Why America’s Workers Need Faster Wage Growth—And What We Can Do About It

No customers make you money, employees are an expense. The net cost difference maybe fired employees or some reduced to part-time in order to defeat the cost increase. The difference you asked for is about 30% more, two thirds of that is the wage increase itself, then there is the additional taxes and benefits paid by employers

Who serves the customers? Would you have customers if you didn't have employees? Do your customers return because you hired correctly? My employees are responsible for new and renewal of contracts.

The net cost (depending on tax structure) is 3% to 10%.
 
Again no, it can also be increased profits, regulations, licensing, interest and a host of other things. You are not much into economics are you?

Increased profits is inflation? Maybe inflation of the wallet.

Regulations and licensing are services, interest is goods.
 
of course that 100 stupid and liberal. Unions are gone and Americans are still the richest people in the world and even in indistries where there were never unions

We are the richest in human history by far thanks to capitalism which forces companies to provide best jobs and products possible just to survive. Post on fridge for daily review until you take Econ 101, little boy!

Unions are not gone.

Americans are NOT the worlds richest....anymore.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/23/u...r-the-worlds-richest.html?_r=0&abt=0002&abg=0

Thanks to your failed voting record and greedy capitalism, middle class incomes are shrinking.
 
Again no, it can also be increased profits, regulations, licensing, interest and a host of other things. You are not much into economics are you?

Increased profits is inflation? Maybe inflation of the wallet.

Regulations and licensing are services, interest is goods.

prices and wages cant go up unless the govt prints more money to make it possible!
 
No customers make you money, employees are an expense. The net cost difference maybe fired employees or some reduced to part-time in order to defeat the cost increase. The difference you asked for is about 30% more, two thirds of that is the wage increase itself, then there is the additional taxes and benefits paid by employers

Who serves the customers? Would you have customers if you didn't have employees? Do your customers return because you hired correctly? My employees are responsible for new and renewal of contracts.

The net cost (depending on tax structure) is 3% to 10%.

Well you gave them a 20% wage hike, 20% additional social security, medicare and state tax increases. I'd say that is a twenty percent minimum before benefits. By the way, your example resulted in $62.65 a week more in net.

Customers return for many reasons, price, service, product to name a few. The self employed may not have employees.
 
total illiterate liberal!! Inflation occures when Fed prints too much money relative to goods and services available.

Econ 101- class one day one. Again you are a total illiterate and so a liberal . Please ask questions only.

Inflation is caused by increased costs of goods and services.
 
Thanks to your failed voting record and greedy capitalism, middle class incomes are shrinking.

shrinking because liberals invited 20 million illegals in, and because liberal taxes and unions drove 30 million jobs offshore. Isn't learning your ABC's fun. How old are you, liberal brainless parrot?
 
Well you gave them a 20% wage hike, 20% additional social security, medicare and state tax increases. I'd say that is a twenty percent minimum before benefits. By the way, your example resulted in $62.65 a week more in net.

Customers return for many reasons, price, service, product to name a few. The self employed may not have employees.

Now deduct 100% reducing your tax liability and subtract tax saving from the increased cost to find your net.

Service is employee related. Price is relative to the amount of product sold. If you have employees that sell more widgets, then you can negotiate lower prices.

The only reason someone would be self-employed is they didn't have adequate financing to start their business. The mark of success of a business owner is if you can make at least twice as much as being employed and never go to work, you've made it.
 
unions are mostly gone, especially in the industries they drove off shore thus destroying our middle class and manufacturing bases. Making them illegal again would cause an instant boom

So now Unions are MOSTLY gone. Which is it?

The only thing that would happen if Unions were gone is increased profits for business. Off-shoring was only done for increased profits, ie; greed.
 
The only thing that would happen if Unions were gone is increased profits for business. Off-shoring was only done for increased profits, ie; greed.

100% stupid and liberal of course. Competitors move off shore too so why would profits go up??
You'll need Econ 101 to know the answer so why even try?
 
Well you gave them a 20% wage hike, 20% additional social security, medicare and state tax increases. I'd say that is a twenty percent minimum before benefits. By the way, your example resulted in $62.65 a week more in net.

Customers return for many reasons, price, service, product to name a few. The self employed may not have employees.

Now deduct 100% reducing your tax liability and subtract tax saving from the increased cost to find your net.

Service is employee related. Price is relative to the amount of product sold. If you have employees that sell more widgets, then you can negotiate lower prices.

The only reason someone would be self-employed is they didn't have adequate financing to start their business. The mark of success of a business owner is if you can make at least twice as much as being employed and never go to work, you've made it.

No, the taxes are paid, the revenue spent. Accounting nor taxes can return it to you. It simply isn't taxed a second time as income to you.
 
No customers make you money, employees are an expense. The net cost difference maybe fired employees or some reduced to part-time in order to defeat the cost increase. The difference you asked for is about 30% more, two thirds of that is the wage increase itself, then there is the additional taxes and benefits paid by employers

Who serves the customers? Would you have customers if you didn't have employees? Do your customers return because you hired correctly? My employees are responsible for new and renewal of contracts.

The net cost (depending on tax structure) is 3% to 10%.


There wouldn't be any customers to serve if someone didn't invest capital in a building, products, marketing, etc.

Or do you think the Customers would just give the workers money for standing on a sidewalk holding out their hands?
 
No customers make you money, employees are an expense. The net cost difference maybe fired employees or some reduced to part-time in order to defeat the cost increase. The difference you asked for is about 30% more, two thirds of that is the wage increase itself, then there is the additional taxes and benefits paid by employers

Who serves the customers? Would you have customers if you didn't have employees? Do your customers return because you hired correctly? My employees are responsible for new and renewal of contracts.

The net cost (depending on tax structure) is 3% to 10%.


There wouldn't be any customers to serve if someone didn't invest capital in a building, products, marketing, etc.

Or do you think the Customers would just give the workers money for standing on a sidewalk holding out their hands?

and who would risk the investment without possibility of profit.
 
When the left wing uses terms like "American workers" it sounds like the same old Marxist crap we have been hearing from the radical left for half a century. The median income for the middle class dropped 8% since Barry Hussein was elected. How long will the left be able to blame Bush?

Does that mean "American non-workers" make you think of capitalism?
 
No customers make you money, employees are an expense. The net cost difference maybe fired employees or some reduced to part-time in order to defeat the cost increase. The difference you asked for is about 30% more, two thirds of that is the wage increase itself, then there is the additional taxes and benefits paid by employers

Who serves the customers? Would you have customers if you didn't have employees? Do your customers return because you hired correctly? My employees are responsible for new and renewal of contracts.

The net cost (depending on tax structure) is 3% to 10%.


There wouldn't be any customers to serve if someone didn't invest capital in a building, products, marketing, etc.

Or do you think the Customers would just give the workers money for standing on a sidewalk holding out their hands?

and who would risk the investment without possibility of profit.


Uh...the Government. *cough* Solyndra *cough*
 
We had onepercenter haters down the block. They paid top dollar for a landscape architect to design and build their yard. Three years later they auctioned most of their stuff off and are trying to sell their house before foreclosure.
 
shrinking because liberals invited 20 million illegals in, and because liberal taxes and unions drove 30 million jobs offshore. Isn't learning your ABC's fun. How old are you, liberal brainless parrot?

Greedy corporations and their political party the GOP are the cause.
 
No customers make you money, employees are an expense. The net cost difference maybe fired employees or some reduced to part-time in order to defeat the cost increase. The difference you asked for is about 30% more, two thirds of that is the wage increase itself, then there is the additional taxes and benefits paid by employers

Who serves the customers? Would you have customers if you didn't have employees? Do your customers return because you hired correctly? My employees are responsible for new and renewal of contracts.

The net cost (depending on tax structure) is 3% to 10%.


There wouldn't be any customers to serve if someone didn't invest capital in a building, products, marketing, etc.

Or do you think the Customers would just give the workers money for standing on a sidewalk holding out their hands?

and who would risk the investment without possibility of profit.


Uh...the Government. *cough* Solyndra *cough*

If I remember right Michelle Obama's friends DID profit from that.
 
No customers make you money, employees are an expense. The net cost difference maybe fired employees or some reduced to part-time in order to defeat the cost increase. The difference you asked for is about 30% more, two thirds of that is the wage increase itself, then there is the additional taxes and benefits paid by employers

Who serves the customers? Would you have customers if you didn't have employees? Do your customers return because you hired correctly? My employees are responsible for new and renewal of contracts.

The net cost (depending on tax structure) is 3% to 10%.


There wouldn't be any customers to serve if someone didn't invest capital in a building, products, marketing, etc.

Or do you think the Customers would just give the workers money for standing on a sidewalk holding out their hands?

and who would risk the investment without possibility of profit.


Uh...the Government. *cough* Solyndra *cough*

yes its not their money so they are happy to waste it as opposed to leaving it in the private sector where the folks who earned it will see that it is invested productively!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top