Why Bibi’s Speech Matters

[LoneLaugher]

If nutters are ever successful at ridding the world of Muslims.....which religion do you think is next in line?

Hopefully yours.

You rock!

 

[The Irish Ram]

Clowny, if nutters want to rid the world of radical head removers, pray tell, what do you left wing nutters want to do with them? Continue to let them decide pro radical Muslim policy in our White House? Invite them to tea? Buy them better knives? Walk them across the border? What is your solution to children being slaughtered as they sit at their desks? Thank God Hitler was before your time, or you'd have elected him President too.

 

[guno]

Well? I can't wait to hear what he has to tell us

SNIP:
Column: It exposes the Iran deal as indefensible—and Obama's politics as bankrupt


AP

BY: Matthew Continetti
February 27, 2015 5:00 am


The emerging nuclear deal with Iran is indefensible. The White House knows it. That is why President Obama does not want to subject an agreement to congressional approval, why critics of the deal are dismissed as warmongers, and why the president, his secretary of state, and his national security adviser have spent several weeks demonizing the prime minister of Israel for having the temerity to accept an invitation by the U.S. Congress to deliver a speech on a subject of existential import for his small country. These tactics distract public attention. They turn a subject of enormous significance to American foreign policy into a petty personal drama. They prevent us from discussing what America is about to give away.

And America is about to give away a lot. This week the AP reported on what an agreement with Iran might look like: sanctions relief in exchange for promises to slow down Iranian centrifuges for 10 years. At which point the Iranians could manufacture a bomb—assuming they hadn’t produced one in secret. Iran would get international legitimacy, assurance that military intervention was not an option, and no limitations on its ICBM programs, its support for international terrorism, its enrichment of plutonium, its widespread human rights violations, and its campaign to subvert or co-opt Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria. Then it can announce itself as the first Shiite nuclear power.

And America? Liberals would flatter themselves for avoiding a war. Obama wouldn’t have to worry about the Iranians testing a nuke for the duration of his presidency. And a deal would be a step toward the rapprochement with Iran that he has sought throughout his years in office. The EU representative to the talks, for example, says a nuclear agreement “could open the way for a normal diplomatic relation” between Iran and the West, and could present “the opportunity for shaping a different regional framework in the Middle East.” A regional framework, let it be said, that would leave American interests at risk, Israel one bomb away from a second Holocaust, nuclear proliferation throughout the Middle East, and Islamic theocrats in charge of a large part of a strategic and volatile region.

I feel safer already.

ALL of it here:
Why Bibi s Speech Matters Washington Free Beacon

any wonder why We jews who are overwhelming progressive laugh at trailer dwellers and your ignorant uneducated ilk

 

[LoneLaugher]

Clowny, if nutters want to rid the world of radical head removers, pray tell, what do you left wing nutters want to do with them? Continue to let them decide pro radical Muslim policy in our White House? Invite them to tea? Buy them better knives? Walk them across the border? What is your solution to children being slaughtered as they sit at their desks? Thank God Hitler was before your time, or you'd have elected him President too.

With the 99.9999% of Muslims who don't remove heads?

 

[NYcarbineer]

I still can't figure out why Israel was allowed to get the bomb.

They're a western ally surrounded by countries that want to destroy it. It's a good thing they have nukes. Have you ever expressed any outrage over any other western nation having nukes? My guess is no.

Israel is not our ally. Israel is our dependent.

Israel is a far greater threat to our national security than is any other country in the Middle East.

Why? Because our irrational support of Israel increases the hostility towards us from other nations,

and we get no benefit from it.

 

[Rocko]

I still can't figure out why Israel was allowed to get the bomb.

They're a western ally surrounded by countries that want to destroy it. It's a good thing they have nukes. Have you ever expressed any outrage over any other western nation having nukes? My guess is no.

Israel is not our ally. Israel is our dependent.

Israel is a far greater threat to our national security than is any other country in the Middle East.

Why? Because our irrational support of Israel increases the hostility towards us from other nations,

and we get no benefit from it.

Right, if we throw the Jews to the wolves we'd be so much safer. Only problems with that is that its the immoral thing to do, and it's totally bullshit - with or without Israel these animals would want nothing more than to piss on our graves... If anything we'd be less safe without Israeli intelligence to provide us with information on these animals. You really haven't thought this through, have you?

 

[The Irish Ram]

Clowny, if nutters want to rid the world of radical head removers, pray tell, what do you left wing nutters want to do with them? Continue to let them decide pro radical Muslim policy in our White House? Invite them to tea? Buy them better knives? Walk them across the border? What is your solution to children being slaughtered as they sit at their desks? Thank God Hitler was before your time, or you'd have elected him President too.

With the 99.9999% of Muslims who don't remove heads?

I don't recall us declaring war on the 99.9999% of the Muslims who don't remove heads, but if you read the same holy book that 99.9999% read, they are to pray for the success of those who behead, kill innocents, bomb buildings with planes and kill people in Boston.
Hell we can't even get our Muslim president to declare war on the % who do kill "at random".

Now that I have answered your question Clowny, how about answering mine? Why are Muslims in our White House overthrowing our Allies in favor of radical Islam??

 

[LoneLaugher]

Clowny, if nutters want to rid the world of radical head removers, pray tell, what do you left wing nutters want to do with them? Continue to let them decide pro radical Muslim policy in our White House? Invite them to tea? Buy them better knives? Walk them across the border? What is your solution to children being slaughtered as they sit at their desks? Thank God Hitler was before your time, or you'd have elected him President too.

With the 99.9999% of Muslims who don't remove heads?

I don't recall us declaring war on the 99.9999% of the Muslims who don't remove heads, but if you read the same holy book that 99.9999% read, they are to pray for the success of those who behead, kill innocents, bomb buildings with planes and kill people in Boston.
Hell we can't even get our Muslim president to declare war on the % who do kill "at random".

Silly nutter. You just said that we have a Muslim president. How do you know enough to breathe?

 

[Lakhota]

Israel has nukes. Iran wants nukes to help keep bullies like Nutanyahoo in check.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Silly clown. You have been too busy going after Americans that don't agree with you to recognize a Muslim when you elect one.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Israel has nukes. Iran wants nukes to help keep bullies like Nutanyahoo in check.

Dumbass! Read your stupid remark again. One of those 2 countries has nukes and has had for some time. When is the last time they shot one off in Iran's direction, or even threatened to wipe Iran off the map???? Israel wants LEFT ALONE. Helping Iran is not leaving them alone it is perpetuating a global human disaster.

 

[zeke]

If anything we'd be less safe without Israeli intelligence to provide us with information on these animals. You really haven't thought this through, have you?

We give Israel something like 4 billion a year. Almost 25% of their defense budget.

Now why don't you explain what this country gets from Israel? Is it using our Congress for a photo op? Or is it using our Congress to diss the President? And why should I think this is good for America?

Jews are big boys now. Baddest fuckers in the region. Best weapons best soldiers. If they can't take care of themselves by now, why is that the problem of the USA?

You feel guilty or something?

 

[Missouri_Mike]

It's incredible how ready and willing the American left is to fall in line and suck the cock of all the planet's evils, especially those who'd toss them off the roof in a New York nanosecond.

It's incredible how ready and willing the American rightwing is to fall in line and suck the cock of Netanyahu, especially he who'd toss them off the roof in a New York nanosecond

I'm guessing somehow in your twisted little mind this was an awesome reply.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Israel has nukes. Iran wants nukes to help keep bullies like Nutanyahoo in check.

You retard. When was the last time Israel had an offensive military action...ever?

 

[Lakhota]

Israel has nukes. Iran wants nukes to help keep bullies like Nutanyahoo in check.

You retard. When was the last time Israel had an offensive military action...ever?

Ask Palestinians.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Israel has nukes. Iran wants nukes to help keep bullies like Nutanyahoo in check.

You retard. When was the last time Israel had an offensive military action...ever?

Ask Palestinians.

The fucking people that keep rockets in their schools and fire them at Israeli citizens? You want me to sympathize with them?

 

[Rocko]

If anything we'd be less safe without Israeli intelligence to provide us with information on these animals. You really haven't thought this through, have you?

We give Israel something like 4 billion a year. Almost 25% of their defense budget.

Now why don't you explain what this country gets from Israel? Is it using our Congress for a photo op? Or is it using our Congress to diss the President? And why should I think this is good for America?

Jews are big boys now. Baddest fuckers in the region. Best weapons best soldiers. If they can't take care of themselves by now, why is that the problem of the USA?

You feel guilty or something?

Actually we give them more like 3 billion, and they provide us plenty of intelligence.

The military aid we provide them with is essential for their country's survival. I'm proud of the role the USA plays. You should be too.

I'm confused - why should I be feeling guilty?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Well? I can't wait to hear what he has to tell us

SNIP:
Column: It exposes the Iran deal as indefensible—and Obama's politics as bankrupt


AP

BY: Matthew Continetti
February 27, 2015 5:00 am


The emerging nuclear deal with Iran is indefensible. The White House knows it. That is why President Obama does not want to subject an agreement to congressional approval, why critics of the deal are dismissed as warmongers, and why the president, his secretary of state, and his national security adviser have spent several weeks demonizing the prime minister of Israel for having the temerity to accept an invitation by the U.S. Congress to deliver a speech on a subject of existential import for his small country. These tactics distract public attention. They turn a subject of enormous significance to American foreign policy into a petty personal drama. They prevent us from discussing what America is about to give away.

And America is about to give away a lot. This week the AP reported on what an agreement with Iran might look like: sanctions relief in exchange for promises to slow down Iranian centrifuges for 10 years. At which point the Iranians could manufacture a bomb—assuming they hadn’t produced one in secret. Iran would get international legitimacy, assurance that military intervention was not an option, and no limitations on its ICBM programs, its support for international terrorism, its enrichment of plutonium, its widespread human rights violations, and its campaign to subvert or co-opt Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria. Then it can announce itself as the first Shiite nuclear power.

And America? Liberals would flatter themselves for avoiding a war. Obama wouldn’t have to worry about the Iranians testing a nuke for the duration of his presidency. And a deal would be a step toward the rapprochement with Iran that he has sought throughout his years in office. The EU representative to the talks, for example, says a nuclear agreement “could open the way for a normal diplomatic relation” between Iran and the West, and could present “the opportunity for shaping a different regional framework in the Middle East.” A regional framework, let it be said, that would leave American interests at risk, Israel one bomb away from a second Holocaust, nuclear proliferation throughout the Middle East, and Islamic theocrats in charge of a large part of a strategic and volatile region.

I feel safer already.

ALL of it here:
Why Bibi s Speech Matters Washington Free Beacon

The little Jewish Nazi is going to get spanked here, and then in a a couple of weeks get spanked there, and he deserves to be.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Israel has nukes. Iran wants nukes to help keep bullies like Nutanyahoo in check.

You retard. When was the last time Israel had an offensive military action...ever?

Ask Palestinians.

The fucking people that keep rockets in their schools and fire them at Israeli citizens? You want me to sympathize with them?

The rest of the world does, dumbass, since the Jewish Nazis are slaughtering them while stealing their land, and have been for 60 years now.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Well? I can't wait to hear what he has to tell us

SNIP:
Column: It exposes the Iran deal as indefensible—and Obama's politics as bankrupt


AP

BY: Matthew Continetti
February 27, 2015 5:00 am


The emerging nuclear deal with Iran is indefensible. The White House knows it. That is why President Obama does not want to subject an agreement to congressional approval, why critics of the deal are dismissed as warmongers, and why the president, his secretary of state, and his national security adviser have spent several weeks demonizing the prime minister of Israel for having the temerity to accept an invitation by the U.S. Congress to deliver a speech on a subject of existential import for his small country. These tactics distract public attention. They turn a subject of enormous significance to American foreign policy into a petty personal drama. They prevent us from discussing what America is about to give away.

And America is about to give away a lot. This week the AP reported on what an agreement with Iran might look like: sanctions relief in exchange for promises to slow down Iranian centrifuges for 10 years. At which point the Iranians could manufacture a bomb—assuming they hadn’t produced one in secret. Iran would get international legitimacy, assurance that military intervention was not an option, and no limitations on its ICBM programs, its support for international terrorism, its enrichment of plutonium, its widespread human rights violations, and its campaign to subvert or co-opt Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and Syria. Then it can announce itself as the first Shiite nuclear power.

And America? Liberals would flatter themselves for avoiding a war. Obama wouldn’t have to worry about the Iranians testing a nuke for the duration of his presidency. And a deal would be a step toward the rapprochement with Iran that he has sought throughout his years in office. The EU representative to the talks, for example, says a nuclear agreement “could open the way for a normal diplomatic relation” between Iran and the West, and could present “the opportunity for shaping a different regional framework in the Middle East.” A regional framework, let it be said, that would leave American interests at risk, Israel one bomb away from a second Holocaust, nuclear proliferation throughout the Middle East, and Islamic theocrats in charge of a large part of a strategic and volatile region.

I feel safer already.

ALL of it here:
Why Bibi s Speech Matters Washington Free Beacon

The little Jewish Nazi is going to get spanked here, and then in a a couple of weeks get spanked there, and he deserves to be.

Jewish Nazi, that's an interesting combo.