Who Is Standing With Their Oppressor?

[WTF19]

Trump had 81 million Americans say they did not want him as President.
More votes against than any President in history

so your faulty dominion voting machines say, after they alter the AMERICANs actual vote. you still are a moron

 

[WTF19]

1.While the Democrats claim the election victory, even they know it was done with theft via smoke and mirrors.

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

Thanks PC ... a good belly laugh first thing Monday morning ...

thats the problem with idiots of the demonRATs...you cant/arent allowed to see the TRUTH...you idiots are sad excuses for trying to be AMERICAN...you asswipe commies...go say hail to your pedophile and home wrecking whore

 

[rightwinger]

Trump had 81 million Americans say they did not want him as President.
More votes against than any President in history

so your faulty dominion voting machines say, after they alter the AMERICANs actual vote. you still are a moron

Wrong again Skippy

When threatened with lawsuits, both FOX and Newsmax admitted there is no basis for the claim Dominion alters any votes.

You lose

 

[WTF19]

Trump had 81 million Americans say they did not want him as President.
More votes against than any President in history

so your faulty dominion voting machines say, after they alter the AMERICANs actual vote. you still are a moron

Wrong again Skippy

When threatened with lawsuits, both FOX and Newsmax admitted there is no basis for the claim Dominion alters any votes.

You lose

sorry skippy...they even admitted it wasnt 100%...so there you go again lying, deflecting and denying...skippy

 

[PoliticalChic]

Democrats/Leftists biting their nails over the shift by minority voters away from the Left’s lies.



6. “.. it is easy to see a realignment of working-class voters, regardless of race, toward the party that expresses an interest in their economic concerns. The Democratic Party has become the party of college-educated professionals, focused on forgiving student debt and a “transition” from uncouth industries, ensuring the unfettered flow of unskilled immigrant workers, and framing education policy around the interests of teachers rather than students.

Yes, they will raise taxes, but they will fight tooth-and-nail for the “SALT” deduction that gives a discount to owners of expensive homes in high-tax states. They will expand government programs, but their idea of “pro-family” policy is free childcare so both parents can work full-time. What they’d really like to talk to you about, if you have a minute, is climate change and racial justice.”

The Birth of a Multi-Ethnic, Working-Class Conservatism - American Compass

American Compass's Oren Cass argues that the future of conservatism lies in a multi-ethnic, working-class coalition.

americancompass.org

Seems more than impossible to accept the NYTimes explanation that minorities are allying with their ‘oppressors.’

It more like their saviors.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. “…Donald Trump has clearly changed the equation.

…as the Roosevelt Institute’s Mike Konczal observed in a 2016 essay, “Trump is Actually Full of Policy.” In politics, policy is as much a matter of defining problems as offering concrete solutions; voters want to know who is focused on the issues in their lives. And there, Trump has spoken to workers in a way that other candidates in either party have not.


On the campaign trail, Trump emphasized people’s jobs, the importance of industries like manufacturing and professions like the trades, and the value people placed on their own places—the towns where they lived, and their roles as productive contributors to their communities.


The problem was not a tax rate that discouraged investors from creating jobs, it was that investors preferred creating jobs in China. His “plan” was not to get everyone a college degree, or retrain them in some exciting new field, or help them move somewhere with greater opportunity, it was to make those things unnecessary.” The birth of a multi-ethnic, working-class conservatism


Trump was a sea change in American politics.....and the Leftists trembled.

They spent four years fighting the man who stood for America.

 

[HappyJoy]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Why?

To preserve your esteemed reputation.

Preserve same from what?

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

That seems to be your problem, not mine.

You didn't link to the poll, you linked to a wingnut web page and if you're debating people of different political persuasions then maybe to prove a point you don't post rabid wingnut sources. It's debate 101.

You seem to think a link to just anything on the internet is a valid source if you say so. Doesn't work that way. Now, I suspect the pollster (actually I know) is also a right wing hack outlet but I'd like to see their crosstabs and review the poll but I can't find it which means you don't have a clue where it is or what it really states, do you? You're assuming your link has all the information, it doesn't.

So, stop being a fraud and just post a link to the survey or admit you can't back up what you think it's findings are.

EDIT: I generally tend to stay out of any thread you start because you are extremely dishonest. You don't debate points people make you simply reinvent what you are replying to and then runaway by posting a wall of shit from dubious sources that have little to do with the topic. I'm only here for the poll that you are unable to provide.

Aw, looks like she ran away.

When she posts a shitty source or her source is incomplete or she is incapable of defending it she pretends it didn't happen.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Why?

To preserve your esteemed reputation.

Preserve same from what?

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

That seems to be your problem, not mine.

You didn't link to the poll, you linked to a wingnut web page and if you're debating people of different political persuasions then maybe to prove a point you don't post rabid wingnut sources. It's debate 101.

You seem to think a link to just anything on the internet is a valid source if you say so. Doesn't work that way. Now, I suspect the pollster (actually I know) is also a right wing hack outlet but I'd like to see their crosstabs and review the poll but I can't find it which means you don't have a clue where it is or what it really states, do you? You're assuming your link has all the information, it doesn't.

So, stop being a fraud and just post a link to the survey or admit you can't back up what you think it's findings are.

EDIT: I generally tend to stay out of any thread you start because you are extremely dishonest. You don't debate points people make you simply reinvent what you are replying to and then runaway by posting a wall of shit from dubious sources that have little to do with the topic. I'm only here for the poll that you are unable to provide.

Aw, looks like she ran away.

When she posts a shitty source or her source is incomplete or she is incapable of defending it she pretends it didn't happen.

Run from what???


I proved the thesis, and your sort proved that there aren't any Biden policies you could vote for, or even defend.



And.....try to post sans the vulgarity that identifies you as trash.

 

[HappyJoy]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Why?

To preserve your esteemed reputation.

Preserve same from what?

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

That seems to be your problem, not mine.

You didn't link to the poll, you linked to a wingnut web page and if you're debating people of different political persuasions then maybe to prove a point you don't post rabid wingnut sources. It's debate 101.

You seem to think a link to just anything on the internet is a valid source if you say so. Doesn't work that way. Now, I suspect the pollster (actually I know) is also a right wing hack outlet but I'd like to see their crosstabs and review the poll but I can't find it which means you don't have a clue where it is or what it really states, do you? You're assuming your link has all the information, it doesn't.

So, stop being a fraud and just post a link to the survey or admit you can't back up what you think it's findings are.

EDIT: I generally tend to stay out of any thread you start because you are extremely dishonest. You don't debate points people make you simply reinvent what you are replying to and then runaway by posting a wall of shit from dubious sources that have little to do with the topic. I'm only here for the poll that you are unable to provide.

Aw, looks like she ran away.

When she posts a shitty source or her source is incomplete or she is incapable of defending it she pretends it didn't happen.

Run from what???


I proved the thesis, and your sort proved that there aren't any Biden policies you could vote for, or even defend.



And.....try to post sans the vulgarity that identifies you as trash.

Nope, as per usual you posted from a far right source vaguely showing some poll results but the article doesn't link to the poll so we have no way of knowing whether it's scientific or not, whether it was actually ever conducted.

Where is the poll, dummy? You used it as proof of something but you can't even find it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Why?

To preserve your esteemed reputation.

Preserve same from what?

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

That seems to be your problem, not mine.

You didn't link to the poll, you linked to a wingnut web page and if you're debating people of different political persuasions then maybe to prove a point you don't post rabid wingnut sources. It's debate 101.

You seem to think a link to just anything on the internet is a valid source if you say so. Doesn't work that way. Now, I suspect the pollster (actually I know) is also a right wing hack outlet but I'd like to see their crosstabs and review the poll but I can't find it which means you don't have a clue where it is or what it really states, do you? You're assuming your link has all the information, it doesn't.

So, stop being a fraud and just post a link to the survey or admit you can't back up what you think it's findings are.

EDIT: I generally tend to stay out of any thread you start because you are extremely dishonest. You don't debate points people make you simply reinvent what you are replying to and then runaway by posting a wall of shit from dubious sources that have little to do with the topic. I'm only here for the poll that you are unable to provide.

Aw, looks like she ran away.

When she posts a shitty source or her source is incomplete or she is incapable of defending it she pretends it didn't happen.

Run from what???


I proved the thesis, and your sort proved that there aren't any Biden policies you could vote for, or even defend.



And.....try to post sans the vulgarity that identifies you as trash.

Nope, as per usual you posted from a far right source vaguely showing some poll results but the article doesn't link to the poll so we have no way of knowing whether it's scientific or not, whether it was actually ever conducted.

Where is the poll, dummy? You used it as proof of something but you can't even find it.

"... you posted from a far right source..."


There is no Far Right.....only a Far Left.

Let's have you prove it:

As documented in a number of threads, there is no Far Right in America, but certainly is a Far Left, radicals who have taken over one of the parties….the Democrats. A reminder: To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center. American traditions, values, and history represent that center. The Right, represented by the Republican Party, has no radial positions not consistent with America’s heritage…..but the Democrats sure do!

Subservient to the master they serve, that fire and brimstone guy, the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Talk about “Far”!!!!



If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Bet you can't.

 

[HappyJoy]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Why?

To preserve your esteemed reputation.

Preserve same from what?

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

That seems to be your problem, not mine.

You didn't link to the poll, you linked to a wingnut web page and if you're debating people of different political persuasions then maybe to prove a point you don't post rabid wingnut sources. It's debate 101.

You seem to think a link to just anything on the internet is a valid source if you say so. Doesn't work that way. Now, I suspect the pollster (actually I know) is also a right wing hack outlet but I'd like to see their crosstabs and review the poll but I can't find it which means you don't have a clue where it is or what it really states, do you? You're assuming your link has all the information, it doesn't.

So, stop being a fraud and just post a link to the survey or admit you can't back up what you think it's findings are.

EDIT: I generally tend to stay out of any thread you start because you are extremely dishonest. You don't debate points people make you simply reinvent what you are replying to and then runaway by posting a wall of shit from dubious sources that have little to do with the topic. I'm only here for the poll that you are unable to provide.

Aw, looks like she ran away.

When she posts a shitty source or her source is incomplete or she is incapable of defending it she pretends it didn't happen.

Run from what???


I proved the thesis, and your sort proved that there aren't any Biden policies you could vote for, or even defend.



And.....try to post sans the vulgarity that identifies you as trash.

Nope, as per usual you posted from a far right source vaguely showing some poll results but the article doesn't link to the poll so we have no way of knowing whether it's scientific or not, whether it was actually ever conducted.

Where is the poll, dummy? You used it as proof of something but you can't even find it.

"... you posted from a far right source..."


There is no Far Right.....only a Far Left.

More crap. Do you have the poll you relied on to demonstrate "illegals" vote or not? You depended on it to prove something and now you don't have it so as per usual you're trying to change the subject.

What a piece of shit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections
Hans von Spakovsky, Daily signal—Heritage Foundation, 6/2/15

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

A poll by John McLaughlin confirms again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country. Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law. The only reason she was caught is because she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview that she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Why?

To preserve your esteemed reputation.

Preserve same from what?

Everything I post is linked, sourced and documented.

That seems to be your problem, not mine.

You didn't link to the poll, you linked to a wingnut web page and if you're debating people of different political persuasions then maybe to prove a point you don't post rabid wingnut sources. It's debate 101.

You seem to think a link to just anything on the internet is a valid source if you say so. Doesn't work that way. Now, I suspect the pollster (actually I know) is also a right wing hack outlet but I'd like to see their crosstabs and review the poll but I can't find it which means you don't have a clue where it is or what it really states, do you? You're assuming your link has all the information, it doesn't.

So, stop being a fraud and just post a link to the survey or admit you can't back up what you think it's findings are.

EDIT: I generally tend to stay out of any thread you start because you are extremely dishonest. You don't debate points people make you simply reinvent what you are replying to and then runaway by posting a wall of shit from dubious sources that have little to do with the topic. I'm only here for the poll that you are unable to provide.

Aw, looks like she ran away.

When she posts a shitty source or her source is incomplete or she is incapable of defending it she pretends it didn't happen.

Run from what???


I proved the thesis, and your sort proved that there aren't any Biden policies you could vote for, or even defend.



And.....try to post sans the vulgarity that identifies you as trash.

Nope, as per usual you posted from a far right source vaguely showing some poll results but the article doesn't link to the poll so we have no way of knowing whether it's scientific or not, whether it was actually ever conducted.

Where is the poll, dummy? You used it as proof of something but you can't even find it.

"... you posted from a far right source..."


There is no Far Right.....only a Far Left.

More crap. Do you have the poll you relied on to demonstrate "illegals" vote or not? You depended on it to prove something and now you don't have it so as per usual you're trying to change the subject.

What a piece of shit.

Being neither articulate nor informed, yet desirous of making a forceful presentation, the lesser poster resorts to vulgarity.


Raise your paw.

 

[HappyJoy]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections
Hans von Spakovsky, Daily signal—Heritage Foundation, 6/2/15

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

A poll by John McLaughlin confirms again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country. Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law. The only reason she was caught is because she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview that she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

Hey, idiot. I already told you the link to your sham poll is broken. Don't you bother to check your sources or the fact that they are all wingnutty and full of shit is all you need?

Where is the poll?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections
Hans von Spakovsky, Daily signal—Heritage Foundation, 6/2/15

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

A poll by John McLaughlin confirms again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country. Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law. The only reason she was caught is because she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview that she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

Hey, idiot. I already told you the link to your sham poll is broken. Don't you bother to check your sources or the fact that they are all wingnutty and full of shit is all you need?

Where is the poll?

I have a gift for making dopes leap to vulgarity.

It’s one of the hoops I make Liberals jump through.

Shall I make you roll over and play dead?

 

[HappyJoy]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections
Hans von Spakovsky, Daily signal—Heritage Foundation, 6/2/15

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

A poll by John McLaughlin confirms again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country. Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law. The only reason she was caught is because she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview that she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

Hey, idiot. I already told you the link to your sham poll is broken. Don't you bother to check your sources or the fact that they are all wingnutty and full of shit is all you need?

Where is the poll?

I have a gift for making dopes leap to vulgarity.

It’s one of the hoops I make Liberals jump through.

Shall I make you roll over and play dead?

This is what you do. You attempted to make a point with a post, I questioned the source, specifically missing the polling data that you claim proves "illegals" vote but the poll info isn't there. It could be entirely made up for all we know. You can't find the poll but you're depending on it as a source.

No wonder people use vulgarities when describing you, shall we get the fainting couch for you?

Where is the poll? Don't have it, I win.

 

[2aguy]

Minority voters are. So saith the Democrat apologists. What do totalitarians do when they find their grip on the formerly reliable, slipping?

Exit polls struck fear into the Leftists.



1.While the Democrats claim the election victory, even they know it was done with theft via smoke and mirrors. Trump provably won the actual vote, accruing some 12 million more votes than he did in 2016, even after the Dominion machines co-opted many of his votes.

Trump63.0 million 2016

Trump74.0 million 2020

Trump+11.1 million
Even in Defeat, Trump Found New Voters Across the U.S.

74,223,744 votes https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2020/dec/08/us-election-results-2020-joe-biden-defeats-donald-trump-to-win-presidency


But the minority vote is what left the Left gasping:
He got 12% of the black vote, and 32% of Hispanic.
24% of the Jewish vote in ’16, and that jumped to 30%.

“…less anticipated was the level of support Trump received from Muslim voters, a third of whom backed him, according to the AP VoteCast survey.” A third of Muslim voters backed Trump. Why? | Spectator USA




2. “Writing in the New York Times, columnist Charles Blow declares himself “stunned” by the “personally devastating” news that exit polls (all disclaimers apply) show minority groups continuing their rightward trend of recent years.”

The Birth of a Multi-Ethnic, Working-Class Conservatism - American Compass

American Compass's Oren Cass argues that the future of conservatism lies in a multi-ethnic, working-class coalition.

americancompass.org

Uh, oh!



3. Now, how does this Far Left publication and columnist explain this? “In what must surely be among the most noxious claims printed in recent years by The New York Times, he concludes that, “All of this to me points to the power of the white patriarchy and the coattail it has of those who depend on it or aspire to it. … Some people who have historically been oppressed will stand with the oppressors, and will aspire to power by proximity.

Blow’s gross accusation follows “analyses” from several other writers blinded by staring incessantly through the same racial lens. Nikole Hannah-Jones of 1619-Project fame solves her conundrum by deciding that some minorities who support President Trump actually are white, while The Root’s Michael Harriot explains that such support is how they become white. Washington Post reporter Eugene Scott says they “support white supremacy” and his colleague Karen Attiah describes them as “going along to get along” with white supremacists as a “survival strategy.” A befuddled Paul Krugman, perhaps looking backward through his binoculars, declares that he has “no idea what the true lessons are.”
Op. Cit.



Perhaps you’ve noticed what I have, that rather than be pleased as punch at the supposed electoral victory, Leftist posters seem angrier than ever!
Perhaps the above is the explanation…..something they had never anticipated: a great big worm in their shiny apple. It may not be their thousand year Reich.

Yep........leftists are more dangerous as the get more power.......their mass graves don't get filled on their own......

 

[2aguy]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections
Hans von Spakovsky, Daily signal—Heritage Foundation, 6/2/15

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

A poll by John McLaughlin confirms again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country. Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law. The only reason she was caught is because she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview that she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

Hey, idiot. I already told you the link to your sham poll is broken. Don't you bother to check your sources or the fact that they are all wingnutty and full of shit is all you need?

Where is the poll?

I have a gift for making dopes leap to vulgarity.

It’s one of the hoops I make Liberals jump through.

Shall I make you roll over and play dead?

I have to amend a previous post.....

You don't stir the "S**t."

You tell the truth and the S**t heads come out of the wood work....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections
Hans von Spakovsky, Daily signal—Heritage Foundation, 6/2/15

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

A poll by John McLaughlin confirms again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country. Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law. The only reason she was caught is because she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview that she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

Hey, idiot. I already told you the link to your sham poll is broken. Don't you bother to check your sources or the fact that they are all wingnutty and full of shit is all you need?

Where is the poll?

I have a gift for making dopes leap to vulgarity.

It’s one of the hoops I make Liberals jump through.

Shall I make you roll over and play dead?

This is what you do. You attempted to make a point with a post, I questioned the source, specifically missing the polling data that you claim proves "illegals" vote but the poll info isn't there. It could be entirely made up for all we know. You can't find the poll but you're depending on it as a source.

No wonder people use vulgarities when describing you, shall we get the fainting couch for you?

Where is the poll? Don't have it, I win.

Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections
Hans von Spakovsky, Daily signal—Heritage Foundation, 6/2/15

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

A poll by John McLaughlin confirms again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country. Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law. The only reason she was caught is because she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview that she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Everything I post is 100% true, accurate and correct.

Like the 3-5 million illegal votes you claimed were cast in California in 2016.

Four years later and not any of them have been found. And you would think that with 3 million illegal votes at least a dozen would be provable.

"Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote
Thanks to a new poll, we now know that approximately 13% of illegal aliens vote. Since they are already criminals, stealing ID’s or using phony ID’s. lie to get welfare, steal jobs—why not vote as they to lose. Since they can not be deported or jailed, they have nothing to lose. Obama is protecting these law breakers. "
Poll: 13% of Illegal Aliens ADMIT They Vote - California Political Review

Maybe post a link directly to the poll.

Poll Shows Noncitizens Can Shape Elections
Hans von Spakovsky, Daily signal—Heritage Foundation, 6/2/15

Hans von Spakovsky is an authority on a wide range of issues—including civil rights, civil justice, the First Amendment, immigration, the rule of law and government reform—as a senior legal fellow in The Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies and manager of the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. Read his research.

A poll by John McLaughlin confirms again we may have a significant problem with noncitizens participating illegally in our elections. Based on a sample survey of 800 Hispanics in 2013, McLaughlin found that of foreign-born respondents who were registered voters, 13 percent admitted they were not United States citizens.

In our 2012 book on voter fraud, John Fund and I noted numerous cases of noncitizen registration and voting all over the country. Only a month ago, the Board of Immigration Appeals of the Executive Office for Immigration Review at the Justice Department held that a Peruvian citizen who illegally registered and voted in the 2006 congressional election could be deported for violating federal law. The only reason she was caught is because she applied for naturalization in 2007 and admitted in the INS interview that she had voted in an American election.

In 2014, a study released by three professors at Old Dominion University and George Mason University, based on survey data from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study, estimated 6.4 percent of noncitizens voted illegally in the 2008 presidential election and 2.2 percent voted in the 2010 midterm congressional elections.

Since 80 percent of noncitizens vote Democratic, according to the study, noncitizen participation could have “been large enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College votes [in North Carolina in 2008], and Congressional elections” such as the 2008 race in Minnesota in which Al Franken was elected to the U.S. Senate, giving “Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote” to pass Obamacare. The Old Dominion/George Mason study was sharply attacked by progressive critics, but the mounting evidence makes clear this is a real problem.

Hey, idiot. I already told you the link to your sham poll is broken. Don't you bother to check your sources or the fact that they are all wingnutty and full of shit is all you need?

Where is the poll?

I have a gift for making dopes leap to vulgarity.

It’s one of the hoops I make Liberals jump through.

Shall I make you roll over and play dead?

This is what you do. You attempted to make a point with a post, I questioned the source, specifically missing the polling data that you claim proves "illegals" vote but the poll info isn't there. It could be entirely made up for all we know. You can't find the poll but you're depending on it as a source.

No wonder people use vulgarities when describing you, shall we get the fainting couch for you?

Where is the poll? Don't have it, I win.

So you're ready to admit that there is no Far Right?

Only a Far Left, for which you serve as a pawn?

Excellent.