Why Do Those Who Are Not Wealthy Support Trump ?

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.

They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.

What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal

The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

Because rich progressives, who make millions of dollars by sucking off of the public teat, and pass laws that they exempt themselves from disdainfully look down their collective noses and proclaim that the 1200 dollar or so tax breaks that they will receive are "crumbs".

Brings to mind another famously ignorant woman who uttered the infamous "let them eat cake" quote, that lead to her demise.

Errr..Sorry How does that explain why about 40% = of people earning under 30K voted for him?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266


So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

/——/ idiot

If I'm such an idiot, prove me wrong.

/----/ All you have is the class envy card. No matter what Trump says or does, Libtards twist it into something bad. Yet if Hillary had won and had the same economic results what would you LIbtards be saying?

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street, blowing up the deficit, endangering consumers, and wrecking the environment. Let the good times roll but it will all come back to but you.

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street,

Exactly!!

All those Wall Street bribes...err...speaking fees were to ensure she'd rein them in.

They were already reined in to a reasonable degree that they mostly accepted and were sill making money. No Trump is trying to cast off the reins inviting disaster. Most wall street execs understand the dangers of their past recklessness but they are also greedy, like two year olds who can't help themselves but want the parent to set limits.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.

They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.

What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal

The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

Perhaps after having been shat upon by both parties at least since 1992 and perhaps 88, they prefer someone who is a thorn in the side of elites of both parties.

Is he a thorn in the side of the elites? Did he drain the swamp?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Actually most rich people also don't support Trump because they know what a bad businessman he is and how he can destroy the economy.

Actually, 48% of those earning over $250K don't know that, or don't care.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266


So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

/——/ idiot

If I'm such an idiot, prove me wrong.

/----/ All you have is the class envy card. No matter what Trump says or does, Libtards twist it into something bad. Yet if Hillary had won and had the same economic results what would you LIbtards be saying?

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street, blowing up the deficit, endangering consumers, and wrecking the environment. Let the good times roll but it will all come back to but you.

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street,

Exactly!!

All those Wall Street bribes...err...speaking fees were to ensure she'd rein them in.

Are you telling me that you believe that she would have moved to repeal Dodd-Frank and destroy the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Seriously?

 

[bendog]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.

They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.

What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal

The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

Perhaps after having been shat upon by both parties at least since 1992 and perhaps 88, they prefer someone who is a thorn in the side of elites of both parties.

Is he a thorn in the side of the elites? Did he drain the swamp?

He's a charlatan. He trashed Nato. But substantively, he's all Wall St dreamed of. But, the group of whom you posted does not have any illusions that they're beyond fucked over, and their expectations are more that the Bill Kristols and NYT's will be unhappy.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

/——/ idiot

If I'm such an idiot, prove me wrong.

/----/ All you have is the class envy card. No matter what Trump says or does, Libtards twist it into something bad. Yet if Hillary had won and had the same economic results what would you LIbtards be saying?

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street, blowing up the deficit, endangering consumers, and wrecking the environment. Let the good times roll but it will all come back to but you.

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street,

Exactly!!

All those Wall Street bribes...err...speaking fees were to ensure she'd rein them in.

Are you telling me that you believe that she would have moved to repeal Dodd-Frank and destroy the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Seriously?

No, she would have put additional shackles on the economy.
With loopholes for cronies, of course.

 

[hazlnut]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.

They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.

What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal

The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

Because Trump allows them to blame the brown man or black man for their own failures in life.

 

[Shrimpbox]

It's not that they are dumb it's that they neither care, nor have any affinity with the complexities of something. They don't consider context or have any patience with complexity.

Hope & Change

Sure, it's what people want. The problem is running a government is an insanely complex thing. Saying it's simple is a very easy lie. Saying it's complex an infinitely harder thing to rally behind. Trump used that to his advantage. He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer. People relate to that way easier.

He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.

And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.

Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.

Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.

He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.

Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?

I guess there weren’t as many shovel ready jobs as I thought

 

[Foxfyre]

It's not that they are dumb it's that they neither care, nor have any affinity with the complexities of something. They don't consider context or have any patience with complexity.

Hope & Change

Sure, it's what people want. The problem is running a government is an insanely complex thing. Saying it's simple is a very easy lie. Saying it's complex an infinitely harder thing to rally behind. Trump used that to his advantage. He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer. People relate to that way easier.

He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.

And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.

Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.

Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.

He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.

Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?

I will preface this by the truth that many competent people are not competent extemporaneous speakers. And President Obama is one of those who is not. Here is just one example:


I won't post all the Youtube clips of his most flustered or incoherant moments but just google it yourself, i.e. Obama off the teleprompter. But President Obama was a strong intravert and therefore comfortable with the teleprompter but not so much in extemporaneous comments.

President Trump, conversely, is a strong extrovert who is thinking ahead faster than he speaks sometimes, and that is why he often speaks in half finished thoughts or incomplete sentences. As an extemporaneous speaker myself, I also sometimes have that problem whether I am typing out an opinion or concept or am verbally expressing one. A lot of extenuating detail gets left out and sometimes it is necessary to go back later to fill in those blanks. And while that makes a person more authentic and real instead of a robotic, poll tested, scripted politician or whatever, it also makes it easy for the unethical and dishonest to take a sentence out of the whole and make it look like something that was never intended or said within the whole context..

He (nor I) am as comfortable with a written speech or teleprompter because it is frustrating to have to stick with a fixed script when we think of something else that we really want to include or say. So he and I both often stray off script unless there is a compelling reason we have to stick with it. And no, we have never met each other or have any connection other than both of us are Americans who want to do what is best for Americans and America rather than what is politically proper or expedient.

 

[Cellblock2429]

/——/ idiot

If I'm such an idiot, prove me wrong.

/----/ All you have is the class envy card. No matter what Trump says or does, Libtards twist it into something bad. Yet if Hillary had won and had the same economic results what would you LIbtards be saying?

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street, blowing up the deficit, endangering consumers, and wrecking the environment. Let the good times roll but it will all come back to but you.

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street,

Exactly!!

All those Wall Street bribes...err...speaking fees were to ensure she'd rein them in.

Are you telling me that you believe that she would have moved to repeal Dodd-Frank and destroy the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Seriously?

/----/ If you donated enough to her fake charity she would repeal Christmas.

 

[forkup]

Sure, it's what people want. The problem is running a government is an insanely complex thing. Saying it's simple is a very easy lie. Saying it's complex an infinitely harder thing to rally behind. Trump used that to his advantage. He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer. People relate to that way easier.

He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.

And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.

Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.

Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.

He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.

Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?

I will preface this by the truth that many competent people are not competent extemporaneous speakers. And President Obama is one of those who is not. Here is just one example:


I won't post all the Youtube clips of his most flustered or incoherant moments but just google it yourself, i.e. Obama off the teleprompter. But President Obama was a strong intravert and therefore comfortable with the teleprompter but not so much in extemporaneous comments.

President Trump, conversely, is a strong extrovert who is thinking ahead faster than he speaks sometimes, and that is why he often speaks in half finished thoughts or incomplete sentences. As an extremporaneous speaker myself, I also sometimes have that problem whether I am typing out an opinion or concept. A lot of extenuating detail gets left out and sometimes it is necessary to go back later to fill in those blanks later. And while that makes a person more authentic and real instead of a robotic, poll tested, scripted politician or whatever, it also makes it easy for the unethical and dishonest to take a sentence out of the whole and make it look like something that was never intended or said within the whole context..

He (nor I) am as comfortable with a written speech or teleprompter because it is frustrating to have to stick with a fixed script when we think of something else that we really want to include or say. So he and I both often stray off script unless there is a compelling reason we have to stick with it. And no, we have never met each other or have any connection other than both of us are Americans who want to do what is best for Americans and America rather than what is politically proper or expedient.

I'm sorry to tell you Fox but being able to speak so people can understand what you mean is a BIG part of being POTUS. I will leave aside the fact that I think you give him to much credit but focus on your last sentence.
politically proper or expedient.
Saying you can grab a woman by the pussy is not just not politically proper, it's not proper as a HUMAN being.
Saying Mexican's who come over the border are criminals and rapists is not just not politically proper, it's not proper as a HUMAN being.
Calling people Pocahontas, sloppy Steve, etc is behavior I wouldn't allow in my 6 year old, let alone the president. There is no context where those things are acceptable.
Thanks for replying but I need to go for today.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.

They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.

What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal

The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

Perhaps after having been shat upon by both parties at least since 1992 and perhaps 88, they prefer someone who is a thorn in the side of elites of both parties.

Is he a thorn in the side of the elites? Did he drain the swamp?

/-----/ You libtards demanded we give Obozo 8 years to fix things yet think Trump should fix everything overnight.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.

They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.

What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal

The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

Perhaps after having been shat upon by both parties at least since 1992 and perhaps 88, they prefer someone who is a thorn in the side of elites of both parties.

Is he a thorn in the side of the elites? Did he drain the swamp?

He's a charlatan. He trashed Nato. But substantively, he's all Wall St dreamed of. But, the group of whom you posted does not have any illusions that they're beyond fucked over, and their expectations are more that the Bill Kristols and NYT's will be unhappy.

/----/ NATO deserves trashing. Next.....

 

[Doc1]

Many of Trumps supports who voted for him and are sticking by him are not well off. While it is true that the further up the income ladder you go, the great support the support for Trump was in 2016, amazingly 41 % of those earning under $30K and 42% of those earning between $30 and $50K voted for him:

http://www.businessinsider.com/exit-polls-who-voted-for-trump-clinton-2016-11/#by-income-clinton-led-only-among-voters-with-a-2015-family-income-under-50000-a-group-that-included-36-of-the-voters-in-the-exit-polls-4

Yes, during the campaign, he made many promises to the working middle class which, of course went out the window in the form of the recent tax giveaway to the wealthy. Yet, I have seen little evidence that those people are abandoning him in large numbers

What is going on here? Trump once said, ' I love the poorly educated" Yes, he does and for good reason. They have been easily duped into supporting him, and continuing to support him despite the fact that everything that Trump does and everything that he says indicates that it is the wealthy and privileged - who tend to be better educated that he really "loves". The connection between education and wealth /income is irrefutable

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-strauss/the-connection-between-ed_b_1066401.html

High and rising income inequality in the United States has recently been widely commented upon. What has not been as widely discussed is the role educational attainment has played in these disparities. Indeed, America is in some ways two different countries economically, segregated by educational achievement.

Or ….. are there other forces at work that intersect at Trump . Let’s consider cognitive abilities*- which are highly indicative of educational level- and race

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/millennial-media/201304/do-racism-conservatism-and-low-iq-go-hand-in-hand

Lower cognitive abilities predict greater prejudice through right wing ideology

Hodson and Busseri (2012) found in a correlational study that lower intelligence in childhood is predictive of greater racism in adulthood, with this effect being mediated (partially explained) through conservative ideology.

They also found poor abstract reasoning skills were related to homophobic attitudes which was mediated through authoritarianism and low levels of intergroup contact.

What this study and those before it suggests is not necessarily that all liberals are geniuses and all conservatives are ignorant. Rather, it makes conclusions based off of averages of groups. The idea is that for those who lack a cognitive ability to grasp complexities of our world, strict-right wing ideologies may be more appealing.

Bottom line: Lower intelligence equals low income Trump Supporters who have a marked tendency toward racism.

Those same people tend to own guns as well and Trump is not a big fan of gun control:

http://www.guns.com/2013/11/03/study-finds-correlation-racism-white-gun-owners-video/

There’s is a positive correlation between symbolic racism amongst white Americans and gun ownership, according to the results of a new international study published in PLoS One, the peer-reviewed scientific journal

The study, “Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions,” conducted by researchers from Britain’s Manchester University and Australia’s Monash University, collected data from white U.S. voters and found that for each one point increase (on a scale from one to five) in symbolic racism there was a 50 percent increase in the odds that the respondent had a firearm in the home. This political reality did not spring up overnight.

The picture is almost complete: A high correlation between support for Trump, low cognitive ability, racism and now guns. But there is one more variable to consider, the role of religion. We know that a good deal of Trumps support comes from religious zealots, namely the Evangelicals. Why is that? It turns out that it ties in very neatly with the intelligence factor:

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868313497266

A meta-analysis of 63 studies showed a significant negative association between intelligence and religiosity. The association was stronger for college students and the general population than for participants younger than college age; it was also stronger for religious beliefs than religious behavior. For college students and the general population, means of weighted and unweighted correlations between intelligence and the strength of religious beliefs ranged from −.20 to −.25 (mean r = −.24). Three possible interpretations were discussed. First, intelligent people are less likely to conform and, thus, are more likely to resist religious dogma. Second, intelligent people tend to adopt an analytic (as opposed to intuitive) thinking style, which has been shown to undermine religious beliefs. Third, several functions of religiosity, including compensatory control, self-regulation, self-enhancement, and secure attachment, are also conferred by intelligence. Intelligent people may therefore have less need for religious beliefs and practices.

So there we have it the complete picture -Intelligence and cognitive ability, Race, Guns, and now Religion. My work is done here.

* https://www.education.com/reference/article/iq-school-achievement/

Because Trump allows them to blame the brown man or black man for their own failures in life.

Don't forget the gays, everyone wants to blame them too. Fact I though that ole ProgPat thinks he is a superior being. Just ask him.

 

[Thinker101]

He's the drunk guy on the last bar stool that solves the worlds problems between his 6th and 7th beer.

And Obama is the guy who solves the world's problems while passing around the joint.

Really? Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought. In essence that was his problem. He was smart, meticulous, communicative and.... ultimately boring. Black people thought he was to white, white people thought he was to black, those who believed his message of change figured him to much a politician. Trump is his anti synthesis, that is not a coincidence. You have a reality star that treats the office as the Apprentice, and predictable certain people like that way better then an episode of the West Wing without any of the juicy bits.

Obama was capable of finishing a coherent thought.

He read a decent teleprompter.
Without one, he often turned into a stuttering fuck.

Give me 1 example? 1 example of Obama sounding incoherent?

I will preface this by the truth that many competent people are not competent extemporaneous speakers. And President Obama is one of those who is not. Here is just one example:


I won't post all the Youtube clips of his most flustered or incoherant moments but just google it yourself, i.e. Obama off the teleprompter. But President Obama was a strong intravert and therefore comfortable with the teleprompter but not so much in extemporaneous comments.

President Trump, conversely, is a strong extrovert who is thinking ahead faster than he speaks sometimes, and that is why he often speaks in half finished thoughts or incomplete sentences. As an extremporaneous speaker myself, I also sometimes have that problem whether I am typing out an opinion or concept. A lot of extenuating detail gets left out and sometimes it is necessary to go back later to fill in those blanks later. And while that makes a person more authentic and real instead of a robotic, poll tested, scripted politician or whatever, it also makes it easy for the unethical and dishonest to take a sentence out of the whole and make it look like something that was never intended or said within the whole context..

He (nor I) am as comfortable with a written speech or teleprompter because it is frustrating to have to stick with a fixed script when we think of something else that we really want to include or say. So he and I both often stray off script unless there is a compelling reason we have to stick with it. And no, we have never met each other or have any connection other than both of us are Americans who want to do what is best for Americans and America rather than what is politically proper or expedient.

I'm sorry to tell you Fox but being able to speak so people can understand what you mean is a BIG part of being POTUS. I will leave aside the fact that I think you give him to much credit but focus on your last sentence.
politically proper or expedient.
Saying you can grab a woman by the pussy is not just not politically proper, it's not proper as a HUMAN being.
Saying Mexican's who come over the border are criminals and rapists is not just not politically proper, it's not proper as a HUMAN being.
Calling people Pocahontas, sloppy Steve, etc is behavior I wouldn't allow in my 6 year old, let alone the president. There is no context where those things are acceptable.
Thanks for replying but I need to go for today.

Hmmm, but Mexican's or anyone coming across the border illegally are automatically criminals. As far as your child is concerned, evidently, if you have a son that is feeling a bit feminine one day is ok to wear a dress to school.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

If I'm such an idiot, prove me wrong.

/----/ All you have is the class envy card. No matter what Trump says or does, Libtards twist it into something bad. Yet if Hillary had won and had the same economic results what would you LIbtards be saying?

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street, blowing up the deficit, endangering consumers, and wrecking the environment. Let the good times roll but it will all come back to but you.

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street,

Exactly!!

All those Wall Street bribes...err...speaking fees were to ensure she'd rein them in.

Are you telling me that you believe that she would have moved to repeal Dodd-Frank and destroy the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Seriously?

/----/ If you donated enough to her fake charity she would repeal Christmas.

Fake ? are you really that stupid? Or just a liar: Clinton Foundation in Haiti

Since 2010, the Clinton Foundation has raised more than $30 million for Haiti, including relief funds as well as funds for projects focused on supporting Haiti’s small and medium businesses, improving livelihoods, enhancing education and exploring the nexus of agriculture, energy and the environment. Today, the Clinton Foundation focuses on creating sustainable economic growth in the five priority sectors of agriculture, energy, environment, tourism, and artisans/manufacturing. The Foundation also works to promote full-cycle investing into these sectors, bringing together producers, investors, and markets in a way that is socially, environmentally, and economically impactful. Through this approach the Clinton Foundation has helped Haitian businesses develop their skills, increase their productivity, build their capacity, and connect with international partners and markets.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Saying you can grab a woman by the pussy is not just not politically proper, it's not proper as a HUMAN being.

He said that to a bunch of guys he thought was in private. How was he to know some lowlife was recording him? Guys say shit like that all the time with other guys.

Saying Mexican's who come over the border are criminals and rapists is not just not politically proper, it's not proper as a HUMAN being.

He didn't say all Mexicans. Your precious liberal talking heads changed it to "all" because we all know how much liberals love to lie.

Calling people Pocahontas, sloppy Steve, etc is behavior I wouldn't allow in my 6 year old, let alone the president.

Would you let your six year old lie about his heritage or ethnic background for personal or financial gain?

 

[Doc1]

/----/ All you have is the class envy card. No matter what Trump says or does, Libtards twist it into something bad. Yet if Hillary had won and had the same economic results what would you LIbtards be saying?

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street, blowing up the deficit, endangering consumers, and wrecking the environment. Let the good times roll but it will all come back to but you.

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street,

Exactly!!

All those Wall Street bribes...err...speaking fees were to ensure she'd rein them in.

Are you telling me that you believe that she would have moved to repeal Dodd-Frank and destroy the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Seriously?

/----/ If you donated enough to her fake charity she would repeal Christmas.

Fake ? are you really that stupid? Or just a liar: Clinton Foundation in Haiti

Since 2010, the Clinton Foundation has raised more than $30 million for Haiti, including relief funds as well as funds for projects focused on supporting Haiti’s small and medium businesses, improving livelihoods, enhancing education and exploring the nexus of agriculture, energy and the environment. Today, the Clinton Foundation focuses on creating sustainable economic growth in the five priority sectors of agriculture, energy, environment, tourism, and artisans/manufacturing. The Foundation also works to promote full-cycle investing into these sectors, bringing together producers, investors, and markets in a way that is socially, environmentally, and economically impactful. Through this approach the Clinton Foundation has helped Haitian businesses develop their skills, increase their productivity, build their capacity, and connect with international partners and markets.

Sure, that's why Haiti is pissed at the Clinton's....that's why Laura Silsby was going way down til the Beast intervened Your partisanship is your blind spot.

 

[Thinker101]

/----/ All you have is the class envy card. No matter what Trump says or does, Libtards twist it into something bad. Yet if Hillary had won and had the same economic results what would you LIbtards be saying?

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street, blowing up the deficit, endangering consumers, and wrecking the environment. Let the good times roll but it will all come back to but you.

If Secretary Clinton had won , the fiscal and regulatory policies would not be short cited allowing for the return to the reckless practices of wall street,

Exactly!!

All those Wall Street bribes...err...speaking fees were to ensure she'd rein them in.

Are you telling me that you believe that she would have moved to repeal Dodd-Frank and destroy the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau? Seriously?

/----/ If you donated enough to her fake charity she would repeal Christmas.

Fake ? are you really that stupid? Or just a liar: Clinton Foundation in Haiti

Since 2010, the Clinton Foundation has raised more than $30 million for Haiti, including relief funds as well as funds for projects focused on supporting Haiti’s small and medium businesses, improving livelihoods, enhancing education and exploring the nexus of agriculture, energy and the environment. Today, the Clinton Foundation focuses on creating sustainable economic growth in the five priority sectors of agriculture, energy, environment, tourism, and artisans/manufacturing. The Foundation also works to promote full-cycle investing into these sectors, bringing together producers, investors, and markets in a way that is socially, environmentally, and economically impactful. Through this approach the Clinton Foundation has helped Haitian businesses develop their skills, increase their productivity, build their capacity, and connect with international partners and markets.

Really? You do realize the "Clinton Foundation" skimmed something like 90% off the top for administrative fees?