Who is Your Biggest Enemy? Hillary: 'Republicans'

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Who is Your Biggest Enemy? Hillary: 'Republicans'"

Demonstrated to be the truth on this forum daily.

 

[hadit]

Obama and Hillary have called us "the enemy" and they might have started it, but they're sure as fuck not going to like how it ends

And then they act all butthurt when they're in the minority and Republicans don't want to compromise with them.

 

[easyt65]

You're new here, and should not make assumptions.

It wasn't an assumption, it was a FACT. As already mentioned several times - with links - Liberals waster hundreds of man hours and millions of dollars going after Bush after they took over control of both the House and Senate...and facing coming up empty they charged and convicted Scooter Libby to justify their efforts! Yeah, Libby was worth every tax payer-funded dime of that Witch Hunt!

The fact is the Liberals came up with NOTHING for OUR money. As pointed out, enough evidence of criminal activity against Hillary is already more than was needed to convict Patraeus. Liberal condemnation of this investigation and calling it a 'witch hunt', in light of criminal activity already having been proven - unlike with the DNC's witch hunt, surpasses that old saying. The hypocrisy is so thick you could choke on it.

 

[mudwhistle]

During the debate Candidates were asked who their #1 enemy was.

Jim Webb said, "The enemy I’m most proud to have made was a VC who tried to kill me with a grenade."

Continuing to prove that Progressive Liberals have a serious problem with 'THREAT RECOGNITION', Hillary Clinton answered, "Republicans." Not long ago she referred to Republicans as 'terrorists'. In response, Governor Christie accurately and appropriately called her a 'disgrace'.

The problem with Liberals' have with 'Threat Recognition' is well documented:
- Barry's 'buddy' is no other than un-repentant DOMESTIC TERRORIST Bill Ayers, the terrorist who bombed his own country, killed cops, and declared he wishes he had perpetrated even MORE bombings.

- Barry applied pressure on Egypt to push up scheduled elections, giving the terrorist group the Muslim Brotherhood an advantage and helping them take over the government of our ally, Egypt.

- Barry armed 'Libyan Rebels' - Al Qaeida, the group that had been hiring Jihadists to go to Afghanistan and Iraq to kill American soldiers...THEN took the nation to war on his own (without Congressional approval to do so) to help them take over Libya

- Obama / Hillary hired an Al Qaeida-associated militia to protect the NOW DEAD Ambassador Stevens

- Obama declared the Ft. Hood terrorist attack NOT to be an act of terrorism but rather a case of 'workplace violence'

- Obama failed to prevent the Boston Marathon terrorist attack even though he had been warned in plenty of time to stop it

- Obama by-passed congress and violated the Constitution regarding Treaties in order to make a treasonous 'deal' with the largest exporter of terrorism in the world, Iran, who seeks to acquire nuclear weapons to destroy Israel and bomb the US. Knowing Congress would never approve the deal, much like he knew Congress would never authorize him to use our military to help Al Qaeida take over Libya, Obama by-passed Congress, taking the deal straight to the UN. When asked by Congress to release a report giving the number of American deaths Iran is responsible for, Obama refused because he knows the number would outrage Congress and Americans. Obama also cut this deal without even ASKING for the release of 4 Americans Iran is holding. (Hello 'Jimmy Carter terrorist scenario' all over again.) Kerry said they did not ask because they were 'afraid' the Iranians would walk away from the negotiating table. (Good lord, grow a pair!)

- 'The future must not be left to those who slander the prophet of Islam." - Barry O

So it should not be any surprise that this Progressive Liberal traitor (two steps ahead of the posse that intends to throw her in jail) would declare Republicans - not ISIS, Iran, Putin, or China - to be her #1 'enemy'!

*** There is a thread on this board that asks why 'compromise' is such a 'bad thing' for Republicans. Hillary proves, as Israel has learned the hard way, there is no such thing as compromise with someone who declares openly that you are their sworn enemy and who seeks your destruction! As was / is with Obama, if Hillary is elected President, there will be NO UNITY in this country due to a leader who wants nothing BUT division and the destruction of part of the nations' citizens!

As idiotic as it was.....it sounded good to her mind-numb sycophantic followers.

Republicans, I.E., average Americans, are a greater threat to Hillary than Russia, Iran, or ISIS.

 

[konradv]

Haven't Republicans earned the position over the last 20+ years? I can't remember a time when they haven't treated her like an enemy.

In answer to your question, 'No'. I guess the GOP is Hillary's enemy just as a policeman is a crook's enemy. The GOP did not force her to engage in all these scandals and criminal activity - she did that herself. The Government was created to have a system of checks and balances that is supposed to prevent and deal with her type of unethical, immoral, and criminal behavior, and it should be praised not attacked. Her, and Liberal, assertion that this - like her husband's affair and sexual harassment - is a 'right wing conspiracy' is like a criminal caught breaking and entering claiming it was a Police Officer conspiracy! "If they wouldn't have caught me, if they would have just turned the other way....this is all THEIR fault." Liberals have NO F*ING CLUE what 'personal accountability' means. In THEIR dictionary it means ' BLAME SOMEONE ELSE. ** See 'Obama' / 'Hillary'."

I think you've just proved my point, thank you.

 

[Eaglewings]

Benghazi and emails are stupid, manufactured reasons fed to the rubes who don't know how to solve the problems our country is facing.

The reasons to oppose Clinton are policy reasons.

Thanks for Providing this look into the Liberal Mindset:
"The fact that Hillary / Obama hired Al Qaeida to protect a US Ambassador, ignored threats and calls for Stevens Assassination, modified the CIA document identifying the attack as terrorism 13 times to set up a LIE to the American people, violating both rules and laws, perjury, and continued cover-up (ONLY if perpetrated by a Liberal) is just B$, nothing of consequence..

The fact that she has repeatedly been caught in scandal after scandal, lie after lie, and law violation after law violation her entire career, that she puts her own career as a higher priority than to Americans she allowed to die then lied about to protect herself is no reason to oppose her for President."

Haaa Haaa, but you Fail to mention the Facts about Bush and 9/11 ~

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

Bush Received More Warnings About 9/11 Than We Realized - Business Insider

Bush Warned of Hijackings Before 9-11






~

 

[g5000]

What matters about Clinton is what she would do to the tax structure.

What matters about Clinton is who she would place on the Supreme Court.

What matters about Clinton is what she would do about Putin and ISIS and Iraq and Afghanistan and the Euro crisis and Yemen.

What matters about Clinton is what monetary policy she would attempt to implement.

What matters about Clinton is what "government safety net" programs she would implement.

What matters about Clinton is what business regulatory structure she would implement.


While the dumbass retard partisan hacks would be working themselves into a tizzy over how many times she didn't say "God" in her Christmas message, Clinton will be taking advantage of their idiocy to push through legislation which the morons will never read and will only know what they are told through their piss pouring media masters.

That's how Obama got Dodd-Frank; ObamaCare; the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act; and the START Treaty through.

 

[Jarhead]

The tards have spent millions, if not billions, of manhours foaming at the mouth over Benghazi and emails, and about six minutes on substantive policy issues.

1) She falsely claimed the attack was due to a US citizen applying his first amendment rights.
2) She claimed to NOT be aware that the ambassador in the most volatile country located in the most volatile part of the world had asked for extra security...and claimed to not be aware that it was denied.
3) She claimed to have offered all emails to the committee which has since been found to be untrue.

And you feel it is a waste of time?

Bet you would think otherwise if it were Condoleezza Rice.

 

[mudwhistle]

Benghazi and emails are stupid, manufactured reasons fed to the rubes who don't know how to solve the problems our country is facing.

The reasons to oppose Clinton are policy reasons.

Thanks for Providing this look into the Liberal Mindset:
"The fact that Hillary / Obama hired Al Qaeida to protect a US Ambassador, ignored threats and calls for Stevens Assassination, modified the CIA document identifying the attack as terrorism 13 times to set up a LIE to the American people, violating both rules and laws, perjury, and continued cover-up (ONLY if perpetrated by a Liberal) is just B$, nothing of consequence..

The fact that she has repeatedly been caught in scandal after scandal, lie after lie, and law violation after law violation her entire career, that she puts her own career as a higher priority than to Americans she allowed to die then lied about to protect herself is no reason to oppose her for President."

Haaa Haaa, but you Fail to mention the Facts about Bush and 9/11 ~

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html

The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

Bush Received More Warnings About 9/11 Than We Realized - Business Insider

Bush Warned of Hijackings Before 9-11






~

After Bill Clinton was convicted of perjury.....
I think it was wise to take what he said with a grain of salt.

 

[Jarhead]

What matters about Clinton is what she would do to the tax structure.

What matters about Clinton is who she would place on the Supreme Court.

What matters about Clinton is what she would do about Putin and ISIS and Iraq and Afghanistan and the Euro crisis and Yemen.

What matters about Clinton is what monetary policy she would attempt to implement.

What matters about Clinton is what "government safety net" programs she would implement.

What matters about Clinton is what business regulatory structure she would implement.


While the dumbass retard partisan hacks would be working themselves into a tizzy over how many times she didn't say "God" in her Christmas message, Clinton will be taking advantage of their idiocy to push through legislation which the morons will never read and will only know what they are told through their piss pouring media masters.

That's how Obama got Dodd-Frank, ObamaCare, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act, and the START Treaty through.

true to all of them.

But what FIRST matters is the integrity of a candidate for the Presidency.

 

[g5000]

The tards have spent millions, if not billions, of manhours foaming at the mouth over Benghazi and emails, and about six minutes on substantive policy issues.

1) She falsely claimed the attack was due to a US citizen applying his first amendment rights.
2) She claimed to NOT be aware that the ambassador in the most volatile country located in the most volatile part of the world had asked for extra security...and claimed to not be aware that it was denied.
3) She claimed to have offered all emails to the committee which has since been found to be untrue.

And you feel it is a waste of time?

Bet you would think otherwise if it were Condoleezza Rice.

See?

You idiots are stuck in a rut.

 

[g5000]

What matters about Clinton is what she would do to the tax structure.

What matters about Clinton is who she would place on the Supreme Court.

What matters about Clinton is what she would do about Putin and ISIS and Iraq and Afghanistan and the Euro crisis and Yemen.

What matters about Clinton is what monetary policy she would attempt to implement.

What matters about Clinton is what "government safety net" programs she would implement.

What matters about Clinton is what business regulatory structure she would implement.


While the dumbass retard partisan hacks would be working themselves into a tizzy over how many times she didn't say "God" in her Christmas message, Clinton will be taking advantage of their idiocy to push through legislation which the morons will never read and will only know what they are told through their piss pouring media masters.

That's how Obama got Dodd-Frank, ObamaCare, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act, and the START Treaty through.

true to all of them.

But what FIRST matters is the integrity of a candidate for the Presidency.

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

The Republican Party tossed their integrity out the window AGES ago. Christ Almighty, I have been screaming about that for years. It's one of the chief reasons I stopped voting in 2006.

The right wing media lies on a daily basis.

Benghazi? How about that "stand down order" the right wing made up?

"Integrity." What a joke.

 

[Eaglewings]

There are right reasons and there are wrong reasons to oppose Clinton. Unfortunately, most of the Gnu Right couldn't provide any right reasons that extend beyond a bumper sticker.

Benghazi!

Gesundheit.

Hillary's incompetence was the direct cause of the death of 4 americans. Then she lied about what caused it, blaming a video that less than 20 people worldwide had seen. She continues that lie today even after it has been proven to be a lie.

Then she violated federal security laws by using a personal server for classified data. That server was hacked and that classified data is now in the hands or russia, china, and who knows who else. The FBI does not investigate unless there is good evidence that a crime has been committed. This is not going away as much as you libs and the pandering media would like it to.

Why don't we see Bush in jail for the direct cause of killing over a thousand Americans on the US soil. He ran for a 2nd term and won..I bet you were defending Bush Redfish...haaa

Selective memory..

 

[mudwhistle]

What matters about Clinton is what she would do to the tax structure.

What matters about Clinton is who she would place on the Supreme Court.

What matters about Clinton is what she would do about Putin and ISIS and Iraq and Afghanistan and the Euro crisis and Yemen.

What matters about Clinton is what monetary policy she would attempt to implement.

What matters about Clinton is what "government safety net" programs she would implement.

What matters about Clinton is what business regulatory structure she would implement.


While the dumbass retard partisan hacks would be working themselves into a tizzy over how many times she didn't say "God" in her Christmas message, Clinton will be taking advantage of their idiocy to push through legislation which the morons will never read and will only know what they are told through their piss pouring media masters.

That's how Obama got Dodd-Frank; ObamaCare; the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act; and the START Treaty through.

Explain how they were supposed to prevent legislation other than prevent it by voting against it? It was bad....but criminal?

Not hardly.

 

[g5000]

Someday you rubes might actually figure out your right wing piss pourers have not the slightest interest in the truth. Just power and ad money. That's it.

 

[mudwhistle]

What matters about Clinton is what she would do to the tax structure.

What matters about Clinton is who she would place on the Supreme Court.

What matters about Clinton is what she would do about Putin and ISIS and Iraq and Afghanistan and the Euro crisis and Yemen.

What matters about Clinton is what monetary policy she would attempt to implement.

What matters about Clinton is what "government safety net" programs she would implement.

What matters about Clinton is what business regulatory structure she would implement.


While the dumbass retard partisan hacks would be working themselves into a tizzy over how many times she didn't say "God" in her Christmas message, Clinton will be taking advantage of their idiocy to push through legislation which the morons will never read and will only know what they are told through their piss pouring media masters.

That's how Obama got Dodd-Frank, ObamaCare, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act, and the START Treaty through.

true to all of them.

But what FIRST matters is the integrity of a candidate for the Presidency.

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

The Republican Party tossed their integrity out the window AGES ago. Christ Almighty, I have been screaming about that for years. It's one of the chief reasons I stopped voting in 2006.

And one of the chief reasons Democrats got into power.....so they could damage this country irreparably.

 

[mudwhistle]

Someday you rubes might actually figure out your right wing piss pourers have not the slightest interest in the truth. Just power and ad money. That's it.

Okay...point taken......now piss off.

 

[g5000]

What matters about Clinton is what she would do to the tax structure.

What matters about Clinton is who she would place on the Supreme Court.

What matters about Clinton is what she would do about Putin and ISIS and Iraq and Afghanistan and the Euro crisis and Yemen.

What matters about Clinton is what monetary policy she would attempt to implement.

What matters about Clinton is what "government safety net" programs she would implement.

What matters about Clinton is what business regulatory structure she would implement.


While the dumbass retard partisan hacks would be working themselves into a tizzy over how many times she didn't say "God" in her Christmas message, Clinton will be taking advantage of their idiocy to push through legislation which the morons will never read and will only know what they are told through their piss pouring media masters.

That's how Obama got Dodd-Frank; ObamaCare; the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act; the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act; and the START Treaty through.

Explain how they were supposed to prevent legislation other than prevent it by voting against it? It was bad....but criminal?

Not hardly.

You defeat bad legislation by READING it, and giving sound reasons why it is bad legislation.

You DON'T manufacture BULLSHIT about it. When you LIE, and your LIE is exposed, then you shot yourself in the head.

Example? "Death panels".

I bet 99.9999 percent of the rubes on this forum have never even read the ACA. They just parrot whatever manufactured bullshit they are told to regurgitate.

 

[konradv]

GOP congressman says Benghazi panel meant to hurt Clinton - CNNPolitics.com

 

[Jarhead]

The tards have spent millions, if not billions, of manhours foaming at the mouth over Benghazi and emails, and about six minutes on substantive policy issues.

1) She falsely claimed the attack was due to a US citizen applying his first amendment rights.
2) She claimed to NOT be aware that the ambassador in the most volatile country located in the most volatile part of the world had asked for extra security...and claimed to not be aware that it was denied.
3) She claimed to have offered all emails to the committee which has since been found to be untrue.

And you feel it is a waste of time?

Bet you would think otherwise if it were Condoleezza Rice.

See?

You idiots are stuck in a rut.

OK.

Id rather have an idiot tell me I am stuck in a rut than believe a politician who says to me "I know how it looks....just trust me"

Hey genius...you ever question the following....

Why did an independent analyst have to tell the State Department that it is not a good idea to have a lower level employee make a unilateral decision as to whether or not to offer more security to an embassy, when requested by the ambassador, in the most volatile region in the world?

I mean...did you hear what Hillary said? (paraphrased)....We made mistakes and the independent analysts gave us ideas to make things better and we are implmenting them.

Really? She needed someone to tell her that?