In politics money usually translates into votes. If someone is willing to give you money, someone else is also likely to vote for you. It doesnt always work. Kay Hagan raised more money in the NC Senate race than anyone else and still lost. But usually the winner in votes is also the fundraising winner.Good. Your butthurt confirms you arent worth debating. Cruz is currently a top money getter and that means something in politics.Welcome to my ignore list. And have fun watching Cruz and the others go nowhere in the primary. Ill make some TROLL THREADS about it when it happensYour admission of defeat here is noted and accepted. Move along, junior.I don't deal with children who resort to personal attacks for communication. And you label anything you don't agree with as trolling. So you are both a child and someone who looks at things with tunnel-visionThe troll question, dumbshit, was why real conservatives werent developing support. Since fundraising is an important measure of support I showed that Cruz is in the top 3 fundraisers, top 2 of the GOP.
Now you can argue:
1) Fundraising isnt a measure of support. That would indicate you are completely ignorant of politics.
2) Cruz isnt conservative. That would indicate you are a babbling idiot.
3) The source is biased. That would indicate you dont know what you're talking about.
Take your pick. Or agree with me that I blew the thread away.
To win, he need support. He need primary voters. It is possible for Cruz to out raise the majority of his field at the same time is stuck pulling up the rear in all the primary states.
That is a real possibility. The question the Cruz campaign need to address is how to convert their war chest into a lead among voters. His campaign has yet to demonstrate they know how.
Maybe you can volunteer to be Cruz' campaign manager and teach him all about getting votes.