Why Confront Islam?

[Monk-Eye]

" Back To The Issue At Hand "

* Idolatry Of The Shiny Anus *

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

* Diadem Where Crap Originates *

 

[ding]

^ talking about militant atheism.

 

[ding]

" Off The Beaten Path "
* Got A Clue *

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

Classical Liberal - Conservapedia
Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments

 

[ding]

" Back To The Issue At Hand "

* Idolatry Of The Shiny Anus *

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

* Diadem Where Crap Originates *

The propaganda of atheism is necessary for our programs. Vladimir Lenin

 

[Taz]

" Back To The Issue At Hand "

* Idolatry Of The Shiny Anus *

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

* Diadem Where Crap Originates *

The propaganda of atheism is necessary for our programs. Vladimir Lenin

Admit it, you like muslims more then you like atheists.

 

[ding]

" Back To The Issue At Hand "

* Idolatry Of The Shiny Anus *

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

* Diadem Where Crap Originates *

The propaganda of atheism is necessary for our programs. Vladimir Lenin

Admit it, you like muslims more then you like atheists.

I don’t judge individuals or groups. I judge behaviors.

 

[Taz]

" Back To The Issue At Hand "

* Idolatry Of The Shiny Anus *

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

* Diadem Where Crap Originates *

The propaganda of atheism is necessary for our programs. Vladimir Lenin

Admit it, you like muslims more then you like atheists.

I don’t judge individuals or groups. I judge behaviors.

And you like muslim behavior more than atheist behavior.

 

[ding]

" Back To The Issue At Hand "

* Idolatry Of The Shiny Anus *

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

* Diadem Where Crap Originates *

The propaganda of atheism is necessary for our programs. Vladimir Lenin

Admit it, you like muslims more then you like atheists.

I don’t judge individuals or groups. I judge behaviors.

And you like muslim behavior more than atheist behavior.

I work with several muslims. I prefer them to you.

 

[Taz]

" Back To The Issue At Hand "

* Idolatry Of The Shiny Anus *
* Diadem Where Crap Originates *

The propaganda of atheism is necessary for our programs. Vladimir Lenin

Admit it, you like muslims more then you like atheists.

I don’t judge individuals or groups. I judge behaviors.

And you like muslim behavior more than atheist behavior.

I work with several muslims. I prefer them to you.

But you’re forced to work with muzzyz, and you choose to talk with me.

 

[ding]

The propaganda of atheism is necessary for our programs. Vladimir Lenin

Admit it, you like muslims more then you like atheists.

I don’t judge individuals or groups. I judge behaviors.

And you like muslim behavior more than atheist behavior.

I work with several muslims. I prefer them to you.

But you’re forced to work with muzzyz, and you choose to talk with me.

I choose to do both, but they are way better people than you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

" Defining Political Science Terms Adequately With Respect To Government Action "

* Different Tact Altogether *

That’s not exactly how Locke put it. Maybe Marx is more your speed.

"Liberal Versus Conservative Paradigm Is Intellectual Buffoonery"

*Contemporary Liberal Versus Conservative Facility for Communication Bypass*
According to the novel, doublethink is:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.[2]"

*Establishing Consistent Etymology Principle*
As valid political science terms, libertarianism and authoritarianism are antonyms.
Libertarianism implements limitations and prohibitions on government to establish individualism.
Authoritarianism enables government control to establish state management.
Both terms are defined with a common reference of government.
In rejection for the inanity of contemporary vernacular, libertarianism is hereby analogous with liberalism and authoritarianism is hereby analogous with conservatism.

*Examples of Proper Description*
Gun control is implemented through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.
The second amendment is founded upon negative wrights and libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Laissez-faire economics is economic libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Egalitarianism is established through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.

*Historical Source of Terminology Corruption*
Libertarianism emphasizes negative wrights; its extremes for individualism also facilitates monopoly, which provisions tyranny for private despots.
Authoritarianism emphasizes positive wrights; its extremes for state management also facilitates bureaucratic collectives, which provisions tyranny for government despots.
Rather than maintaining a consistent emphasis on libertarian principle to establish individualism through limited government, at some point the term liberal was introduced to describe optimizations of individual freedom, however that deviation was a coup d'etat leading to intellectual corruption.
The contentious degree of implemented libertarian versus authoritarian policy with an objective to optimize individual freedom in the context of a social system is utilitarianism!
See Ouroboros for commonality of libertarianism and authoritarianism at extremes.
See phi for aesthetic political resolutions; adherence for the mean for individualism.

" Articulating A New Standard In Schema "
* Following Droning Imbeciles Off A Cliff Because Of Incompetent Information *
A distinction between equal protection and equal endowment is obvious .
Clearly , negative liberties should be equally protected .
Clearly , positive liberties may not be equally endowed .
The following link is to an example where equal protection and equal endowment differ , where illegal migrants are given equal protection , but are not given " equal endowment " to citizenship for themselves or their children born in us - http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/legislative-proposal-children-born-of-illegal-immigrants-to-receive-citizenship-of-mother.705201/ .
A definition for negative and positive wrights should be made consistent with respect to authoritarian actions by government .
Issue is that the contemporary assertions and understanding for Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) lack a logical consistency and lack basic rigor in definition that surmounts to an intellectual travesty and political science buffoonery , on par with the inanity of the conservative versus liberal paradigm !

The cosmic battle between good and evil has manifested itself in the fight between free enterprise and socialism.

Socialist dismiss this because they are deceitful.

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

True story.

More like self-soothing delusion....you know, your strong suit...

 

[ding]

" Defining Political Science Terms Adequately With Respect To Government Action "

* Different Tact Altogether *

That’s not exactly how Locke put it. Maybe Marx is more your speed.

"Liberal Versus Conservative Paradigm Is Intellectual Buffoonery"

*Contemporary Liberal Versus Conservative Facility for Communication Bypass*
According to the novel, doublethink is:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.[2]"

*Establishing Consistent Etymology Principle*
As valid political science terms, libertarianism and authoritarianism are antonyms.
Libertarianism implements limitations and prohibitions on government to establish individualism.
Authoritarianism enables government control to establish state management.
Both terms are defined with a common reference of government.
In rejection for the inanity of contemporary vernacular, libertarianism is hereby analogous with liberalism and authoritarianism is hereby analogous with conservatism.

*Examples of Proper Description*
Gun control is implemented through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.
The second amendment is founded upon negative wrights and libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Laissez-faire economics is economic libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Egalitarianism is established through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.

*Historical Source of Terminology Corruption*
Libertarianism emphasizes negative wrights; its extremes for individualism also facilitates monopoly, which provisions tyranny for private despots.
Authoritarianism emphasizes positive wrights; its extremes for state management also facilitates bureaucratic collectives, which provisions tyranny for government despots.
Rather than maintaining a consistent emphasis on libertarian principle to establish individualism through limited government, at some point the term liberal was introduced to describe optimizations of individual freedom, however that deviation was a coup d'etat leading to intellectual corruption.
The contentious degree of implemented libertarian versus authoritarian policy with an objective to optimize individual freedom in the context of a social system is utilitarianism!
See Ouroboros for commonality of libertarianism and authoritarianism at extremes.
See phi for aesthetic political resolutions; adherence for the mean for individualism.

" Articulating A New Standard In Schema "
* Following Droning Imbeciles Off A Cliff Because Of Incompetent Information *
A distinction between equal protection and equal endowment is obvious .
Clearly , negative liberties should be equally protected .
Clearly , positive liberties may not be equally endowed .
The following link is to an example where equal protection and equal endowment differ , where illegal migrants are given equal protection , but are not given " equal endowment " to citizenship for themselves or their children born in us - http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/legislative-proposal-children-born-of-illegal-immigrants-to-receive-citizenship-of-mother.705201/ .
A definition for negative and positive wrights should be made consistent with respect to authoritarian actions by government .
Issue is that the contemporary assertions and understanding for Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) lack a logical consistency and lack basic rigor in definition that surmounts to an intellectual travesty and political science buffoonery , on par with the inanity of the conservative versus liberal paradigm !

The cosmic battle between good and evil has manifested itself in the fight between free enterprise and socialism.

Socialist dismiss this because they are deceitful.

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

True story.

More like self-soothing delusion....you know, your strong suit...

I am sorry if I offended your socialist sensibilities.

Socialism intentionally denies examination because it is irrational. There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something good, noble and just: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. Socialism seeks equality through uniformity and communal ownership Socialism has an extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. Socialists dismiss their defeats and ignore their incongruities. They desire big government and use big government to implement their morally relativistic social policies. Socialism is a religion. The religious nature of socialism explains their hostility towards traditional religions which is that of one rival religion over another. Their dogma is based on materialism, primitive instincts, atheism and the deification of man. They see no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural Marxism and normalization of deviance. They worship science but are the first to reject it when it suits their purposes. They can be identified by an external locus of control. Their religious doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and equality via uniformity and communal ownership. They practice critical theory which is the Cultural Marxist theory to criticize what they do not believe to arrive at what they do believe without ever having to examine what they believe. They confuse critical theory for critical thinking. Critical thinking is the practice of challenging what one does believe to test its validity. Something they never do.

 

[Taz]

Admit it, you like muslims more then you like atheists.

I don’t judge individuals or groups. I judge behaviors.

And you like muslim behavior more than atheist behavior.

I work with several muslims. I prefer them to you.

But you’re forced to work with muzzyz, and you choose to talk with me.

I choose to do both, but they are way better people than you.

I bet you love the smell of camels too.

 

[ding]

I don’t judge individuals or groups. I judge behaviors.

And you like muslim behavior more than atheist behavior.

I work with several muslims. I prefer them to you.

But you’re forced to work with muzzyz, and you choose to talk with me.

I choose to do both, but they are way better people than you.

I bet you love the smell of camels too.

Just their toes.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Playing It Off As Relevant "

* True Calling Of A Fictional Ishmaelism Shill *

I bet you love the smell of camels too.

Since he relishes the lofted anus of those before him , to include the dangling testicles , the correct assertion is that he loves the goat , see baphomet .

That the luciferian mythology and sin mythologies are asinine , but those are the references in the crescent moon and star .

He considers fictional ishmaelism adherents better people until they get into the voting booth as a statistical majority , as a hisbah majority , more insane than himself to implement a theocratic final solution , and then he is able to do little other than whimper that socialists are to blame .

The self ignorance he promotes is an inability to make a distinction between political policy and the theocratic , debase , nomian , stupidity which he shares with the rest of the fictional ishmaelism psychopaths .

Urban Dictionary: The Goat
The act of a man tucking his wang and sack between his legs and bending over so that it can be seen from behind resembling the head of a goat.

 

[Taz]

And you like muslim behavior more than atheist behavior.

I work with several muslims. I prefer them to you.

But you’re forced to work with muzzyz, and you choose to talk with me.

I choose to do both, but they are way better people than you.

I bet you love the smell of camels too.

Just their toes.

I'm right again.

 

[ding]

I work with several muslims. I prefer them to you.

But you’re forced to work with muzzyz, and you choose to talk with me.

I choose to do both, but they are way better people than you.

I bet you love the smell of camels too.

Just their toes.

I'm right again.

That would be a first.

 

[Taz]

But you’re forced to work with muzzyz, and you choose to talk with me.

I choose to do both, but they are way better people than you.

I bet you love the smell of camels too.

Just their toes.

I'm right again.

That would be a first.

So you agree that I'm right, good for you.

 

[ding]

I choose to do both, but they are way better people than you.

I bet you love the smell of camels too.

Just their toes.

I'm right again.

That would be a first.

So you agree that I'm right, good for you.

That would be a first too.

 

[Taz]

I bet you love the smell of camels too.

Just their toes.

I'm right again.

That would be a first.

So you agree that I'm right, good for you.

That would be a first too.

Just don't forget that I'm right and you agree.