Why Confront Islam?

[longknife]

" Constitutional Framers Were Prophets"

* Last Prophet Of Qurayshism *

There is nothing sectarian about what I wrote.
Socialism is a reaction. But it always results in an attempt to subordinate the dominant religion. Like what you are doing. There's your relevance.

My political lean does not espouse socialism , or communism .

Your bent against socialism seems to be more specifically a bent against secularism , as secularism presumes to establish public policy without a nomian expectation , which is otherwise your endorsement of sectarian rule .

The institutions of fictional ishmaelism laud democracy for its tyranny by majority , without regard for individual liberty and without regard for individual liberty .

* Lofted Ass Hole Totalitarianism With Sectarian Socialism *

Hisbah - Wikipedia
Hisbah (Arabic: ḥisbah) is an Islamic doctrine which means "accountability".[1] Hisbah is the divinely-sanctioned duty of the ruler (government) to intervene and coercively "enjoining good and forbidding wrong" in order to keep everything in order according to sharia (Islamic law).[2] The doctrine is based on an expression from the Quran .[1][3][page needed] Some Salafists suggest that it is the sacred duty of all Muslims, not just rulers.[2]

Do you EVER have anything constructive to add to this thread?

 

[ding]

" Classic Pandering Obfuscation To Defend The Indefensible "
* Art Of Esoteric Language And Red Herring Identities *

I think you are reading more into the self evident truth that ignorance is often insolent.

My intuition about innuendo is astute .

* Not Entitled To Respect *

You are insolent because you believe you know better, but it isn't your religion so it is not possible for you to know better.

Again , whether an ideology violates non aggression principles can be evaluated apatheistically , without regard for some pretense that an ideology is a religion ; and , there is not an entitlement to a religious exception for tenets of creed that violate non aggression principles as fictional ishmaelism does , even by us first amendment .

* Hypocrites Sporting Pot And Kettle Clown Shoes *

Your only mission is to subordinate religion because that's what socialism has always done.

When has religion done anything other than attempt to subordinate everyone ?

* Compulsions Of Homicidal Megalomania *

Surah 8:65 It is not for a prophet to have captives [of war] until he inflicts a massacre [upon God’s enemies] in the land. You [i.e., some Muslims] desire the commodities of this world, but God desires [for you] the Hereafter. And God is Exalted in Might and Wise.

Nonaggression? It violates Darwin.

You have a very biased view towards religion.

 

[ding]

" Constitutional Framers Were Prophets"

* Last Prophet Of Qurayshism *

There is nothing sectarian about what I wrote.
Socialism is a reaction. But it always results in an attempt to subordinate the dominant religion. Like what you are doing. There's your relevance.

My political lean does not espouse socialism , or communism .

Your bent against socialism seems to be more specifically a bent against secularism , as secularism presumes to establish public policy without a nomian expectation , which is otherwise your endorsement of sectarian rule .

The institutions of fictional ishmaelism laud democracy for its tyranny by majority , without regard for individual liberty and without regard for individual liberty .

* Lofted Ass Hole Totalitarianism With Sectarian Socialism *

Hisbah - Wikipedia
Hisbah (Arabic: ḥisbah) is an Islamic doctrine which means "accountability".[1] Hisbah is the divinely-sanctioned duty of the ruler (government) to intervene and coercively "enjoining good and forbidding wrong" in order to keep everything in order according to sharia (Islamic law).[2] The doctrine is based on an expression from the Quran .[1][3][page needed] Some Salafists suggest that it is the sacred duty of all Muslims, not just rulers.[2]

Do you EVER have anything constructive to add to this thread?

That’s not his mission.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Islam is not a religion it is an ideology. Only 10% of Germans were Nazis, most Germans were good people. Only a small minority of Russians were bad, most were good people yet Stalin killed millions. Only a small portion of Japanese were bad yet they conquered many countries around them and killed millions. Only a small portion of North Koreans are bad, I am sure most are good people.

25% of Islam is “bad” the 75% of good people don’t matter. Learn from history.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Defending Ships of Fools With Bandwagon Fallacy "

* Sycophants Testing If Nonsense Thrown On A Wall Sticks *

Okay, but there weren't 1 billion+ Nazis...

What is your point ?

Is your point to marginalize the despicable history of fictional ishmaelism , to dismiss its contention for the greatest number of homicides attributable to an ideology , to redirect focus away from its tenets of creed as a basis for its violent history and for its presumption to implement such pogroms further should it ever become dominant ?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

" Constitutional Framers Were Prophets"

* Last Prophet Of Qurayshism *

There is nothing sectarian about what I wrote.
Socialism is a reaction. But it always results in an attempt to subordinate the dominant religion. Like what you are doing. There's your relevance.

My political lean does not espouse socialism , or communism .

Your bent against socialism seems to be more specifically a bent against secularism , as secularism presumes to establish public policy without a nomian expectation , which is otherwise your endorsement of sectarian rule .

The institutions of fictional ishmaelism laud democracy for its tyranny by majority , without regard for individual liberty and without regard for individual liberty .

* Lofted Ass Hole Totalitarianism With Sectarian Socialism *

Hisbah - Wikipedia
Hisbah (Arabic: ḥisbah) is an Islamic doctrine which means "accountability".[1] Hisbah is the divinely-sanctioned duty of the ruler (government) to intervene and coercively "enjoining good and forbidding wrong" in order to keep everything in order according to sharia (Islamic law).[2] The doctrine is based on an expression from the Quran .[1][3][page needed] Some Salafists suggest that it is the sacred duty of all Muslims, not just rulers.[2]

Do you EVER have anything constructive to add to this thread?

That’s not his mission.

Are you sad over the Astros. My Red Sox took care of them. Sorry about the off topic post.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What is your point ?

I

That even if the civilized world lined up to do a D-day style invasion, the scale would still be about a tenth of what would be required to "treat Islam like naziism". So you are forwarding a pipe dream, and our thought and energy is better spent on other things.

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Herding "

* Cooperative Success *

Nonaggression? It violates Darwin.
You have a very biased view towards religion.

Confronted with the relativism of nature , individuals surrender their natural freedoms for membership in a social civil contract to improve their odds of individual benefit .

The non aggression principle is one of many alternatives for social systems , however the non aggression principle does found a philosophical basis for individual liberty that includes self ownership ( free association , free roam , procreation ) and self determination ( private property , willful intents ) .

Perspectivism - Wikipedia
This is often taken to imply that no way of seeing the world can be taken as definitively "true", but does not necessarily entail that all perspectives are equally valid.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Deconstruction With Ease "

* Leverage Behind Informed Consent *

That even if the civilized world lined up to do a D-day style invasion, the scale would still be about a tenth of what would be required to "treat Islam like naziism". So you are forwarding a pipe dream, and our thought and energy is better spent on other things.

The term " i slam " is an infinitive meaning " to submit " , and the term " muslim " is a noun meaning " one who submits " , however the terms are generic and one may practice " i slam " in a bdsm dungeon by being a muslim to a dominatrix .

There is no such thing as a religion of " i slam " , and there is no such thing as a " muslim " who follows a religion that does not exist , there is only qurayshism that would only apply within hejaz and fictional ishmaelism that is the debase presumption that qurayshism would apply outside of hejaz .

Qurayshism is a genetic religion for preservation of the patriarchal lineage of eponymous ishmael, where the tenets , cultural traditions and city state laws ( sharia ) , as proposed in the qurayn , would only apply within hejaz .

Any pretense that qurayshism applies outside of hejaz is debase and termed fictional ishmaelism .

Torahnism is a genetic religion for preservation of the patriarchal lineage of eponymous isaac , where the tenets , cultural traditions and city state laws ( 613 mitzvot ) , as proposed in the torah , would only apply within israel .

In deed , legitimizing a precept that " one who submits to submission " is morose , and it is an example of orwellian double-speak characteristic and contributor to a cultural psychosis .

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

" Deconstruction With Ease "

* Leverage Behind Informed Consent *

That even if the civilized world lined up to do a D-day style invasion, the scale would still be about a tenth of what would be required to "treat Islam like naziism". So you are forwarding a pipe dream, and our thought and energy is better spent on other things.

The term " i slam " is an infinitive meaning " to submit " , and the term " muslim " is a noun meaning " one who submits " , however the terms are generic and one may practice " i slam " in a bdsm dungeon by being a muslim to a dominatrix .

There is no such thing as a religion of " i slam " , and there is no such thing as a " muslim " who follows a religion that does not exist , there is only qurayshism that would only apply within hejaz and fictional ishmaelism that is the debase presumption that qurayshism would apply outside of hejaz .

Qurayshism is a genetic religion for preservation of the patriarchal lineage of eponymous ishmael, where the tenets , cultural traditions and city state laws ( sharia ) , as proposed in the qurayn , would only apply within hejaz .

Any pretense that qurayshism applies outside of hejaz is debase and termed fictional ishmaelism .

Torahnism is a genetic religion for preservation of the patriarchal lineage of eponymous isaac , where the tenets , cultural traditions and city state laws ( 613 mitzvot ) , as proposed in the torah , would only apply within israel .

In deed , legitimizing a precept that " one who submits to submission " is morose , and it is an example of orwellian double-speak characteristic and contributor to a cultural psychosis .

Great,no such thing as "Islam" as a religion....well that will certainly be helpful,in some alternative universe....

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Giving Them What They Need To Overcome "

* Reality Of Valid Depiction *

Great,no such thing as "Islam" as a religion....well that will certainly be helpful,in some alternative universe....

A distinction between the genetic religion of qurayshism and its debase application as fictional ishmaelism is definitely helpful - in this universe .

 

[ding]

" Herding "

* Cooperative Success *

Nonaggression? It violates Darwin.
You have a very biased view towards religion.

Confronted with the relativism of nature , individuals surrender their natural freedoms for membership in a social civil contract to improve their odds of individual benefit .

The non aggression principle is one of many alternatives for social systems , however the non aggression principle does found a philosophical basis for individual liberty that includes self ownership ( free association , free roam , procreation ) and self determination ( private property , willful intents ) .

Perspectivism - Wikipedia
This is often taken to imply that no way of seeing the world can be taken as definitively "true", but does not necessarily entail that all perspectives are equally valid.

That’s not exactly how Locke put it. Maybe Marx is more your speed.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Quixotic Lacking Adequate Skill Sets "

* Propaganda Agendas *

That’s not exactly how Locke put it. Maybe Marx is more your speed.

The insinuations of your posts surmount to little more than tit-for-tat ad hominem stupidity to misrepresent others with red herring obfuscation and categorically , ridiculous , false , nonsense .

First you present yourself as a heretic of anti-nomianism ( a complete lack of understanding to begin with ) , then as a proponent for the depravity and institutional psychopathy that is the nomian legalsim of fictional ishmaelism , and then as one with an absurd and completely ridiculous understanding of political science with respect to socialism .

We are all grateful that a statistical majority of such idiocy , as you have demonstrated , has thus far been held in check by geographic isolation that appeals to the below average median intelligence quotient of those in arid , sun stroked , demented sand pits of the planet .

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Simple Validation of Proof "

* Inquisitive Request For Information *

Do you have a link to that quote ?

Churchill on Islam - The Churchill Project - Hillsdale College
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/churchill-on-islam/ - TRUE
How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Defining Political Science Terms Adequately With Respect To Government Action "

* Different Tact Altogether *

That’s not exactly how Locke put it. Maybe Marx is more your speed.

"Liberal Versus Conservative Paradigm Is Intellectual Buffoonery"

*Contemporary Liberal Versus Conservative Facility for Communication Bypass*
According to the novel, doublethink is:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.[2]"

*Establishing Consistent Etymology Principle*
As valid political science terms, libertarianism and authoritarianism are antonyms.
Libertarianism implements limitations and prohibitions on government to establish individualism.
Authoritarianism enables government control to establish state management.
Both terms are defined with a common reference of government.
In rejection for the inanity of contemporary vernacular, libertarianism is hereby analogous with liberalism and authoritarianism is hereby analogous with conservatism.

*Examples of Proper Description*
Gun control is implemented through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.
The second amendment is founded upon negative wrights and libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Laissez-faire economics is economic libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Egalitarianism is established through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.

*Historical Source of Terminology Corruption*
Libertarianism emphasizes negative wrights; its extremes for individualism also facilitates monopoly, which provisions tyranny for private despots.
Authoritarianism emphasizes positive wrights; its extremes for state management also facilitates bureaucratic collectives, which provisions tyranny for government despots.
Rather than maintaining a consistent emphasis on libertarian principle to establish individualism through limited government, at some point the term liberal was introduced to describe optimizations of individual freedom, however that deviation was a coup d'etat leading to intellectual corruption.
The contentious degree of implemented libertarian versus authoritarian policy with an objective to optimize individual freedom in the context of a social system is utilitarianism!
See Ouroboros for commonality of libertarianism and authoritarianism at extremes.
See phi for aesthetic political resolutions; adherence for the mean for individualism.

" Articulating A New Standard In Schema "
* Following Droning Imbeciles Off A Cliff Because Of Incompetent Information *
A distinction between equal protection and equal endowment is obvious .
Clearly , negative liberties should be equally protected .
Clearly , positive liberties may not be equally endowed .
The following link is to an example where equal protection and equal endowment differ , where illegal migrants are given equal protection , but are not given " equal endowment " to citizenship for themselves or their children born in us - http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/legislative-proposal-children-born-of-illegal-immigrants-to-receive-citizenship-of-mother.705201/ .
A definition for negative and positive wrights should be made consistent with respect to authoritarian actions by government .
Issue is that the contemporary assertions and understanding for Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) lack a logical consistency and lack basic rigor in definition that surmounts to an intellectual travesty and political science buffoonery , on par with the inanity of the conservative versus liberal paradigm !

 

[ding]

" Defining Political Science Terms Adequately With Respect To Government Action "

* Different Tact Altogether *

That’s not exactly how Locke put it. Maybe Marx is more your speed.

"Liberal Versus Conservative Paradigm Is Intellectual Buffoonery"

*Contemporary Liberal Versus Conservative Facility for Communication Bypass*
According to the novel, doublethink is:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.[2]"

*Establishing Consistent Etymology Principle*
As valid political science terms, libertarianism and authoritarianism are antonyms.
Libertarianism implements limitations and prohibitions on government to establish individualism.
Authoritarianism enables government control to establish state management.
Both terms are defined with a common reference of government.
In rejection for the inanity of contemporary vernacular, libertarianism is hereby analogous with liberalism and authoritarianism is hereby analogous with conservatism.

*Examples of Proper Description*
Gun control is implemented through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.
The second amendment is founded upon negative wrights and libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Laissez-faire economics is economic libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Egalitarianism is established through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.

*Historical Source of Terminology Corruption*
Libertarianism emphasizes negative wrights; its extremes for individualism also facilitates monopoly, which provisions tyranny for private despots.
Authoritarianism emphasizes positive wrights; its extremes for state management also facilitates bureaucratic collectives, which provisions tyranny for government despots.
Rather than maintaining a consistent emphasis on libertarian principle to establish individualism through limited government, at some point the term liberal was introduced to describe optimizations of individual freedom, however that deviation was a coup d'etat leading to intellectual corruption.
The contentious degree of implemented libertarian versus authoritarian policy with an objective to optimize individual freedom in the context of a social system is utilitarianism!
See Ouroboros for commonality of libertarianism and authoritarianism at extremes.
See phi for aesthetic political resolutions; adherence for the mean for individualism.

" Articulating A New Standard In Schema "
* Following Droning Imbeciles Off A Cliff Because Of Incompetent Information *
A distinction between equal protection and equal endowment is obvious .
Clearly , negative liberties should be equally protected .
Clearly , positive liberties may not be equally endowed .
The following link is to an example where equal protection and equal endowment differ , where illegal migrants are given equal protection , but are not given " equal endowment " to citizenship for themselves or their children born in us - http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/legislative-proposal-children-born-of-illegal-immigrants-to-receive-citizenship-of-mother.705201/ .
A definition for negative and positive wrights should be made consistent with respect to authoritarian actions by government .
Issue is that the contemporary assertions and understanding for Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) lack a logical consistency and lack basic rigor in definition that surmounts to an intellectual travesty and political science buffoonery , on par with the inanity of the conservative versus liberal paradigm !

The cosmic battle between good and evil has manifested itself in the fight between free enterprise and socialism.

Socialist dismiss this because they are deceitful.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

" Defining Political Science Terms Adequately With Respect To Government Action "

* Different Tact Altogether *

That’s not exactly how Locke put it. Maybe Marx is more your speed.

"Liberal Versus Conservative Paradigm Is Intellectual Buffoonery"

*Contemporary Liberal Versus Conservative Facility for Communication Bypass*
According to the novel, doublethink is:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.[2]"

*Establishing Consistent Etymology Principle*
As valid political science terms, libertarianism and authoritarianism are antonyms.
Libertarianism implements limitations and prohibitions on government to establish individualism.
Authoritarianism enables government control to establish state management.
Both terms are defined with a common reference of government.
In rejection for the inanity of contemporary vernacular, libertarianism is hereby analogous with liberalism and authoritarianism is hereby analogous with conservatism.

*Examples of Proper Description*
Gun control is implemented through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.
The second amendment is founded upon negative wrights and libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Laissez-faire economics is economic libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Egalitarianism is established through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.

*Historical Source of Terminology Corruption*
Libertarianism emphasizes negative wrights; its extremes for individualism also facilitates monopoly, which provisions tyranny for private despots.
Authoritarianism emphasizes positive wrights; its extremes for state management also facilitates bureaucratic collectives, which provisions tyranny for government despots.
Rather than maintaining a consistent emphasis on libertarian principle to establish individualism through limited government, at some point the term liberal was introduced to describe optimizations of individual freedom, however that deviation was a coup d'etat leading to intellectual corruption.
The contentious degree of implemented libertarian versus authoritarian policy with an objective to optimize individual freedom in the context of a social system is utilitarianism!
See Ouroboros for commonality of libertarianism and authoritarianism at extremes.
See phi for aesthetic political resolutions; adherence for the mean for individualism.

" Articulating A New Standard In Schema "
* Following Droning Imbeciles Off A Cliff Because Of Incompetent Information *
A distinction between equal protection and equal endowment is obvious .
Clearly , negative liberties should be equally protected .
Clearly , positive liberties may not be equally endowed .
The following link is to an example where equal protection and equal endowment differ , where illegal migrants are given equal protection , but are not given " equal endowment " to citizenship for themselves or their children born in us - http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/legislative-proposal-children-born-of-illegal-immigrants-to-receive-citizenship-of-mother.705201/ .
A definition for negative and positive wrights should be made consistent with respect to authoritarian actions by government .
Issue is that the contemporary assertions and understanding for Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) lack a logical consistency and lack basic rigor in definition that surmounts to an intellectual travesty and political science buffoonery , on par with the inanity of the conservative versus liberal paradigm !

The cosmic battle between good and evil has manifested itself in the fight between free enterprise and socialism.

Socialist dismiss this because they are deceitful.

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

 

[ding]

" Defining Political Science Terms Adequately With Respect To Government Action "

* Different Tact Altogether *

That’s not exactly how Locke put it. Maybe Marx is more your speed.

"Liberal Versus Conservative Paradigm Is Intellectual Buffoonery"

*Contemporary Liberal Versus Conservative Facility for Communication Bypass*
According to the novel, doublethink is:
"The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them....To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies - all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.[2]"

*Establishing Consistent Etymology Principle*
As valid political science terms, libertarianism and authoritarianism are antonyms.
Libertarianism implements limitations and prohibitions on government to establish individualism.
Authoritarianism enables government control to establish state management.
Both terms are defined with a common reference of government.
In rejection for the inanity of contemporary vernacular, libertarianism is hereby analogous with liberalism and authoritarianism is hereby analogous with conservatism.

*Examples of Proper Description*
Gun control is implemented through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.
The second amendment is founded upon negative wrights and libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Laissez-faire economics is economic libertarianism, hence it is a liberal policy.
Egalitarianism is established through authoritarianism, hence it is a conservative policy.

*Historical Source of Terminology Corruption*
Libertarianism emphasizes negative wrights; its extremes for individualism also facilitates monopoly, which provisions tyranny for private despots.
Authoritarianism emphasizes positive wrights; its extremes for state management also facilitates bureaucratic collectives, which provisions tyranny for government despots.
Rather than maintaining a consistent emphasis on libertarian principle to establish individualism through limited government, at some point the term liberal was introduced to describe optimizations of individual freedom, however that deviation was a coup d'etat leading to intellectual corruption.
The contentious degree of implemented libertarian versus authoritarian policy with an objective to optimize individual freedom in the context of a social system is utilitarianism!
See Ouroboros for commonality of libertarianism and authoritarianism at extremes.
See phi for aesthetic political resolutions; adherence for the mean for individualism.

" Articulating A New Standard In Schema "
* Following Droning Imbeciles Off A Cliff Because Of Incompetent Information *
A distinction between equal protection and equal endowment is obvious .
Clearly , negative liberties should be equally protected .
Clearly , positive liberties may not be equally endowed .
The following link is to an example where equal protection and equal endowment differ , where illegal migrants are given equal protection , but are not given " equal endowment " to citizenship for themselves or their children born in us - http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/legislative-proposal-children-born-of-illegal-immigrants-to-receive-citizenship-of-mother.705201/ .
A definition for negative and positive wrights should be made consistent with respect to authoritarian actions by government .
Issue is that the contemporary assertions and understanding for Negative and positive rights - Wikipedia ( sic ) lack a logical consistency and lack basic rigor in definition that surmounts to an intellectual travesty and political science buffoonery , on par with the inanity of the conservative versus liberal paradigm !

The cosmic battle between good and evil has manifested itself in the fight between free enterprise and socialism.

Socialist dismiss this because they are deceitful.

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

True story.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Off The Beaten Path "
* Got A Clue *

Haha, what a bunch of crap.

Classical Liberal - Conservapedia
Political Science Terminology : Negative / Positive : Wrights / Liberties : Protections / Endowments