- Thread starter
- #81
As I do so enjoy pinning the tail on the Democrat donkey...the situation lends itself to a 'what if' analysis, especially since the answers one comes up with, tend to be predictive.
What if the government had decided that it was not in its interests nor purview to choose who should own homes....novel concept?
We could call it.....say, a 'free market.'
Because if this had been the case, there would not have been GSE's or CRA's....or mortgage meltdowns.
Or, at least none of this magnitude.
And if this analysis had import, we could decide that any pols who pursued the idea of government encouragement of home ownership were, in reality, merely trolling for votes.
See Andrew Tytler.
And send them to the stocks, forthwith.
What if the government had decided that it was not in its interests nor purview to choose who should own homes....novel concept?
We could call it.....say, a 'free market.'
Because if this had been the case, there would not have been GSE's or CRA's....or mortgage meltdowns.
Or, at least none of this magnitude.
And if this analysis had import, we could decide that any pols who pursued the idea of government encouragement of home ownership were, in reality, merely trolling for votes.
See Andrew Tytler.
And send them to the stocks, forthwith.