Why Allow Gun Ownership?

Where would the money come from?

I suppose America could have millions more men in the military, but housing and training all of those people, not to mention arming them would be prohibitive. Further, we really don't have the number of wars and conflicts to engage the people in.
Sorry, you’re barking up the wrong tree. You’ve Obviously never served in guard units. The vast majority are support units that can easily provide services to the populous in general. Many do now. More would provide services that usually that some communities can’t afford with lower tax bases.

It means the thousands of jobs in support of government services need to be supported after training, just like in the guard, services are performed one week end a month for nominal pay. Construction, firefighting, service to the poor in need, building dwellings, teaching indigent workers, etc, are just part of it.

The economy usually grows grows as real-estate improves. . These people could easily be transported throughout the country in emergency support jobs… medical personell on call, search and rescue and construction can save millions in labor for poorer communities.

There are thousands of charity services that could easily be included.Secondly,I said, mandatory service; that doesn’t mean everyone is a soldier or even in the military.

You could get credits for service just voluntarily working at the local soup kitchen.
 
Last edited:
COITUS Is a Government Document. Why Expect It to Give Us Freedom?

The Framers framed us. We tell them what our rights are; if they tell us, that makes them tyrants.

That's why I don't care about how the Constitution is interpreted. It's bad law any way those who worship it tell us what it means.
Now wait. The constitution was written in response to the tyrannical British who wanted to tax and extract wealth from the colonies. It banded together the colonies to fight the tyranny of foreign interference. It supports the formation of a federation of states not the dissolving of them.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't matter. Each state can cut back on that rate. Of, all but stop Mass Shootings. But it's more important to not take any of your toys instead saving one single life.


No they can't. The blue cities aid and abet violence.
 
All be dead?

Poor metric. We have the highest murder rate and highest gun death rate in the first world… by a lot


That's just bullshit.

Plenty of countries, including those with very restrictive gun control like the Tremendous Nation of Mexico, have much higher murder rates than America.

And America's murder rate would be a lot lower if it wasn't for ultraliberal Urban Heck Holes like Detroit and East St. Louis which drag the whole country down.
 
/----/ It's the democRAT run cities in the Red States, you moron.
That’s stupid. You OBVIOUSLY NEVER had any knowledge what so ever how law enforcement works between states and local govt. Most of those cities in blue states actually have crime rates less than red states. NYC is ranked among the safest large cities in the world. All the crimes that make cities unsafe ARE STATE CRIMES. THEY ARE enforced and prosecuted by state agencies. The idea that a big city major has control of state crimes in bigger cities is totally ridiculous .

I bet you don’t even know how many STATE courts and police work in big cities. You idiots think they are all run like Mayberry

You're such an illiterate. Majors have less control of Stae crimes in their cities than the state Enforcement agencies in them. The stats are against you. Most safer big cities are in blue STATES foolish.
Look at this list….nearly all the worse cities….ARE IN RED STATES.
Gee, where is Chicago ? Where is NYC ? https://realestate.usnews.com/places/rankings/most-dangerous-places
 
Last edited:
That’s stupid. You OBVIOUSLY NEVER had any knowledge what so ever how law enforcement works between states and local govt. Most of those cities in blue states actually have crime rates less than red states. NYC is ranked among the safest large cities in the world. All the crimes that make cities unsafe ARE STATE CRIMES. THEY ARE enforced and prosecuted by state agencies. The idea that a big city major has control of state crimes in bigger cities is totally ridiculous .

I bet you don’t even know how many STATE courts and police work in big cities. You idiots think they are all run like Mayberry

You're such an illiterate. Majors have less control of Stae crimes in their cities than the state Enforcement agencies in them. The stats are against you. Most safer big cities are in blue STATES foolish.
Look at this list….nearly all the worse cities….ARE IN RED STATES.
Gee, where is Chicago ? Where is NYC ? https://realestate.usnews.com/places/rankings/most-dangerous-places
/—-/ NYC is so safe that the governor has to use the National Guard to patrol the subway system. The police are forced to catch and release hardened criminals because there is no longer bail.

Shoplifting gangs rob stores with impunity, knowing no one will stop them. So, stop your lying. I live in New York and know what it’s like here.

BTW, moron, the stores don't report the shoplifting, they aren't counted in the crime statistics.
 
Last edited:
No they can't. The blue cities aid and abet violence.
That’s stupid….all cities have higher rates of some crimes because of population density bubba. The big cities in BLUE STATES are less….because violent crimes are state crimes
/—-/ NYC is so safe that the governor has to use the National Guard to patrol the subway system. The police are forced to catch and release hardened criminals because there is no longer bail.

Shoplifting gangs rob stores with impunity, knowing no one will stop them. So, stop your lying. I live in New York and know what it’s like here.

BTW, moron, the stores don't report the shoplifting, they aren't counted in the crime statistics.
Red states have higher crime rates than NYC alone , so your made up shit means nothing. Even with all your claims, Red states still have higher crime rates. Red states are more dangerous than NYC. You have no facts….made up shit.
 
That’s stupid….all cities have higher rates of some crimes because of population density dufus. The big cities in BLUE STAES are less….because violent crimes are state crimes

Red states have higher crime rates than NYC alone , so your made up shit means nothing. Even with all your claims, Red states still have higher crime rates. Red states are more dangerous than NYC. You have no facts….made up shit.
/---/ Prove it or STFU.
 
It's bad if you are a fascist who wants to enslave the People.

On the other hand, if you love freedom from oppression, then it is excellent.
"Mob Rule" Is a Scare Story Created by Snob Rule


Only sheep need Good Shepherds to make all their political decisions for them. The Constitution gives absolute power to those who will fleece and butcher us. Electing one or the other of the pre-owned candidates is still giving up your right to self-determination to your favorite slick-talking used-country salesman. The 1% would lose its Constitutional absolute power if tyrannized by the White majority.

The ruling-class's Constitution even takes away our right to determine who else can vote, making its Popular Vote anti-populist. It also corrupts the minds of some Whites through its toxic educational system.

As for the Bill of Rights, it takes away our right to interpret it, so we are still dependent on a sheltered, contemptuous, and tiny
political class to tell us what it means and what interpretation we have to obey.
 
Last edited:
Well, we know you bozos are easier on crime. You have indicted confessed fraud and adjudge sexual abuser as your candidate. Who the fk does this shit except for a party soft on crime.,
A Republic Is a Foster Government

All this childish bickering and playground name-calling are the inevitable results of the fact that the rulers' Constitution turns us into dependent NPCs. Worms wriggling on the hook.
 
Now wait. The constitution was written in response to the tyrannical British who wanted to tax and extract wealth from the colonies. It banded together the colonies to fight the tyranny of foreign interference. It supports the formation of a federation of states not the dissolving of them.
The Founding Fodder Put the Crack in Philadelphia's Liberty Bell

It established an American House of Lords. Why let sheltered, ignorant, and bossy snobs make decisions for us when we can and should make those decisions ourselves?

It's childish to always be seeking father-figures. The states, too, are run by the same class of elected elitists, who self-select among their own exclusionist cliques.
 
The Founding Fodder Put the Crack in Philadelphia's Liberty Bell

It established an American House of Lords. Why let sheltered, ignorant, and bossy snobs make decisions for us when we can and should make those decisions ourselves?

It's childish to always be seeking father-figures. The states, too, are run by the same class of elected elitists, who self-select among their own exclusionist cliques.
Who were the founding fathers ? The educated who could read and write.
 
A Republic Is a Foster Government

All this childish bickering and playground name-calling are the inevitable results of the fact that the rulers' Constitution turns us into dependent NPCs. Worms wriggling on the hook.
Since when is it name calling, when calling a fraud, sexual abusers and indicted criminals, criminals. Only the gop rewards criminals with a nomination to the presidency, not once, but twice. He’s even more popular with republicans since he was imoeached and indicted. Nothing new for republicans. They reward criminality, some times with the head of their PACs, like the NRA, more often with adulation. They adore liars, cheaters and frauds….
Like Dorothy in the Wiz of oz, “ liars and cheaters and frauds, oh my”
 

Forum List

Back
Top