you can still rate themI have noticed that greenpartyaz has disabled the reputation rating button....yet feels compelled to adjust others reputation rating.......hypocritical. Funny....
it just doesnt show
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you can still rate themI have noticed that greenpartyaz has disabled the reputation rating button....yet feels compelled to adjust others reputation rating.......hypocritical. Funny....
you can still rate them
it just doesnt show
There's also a greater chancethat a thief will get shot--which is certainly your real complaint.In a community with a high gun ownership the chances of a random break on a house turning up firearms to be stolen are greater that a thief will find a weapon.
"Weapons stored in a secure manner" is newspeak for "weapons stored in a manner that they are not readily available for self defense."But if the weapons are stored in a secure manner then it might be that the chances of a thief actually getting the firearms is lowered.
It's sensible only to the criminally violent.It's sensible then to ensure that gun owners are required to lock away their weapons securely to avoid giving crooks an easy supply of firearms.
Except that is exacly how they are used; and used to great effect.The idea that lists of gun owners make it easier for thieves to steal guns is ridiculous.
Spoken like a true totalitarian. My point is well made.If a community has a high gun ownership concentration then who cares about lists? Just keep doing busts until you find what you want
It's a bad idea to make sure it's safe for criminals and Brown-Shirts to exert their will.It's a good idea to make sure that responsible gun owners make sure their weapons are secured against theft.
There's also a greater chancethat a thief will get shot--which is certainly your real complaint.
"Weapons stored in a secure manner" is newspeak for "weapons stored in a manner that they are not readily available for self defense."
Obviously you are more concerned that victims remian unarmed.
It's sensible only to the criminally violent.
Except that is exacly how they are used; and used to great effect.
Spoken like a true totalitarian. My point is well made.
It's a bad idea to make sure it's safe for criminals and Brown-Shirts to exert their will.
You're wrong in that police officers aren't required to put themselves in harm's way. They take an oath to do just that.
You are the fucking LOLZ!You're wrong in that police officers aren't required to put themselves in harm's way. They take an oath to do just that.
I have really no problem with someone hunting. I state the extreme of my position. I think that something does need to be done to curb violence in the streets. But with so many people worried about gun control it is hard to make it happen.
Gun control doesn't work....it's a proven fact....the problem is in the sentencing of the thugs....if the courts would just enforce the laws on the books & get these bastards off the street, we wouldn't have the violence we now have.....
As far as firearms are concerned, the right to defend oneself is one of the basic rights you have in this country. The 2nd Amendment isn't a right to hunt as the Left would have you believe, it is a right to protect yourself & your community.......
On that we agree
If but only the founder fathers had bothered to write that sentiment more clearly, this whole goofy argument would just go away.
Instead they confused the issue by noting STATE MILITIAS as the reason why people should be able to keep guns, and by doing so they clouded their intentions considerably.
On that we agree
If but only the founder fathers had bothered to write that sentiment more clearly, this whole goofy argument would just go away.
Instead they confused the issue by noting STATE MILITIAS as the reason why people should be able to keep guns, and by doing so they clouded their intentions considerably.
I can't imagine being much clearer than, "...the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."If but only the founder fathers had bothered to write that sentiment more clearly, this whole goofy argument would just go away.
Not so. Militias were in no way cited as the reason why people should be able to keep and bear arms--no such reasons were cited.Instead they confused the issue by noting STATE MILITIAS as the reason why people should be able to keep guns,...
Their intentions were crystal clear--their intentions are clouded by the fatuous arguments from Nanny Statists who find a other people's rights repugnant to their authoritartian aggendas....and by doing so they clouded their intentions considerably.
I have really no problem with someone hunting. I state the extreme of my position. I think that something does need to be done to curb violence in the streets. But with so many people worried about gun control it is hard to make it happen.
The Japanese can afford strict gun laws for the same reason that the British could afford to ban them several decades ago: their crime rate is already low, for whatever other undetermined reasons. It's not politically correct to say it, but culture has the biggest effect on crime, bigger than guns or laws or whatever.
On the other hand I could point out that Switzerland has lots of gun ownership, and is one of the most peaceful places on earth. What few violent crimes they experience, are done by immigrants usually. But again, culture. Being shamed and ostracized by your peers is a powerful motivator. Shame and guilt are not PC emotions though.
Also I should point out that even if you could confiscate and melt down all firearms, it would not be terribly difficult for a machinist to fabricate new ones. Seriously, all it would take would be a gangster with some spare cash, a spare garage, a mill and a lathe, some blueprints and a machinist. You could probably get started for well under $10k.
An interesting fact about Switzerland is one thing: They very tightly control Handguns. I would propose to control Handguns while keeping Rifles legal. The advandtadge of a Handgun is its easyness to conceal, which is not really needed for legitimate gun using.
Wrong.
Gonzales v. Castle Rock
You are the fucking LOLZ!