Shogun
Free: Mudholes Stomped
- Jan 8, 2007
- 30,530
- 2,266
- 1,045
You are a retard, but we already knew that.
and you are a nutty cultist.. but we already knew that too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are a retard, but we already knew that.
I know the words quite well my friend and once again I have to tell you because youre head is so clouded with stem cell research and cloning that you seem to forget.
I AM NOT A RELIGIOUS PERSON!!!!!
Was John Lennon... he was wrong about that one, though. There ARE things worth killing/dying over.
What does "faith in the Big Bang" mean? I ask because I have never met one of these people, unless you are talking about those who have a faith-based paradigm that they can't imagine others don't share--but they don't believe in the Big Bang anyway; faith-based or otherwise.
Was John Lennon... he was wrong about that one, though. There ARE things worth killing/dying over.
oh I know.. suicide bombers and zionists agree on that one thing, at least!
You've never met people who believe that the Big Bang actually happened? I have.
Some of them just hadn't thought of it that deeply. They seemed to be operating under a "Science sez it, so it must be so," assumption. I was like that as a kid. Dad told be about the Big Bang and I was all like "wow," and just sort of believed it by default for many years.
Others seemed to cling to it as part of their rejection of their family's faith. They saw it as the alternative to whatever story they were told growing up, so they embraced it with all the faith they felt they were supposed to have for the religious story, a sort of rebelous sacralige.
Some were just adamant about it, and considered those who weren't to be ignorant, throwbacks to a primitive and superstitious time. For them, science was the truth, the light, and the way, and they felt a condescending pity for those who refused to accept it.
All of them had made a leap of faith.
I mean, do you really believe, based on our instrument readings many eons after the fact, that
Billions of years ago, all the matter in the universe was compressed into one tiny ball, which then exploded forth...
?
I thought you supported the death penalty?
Originally posted by jillian
Was John Lennon... he was wrong about that one, though. There ARE things worth killing/dying over.
you're right shogie baby... it wasn't worth killing nazis. nope... shoulda let them finish the job, right? then you wouldn't have had to worry about it too much.
ijit.
i do.
apparently, your sarcasm button is turned off. Imagine using john lennon quotes at someone whose avatar doesn't match his message. It's easy if you try.
Is my allusion to suicide bombers and zionists really that evasive?
is that truly ANY nuttier than a jewish ghost snapping his fingers seven times?
You've never met people who believe that the Big Bang actually happened? I have.
Some of them just hadn't thought of it that deeply. They seemed to be operating under a "Science sez it, so it must be so," assumption. I was like that as a kid. Dad told be about the Big Bang and I was all like "wow," and just sort of believed it by default for many years.
Others seemed to cling to it as part of their rejection of their family's faith. They saw it as the alternative to whatever story they were told growing up, so they embraced it with all the faith they felt they were supposed to have for the religious story, a sort of rebelous sacralige.
Some were just adamant about it, and considered those who weren't to be ignorant, throwbacks to a primitive and superstitious time.
For them, science was the truth, the light, and the way, and they felt a condescending pity for those who refused to accept it.
All of them had made a leap of faith.
I mean, do you really believe, based on our instrument readings many eons after the fact, that
Billions of years ago, all the matter in the universe was compressed into one tiny ball, which then exploded forth...
?
No, I don't think it is.
But saying, "hey, it's not as crazy as X," doesn't make it sound any more true to me.
I have, but their believing the Big Bang actually happened as the result of the evidence not faith, so I don't get your religion thrust.
You seem to percive "science" to be some keebleresque elf in a lab coat with a golden frisbee floating over his head, making "scientific" proclamations that others must believe--just the way religion works.
I have a news bulletin for you fellah: Your witch-doctor paradigm DOES NOT apply.
IThe evidence apprears to indicate something pretty much like that.
Do you believe that an all powerful, all knowing, invisible white father, who lives in the sky, (and is bad with money) created the universe in six days, out of nothing, a few thousand years ago, and made it appear to have begun billions of years ago from some manner of singularity?
yet THIS is where the PHYSICAL EVIDENCE comes into play. I don't validate the bang because genesis is nutty as hell but, rather, BECAUSE OF THE EVIDENCE.
There is nowhere near enough evidence to make believing the Big Bang not require faith.
It doesn't require as much faith as say, believing that the universe was constructed by magical dwarves that spontenously popped into existence one day, but it certainly does take a leap of faith.
You speak almost as though the Big Bang has been proven.
It has not been.
Believing it takes faith.
That is not how I percieve it. That is how I have seen others treat it.
It shouldn't. For some people, it does.
They hear that X is the leading scientific theory, and they believe that X is true, even if the evidence that supports X is less than thoroughly conclusive. Believing unproven propositions involves faith, even if there is some evidence for those conclusions.
I've said as much, but that isn't what I asked. I asked if you really believe that it happened.
There is certainly evidence for it. There is certainly not enough evidence to make skepticism of it unwarranted.
No, I do not. I think that sounds silly.