Who created the...

And it doesn't matter what people have done throughout history I was takling about the ideals of JESUS, MUHAMMED, AND BUDDHA. Neither of which ever started wars or threw books at people or anything violent really. And once again what do you have against a peaceful environment?
 
Good grief, not that again.

The kid died because she was diabetic. Kids with diabetes die all the time, and their parents don't get thrown into jail.
 
Again I repeat Some people are extremist not every Christian is going to let their kids die dude. For all we know those people were posing as Christians so they could kill their child and not look so bad. Who knows crazier things have happened.
 
criminal neglect, baba. prayer doesn't heal. A kid died because, apparently, faith was more important than insulin.
 
Again I repeat Some people are extremist not every Christian is going to let their kids die dude. For all we know those people were posing as Christians so they could kill their child and not look so bad. Who knows crazier things have happened.

:thup:

yea.. THAT must be it.
 
criminal neglect, baba. prayer doesn't heal. A kid died because, apparently, faith was more important than insulin.

Not convicted yet, Shoggie.

So whattya think about all the FDLS kids being returned quietly as I TOLD YOU THEY SHOULD AND WOULD BE because they were seized illegally and in a way which had nothing to do with normal operating procedures of children's services?
 
Im not saying it is for sure but it could be. What if they got the kid insulin and she slipped and hit her head and died in the shower? We are all going to die. We were born dying. Maybe it was just her time.
 
Not convicted yet, Shoggie.

So whattya think about all the FDLS kids being returned quietly as I TOLD YOU THEY SHOULD AND WOULD BE because they were seized illegally and in a way which had nothing to do with normal operating procedures of children's services?

I think it's a shame that yet another cult will continue pumping out cock fodder for dirty old men who think that a young girls hymen is their key to salvation. Truly, not a proud moment in our system of justice.
 
Im not saying it is for sure but it could be. What if they got the kid insulin and she slipped and hit her head and died in the shower? We are all going to die. We were born dying. Maybe it was just her time.

yea, and maybe some of us who make excuses for thumpers to kill their kids are simply full of shit. I mean, hell... if the snakebiting christians start offing their kids with venomous snakes well, uh, I guess it was just their time, eh? I mean, who needs to be convicted of murder since, as you say, we are all dying anyway?
 
whats wrong with that?


gosh, lemme dig up the last thread where a kid with diabetes dies because of thumper parents if you would rather not consider the historic record...


if ONLY people were "just having fun", eh?


but, funny you bring up the santa clause myth...

And shall we find all the examples of non religious people murdering and causeing mayhem and use it to justify vilifying them as non religious?
 
Better to push those same kids into the porn industry via Disney Channel.

Give me a break.
 
And shall we find all the examples of non religious people murdering and causeing mayhem and use it to justify vilifying them as non religious?

go for it. And, while you are compiling your list, make sure to add only those who kill in the name of ATHEISM instead of any other range of human traits.
 
Better to push those same kids into the porn industry via Disney Channel.

Give me a break.

oh yea, baba.. let's pretend that disney causes porn just to rationalize a christian cult using broken hymens like catholics using wine and crackers..

:cuckoo:
 
let me rephrase for you then buddy. Everyone on Earth besides you are dying. You on the other hand will live for ever. Which will be incredible. I salute you Mr. Roboto.
 
let me rephrase for you then buddy. Everyone on Earth besides you are dying. You on the other hand will live for ever. Which will be incredible. I salute you Mr. Roboto.

dying or not, this doesn't excuse killing a kid in the name of jebus. Now, go put Imagine on repeat and listen to the words this time.
 
I know the words quite well my friend and once again I have to tell you because youre head is so clouded with stem cell research and cloning that you seem to forget.


I AM NOT A RELIGIOUS PERSON!!!!!
 
Somewhat thin evidence, I think, to determine what happend 15 billion years ago. For all we know, the universe is more of a churning soup, and it just so happens that all the galaxies we can see are moving away from eachother for now, or there may be other explanations for the red-shift that makes it look like the galaxies are spreading apart.

Thin as that evidence might be, it's infinitely thicker than the evidence supporting faith-based creation theories.

The Big Bang theory is the simplest extrapolation from the most straight-forward interpretations of our current observations. That's what makes it a good scientific theory. It doesn't make it true, though. The evidence is far from overwhelming and the tests nonexistant.

Evidence overwhelmingly supports the Big Bang theory more than faith-based creation theories.

You could argue that of all the popular "creation" stories, the Big Bang has the most emperical evidence going for it, but that isn't saying much.

Good. I argue this, and I say it says quite a bit more about the actual nature of the universe than faith-based creation stories do.

Personally, I have yet to hear a creation story that didn't sound weird, silly, and unbelievable, and I've certainly never heard one that had enough substantial and well-tested evidence supporting it that I would believe it despite my reservations.

Surely, there's room in this world for a better mouse-trap; and understanding this does not make the current mouse-trap invalid or worthless--and it most certainly does not put the current mouse trap in the same category of effective usefulness as "believing" the mice away.

It irritates me that you would treat science as some sort of religion. ;)

I listed reasons it was a good scientific theory.

It isn't rational to believe something just because it's a good scientific theory, though.

Yet, it is rational to reject any bad theory, just because it's bad.

Good scientific theories approach certainty asymptotically in proportion to how well-tested they are. This one is a long way off from that.

Yet, it is MUCH farther along than faith-based theories.

Hm. Perhaps I'm just a romantic, but I can't help but suspect that there's more to the nature of the universe than patterns of physical behavoir, but *shrug* I can't really say.

Interesting hypothesis--how would you test it? :razz:

Yes, limitations of observability and testability can be overcome through technology.

No doubt as time goes on we will develop a more piercing analysis of the history of the universe. I don't think either of us can say whether the Big Bang theory will survive such increased capabilities.

Yet if it fails, I won't walk the path of the proponents of faith-based theories and deny the evidence, and use the strength of that denial to argue the strength of my faith, and the validity of the theory.

The "masses" need no help or prompting to remain gullible or to buy into authoritarian power structures. Science won't change that.

Yet faith promotes it, and I choose not to.
 
Surely, there's room in this world for a better mouse-trap; and understanding this does not make the current mouse-trap invalid or worthless--and it most certainly does not put the current mouse trap in the same category of effective usefulness as "believing" the mice away.

Why do I get the impression that you feel that one theory or the other must be believed?

It irritates me that you would treat science as some sort of religion. ;)

:huff: People who have faith in the Big Bang theory are the ones religiousizing* science.

* - That's totally a real word. Srsly.

Yet, it is rational to reject any bad theory, just because it's bad.

Agreed.

Interesting hypothesis--how would you test it? :razz:

:smirk: I can't of course, as you know. Which means that science won't be able to help me investigate it. But then, I don't expect science to be able to pierce every mystery; I don't see science as some sort of ultimate path of enlightenment, just as a tool, with rational limits.
 
Why do I get the impression that you feel that one theory or the other must be believed?

Because you were indoctrinated to believe that regecting one theory would land you in hell? :eusa_shifty:

:huff: People who have faith in the Big Bang theory are the ones religiousizing* science.

* - That's totally a real word. Srsly.

What does "faith in the Big Bang" mean? I ask because I have never met one of these people, unless you are talking about those who have a faith-based paradigm that they can't imagine others don't share--but they don't believe in the Big Bang anyway; faith-based or otherwise.

:smirk: I can't of course, as you know. Which means that science won't be able to help me investigate it.

If you can't test it, how do you investigate it?

But then, I don't expect science to be able to pierce every mystery; I don't see science as some sort of ultimate path of enlightenment, just as a tool, with rational limits.

Describe "rational limits."
 

Forum List

Back
Top