Why Aren't the Republicans Calling Witnesses to Defend Trump?

[Wyatt earp]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Which witness had first hand knowledge?

So far, all I've heard is, "I was told"

You did not watch the testimony, did you.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

You really should read the transcripts instead of parroting your propagandists.


The witnesses had first hand testimony of the events in Ukraine.

Don't worry. Witnesses who had first hand knowledge of Trump will be coming. Even though Trump is doing everything he can to obstruct them.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

Odd, I mentioned Kent, Taylor, and Yonovitch….

Actually you didn't.

You asked "Which witness had first hand knowledge?"

Don't lie when it is so easy to prove you lied. That's just stupid and makes you look desperate.

Why do we need this kangaroo court?

Just vote already for impeachment.

 

[Wyatt earp]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Which witness had first hand knowledge?

So far, all I've heard is, "I was told"

You did not watch the testimony, did you.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

You really should read the transcripts instead of parroting your propagandists.


The witnesses had first hand testimony of the events in Ukraine.

Don't worry. Witnesses who had first hand knowledge of Trump will be coming. Even though Trump is doing everything he can to obstruct them.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

Odd, I mentioned Kent, Taylor, and Yonovitch….

Actually you didn't.

You asked "Which witness had first hand knowledge?"

Don't lie when it is so easy to prove you lied. That's just stupid and makes you look desperate.

Vote already for impeachment..

The drama queens and whores are trying to make this a Broadway show


So they can make millions off it

 

[Auld Phart]

Actually, I did.

The only witnesses I've seen are the 3 I mentioned.

The first 3 on the 'hot seat'

and they didn't see squat.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Holy fuck.. this is what's it about, a Broadway play/ a movie

 

[BlindBoo]

Here are the open hearings they cried for. The Public is waiting! Why is the White House not honoring the Congressional ? Why are they hiding?

Here's the Deadline Countdown for Every Trump Impeachment Subpoena Issued So Far

3 branches of government and they can take their Subpoenas and shove it up there ass?

Think potsie think

"Prior court decisions on executive privilege also demonstrate that the president has very little room to keep information from congressional or special counsel investigations. Moreover, the ability to claim executive privilege is generally limited to the president himself, rather than extending to Cabinet members. Some Trump staff have attempted to get around this rule by refusing to testify in case the president later wants to claim executive privilege on the information in question, while others have claimed it outright. In either case, this is not in keeping with court precedents on the policy."

What is executive privilege, anyway? A brief guide to the Trump administration's favorite phrase

 

[Seawytch]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Is hunter Biden your cocaine dealer?

Stop it already fag face.

Nice non sequitur. Got an actual answer? If Republican's primary issue is that none of the witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why not call those witnesses that DO? Why is the White House blocking testimony from those with first hand knowledge?

 

[Dick Foster]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Is hunter Biden your cocaine dealer?

Stop it already fag face.

Nice non sequitur. Got an actual answer? If Republican's primary issue is that none of the witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why not call those witnesses that DO? Why is the White House blocking testimony from those with first hand knowledge?

I guess you're used to it by now but you're obviously a clueless dumbass.

 

[beautress]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Which witness had first hand knowledge?

So far, all I've heard is, "I was told"

You did not watch the testimony, did you.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

You really should read the transcripts instead of parroting your propagandists.


The witnesses had first hand testimony of the events in Ukraine.

Don't worry. Witnesses who had first hand knowledge of Trump will be coming. Even though Trump is doing everything he can to obstruct them.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

Odd, I mentioned Kent, Taylor, and Yonovitch….

Actually you didn't.

You asked "Which witness had first hand knowledge?"

Don't lie when it is so easy to prove you lied. That's just stupid and makes you look desperate.

Hearsay evidence is inappropriate in an impeachment inquiry and your Schiffy knows it and is hard of hearing. Our guys are going to perform a surgery on his ears and he's going to hear it from the people of this country who no longer support Schiff's freedom to piss all over America and the Constitution. He's shilling for goddamn communism.

Biden is wanting for money to have. Hillary is wanting for more, more, more money. Pelosi has apparently expropriated $2.4 billion from Social Security to take away from seniors who paid in and give 100% of it to buying voters from everywhere else in the world but here.

You better make some decisions--are you going to abide by the voters in this country or are you going to continue this demonic trail to a civil war. You better think carefully because everybody in this nation suffers if you Democrats don't straighten up and fly right.

 

[Siete]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Is hunter Biden your cocaine dealer?

Stop it already fag face.

Nice non sequitur. Got an actual answer? If Republican's primary issue is that none of the witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why not call those witnesses that DO? Why is the White House blocking testimony from those with first hand knowledge?

just these people -

Here are the witnesses in Trump's administration who have defied subpoenas in the inquiry.

• Mick Mulvaney, acting chief of staff
• Robert Blair, assistant to the president and senior adviser to the acting chief of staff
• John Eisenberg, legal adviser at National Security Council (NSC)
• Michael Ellis, deputy NSC legal adviser
• Brian McCormack, associate director at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
• Michael Duffey, associate director at OMB
• Wells Griffith, special assistant to the president and senior director at NSC
• T. Ulrich Brechbuhl, counselor at the Department of State
• Russell Vought, acting director at OMB
• Charles Kupperman, former deputy assistant to the president for national security affair

 

[Siete]

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Which witness had first hand knowledge?

So far, all I've heard is, "I was told"

You did not watch the testimony, did you.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

You really should read the transcripts instead of parroting your propagandists.


The witnesses had first hand testimony of the events in Ukraine.

Don't worry. Witnesses who had first hand knowledge of Trump will be coming. Even though Trump is doing everything he can to obstruct them.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

Odd, I mentioned Kent, Taylor, and Yonovitch….

Actually you didn't.

You asked "Which witness had first hand knowledge?"

Don't lie when it is so easy to prove you lied. That's just stupid and makes you look desperate.

Hearsay evidence is inappropriate in an impeachment inquiry and your Schiffy knows it and is hard of hearing. Our guys are going to perform a surgery on his ears and he's going to hear it from the people of this country who no longer support Schiff's freedom to piss all over America and the Constitution. He's shilling for goddamn communism.

Biden is wanting for money to have. Hillary is wanting for more, more, more money. Pelosi has apparently expropriated $2.4 billion from Social Security to take away from seniors who paid in and give 100% of it to buying voters from everywhere else in the world but here.

You better make some decisions--are you going to abide by the voters in this country or are you going to continue this demonic trail to a civil war. You better think carefully because everybody in this nation suffers if you Democrats don't straighten up and fly right.

clinton won the popular vote

look up popular then STFU

 

[whitehall]

How do you prove a negative? The burden of proof is on the crazy political coup democrats. The president's strategy would be to confront the alleged "whistle blower" but strangely enough he(she) is nowhere to be found. The rest of the alleged "evidence" is nothing but heresay.

 

[debbiedowner]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Now that is funny you know very well they would rather smear witnesses being called by the dems. I don't think after today and trumps tweets to intimidate is going over very well even with the Fox news personalities.

 

[debbiedowner]

How do you prove a negative? The burden of proof is on the crazy political coup democrats. The president's strategy would be to confront the alleged "whistle blower" but strangely enough he(she) is nowhere to be found. The rest of the alleged "evidence" is nothing but heresay.

An impeachment isn't a fucking coup and in almost any hearings the other side can call witnesses.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Da! Da! If he's innocent, he should show us!

 

[debbiedowner]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Are you serious?...Schiff's unfair rules forbid the GOP from calling witnesses that they would like to hear from...you were kidding right?...because if you didn't know that you shouldn't be commenting because you don't know anything....

Schiffs rules were put in place by the republicans back in Clinton days.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Just vote on impeachment and get this sham over with.

Yeah who the fuck do they think they're fooling?

They have the votes.

Pelosi will NEVER let this go the the Senate. She will throw a pillow over it and suffocate it to death

 

[beautress]

Which witness had first hand knowledge?

So far, all I've heard is, "I was told"

You did not watch the testimony, did you.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

You really should read the transcripts instead of parroting your propagandists.


The witnesses had first hand testimony of the events in Ukraine.

Don't worry. Witnesses who had first hand knowledge of Trump will be coming. Even though Trump is doing everything he can to obstruct them.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

Odd, I mentioned Kent, Taylor, and Yonovitch….

Actually you didn't.

You asked "Which witness had first hand knowledge?"

Don't lie when it is so easy to prove you lied. That's just stupid and makes you look desperate.

Hearsay evidence is inappropriate in an impeachment inquiry and your Schiffy knows it and is hard of hearing. Our guys are going to perform a surgery on his ears and he's going to hear it from the people of this country who no longer support Schiff's freedom to piss all over America and the Constitution. He's shilling for goddamn communism.

Biden is wanting for money to have. Hillary is wanting for more, more, more money. Pelosi has apparently expropriated $2.4 billion from Social Security to take away from seniors who paid in and give 100% of it to buying voters from everywhere else in the world but here.

You better make some decisions--are you going to abide by the voters in this country or are you going to continue this demonic trail to a civil war. You better think carefully because everybody in this nation suffers if you Democrats don't straighten up and fly right.

clinton won the popular vote

look up popular then STFU

Your Democrat OPERATIVE WENT GUNNING FOR OUR CONGRESSMEN not so many months ago as you think.

You have already taught Republicans you are entitled to run the country as if it were already a communist state with Communist card-carrying creep Nancy Pelosi and her minions. What would you do if you were us?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

You dumbass, your post says you don't have the slightest friggin clue about what is going on. Try paying more attention to what's truly important than trivial nonsense like sports and reality TV from now on. And until you do, please refrain from voting in any election for anything or anyone.

He got his legal advise from Barack

 

[Dick Foster]

Which witness had first hand knowledge?

So far, all I've heard is, "I was told"

You did not watch the testimony, did you.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

You really should read the transcripts instead of parroting your propagandists.


The witnesses had first hand testimony of the events in Ukraine.

Don't worry. Witnesses who had first hand knowledge of Trump will be coming. Even though Trump is doing everything he can to obstruct them.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

Odd, I mentioned Kent, Taylor, and Yonovitch….

Actually you didn't.

You asked "Which witness had first hand knowledge?"

Don't lie when it is so easy to prove you lied. That's just stupid and makes you look desperate.

Hearsay evidence is inappropriate in an impeachment inquiry and your Schiffy knows it and is hard of hearing. Our guys are going to perform a surgery on his ears and he's going to hear it from the people of this country who no longer support Schiff's freedom to piss all over America and the Constitution. He's shilling for goddamn communism.

Biden is wanting for money to have. Hillary is wanting for more, more, more money. Pelosi has apparently expropriated $2.4 billion from Social Security to take away from seniors who paid in and give 100% of it to buying voters from everywhere else in the world but here.

You better make some decisions--are you going to abide by the voters in this country or are you going to continue this demonic trail to a civil war. You better think carefully because everybody in this nation suffers if you Democrats don't straighten up and fly right.

clinton won the popular vote

look up popular then STFU

NO you read the damn constitution and then YOU STFU, asshole.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I think the dems are up Schiff creek without a paddle.