Why Aren't the Republicans Calling Witnesses to Defend Trump?

[Syriusly]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

 

[22lcidw]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Just vote on impeachment and get this sham over with.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Why would you need to call anyone?

This is a kangaroo court where the libtards already convicted him 3 years ago.



.

 

[Wyatt earp]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Just vote on impeachment and get this sham over with.

Yeah who the fuck do they think they're fooling?

They have the votes.

 

[Dick Foster]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

You dumbass, your post says you don't have the slightest friggin clue about what is going on. Try paying more attention to what's truly important than trivial nonsense like sports and reality TV from now on. And until you do, please refrain from voting in any election for anything or anyone.

 

[beautress]

Schiff needs his mommy.

 

[beautress]

Cause Schiff's daddy would be pissed if he saw him today.

 

[beautress]

<snicker>

 

[beautress]

It must suck to be a Democrat watching Bugeye Schiff humiliating all Democrats by being the north end of a horse headed south in these hearings in which he lords over rejecting equality of regular rules against Republicans. We're not going to forget it, either. Say farewell to communism and destroying the Constitution with your arrogant, priviledged royalty-style disregard for all other human beings, Adam Schiff, loser extraordinaire!

 

[Wyatt earp]

Cause Schiff's daddy would be pissed if he saw him today.

This court is why William Wallace fought the British.


It's just for show ..

 

[Wyatt earp]

It must suck to be a Democrat watching bugeyes humiliating all Democrats by being the north end of a horse headed south in these hearings in which he lord's over rejecting equality of regular rules against Republicans. We're not going to forget it, either. Say farewell to communism and destroying the Constitution with your arrogant, priviledged royalty-style disregard for all other human beings, Adam Schiff, loser extraordinaire!

We think alike I feel like we are in the 1500's

 

[Wyatt earp]

Cause Schiff's daddy would be pissed if he saw him today.

This court is why William Wallace fought the British.


It's just for show ..

William Wallace:
“I am William Wallace. And I see a whole army of my countrymen, here in defiance of tyranny! You have come to fight as free men. And free man you are! What will you do with that freedom? Will you fight?”
Many random peons:
“No! No….”
Some random peon:
“Against that? No! We will run, and we will live!”
William Wallace:
“Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but they will never take our FREEDOM!”
ALBA GU BRATH!!!

 

[Theowl32]

They have the transcript. No witnesses needed.

LOL

 

[Jackson]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

If you have been watching the hearing, you would see that the Republicans can do nothing with Schiff in charge. He won't even let them finish their comments! Pure political theater.

 

[bodecea]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Because...they'd have to be under oath.

 

[bodecea]

Cause Schiff's daddy would be pissed if he saw him today.

This court is why William Wallace fought the British.


It's just for show ..

The British?

 

[bodecea]

Panic in the Orange Cult....

 

[Siete]

Why Aren't the Republicans Calling Witnesses to Defend Trump?


I'd say the f'n line is pretty short.

who wants to go to prison for lying ?

 

[Rambunctious]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Are you serious?...Schiff's unfair rules forbid the GOP from calling witnesses that they would like to hear from...you were kidding right?...because if you didn't know that you shouldn't be commenting because you don't know anything....

 

[Wyatt earp]

Cause Schiff's daddy would be pissed if he saw him today.

This court is why William Wallace fought the British.


It's just for show ..

The British?

Yeah it acts like a British court from 1298.

The verdict is already in, it's just for show