Why Conservative Is Simply Better....

[PoliticalChic]

You're wasting my time trying to change the subject to Liberalism.

I'm not changing any subject, but merely mirroring your expressed opinion.

The Op has made the assertion that Conservatism is better for the individual and for society, the problem of course is that the Republican Party does not meet the standards of Conservatism.

Perhaps. But it is certain that the current Democratic Party does not meet the standards of classical liberalism.

Next?

I don't think the captains of the present democratic Party ever claimed to be the standard bearers of classic liberalism. That "liberal" moniker was hung around their necks by right wing talking heads. The Democratic Party is made up of both conservative AND liberal factions. One or the other surfaces depending on the issue at hand.

What nonsense.

If you ask nicely, I'm certain an adult will help you to obtain a library card.

A bit of study, and you won't embarrass yourself like this again.

 

[g5000]

can you find shots of the ugly ones that look attractive?

Easy peasey!

Guess who:

That's a photo from the period when she was actually relevant, unlike the photo of her now when she isn't even a liberal force any more.

Take a picture of Megyn Kelly 40 years from now, and see how she looks.

Again, what YOU find ugly in the conservative ones is based on your personal and political bias.

My political bias is a conservative bias. But I wouldn't touch most of those women with a ten foot pole.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[


Interesting,....bordering on amusing...that you would reference Nazism...

...Nazism, and Liberalism are scions of the very same evil predecessor....


.”

Or, instead of listening to some confused haus frau on the internet, we could go right to a real Nazi,

Joseph Goebbels:

"Both in theory and practice, National Socialism opposes liberalism."

So.....Goebbels is your paragon of truth?

How consistent of you.

So to fit your crackpot agenda you need to simply reject the facts?

Name 5 major issues on which a consensus of modern day American liberals agree with the Nazis of the past.

 

[JQPublic1]

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

 

[Auld Phart]

can you find shots of the ugly ones that look attractive?

Easy peasey!

Guess who:

That's a photo from the period when she was actually relevant, unlike the photo of her now when she isn't even a liberal force any more.

Take a picture of Megyn Kelly 40 years from now, and see how she looks.

Again, what YOU find ugly in the conservative ones is based on your personal and political bias.

My political bias is a conservative bias. But I wouldn't touch most of those women with a ten foot pole.

Guess who:

No idea.

Should I care?

My political bias is a conservative bias.

Really?

But I wouldn't touch most of those women with a ten foot pole.

Your choice.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[


Interesting,....bordering on amusing...that you would reference Nazism...

...Nazism, and Liberalism are scions of the very same evil predecessor....


.”

Or, instead of listening to some confused haus frau on the internet, we could go right to a real Nazi,

Joseph Goebbels:

"Both in theory and practice, National Socialism opposes liberalism."

So.....Goebbels is your paragon of truth?

How consistent of you.

The Nazis were militaristic, xenophobic, extreme nationalists, anti-gay, anti-abortion, anti-liberal, for starters.

Now where in America today do you find the political entity closest to that set of beliefs?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

He's pretending that the totalitarian regime of the Soviet Union was somehow an example of liberalism. In short, he's stupid.

 

[g5000]

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

Now that is one batshit crazy post.

How many pounds of brain damage do you have to have to believe a CONSERVATIVE would have kept the communist central planning regime the same in those countries?

It was the Liberals who kowtowed to the commies and socialists, and still do.

 

[g5000]

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

He's pretending that the totalitarian regime of the Soviet Union was somehow an example of liberalism. In short, he's stupid.

No, I am saying a free market economy is what conservatism is all about.

Nice try.

American Liberals were quite obsequious to the USSR, though. And not a few left wingers were outright commies and comsymps in the 60s and 70s.

"I'll take two Che Guevara shirts, please."

 

[JQPublic1]

You're wasting my time trying to change the subject to Liberalism.

I'm not changing any subject, but merely mirroring your expressed opinion.

The Op has made the assertion that Conservatism is better for the individual and for society, the problem of course is that the Republican Party does not meet the standards of Conservatism.

Perhaps. But it is certain that the current Democratic Party does not meet the standards of classical liberalism.

Next?

I don't think the captains of the present democratic Party ever claimed to be the standard bearers of classic liberalism. That "liberal" moniker was hung around their necks by right wing talking heads. The Democratic Party is made up of both conservative AND liberal factions. One or the other surfaces depending on the issue at hand.

What nonsense.

If you ask nicely, I'm certain an adult will help you to obtain a library card.

A bit of study, and you won't embarrass yourself like this again.

The Stormfront library is not on my list of places to visit... BTW, does your library card have swastikas on it?

You d

 

[NYcarbineer]

we all enjoy letting someone tell us what is better,,,good thing the Founders didn't listen...

Ah yes, the Founders' redefinition of national government, a sin apparently verboten by the same 'reasoning' that says you can't redefine marriage.

Not to mention the overthrow of their ruler who was endowed with his right to rule by the divine right of the Christian God.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

He's pretending that the totalitarian regime of the Soviet Union was somehow an example of liberalism. In short, he's stupid.

No, I am saying a free market economy is what conservatism is all about.

Nice try.

American Liberals were quite obsequious to the USSR, though. And not a few left wingers were outright commies and comsymps in the 60s and 70s.

"I'll take two Che Guevara shirts, please."

We have a market economy in this country. We also have rightwing extremists. Get to your point, preferably in English.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You're wasting my time trying to change the subject to Liberalism.

I'm not changing any subject, but merely mirroring your expressed opinion.

The Op has made the assertion that Conservatism is better for the individual and for society, the problem of course is that the Republican Party does not meet the standards of Conservatism.

Perhaps. But it is certain that the current Democratic Party does not meet the standards of classical liberalism.

Next?

I don't think the captains of the present democratic Party ever claimed to be the standard bearers of classic liberalism. That "liberal" moniker was hung around their necks by right wing talking heads. The Democratic Party is made up of both conservative AND liberal factions. One or the other surfaces depending on the issue at hand.

What nonsense.

If you ask nicely, I'm certain an adult will help you to obtain a library card.

A bit of study, and you won't embarrass yourself like this again.

The Stormfront library is not on my list of places to visit... BTW, does your library card have swastikas on it?

You d

Her library card has a picture of a bewildered old Korean woman on it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

we all enjoy letting someone tell us what is better,,,good thing the Founders didn't listen...

That PoliticalChic has to resort to Greg Gutfeld for a thought is the least surprising thing I've seen all day.

 

[JQPublic1]

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

Now that is one batshit crazy post.

How many pounds of brain damage do you have to have to believe a CONSERVATIVE would have kept the communist central planning regime the same in those countries?

It was the Liberals who kowtowed to the commies and socialists, and still do.

There is no need for low class truculence, fella. I was merely pointing out that Conservatism is synonymous with resistance to change from the perspective of those being affected by the changing, not the outside observers like YOU.

 

[g5000]

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

He's pretending that the totalitarian regime of the Soviet Union was somehow an example of liberalism. In short, he's stupid.

No, I am saying a free market economy is what conservatism is all about.

Nice try.

American Liberals were quite obsequious to the USSR, though. And not a few left wingers were outright commies and comsymps in the 60s and 70s.

"I'll take two Che Guevara shirts, please."

We have a market economy in this country. We also have rightwing extremists. Get to your point, preferably in English.

I did get to my point. Quite succinctly. Right at the start of this little chain of uncomprehending idiocy which followed.

Allow me to refresh your amazingly short memory:

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

And so we see history and progress replaced failed left wing systems with successful right wing systems, contrary to your claim.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

He's pretending that the totalitarian regime of the Soviet Union was somehow an example of liberalism. In short, he's stupid.

No, I am saying a free market economy is what conservatism is all about.

Nice try.

American Liberals were quite obsequious to the USSR, though. And not a few left wingers were outright commies and comsymps in the 60s and 70s.

"I'll take two Che Guevara shirts, please."

We have a market economy in this country. We also have rightwing extremists. Get to your point, preferably in English.

I did get to my point. Quite succinctly. Right at the start of this little chain of uncomprehending idiocy which followed.

Allow me to refresh your amazingly short memory:

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

And so we see progress replaced failed left wing systems with successful right wing systems, contrary to your claim.

I wasn't aware that Liberals supported totalitarian dictatorship. Name the prominent Liberals in America who do.

 

[2aguy]

In less than five minutes, Greg Gutfeld explains why Conservative is simply better for the individual, and for society, than Liberal

And, by investing the five minutes in this vid...you get course credit in Prager University.....




Why the Right is Right - Prager University

I just heard Gutfeld on Prager's show today…….Greg is great……..

 

[2aguy]

That doesn't sound like conservatism to me, that sounds like progress and change. Conservatism would have kept things the same...

He's pretending that the totalitarian regime of the Soviet Union was somehow an example of liberalism. In short, he's stupid.

No, I am saying a free market economy is what conservatism is all about.

Nice try.

American Liberals were quite obsequious to the USSR, though. And not a few left wingers were outright commies and comsymps in the 60s and 70s.

"I'll take two Che Guevara shirts, please."

We have a market economy in this country. We also have rightwing extremists. Get to your point, preferably in English.

I did get to my point. Quite succinctly. Right at the start of this little chain of uncomprehending idiocy which followed.

Allow me to refresh your amazingly short memory:

Conservatism can't be better because historically progress replaces it with something better.

Looks to me like conservatism is winning all over the globe.

The Soviet Union collapsed. China and India are moving away from centrally planned economies toward freer and freer market economies.

Those are huge victories for conservatism.

And so we see progress replaced failed left wing systems with successful right wing systems, contrary to your claim.

I wasn't aware that Liberals supported totalitarian dictatorship. Name the prominent Liberals in America who do.

obama…..kerry…..anyone of them who supports the castros…...

 

[2aguy]

View attachment 50666

Dipshit….you obviously don't realize that modern Conservatives in America are actual "Classical Liberals." We are the ones who support individual liberty and equality…you morons want a huge government controlling everything you do…and if you have a huge government, they will team up with big business…..moron.