- Feb 27, 2013
- 1,598
- 1,058
- 930
"No, you are absolutely WRONG. When I was a kid, we were taught that it isn't whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game. The rules matter."Your post doesn't make much sense to me.Democrats are building their base. When they get enough power, they will grant illegals the right to vote and that will be the end of the two-party system.
There are way too many illegals and dead people voting already.
"Illegals" don't vote. People vote. The objective of the government, regardless of party label, is to disenfranchise the Posterity of the founders and framers. Once you end the bloodline of the people who created our form of government, you have another third world cesspool with the wealth that previous generations built for the super rich. The politicians want the third world to take over. Trying to make it politically palatable by doing something stupid like calling people "illegal" hides the ugly truth. You give citizenship to someone who supports socialism, they are doing this country harm. We give citizenship to more than 750,000 people per year. We don't need them - sticking a label like "illegal" on some of them only says you don't know squat about Liberty. We don't need any more people becoming citizens in this country at the present time, so the "legal" v. "illegal" labels are meaningless in the context of immigration... NOT so much for the cause of Liberty.
Illegals are not citizens, but some of them do manage to vote with the help of Democrats who issue them driver's licenses and even encourage them to vote in local elections. I'm not calling people names or labeling here....there's a ACTUAL difference in an illegal vs. legal immigrant. I'm sure you know that.
No, you are absolutely WRONG. When I was a kid, we were taught that it isn't whether you win or lose, it's how you play the game. The rules matter.
In school I was taught that there are three branches of government: the Legislative, the Judicial and the Executive. I was taught they were co-equal branches of government with a set function. I was also taught that the Constitution was the law of the land. You say you don't understand my post? It's because the schools taught you a lot of B.S. and you've been programmed to accept a government that is at odds with the Constitution. That Constitution only gives the federal government ONE job with respect to foreigners. That job is found in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution: "Congress shall have the power... To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization." That is citizenship. Who a state does and does not allow into their respective states to participate in the free market economy is a state's rights issue. So, how did we get this notion that the immigration laws the Democrats passed to disenfranchise the white people were law?
The United States Supreme Court, in 1875, granted "plenary powers" to Congress over all foreigners and laws pertaining to them. The problem you have is that the Constitution does not give the United States Supreme Court any authority to bestow upon any other branch of government ANY POWERS. Period. End of story. Such a proposition is contrary to the Tenth Amendment. What that means is that the United States Supreme Court legislated from the bench and made law, not interpreted the law. Now, that may make you as happy as a fly in a pile of shit, but the principle (called a precedent in legal terminology) has allowed the United States Supreme Court to be legislators as well as arbiters of the law. Sounds good when you apply it to immigration, but not so much when you think of all the damaging things the high Court has done to things like abortion, gun Rights, the Fourth Amendment and your Right to Privacy along with... no surprise... voting. So, if that's the way you want the game to be played, you may as well send 535 federal legislators home and scrap the whole notion of voting. The liberals end game was to disenfranchise the whites (and you ignorantly and maybe willingly supported that effort without understanding our system of jurisprudence.) When you can master Hegelian Dialectics, Pavlovian Conditioning, Psychopolitics, Disinformation and Political Propaganda from a strategist's understanding, then you - and only then will understand this when I say it - YOU GOT PLAYED.
The rules DON'T matter to Democrats. They will change the rules to suit their purposes.
Citizenship and voting rights for illegals are part of the Democrats long-term plans. I'm not the only one who thinks it's coming. I'm not trying to convince you of anything.