Why do women keep talking about EQUAL PAY????

[fbj]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

 

[Crepitus]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

Ummm, .you do realize that's exactly what they are talking about when they say "equal pay", right?

 

[fbj]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

Ummm, .you do realize that's exactly what they are talking about when they say "equal pay", right?

I dont know what the fuck equal pay means, help me

 

[Crepitus]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

Ummm, .you do realize that's exactly what they are talking about when they say "equal pay", right?

I dont know what the fuck equal pay means, help me

Pay based on qualifications and experience. No matter what sex the applicant.

 

[Slyhunter]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

Ummm, .you do realize that's exactly what they are talking about when they say "equal pay", right?

No they think they should be able to take vacations for 9 months at a time and still get paid the same as a guy who has to work his ass off to pay for his woman to take time off from her work.

 

[Crepitus]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

Ummm, .you do realize that's exactly what they are talking about when they say "equal pay", right?

No they think they should be able to take vacations for 9 months at a time and still get paid the same as a guy who has to work his ass off to pay for his woman to take time off from her work.

Hey ladies, this guy thinks maternity leave is a vacation .

 

[fbj]

How would a female coworker know what I am making anyway?

 

[Slyhunter]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

Ummm, .you do realize that's exactly what they are talking about when they say "equal pay", right?

No they think they should be able to take vacations for 9 months at a time and still get paid the same as a guy who has to work his ass off to pay for his woman to take time off from her work.

Hey ladies, this guy thinks maternity leave is a vacation .

The employer has to make due without the employee whatever you call it. That is not how he makes a buck.

 

[DGS49]

Compensation must be based on value to the enterprise.

But the Law demands that large employers ignore many, many drawbacks of women in the workforce.

They will be worthless for the year of so before their wedding. They are likely to miss months and months at a time for childbearing. Once married-with-children, they will call off when THEIR KIDS get sick, they will decline relocation opportunities, avoid overnight travel, and refuse to work overtime that is inconvenient to the family.

If either or both of her parents are still alive, she will very possibly miss as much time as the parents get old as they do when the kids are young.

And you know what: ALL OF THIS IS GOOD. It indicates women with their priorities RIGHT WHERE THEY BELONG. Family is more important than some stupid job. But that priority makes women less valuable to the employer, and denying it is folly.

 

[fbj]

Compensation must be based on value to the enterprise.

But the Law demands that large employers ignore many, many drawbacks of women in the workforce.

They will be worthless for the year of so before their wedding. They are likely to miss months and months at a time for childbearing. Once married-with-children, they will call off when THEIR KIDS get sick, they will decline relocation opportunities, avoid overnight travel, and refuse to work overtime that is inconvenient to the family.

If either or both of her parents are still alive, she will very possibly miss as much time as the parents get old as they do when the kids are young.

And you know what: ALL OF THIS IS GOOD. It indicates women with their priorities RIGHT WHERE THEY BELONG. Family is more important than some stupid job. But that priority makes women less valuable to the employer, and denying it is folly.

I dont like to travel and not interested in relocation

 

[Dekster]

I don't know if they keep talking about it or not. I pretty much let them go in one ear and out the other when they are on about something.

 

[fbj]

I don't know if they keep talking about it or not. I pretty much let them go in one ear and out the other when they are on about something.

I would snap the shit any woman at my job who ask about my salary

 

[Dekster]

I don't know if they keep talking about it or not. I pretty much let them go in one ear and out the other when they are on about something.

I would snap the shit any woman at my job who ask about my salary

Like they don't already know that. Women have ESP to go with their PMS.

 

[BULLDOG]

Compensation must be based on value to the enterprise.

But the Law demands that large employers ignore many, many drawbacks of women in the workforce.

They will be worthless for the year of so before their wedding. They are likely to miss months and months at a time for childbearing. Once married-with-children, they will call off when THEIR KIDS get sick, they will decline relocation opportunities, avoid overnight travel, and refuse to work overtime that is inconvenient to the family.

If either or both of her parents are still alive, she will very possibly miss as much time as the parents get old as they do when the kids are young.

And you know what: ALL OF THIS IS GOOD. It indicates women with their priorities RIGHT WHERE THEY BELONG. Family is more important than some stupid job. But that priority makes women less valuable to the employer, and denying it is folly.

I dont like to travel and not interested in relocation

You're a woman?

 

[Slade3200]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

What would you say if a woman with equal skills and equal contributions is getting paid less than a man who is doing the same job?

 

[Slyhunter]

Compensation must be based on value to the enterprise.

But the Law demands that large employers ignore many, many drawbacks of women in the workforce.

They will be worthless for the year of so before their wedding. They are likely to miss months and months at a time for childbearing. Once married-with-children, they will call off when THEIR KIDS get sick, they will decline relocation opportunities, avoid overnight travel, and refuse to work overtime that is inconvenient to the family.

If either or both of her parents are still alive, she will very possibly miss as much time as the parents get old as they do when the kids are young.

And you know what: ALL OF THIS IS GOOD. It indicates women with their priorities RIGHT WHERE THEY BELONG. Family is more important than some stupid job. But that priority makes women less valuable to the employer, and denying it is folly.

I dont like to travel and not interested in relocation

Depending on the company you work for that could hurt your promotional prospects.

 

[fbj]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

What would you say if a woman with equal skills and equal contributions is getting paid less than a man who is doing the same job?

That she deserves to be paid for her skills. Not equal. Equal shit sounds retarded

 

[Slade3200]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

What would you say if a woman with equal skills and equal contributions is getting paid less than a man who is doing the same job?

That she deserves to be paid for her skills. Not equal. Equal shit sounds retarded

Fair point but how is it determined what is fair pay for her skills?

 

[fbj]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

What would you say if a woman with equal skills and equal contributions is getting paid less than a man who is doing the same job?

That she deserves to be paid for her skills. Not equal. Equal shit sounds retarded

Fair point but how is it determined what is fair pay for her skills?

Why do it have to be gender based? There are several women who make more than men

 

[Slyhunter]

I don't think no one should get equal nothing. Pay should be determined by skill and background. If a woman has the skills to do a certain job then she should be paid more than a guy who has less skills and vice versa

That's all

What would you say if a woman with equal skills and equal contributions is getting paid less than a man who is doing the same job?

That she deserves to be paid for her skills. Not equal. Equal shit sounds retarded

Fair point but how is it determined what is fair pay for her skills?

What kind of value does she bring to the company? How much money does she make the company vs the heartache of having to deal with her?