is throw in the towel and enjoy the enchilada :D

WHY are you avoiding this simple question, dude? I'm not asking what you think the best thing we Gringos can do is. I'm asking you to give me the name of the jew who walked into palestine and asked those palestinians for the same permission to create israel as gringos had when walking into mexico city to settle texas. Why is this specific point so hard to answer?
 
Saddam was indiscriminately targeting civilians and engaging in what would be considered genocide...and WE DID NOT step in. We went in much later..afterwards.

The Palestinians elected leaders HAMAS are doing the same thing.

Israel's targets are not civilians, but it is acknowledged by Israel herself that civilians get in the way of her attacks on HAMAS, but what other option has HAMAS left Israel? To just lay back and allow bombs to fall from the sky...bombs coming from GAZA?

Iraq Genocide - The USA killed way more Iraqis then Saddam. Clinton was starving around 8,000 thousand a month to death when he was in the seat, then Bush came in and killed over a million more. The depleted uranium spread throughout Iraq will take millions more. It's clear who commited genocide.

Death For Oil

Hamas- They have been financed all along by Israel (as well as Fatah). Israel has killed many many times more Palestinians then Hamas, even though Israel is killing Palestinians through Hamas as a proxy. It's called divide and conquer. The Ashkenazi Jews are the best at it.



Civilian Targets - You are quite WRONG

deaths.gif
 

Forum List

Back
Top