Why Democrats could be in Serious Trouble!

[rightwinger]

Now Gomer you are starting to sound like Goober

A region is an area you live in. If you live in a rural region you are benefitting from “free stuff” to keep your region livable

Hold on. If I live in Boston but vacation in a rural area, do my taxes not go to all of MA not just the urban area? Find me a link or proof that state taxes (which are flat btw) go to one highly populated areas. You cannot. You have dug this hole, now you look stupid and cannot help yourself but to look even more stupid. And I have further explained to you that even in Blue populated areas like Boston, most high income earners are either Republicans or Independents (like myself). Just because a bunch of cost centers (students and those who don't work) vote Blue doesn't mean the state is only powered by Democrats. That is just idiotic. Hell our Governor is a Republican. Please STFU, because you're embarrassing yourself. Again.

Gomer...just stop it

The issue is that those rural areas received “free stuff” in terms of roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, electrification, water that their population does not justify

Nope, you're making yourself look stupid. None of that was free and property taxes pay for schools. You really have zero clue on how the economy works. Scary that an idiot like you has as much voting power as me.

Wrong again Gomer

The taxes generated in those remote rural areas did not pay for the services they receive. They need subsidies from populated areas that allow them to receive basic services

What are you talking about? State tax is state tax. Some places have a city tax but in MA if I live in Boston or Hull I still pay the same level of taxes. You need to take an economics class or get a job. You've been retired too long.

Right over your head Gomer

 

[rightwinger]

Now Gomer you are starting to sound like Goober

A region is an area you live in. If you live in a rural region you are benefitting from “free stuff” to keep your region livable

Hold on. If I live in Boston but vacation in a rural area, do my taxes not go to all of MA not just the urban area? Find me a link or proof that state taxes (which are flat btw) go to one highly populated areas. You cannot. You have dug this hole, now you look stupid and cannot help yourself but to look even more stupid. And I have further explained to you that even in Blue populated areas like Boston, most high income earners are either Republicans or Independents (like myself). Just because a bunch of cost centers (students and those who don't work) vote Blue doesn't mean the state is only powered by Democrats. That is just idiotic. Hell our Governor is a Republican. Please STFU, because you're embarrassing yourself. Again.

Gomer...just stop it

The issue is that those rural areas received “free stuff” in terms of roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, electrification, water that their population does not justify

Nope, you're making yourself look stupid. None of that was free and property taxes pay for schools. You really have zero clue on how the economy works. Scary that an idiot like you has as much voting power as me.

Wrong again Gomer

The taxes generated in those remote rural areas did not pay for the services they receive. They need subsidies from populated areas that allow them to receive basic services

You do realize gas tax goes to pay for roads, no?

https://files.taxfoundation.org/20180808093450/Gas-Tax-July-2018.png

Figured that one out yourself? Rocket Scientist

And the gas taxes generated from rural roads do not generate enough revenue to justify their construction and maintenance

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Hold on. If I live in Boston but vacation in a rural area, do my taxes not go to all of MA not just the urban area? Find me a link or proof that state taxes (which are flat btw) go to one highly populated areas. You cannot. You have dug this hole, now you look stupid and cannot help yourself but to look even more stupid. And I have further explained to you that even in Blue populated areas like Boston, most high income earners are either Republicans or Independents (like myself). Just because a bunch of cost centers (students and those who don't work) vote Blue doesn't mean the state is only powered by Democrats. That is just idiotic. Hell our Governor is a Republican. Please STFU, because you're embarrassing yourself. Again.

Gomer...just stop it

The issue is that those rural areas received “free stuff” in terms of roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, electrification, water that their population does not justify

Nope, you're making yourself look stupid. None of that was free and property taxes pay for schools. You really have zero clue on how the economy works. Scary that an idiot like you has as much voting power as me.

Wrong again Gomer

The taxes generated in those remote rural areas did not pay for the services they receive. They need subsidies from populated areas that allow them to receive basic services

You do realize gas tax goes to pay for roads, no?

https://files.taxfoundation.org/20180808093450/Gas-Tax-July-2018.png

Figured that one out yourself? Rocket Scientist

And the gas taxes generated from rural roads do not generate enough revenue to justify their construction and maintenance

Link? I d love to see this one. You’re a dumbass who needs to take a class in economics.

 

[rightwinger]

Gomer...just stop it

The issue is that those rural areas received “free stuff” in terms of roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, electrification, water that their population does not justify

Nope, you're making yourself look stupid. None of that was free and property taxes pay for schools. You really have zero clue on how the economy works. Scary that an idiot like you has as much voting power as me.

Wrong again Gomer

The taxes generated in those remote rural areas did not pay for the services they receive. They need subsidies from populated areas that allow them to receive basic services

You do realize gas tax goes to pay for roads, no?

https://files.taxfoundation.org/20180808093450/Gas-Tax-July-2018.png

Figured that one out yourself? Rocket Scientist

And the gas taxes generated from rural roads do not generate enough revenue to justify their construction and maintenance

Link? I d love to see this one. You’re a dumbass who needs to take a class in economics.

Gomer...are you really as dumb as you post?

Think of an urban highway with bumper to bumper traffic burning gas. How much gas tax revenue is generated by that highway?

Now, let’s look at a similar length stretch of rural highway with seven cars an hour traveling over it. How much gas tax revenue does that rural highway generate?

Not enough to pay for its construction and maintenance

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Nope, you're making yourself look stupid. None of that was free and property taxes pay for schools. You really have zero clue on how the economy works. Scary that an idiot like you has as much voting power as me.

Wrong again Gomer

The taxes generated in those remote rural areas did not pay for the services they receive. They need subsidies from populated areas that allow them to receive basic services

You do realize gas tax goes to pay for roads, no?

https://files.taxfoundation.org/20180808093450/Gas-Tax-July-2018.png

Figured that one out yourself? Rocket Scientist

And the gas taxes generated from rural roads do not generate enough revenue to justify their construction and maintenance

Link? I d love to see this one. You’re a dumbass who needs to take a class in economics.

Gomer...are you really as dumb as you post?

Think of an urban highway with bumper to bumper traffic burning gas. How much gas tax revenue is generated by that highway?

Now, let’s look at a similar length stretch of rural highway with seven cars an hour traveling over it. How much gas tax revenue does that rural highway generate?

Not enough to pay for its construction and maintenance

That road also requires a lot more repair and oversight. And no road has 7 cars per hour. Your example is as dumb as you are. Calling me A Gomer because I served is fine. You’re just a dumbass civilian.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

View attachment 251103

The cure to immigration, especially illegal immigration, is fitting USA entrances with...

*****CHUCKLE*****

There aren't enough Chappa'ai to implement that plan, sorry to burst your bubble. That said, considering the event horizon looks like a vertical sheet of river water, they probably wouldn't even hesitate when told they had to cross it.

 

[rightwinger]

Wrong again Gomer

The taxes generated in those remote rural areas did not pay for the services they receive. They need subsidies from populated areas that allow them to receive basic services

You do realize gas tax goes to pay for roads, no?

https://files.taxfoundation.org/20180808093450/Gas-Tax-July-2018.png

Figured that one out yourself? Rocket Scientist

And the gas taxes generated from rural roads do not generate enough revenue to justify their construction and maintenance

Link? I d love to see this one. You’re a dumbass who needs to take a class in economics.

Gomer...are you really as dumb as you post?

Think of an urban highway with bumper to bumper traffic burning gas. How much gas tax revenue is generated by that highway?

Now, let’s look at a similar length stretch of rural highway with seven cars an hour traveling over it. How much gas tax revenue does that rural highway generate?

Not enough to pay for its construction and maintenance

That road also requires a lot more repair and oversight. And no road has 7 cars per hour. Your example is as dumb as you are. Calling me A Gomer because I served is fine. You’re just a dumbass civilian.

Right over your head again Gomer ....wasn’t it?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You do realize gas tax goes to pay for roads, no?

https://files.taxfoundation.org/20180808093450/Gas-Tax-July-2018.png

Figured that one out yourself? Rocket Scientist

And the gas taxes generated from rural roads do not generate enough revenue to justify their construction and maintenance

Link? I d love to see this one. You’re a dumbass who needs to take a class in economics.

Gomer...are you really as dumb as you post?

Think of an urban highway with bumper to bumper traffic burning gas. How much gas tax revenue is generated by that highway?

Now, let’s look at a similar length stretch of rural highway with seven cars an hour traveling over it. How much gas tax revenue does that rural highway generate?

Not enough to pay for its construction and maintenance

That road also requires a lot more repair and oversight. And no road has 7 cars per hour. Your example is as dumb as you are. Calling me A Gomer because I served is fine. You’re just a dumbass civilian.

Right over your head again Gomer ....wasn’t it?

Nope. You just don’t understand economics.

 

[dudmuck]

This country is heading toward extreme Socialism. Hell even TX is a purple state now. Sadly people just want “free stuff”. Work ethic is dwindling. People like right winger, who are clueless along with equally clueless millennials are the future. We should have built that Wall in 1980!

Free Stuff created rural America
If not for the government subsidizing roads, bridges, farm subsidies, schools, hospitals, electric and water, postal service.......they would still be living in the Stone Age

None of it was free.
This is why you fail with Venezuela.

Jo

congrats:

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

This country is heading toward extreme Socialism. Hell even TX is a purple state now. Sadly people just want “free stuff”. Work ethic is dwindling. People like right winger, who are clueless along with equally clueless millennials are the future. We should have built that Wall in 1980!

Free Stuff created rural America
If not for the government subsidizing roads, bridges, farm subsidies, schools, hospitals, electric and water, postal service.......they would still be living in the Stone Age

None of it was free.
This is why you fail with Venezuela.

Jo

congrats:

Easy in those countries education is free. Here it costs nearly $400k to become a doctor. They want to get paid. Also in those countries citizenship is not given just for being born there it is here. Next...

 

[dblack]

Invasion:

1 an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.
2 the entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful, as disease.
3 entrance as if to take possession or overrun: the annual invasion of the resort by tourists.
4 infringement by intrusion.

the definition of invasion

yes, but it is the definition in number 1, that the founders were talking about in the constitution...

not like an invasion of privacy...

1. an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.

So here we have a definition that is multi-faceted.

1. An "act" describes a single instance of invasion by anyone who has not a peaceful intent when entering or crossing the border illegally.

Upon an illegal entrance, one might have within themselves an evil purpose to do harm to the citizens of this country in which would be unsuspecting due to an unvetted illegal crosser entering into the country without proper permission to do such harm undetected.

Permission can only be given by our government, law enforcement etc, otherwise by those having the proper authorities permission to do so (let them in).

These are illegals who are the enemy to everything a sovereign nation believes in and honors within the enforcement of it's laws that protect those beliefs, and it's borders.

Of course there is no question about the other one that notes about any invading "army", and how it will be pushed back.

Wow... that's a real stretch.

"Invasion" is just a hyperbolic metaphor, an exaggeration, tossed around carelessly by idiots - and quite deliberately by leaders.

 

[beagle9]

Invasion:

1 an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.
2 the entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful, as disease.
3 entrance as if to take possession or overrun: the annual invasion of the resort by tourists.
4 infringement by intrusion.

the definition of invasion

yes, but it is the definition in number 1, that the founders were talking about in the constitution...

not like an invasion of privacy...

So here we have a definition that is multi-faceted.

1. An "act" describes a single instance of invasion by anyone who has not a peaceful intent when entering or crossing the border illegally.

Upon an illegal entrance, one might have within themselves an evil purpose to do harm to the citizens of this country in which would be unsuspecting due to an unvetted illegal crosser entering into the country, and entering without proper permission to enter, in which allows that illegal to do such harm undetected if that is what the illegal desires to do.

Permission can only be given by our government, law enforcement etc, otherwise by those having the proper authorities permission to do so (i.e. to let them in by way of that permission).

These are illegals who are the enemy to everything a sovereign nation believes in and honors within the enforcement of it's laws that protect those beliefs, and it's borders.

Of course there is no question about the other one that notes about any invading "army", and how it will be pushed back.

Wow... that's a real stretch.

"Invasion" is just a hyperbolic metaphor, an exaggeration, tossed around carelessly by idiots - and quite deliberately by leaders.

Fixed it.

 

[rightwinger]

Invasion:

1 an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.
2 the entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful, as disease.
3 entrance as if to take possession or overrun: the annual invasion of the resort by tourists.
4 infringement by intrusion.

the definition of invasion

yes, but it is the definition in number 1, that the founders were talking about in the constitution...

not like an invasion of privacy...

1. an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.

So here we have a definition that is multi-faceted.

1. An "act" describes a single instance of invasion by anyone who has not a peaceful intent when entering or crossing the border illegally.

Upon an illegal entrance, one might have within themselves an evil purpose to do harm to the citizens of this country in which would be unsuspecting due to an unvetted illegal crosser entering into the country without proper permission to do such harm undetected.

Permission can only be given by our government, law enforcement etc, otherwise by those having the proper authorities permission to do so (let them in).

These are illegals who are the enemy to everything a sovereign nation believes in and honors within the enforcement of it's laws that protect those beliefs, and it's borders.

Of course there is no question about the other one that notes about any invading "army", and how it will be pushed back.

Wow... that's a real stretch.

"Invasion" is just a hyperbolic metaphor, an exaggeration, tossed around carelessly by idiots - and quite deliberately by leaders.

Just more fear mongering from the right

Calling them maids, dish washers and lawn maintenance workers doesn’t scare people

 

[beagle9]

1. an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.

So here we have a definition that is multi-faceted.

1. An "act" describes a single instance of invasion by anyone who has not a peaceful intent when entering or crossing the border illegally.

Upon an illegal entrance, one might have within themselves an evil purpose to do harm to the citizens of this country in which would be unsuspecting due to an unvetted illegal crosser entering into the country, and entering without proper permission to enter, in which allows that illegal to do such harm undetected if that is what the illegal desires to do.

Permission can only be given by our government, law enforcement etc, otherwise by those having the proper authorities permission to do so (i.e. to let them in by way of that permission).

Some illegals are definitely the enemy to everything a sovereign nation believes in and honors when dealing within the enforcement of it's laws that protect those beliefs, and it's borders.

2. Of course there is no question about this one that notes "any" invading "army", and how it will be pushed back as invaders.

 

[beagle9]

Invasion:

1 an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.
2 the entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful, as disease.
3 entrance as if to take possession or overrun: the annual invasion of the resort by tourists.
4 infringement by intrusion.

the definition of invasion

yes, but it is the definition in number 1, that the founders were talking about in the constitution...

not like an invasion of privacy...

1. an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.

So here we have a definition that is multi-faceted.

1. An "act" describes a single instance of invasion by anyone who has not a peaceful intent when entering or crossing the border illegally.

Upon an illegal entrance, one might have within themselves an evil purpose to do harm to the citizens of this country in which would be unsuspecting due to an unvetted illegal crosser entering into the country without proper permission to do such harm undetected.

Permission can only be given by our government, law enforcement etc, otherwise by those having the proper authorities permission to do so (let them in).

These are illegals who are the enemy to everything a sovereign nation believes in and honors within the enforcement of it's laws that protect those beliefs, and it's borders.

Of course there is no question about the other one that notes about any invading "army", and how it will be pushed back.

Wow... that's a real stretch.

"Invasion" is just a hyperbolic metaphor, an exaggeration, tossed around carelessly by idiots - and quite deliberately by leaders.

Just more fear mongering from the right

Calling them maids, dish washers and lawn maintenance workers doesn’t scare people

Your side is the ones saying that hey they're just doing the Jobs American's won't do.

Americans will do the jobs, any job, but first those who hire illegals in order to completely run American's out of work should be punished severely for that act.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Invasion:

1 an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.
2 the entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful, as disease.
3 entrance as if to take possession or overrun: the annual invasion of the resort by tourists.
4 infringement by intrusion.

the definition of invasion

yes, but it is the definition in number 1, that the founders were talking about in the constitution...

not like an invasion of privacy...

1. an act or instance of invading or entering as an enemy, especially by an army.

So here we have a definition that is multi-faceted.

1. An "act" describes a single instance of invasion by anyone who has not a peaceful intent when entering or crossing the border illegally.

Upon an illegal entrance, one might have within themselves an evil purpose to do harm to the citizens of this country in which would be unsuspecting due to an unvetted illegal crosser entering into the country without proper permission to do such harm undetected.

Permission can only be given by our government, law enforcement etc, otherwise by those having the proper authorities permission to do so (let them in).

These are illegals who are the enemy to everything a sovereign nation believes in and honors within the enforcement of it's laws that protect those beliefs, and it's borders.

Of course there is no question about the other one that notes about any invading "army", and how it will be pushed back.

Wow... that's a real stretch.

"Invasion" is just a hyperbolic metaphor, an exaggeration, tossed around carelessly by idiots - and quite deliberately by leaders.

Just more fear mongering from the right

Calling them maids, dish washers and lawn maintenance workers doesn’t scare people

You know what scares people? Your face!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Marion Morrison]

Hold on. If I live in Boston but vacation in a rural area, do my taxes not go to all of MA not just the urban area? Find me a link or proof that state taxes (which are flat btw) go to one highly populated areas. You cannot. You have dug this hole, now you look stupid and cannot help yourself but to look even more stupid. And I have further explained to you that even in Blue populated areas like Boston, most high income earners are either Republicans or Independents (like myself). Just because a bunch of cost centers (students and those who don't work) vote Blue doesn't mean the state is only powered by Democrats. That is just idiotic. Hell our Governor is a Republican. Please STFU, because you're embarrassing yourself. Again.

Gomer...just stop it

The issue is that those rural areas received “free stuff” in terms of roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, electrification, water that their population does not justify

Nope, you're making yourself look stupid. None of that was free and property taxes pay for schools. You really have zero clue on how the economy works. Scary that an idiot like you has as much voting power as me.

Wrong again Gomer

The taxes generated in those remote rural areas did not pay for the services they receive. They need subsidies from populated areas that allow them to receive basic services

You do realize gas tax goes to pay for roads, no?

https://files.taxfoundation.org/20180808093450/Gas-Tax-July-2018.png

Figured that one out yourself? Rocket Scientist

And the gas taxes generated from rural roads do not generate enough revenue to justify their construction and maintenance

The fuel taxes generated by everybody that buys gallons of fuel every day is more than enough to pay for any roads we need in America. In addition, there's also sales and property taxes.

 

[Clipper]

What about the majority of Americans who did not drink Trump's koolaide? There is no emergency but a humanitarian emergency of Trump's own making. The language of fear and division drips from the OP. Invasion, infestation, emergency.

Riddle me this: if our conomy is the 'strongest ever' and unemployment is at an all-time low, what do you fear from immigrants?

The answer is simple. You fear a change in our culture. You fear erosion of White privilege. You fear what your bigoted counterparts a century ago feared. And look how the immigration of the early 20th century worked out! We survived depression, won two world wars, landed men on the moon and then went out for pizza and chow mein.

Those were legal immigrants, dipshit. I'm fine with legal immigration, but 20K million here illegaly? Fuck That! What about the people that busted their ass and waited in line and did things the right way? Huh? Fuck them, amirite?

More amnesty lies? I don't think so. This is it! Grah!

What about the majority of Americans who did not drink Trump's koolaide? There is no emergency but a humanitarian emergency of Trump's own making. The language of fear and division drips from the OP. Invasion, infestation, emergency.

Riddle me this: if our conomy is the 'strongest ever' and unemployment is at an all-time low, what do you fear from immigrants?

The answer is simple. You fear a change in our culture. You fear erosion of White privilege. You fear what your bigoted counterparts a century ago feared. And look how the immigration of the early 20th century worked out! We survived depression, won two world wars, landed men on the moon and then went out for pizza and chow mein.

Those were legal immigrants, dipshit. I'm fine with legal immigration, but 20K million here illegaly? Fuck That! What about the people that busted their ass and waited in line and did things the right way? Huh? Fuck them, amirite?

More amnesty lies? I don't think so. This is it! Grah!

What do you suppose the immigration laws were like 100 years ago?

Everyone got vetted through Ellis Island. There was no welfare or food stamps back then. Either you worked and made it, or not.

This ain't 1920, Maid Marion.

 

[Clipper]

Not just Democrats, Republicans that don't vote to stop invaders as well!

You see, it's part of their job as they took an oath to uphold the Constitution.

What does the Constitution say about invaders?

Article IV, Section IV


Section 4
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

If they're not protecting the states against invasion, they're not upholding the Constitution.

There are penalties for this, unfortunately not as severe as I would like them to be, but it is what it is. The penalty is removal from office and/or a fine/and or up to 366 days in Federal prison.

"
Whoever violates the provision of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he--

(1)  advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(2)  is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(3)  participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia;  or

(4)  is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia;

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both."

18 U.S.C. § 1918 - U.S. Code Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1918 | FindLaw

This also applies to Muslims and leftists in Congress. They are affiliated with an organization that advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.

Just know that there are legal recourses for this bullshit that's been going on for decades. I bet if we fine them all, no additional tax money is necessary!

Democrats have no reason for concern. You are the one who wants to abuse the law to punish your political enemies. That is not how it works. Try it and eventually Trump will call a jail cell his new home. This is not Nazi Germany.

Shut the border for about 40 years. We've done it before.

Yea, let's do that. And enjoy your canned fruit & veggies imported from China. That is, unless you Trumptards plan on hitting the fields come harvest time, asswipe.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Not just Democrats, Republicans that don't vote to stop invaders as well!

You see, it's part of their job as they took an oath to uphold the Constitution.

What does the Constitution say about invaders?

Article IV, Section IV


Section 4
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."

If they're not protecting the states against invasion, they're not upholding the Constitution.

There are penalties for this, unfortunately not as severe as I would like them to be, but it is what it is. The penalty is removal from office and/or a fine/and or up to 366 days in Federal prison.

"
Whoever violates the provision of section 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he--

(1)  advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(2)  is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;

(3)  participates in a strike, or asserts the right to strike, against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia;  or

(4)  is a member of an organization of employees of the Government of the United States or of individuals employed by the government of the District of Columbia that he knows asserts the right to strike against the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia;

shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both."

18 U.S.C. § 1918 - U.S. Code Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1918 | FindLaw

This also applies to Muslims and leftists in Congress. They are affiliated with an organization that advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government.

Just know that there are legal recourses for this bullshit that's been going on for decades. I bet if we fine them all, no additional tax money is necessary!

Democrats have no reason for concern. You are the one who wants to abuse the law to punish your political enemies. That is not how it works. Try it and eventually Trump will call a jail cell his new home. This is not Nazi Germany.

Shut the border for about 40 years. We've done it before.

Yea, let's do that. And enjoy your canned fruit & veggies imported from China. That is, unless you Trumptards plan on hitting the fields come harvest time, asswipe.

China isn't capable of crop production on the level of the good old US of A.

2 of my uncles used to be pickers in the summertime when they were kids.

I suppose the guy I'm quoting is "above" him or his offspring "hitting the fields come harvest time". I'm not.