Why Aren't the Republicans Calling Witnesses to Defend Trump?

Cause Schiff's daddy would be pissed if he saw him today.


This court is why William Wallace fought the British.


It's just for show ..




William Wallace:
“I am William Wallace. And I see a whole army of my countrymen, here in defiance of tyranny! You have come to fight as free men. And free man you are! What will you do with that freedom? Will you fight?”
Many random peons:
“No! No….”
Some random peon:
“Against that? No! We will run, and we will live!”
William Wallace:
“Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but they will never take our FREEDOM!”
ALBA GU BRATH!!!



Careful with that Wallace talk, you might get charged with intimidation.
 
Cause Schiff's daddy would be pissed if he saw him today.


This court is why William Wallace fought the British.


It's just for show ..




William Wallace:
“I am William Wallace. And I see a whole army of my countrymen, here in defiance of tyranny! You have come to fight as free men. And free man you are! What will you do with that freedom? Will you fight?”
Many random peons:
“No! No….”
Some random peon:
“Against that? No! We will run, and we will live!”
William Wallace:
“Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but they will never take our FREEDOM!”
ALBA GU BRATH!!!



Careful with that Wallace talk, you might get charged with intimidation.


My first wife used to hate it when I would quote it word for word driving my new mustang convertible and blowing through Illinois toll booth gates at 90 mph.
 
Cause Schiff's daddy would be pissed if he saw him today.


This court is why William Wallace fought the British.


It's just for show ..




William Wallace:
“I am William Wallace. And I see a whole army of my countrymen, here in defiance of tyranny! You have come to fight as free men. And free man you are! What will you do with that freedom? Will you fight?”
Many random peons:
“No! No….”
Some random peon:
“Against that? No! We will run, and we will live!”
William Wallace:
“Aye! Fight and you may die. Run and you will live, at least awhile. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives but they will never take our FREEDOM!”
ALBA GU BRATH!!!



Careful with that Wallace talk, you might get charged with intimidation.


My first wife used to hate it when I would quote it word for word driving my new mustang convertible and blowing through Illinois till booth gates at 90 mph.


Fyi just balsa wood and never got caught
 
So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?
Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.


giphy.gif


Is hunter Biden your cocaine dealer?

Stop it already fag face.
Nice non sequitur. Got an actual answer? If Republican's primary issue is that none of the witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why not call those witnesses that DO? Why is the White House blocking testimony from those with first hand knowledge?

Would you think that the written words from the call had first hand knowledge?

Do you believe the words you typed made a lick of sense?
 
So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?
Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.


giphy.gif


Is hunter Biden your cocaine dealer?

Stop it already fag face.
Nice non sequitur. Got an actual answer? If Republican's primary issue is that none of the witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why not call those witnesses that DO? Why is the White House blocking testimony from those with first hand knowledge?

Would you think that the written words from the call had first hand knowledge?

Do you believe the words you typed made a lick of sense?


Wait you understand every word of a charlies Daniel song and cant comprehend what she wrote?
 
Why Aren't the Republicans Calling Witnesses to Defend Trump?


I'd say the f'n line is pretty short.

who wants to go to prison for lying ?
When current congressgnat Schiff gets any negative vibes from the right about his illegal impeachment inquiry devoted to perpetrating hearsay as firm evidence, he tells them to shut up, and makes a lot of fart noises coming from his throat region.
 
Here are the open hearings they cried for. The Public is waiting! Why is the White House not honoring the Congressional Subpoenas? Why are they hiding?

Here's the Deadline Countdown for Every Trump Impeachment Subpoena Issued So Far
The Congress is ignoring the separation of powers that is in and of the United States Constitution that protects the elected president from partisan rats like Adam Schiff who rely on liars, second-hand information, third-hand information, and even false narrative specialists' opinions instead of fact. Naughty, naughty!
 
So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?
Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.


giphy.gif
You're criticizing Republicans for observing the Separation of Powers built into the United States Constitution? Would you like a tissue? 'Kay.
th

There, there, now. Don't be blue. ;) Please share with G5ooo, she's off-kilter, thinking that human beings are animals just because she disagrees with patriots who uphold the Constitution of the United States of America. So sad.​
 
Here are the open hearings they cried for. The Public is waiting! Why is the White House not honoring the Congressional Subpoenas? Why are they hiding?

Here's the Deadline Countdown for Every Trump Impeachment Subpoena Issued So Far

which begs the question

how many times will RW wishes be shoved up their ass before they figure out to STFU ?
FUMBDUCKS !
We're fumbling ducks? We're not the ones who sold out to hearsay. :blahblah:Democrats did.


And a book that objects to Hearsay is a best seller?

Can you say 'doh'?
No, of course you can't - Democrats do not do introspection.
:laughing0301:
 
So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?
If you have been watching the hearing, you would see that the Republicans can do nothing with Schiff in charge. He won't even let them finish their comments! Pure political theater.

They are still making him look like the dumbass he is.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"They are still making him look like the dumbass he is. "​

And isn't it funny how the truth makes a dumbass like Shiff look like a dumbass of all dumbasses.
 
So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Because all they need to do is blow these Dem “witnesses” out of the water.

The Blahzay Ford sounding Ambassador was asked point blank if she had any knowledge of President Trump receiving a bribe or committing any crime. Her answer was “no”.

Why bother calling other witnesses when the “prosecution” witnesses exonerate the President of any crime?
 
So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

The republicans have the power to subpoena anyone they choose. Pompeo, Giuliani, Pence, Mulvaney all have first-hand knowledge and could testify as to trump's innocence. Instead, they want to call the Bidens, etc., people with no first-hand knowledge. The republicans obviously are covering up trump's actions and want to deflect attention away from them.

The whole Ukrainian thing has been meant to cover up the role of the Russians in meddling in our affairs and trump's desire to aid Russian interests.
 

Forum List

Back
Top