Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men?

[KNB]

Republican logic: "We should outlaw abortion so poor people have to have more children who will vote Democrat and mooch off the system."

 

[1776]

Nobody said that, shitstain.

Republican logic: "We should outlaw abortion so poor people have to have more children who will vote Democrat and mooch off the system."

 

[Derideo_Te]

No gender has an exclusive on intelligence and empathy.

By the definitions above Jesus was a beta male.

Jackass wasn't made about women!

The premise of the OP is patently absurd and it panders shamelessly to the beleaguered egos of males who feel threatened by strong intelligent women. In some respects it is the blogger equivalent of Jackass. Doing something incredibly stupid in order to show off to your male drinking buddies.

Yes, there are stupid women. There are even women who lack empathy for that matter.

But women are no less logical than men, in fact quite the opposite. Men will make what they believe to be a logical decision without considering all of the ramifications. Women reach different logical decisions because they consider more factors.

The OP is erroneously alleging that testosterone influenced logic is superior to that of estrogen influenced logic. That argument is patently wrong and no, the reverse isn't true either.

Like it or not but We the People are comprised of both genders and so We need to find compromises that work for all of us. This divisive binary "us versus them" mentality is ludicrous. Women and men need each other and those that find solutions together are the ones that are the core of this nation. They form partnership bonds and build futures for their families together. Above all they support each other and compensate for each other's weaknesses.

United We Stand is more than just a motto. It is a way towards the future for We the People.

 

[RKMBrown]

No gender has an exclusive on intelligence and empathy.

By the definitions above Jesus was a beta male.

Jackass wasn't made about women!

The premise of the OP is patently absurd and it panders shamelessly to the beleaguered egos of males who feel threatened by strong intelligent women. In some respects it is the blogger equivalent of Jackass. Doing something incredibly stupid in order to show off to your male drinking buddies.

Yes, there are stupid women. There are even women who lack empathy for that matter.

But women are no less logical than men, in fact quite the opposite. Men will make what they believe to be a logical decision without considering all of the ramifications. Women reach different logical decisions because they consider more factors.

The OP is erroneously alleging that testosterone influenced logic is superior to that of estrogen influenced logic. That argument is patently wrong and no, the reverse isn't true either.

Like it or not but We the People are comprised of both genders and so We need to find compromises that work for all of us. This divisive binary "us versus them" mentality is ludicrous. Women and men need each other and those that find solutions together are the ones that are the core of this nation. They form partnership bonds and build futures for their families together. Above all they support each other and compensate for each other's weaknesses.

United We Stand is more than just a motto. It is a way towards the future for We the People.

Jesus was not beta... he was a leader of men, a free thinker, taught folks to teach others to fish, not give them fish, had no qualm with stopping a stoning or turning over money changer tables.

 

[Mojo2]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

EXCELLENT thread. EXCELLENT O.P.!!!

 

[Mojo2]

No gender has an exclusive on intelligence and empathy.

By the definitions above Jesus was a beta male.

Jackass wasn't made about women!

The premise of the OP is patently absurd and it panders shamelessly to the beleaguered egos of males who feel threatened by strong intelligent women. In some respects it is the blogger equivalent of Jackass. Doing something incredibly stupid in order to show off to your male drinking buddies.

Yes, there are stupid women. There are even women who lack empathy for that matter.

But women are no less logical than men, in fact quite the opposite. Men will make what they believe to be a logical decision without considering all of the ramifications. Women reach different logical decisions because they consider more factors.

The OP is erroneously alleging that testosterone influenced logic is superior to that of estrogen influenced logic. That argument is patently wrong and no, the reverse isn't true either.

Like it or not but We the People are comprised of both genders and so We need to find compromises that work for all of us. This divisive binary "us versus them" mentality is ludicrous. Women and men need each other and those that find solutions together are the ones that are the core of this nation. They form partnership bonds and build futures for their families together. Above all they support each other and compensate for each other's weaknesses.

United We Stand is more than just a motto. It is a way towards the future for We the People.

Nope. Women were given more of a capacity to emanate and respond to emotions as a way of helping nurture children and promote the species.

Men were given more of an ability to stay calmer in stress filled situations like hunting a dangerous animal for food, and making the best, rational decisions as calmly as possible.

Now, women also can think. And men can feel.

But generally speaking the men who have a little MORE of the female hardwiring are going to 'think' emotionally, which isn't thinking as much as it is feeling.

And some women are capable of greater rationality and logic and clear headed, calm decisiveness than many men.

But generally speaking women are going to have more emotional hardwiring and less rational, logical wiring.

And men are going to be less emotive or impulsive or swayed by emotion or fleeting sensory experiences and instead possess a greater ability to think and decide based on facts and analysis of the evidence of any matter.

 

[Iceman]

Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives | Psychology Today

Are Liberals Smarter? Study Indicates The Answer Is Yes -

Liberals and atheists smarter? Intelligent people have values novel in human evolutionary history, study finds

I wouldn't doubt that the average white liberal has a higher IQ than the average white conservative. I would like to see the racial breakdowns on your studies. If blacks and hispanics were included, who lean hard left, I would wager the IQ breakdown would be much different. Considering blacks and hispanics respectively score 15 and 10 points lower than Whites on IQ tests.

However, none of this has anything to do with this topic. If you want to make a discussion on race, political ideology and IQ, I would be happy to discuss the issue there.

This article is trying to explain the social trend of women of women supporting the left. I think a good part of that explanation lies in adaption and evolutionary biology. As nurturers, women see the extract the most resources they can for them and their offspring.

However, when these biological impulses of women are allowed to be expressed to the extreme, through a welfare state and women entering the work forces en masse, the state and the corporation supplant the male provider as the authority the women subject themselves to. This results in women relying on the government and the corporation more than the typical beta provider. They can extract resources from the corporation and state while fulfilling sexual needs with an alpha. However in the long run, this had resulted in less marriages, more sex outside of marriage, more children born out of wedlock, and declining birthrates, among other things.

Why would I break the results down to race. What is the point?

For the reasons I stated. Read my response next time. Also, if you want to carry on the conversation on race, political ideology, and IQ, take it to another thread and I would be interested in discussing it.

 

[Iceman]

Republican logic: "We should outlaw abortion so poor people have to have more children who will vote Democrat and mooch off the system."

I agree, don't understand the logic. Abortion is a fantastic voluntary eugenics program. Margaret Sanger may have helped prevent the inevitable, at least for a while.

 

[Iceman]

No gender has an exclusive on intelligence and empathy.

By the definitions above Jesus was a beta male.

Jackass wasn't made about women!

The premise of the OP is patently absurd and it panders shamelessly to the beleaguered egos of males who feel threatened by strong intelligent women. In some respects it is the blogger equivalent of Jackass. Doing something incredibly stupid in order to show off to your male drinking buddies.

Yes, there are stupid women. There are even women who lack empathy for that matter.

But women are no less logical than men, in fact quite the opposite. Men will make what they believe to be a logical decision without considering all of the ramifications. Women reach different logical decisions because they consider more factors.

The OP is erroneously alleging that testosterone influenced logic is superior to that of estrogen influenced logic. That argument is patently wrong and no, the reverse isn't true either.

Like it or not but We the People are comprised of both genders and so We need to find compromises that work for all of us. This divisive binary "us versus them" mentality is ludicrous. Women and men need each other and those that find solutions together are the ones that are the core of this nation. They form partnership bonds and build futures for their families together. Above all they support each other and compensate for each other's weaknesses.

United We Stand is more than just a motto. It is a way towards the future for We the People.

This is a lot of emotional hogwash, denying the biological realities of the sexes, and obvious social trends.

Next time, stay on topic, read the article, use less liberal platitudes(they are so artificial and manufactured), and that will warrant a longer response from me.

 

[Katzndogz]

Single women are more liberal than married women. Single women are psychologically married to the government who occupies the place of provider.

 

[Leweman]

Republican logic: "We should outlaw abortion so poor people have to have more children who will vote Democrat and mooch off the system."

Or those people could just not be pieces of shit and raise their children or not get pregnant or not impregnate.

 

[Andylusion]

Republican logic: "We should outlaw abortion so poor people have to have more children who will vote Democrat and mooch off the system."

Or those people could just not be pieces of shit and raise their children or not get pregnant or not impregnate.

And why is that so amazing an idea to people these days?

 

[L.K.Eder]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

ha, its becuase there brain is smaller then the brains of us real conservative hulks!

 

[Iceman]

Single women are more liberal than married women. Single women are psychologically married to the government who occupies the place of provider.

Married women lean more conservative than their single counterparts because they view government as an outside threat to the resources of the family(through taxation), whereas single, working women, view the government, the corporation, as their provider, and any attack on the state or the corporation is an attack on their resources, on their "in-group".

 

[Iceman]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

ha, its becuase there brain is smaller then the brains of us real conservative hulks!

This article talks nothing of brain size. This article talks about the biological inclination of women to seek a provider and how it translates to current political/social trends. Though that is a very interesting topic, gender differences in brain. If you want to discuss it, start another thread.

 

[Billy000]

I wouldn't doubt that the average white liberal has a higher IQ than the average white conservative. I would like to see the racial breakdowns on your studies. If blacks and hispanics were included, who lean hard left, I would wager the IQ breakdown would be much different. Considering blacks and hispanics respectively score 15 and 10 points lower than Whites on IQ tests.

However, none of this has anything to do with this topic. If you want to make a discussion on race, political ideology and IQ, I would be happy to discuss the issue there.

This article is trying to explain the social trend of women of women supporting the left. I think a good part of that explanation lies in adaption and evolutionary biology. As nurturers, women see the extract the most resources they can for them and their offspring.

However, when these biological impulses of women are allowed to be expressed to the extreme, through a welfare state and women entering the work forces en masse, the state and the corporation supplant the male provider as the authority the women subject themselves to. This results in women relying on the government and the corporation more than the typical beta provider. They can extract resources from the corporation and state while fulfilling sexual needs with an alpha. However in the long run, this had resulted in less marriages, more sex outside of marriage, more children born out of wedlock, and declining birthrates, among other things.

Why would I break the results down to race. What is the point?

For the reasons I stated. Read my response next time. Also, if you want to carry on the conversation on race, political ideology, and IQ, take it to another thread and I would be interested in discussing it.

To say that most blacks or Hispanics identify as liberal or conservative is a faulty assumption given the study results I provided.

 

[L.K.Eder]

January 24, 2014 by CH


It’s hardly a secret that women vote more liberal and Democrat than do men. Even married women, while voting less liberal than their unmarried cohort, retain the sex disparity in vote preference. A study has found that suffrage moved the country inexorably to the left, and it hasn’t stopped moving in the degenerate direction since.

CH proposed a biological mechanism that follows from an understanding of the sexual market to explain the greater liberalism of women. As the resource-exploiting sex, women are neurally charged to extract support and transfer provisions from men to themselves to see them through the tough times of pregnancy and the raising of small children. To aid them in this purpose, women have evolved an innate (if subtly shifting) warmth for men who can provide for them and who show it through romantic displays of fidelity.

But when women become self-supporting, either by their own financial independence or via government largesse (which is in practice the redistribution of beta male resources to women), then the limbic impulses that help them connect with beta providers become short-circuited and redirected to charming cads and government growth. The cad serves the pile driver need while the sugar daddio big government serves the provider need. Under this arrangement, women can indeed “have it all”, (except for long-term commitment from men, which loses its incentive structure in this beta-bypass system).

Therefore, the liberalism of women is as much a consequence of their reliance on government serving as husband substitute as of their inherently greater sensitivity to perceived inequality or rifts in community cohesion. This theory gains traction by the evidence that married women become less liberal, ostensibly because their provider needs are being met by a real husband and the government has assumed the role of a malevolent outsider ransacking their intact family for tax money to be distributed to other women and their children.

All’s fair in souls and shivs, but this may be only part of the story of women’s infantile harm-based liberalism. The political and economic liberalism of women coexists with a greater female tendency to collectivism and religious feeling. Oddly, women appear to be both more liberal and more conservative than men, at least when the metrics used for comparison are sliced thinner. (And the hamster went wheeee….)

Read more here: Why Are Women More Liberal Than Men? | Chateau Heartiste

ha, its becuase there brain is smaller then the brains of us real conservative hulks!

This article talks nothing of brain size. This article talks about the biological inclination of women to seek a provider and how it translate to current political/social trends. Though that is a very interesting topic, gender differences in brain. If you want to discuss it, start another thread.

readsng articels is for beta males. i whether shoot something

 

[Iceman]

Why would I break the results down to race. What is the point?

For the reasons I stated. Read my response next time. Also, if you want to carry on the conversation on race, political ideology, and IQ, take it to another thread and I would be interested in discussing it.

To say that most blacks or Hispanics identify as liberal or conservative is a faulty assumption given the study results I provided.

Your studies mention nothing of the races of the participants, that is the problem.

Your study talks nothing of the political ideologies of the races. It is just a fact Hispanics and Blacks lean left, Whites lean right, look at surveys and election results. And it is a fact Whites on average have higher IQs than Blacks or Hispanics on average. So the fact this wasn't accounted for in the methodology makes your studies on IQ worthless based purely on political ideology.

 

[Iceman]

ha, its becuase there brain is smaller then the brains of us real conservative hulks!

This article talks nothing of brain size. This article talks about the biological inclination of women to seek a provider and how it translate to current political/social trends. Though that is a very interesting topic, gender differences in brain. If you want to discuss it, start another thread.

readsng articels is for beta males. i whether shoot something

Most betas don't read much these days, you are in good company, beta.

 

[Vox]

they are not.

it depends on the age and marital status.

and race. black women are, most probably, not "more liberal" they simply vote Democrat as they are still on the plantation.