Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So, why is it that Republican-controlled states see more welfare usage? HmmWhile Republicans want an economy where as few as possible need government welfare
Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.
What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?
But it looks like even though we have millions of new jobs, pay has not increased. We have frozen minimum wage for the last 9 years and low skilled pay has been stagnant
So, even though more people have jobs, they do not pay well enough to get people off the dole
Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
If you can't stay current don't stay at all. Trump is the president, and the phone assistance for the poor started under Reagan, yeah word games for a word gamer..There are no Oblama phones they now be Trump phones, live with it..No such animal as food stamps those died years ago...Plenty of jobs out there. Employers can't find Americans to do them because they are sitting home on their Obama phones getting fat on food stamps.
Ah, so word games are now your new debate tool?
Hey, I didn't invent the term Obama Phone.........she did:
Hey!! Isn't that tigerred59 ?
Corporate welfare even pays, multimillion dollar bonuses.Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
It's all in perception.
When a Democrat hears about somebody on the dole, they picture a hard working man who just got done working 12 hours sitting at the dinner table in a dirty tee shirt from work. He and their three kids are under a 40 watt lightbulb hanging from bare wires from the ceiling.
Mom is putting more water in the soup to make it last longer, and the kids with dirty faces are watching since they don't have a television yet alone video games to pay with.
Liberals have great imaginations.
Republicans don't have that good of imaginations though. We see things through experience like those food stamp people with a heaping cart of TV dinners, prepared drinks, and snacks. Mom is 300 lbs and has four kids with her. She pays for the food with food stamps, and then whips out a wad of cash for the huge bags of dog food, cat litter, cigarettes, wine, perfume and flowers.
Why do conservatives contrive such ridiculous lies and inane fallacies.
No, they fought for the rights of workers and ensured they got their fair slice of the piethere is no right work, even in right to work States.Hey....I gotta great idea
Lets create more jobs and then we won't need as many people on food stamps and welfare
If people get jobs, they won't need it anymore
But it looks like even though we have millions of new jobs, pay has not increased. We have frozen minimum wage for the last 9 years and low skilled pay has been stagnant
So, even though more people have jobs, they do not pay well enough to get people off the dole
But there is good news...
We just cut corporate taxes in half so it looks like they can afford to pay their employees more. I also have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you
A 50% tax cut?
That should trickle down with an end to welfare and food stamps
Companies can no longer claim they can't afford pay increases
Without unions, there is nothing to force companies to trickle down that profit to the workers
Correct, that's what unions used to do. They used so much force that they forced our work right out of the country.
Sounds like something Hitler would proposeWhy do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.
What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?
No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.
Sounds like something Hitler would proposeWhy do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.
What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?
No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.
No, they fought for the rights of workers and ensured they got their fair slice of the piethere is no right work, even in right to work States.Hey....I gotta great idea
Lets create more jobs and then we won't need as many people on food stamps and welfare
If people get jobs, they won't need it anymore
But it looks like even though we have millions of new jobs, pay has not increased. We have frozen minimum wage for the last 9 years and low skilled pay has been stagnant
So, even though more people have jobs, they do not pay well enough to get people off the dole
But there is good news...
We just cut corporate taxes in half so it looks like they can afford to pay their employees more. I also have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you
A 50% tax cut?
That should trickle down with an end to welfare and food stamps
Companies can no longer claim they can't afford pay increases
Without unions, there is nothing to force companies to trickle down that profit to the workers
Correct, that's what unions used to do. They used so much force that they forced our work right out of the country.
No more with "right to work"
Right to get paid like shit
current policy pays more when you have more kids. why lie to their stock holders if there is no multimillion dollar bonus in it.Sounds like something Hitler would proposeWhy do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.
What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?
No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.
Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?
Wage slavery? Capitalists already have the social benefits of H1 visas, writing off certain labor costs, and requiring a work ethic in at-will employment States. Simple coercion and invalid on simple ethical grounds.No, they fought for the rights of workers and ensured they got their fair slice of the piethere is no right work, even in right to work States.A 50% tax cut?
That should trickle down with an end to welfare and food stamps
Companies can no longer claim they can't afford pay increases
Without unions, there is nothing to force companies to trickle down that profit to the workers
Correct, that's what unions used to do. They used so much force that they forced our work right out of the country.
No more with "right to work"
Right to get paid like shit
Beats not getting paid at all.
current policy pays more when you have more kids. why lie to their stock holders if there is no multimillion dollar bonus in it.Sounds like something Hitler would proposeWhy do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.
What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?
No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.
Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?
Plesse link up thar more kids donr get you more welfare.current policy pays more when you have more kids. why lie to their stock holders if there is no multimillion dollar bonus in it.Sounds like something Hitler would proposeWhat about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?
No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.
Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?
That is a lie . You don’t have any idea how welfare benefits work. Geez, that stuff changed back in bill Clinton days .
Plesse link up thar more kids donr get you more welfare.current policy pays more when you have more kids. why lie to their stock holders if there is no multimillion dollar bonus in it.Sounds like something Hitler would proposeNo, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.
Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?
That is a lie . You don’t have any idea how welfare benefits work. Geez, that stuff changed back in bill Clinton days .
This should be good.
unlike the right wing with crony forms of capitalism?
How else do you control the slaves? Let them know you can shut off the food. That’s why the democrat party has spent so much time conditioning blacks to feed from their hands.
