Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[Sixties Fan]

I’m sure I’m far from the only audience member who saw that scene and pondered what life would be like if the actual head of the P.A. was someone like the fictional Abu Maher, instead of Mahmoud Abbas or the other real-life Fatah functionaries who are still fixated on the century-old war against Zionism (in which they have yet to admit defeat). With such a person leading the Palestinians, a two-state solution might indeed be possible.

(full article online)

‘Fauda’ and the two-state scenario

 

[Sixties Fan]

The Palestinian Authority continues to defy and mock its donors. Although donors have repeatedly condemned the PA's policy of naming schools and community centers after terrorists and murderers and have refused to fund them, the PA continues to name schools after terrorists. Occasionally the PA pretends to comply with donor demands to stop terror glorification. This is one of those cases.

This is how the PA deceives Europe and keeps the funding flowing:

1. Sept. 27, 2017: PMW exposes that PA named a Belgium-funded school after a terrorist murderer: "The Martyr Dalal Mughrabi Elementary School"
   
2. Oct. 9, 2017: Belgium freezes funding of PA schools and demands name change
   
3. July 31, 2018: PMW notifies Belgium that the school is still named "The Martyr Dalal Mughrabi Elementary School"
   
4. Aug. 10, 2018: Belgium reiterates that it "unequivocally condemns the glorification of terrorist attacks," through PA schools
   
5. Two weeks later, Aug. 23, 2018: PA removes terrorist's name from school and renames it: "The Belgian School"
   
6. Same day: Aug. 23, 2018: PA changes name of nearby school, The Beit Awwa Elementary School for Girls to The Martyr Dalal Mughrabi Elementary School
   
7. Three days later, Aug. 26, 2018: PA adds insult to Belgium by naming a second school after the same terrorist murderer:
   The Second Dalal Mughrabi Republic School

Summary of Belgium's sincere efforts:
Two schools - instead of one - in the Beit Awwa district of Hebron are now named after terrorist murderer Dalal Mughrabi

On Sept. 27, 2017, when Palestinian Media Watch first exposed that a Palestinian Authority elementary school built with Belgian funding was named after terrorist murderer Dalal Mughrabi, who led the murder of 37 Israeli civilians, Belgium immediately condemned the PA, announced a freeze of funding, and demanded that the name be changed. Last month, PMW discovered and exposed that the school continued to be called The Martyr Dalal Mughrabi Elementary School. In response, the Belgian government again publicly condemned the PA practice:
"A spokesperson for the Belgian Foreign Ministry told The Algemeiner in response that the country stood by its previously articulated policy regarding support to schools in the Palestinian territories, which 'unequivocally condemns the glorification of terrorist attacks.' He affirmed that the decision to suspend two Palestinian school construction projects in the West Bank 'remains in effect until further notice.'"
[The Algemeiner, Aug. 10, 2018]

(full article online)

PA mocks Belgium: Names two more schools after terrorist murderer - PMW Bulletins

 

[Sixties Fan]

One could find some justification for the PLO to meet with Hamas - after all, Hamas is the de facto ruler of Gaza and sometimes they would need to talk.

But Islamic Jihad is nothing but a terror group. It has no purpose except to kill Israeli Jews in an attempt to terrorize them and ultimately destroy Israel.

The PLO has far more in common with Islamic Jihad than it has with the governments of Israel or the US, which it refuses to meet with. It is more offended by Israel offers of peace than by Islamic Jihad's pledge of eternal holy war against the Jewish presence in the Middle East.

The PLO's tolerance for and support of terror are not impediments to western European countries falling over themselves to meet with them in European capitals.

(full article online)

The PLO refuses to meet with Israel and the US, but happily meets with Islamic Jihad ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Mindful]

 

[Sixties Fan]

Joan Peters is sorely missed right now. Four years after her death and 34 years after the publication of her bestselling book "From Time Immemorial," the U.S. administration is recognizing her claims about so-called Palestinian refugeeism.

Through her thorough research, Peters was the first to expose the lie that is Palestinian refugeeism. Now, when UNRWA, the U.N. agency for Palestinian refugees, is trying to fool the world into believing there are 5.2 million Palestinian refugees, is the perfect time to return to Peters and her grand opus.


(full article online)

http://www.israelhayom.com/opinions/a-salute-to-joan-peters/

 

[Sixties Fan]

Washington Post article about UNRWA, but one section needs to be analyzed a bit further.

As far as I know, no one has directly ever asked UNRWA why two millions full Jordanian citizens should still be considered "refugees" and why they should deserve some 40% of all UNRWA funds. But the question has been floating out there, and UNRWA spokeperson Chris Gunness indirectly addressed it in this quote:

“They have to decide,” said UNRWA spokesman Christopher Gunness. “We couldn’t say to you, ‘You’re a citizen now’ ” — as Jordan has declared some 2 million Palestinians in that country — “ ‘you have to give up the right of return.’ ”Gunness is admitting that Jordanian Palestinians are not really refugees, but that UNRWA exists in Jordan in order to maintain the fiction that there is a "right of return" for Palestinians even if they are full citizens of any country worldwide.

Now, how much money does it cost to tell Palestinians that they have the right to "return" and destroy Israel (which is what "return" means to begin with)?

Not a whole lot.

But how much does it cost to keep the issue of "return" on the international agenda?

About $1.2 billion a year, which is UNRWA's budget.

(full article online)

Chris Gunness indirectly admits that @UNRWA exists not to help "refugees" but to help eliminate Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Sixties Fan]

• The case of Abu Jhaisheh is neither new nor unique. In fact, his experience is part of a systematic campaign waged by both the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Hamas to silence their critics and deter Palestinian journalists from criticizing their leaders -- a campaign that has long been ignored by the Western mainstream media, whose representatives choose to pretend that the PA and Hamas security agencies are somehow innocent of any wrongdoing.
  
  
• "Failure to prosecute violators of media freedoms is not only a breach of human rights and prevents the attainment of justice, but it is also an indirect authorization to continue committing such violations." — Palestinian Center for Development and Media Freedoms.
  
  
• Why are these purported human rights organizations and the international community, which describe themselves as committed to protecting freedom and the rights of the Palestinian people, always silent?

(full article online)

Palestinian Journalists: We Do Not Have a Free Media

 

[P F Tinmore]

Washington Post article about UNRWA, but one section needs to be analyzed a bit further.

As far as I know, no one has directly ever asked UNRWA why two millions full Jordanian citizens should still be considered "refugees" and why they should deserve some 40% of all UNRWA funds. But the question has been floating out there, and UNRWA spokeperson Chris Gunness indirectly addressed it in this quote:

“They have to decide,” said UNRWA spokesman Christopher Gunness. “We couldn’t say to you, ‘You’re a citizen now’ ” — as Jordan has declared some 2 million Palestinians in that country — “ ‘you have to give up the right of return.’ ”Gunness is admitting that Jordanian Palestinians are not really refugees, but that UNRWA exists in Jordan in order to maintain the fiction that there is a "right of return" for Palestinians even if they are full citizens of any country worldwide.

Now, how much money does it cost to tell Palestinians that they have the right to "return" and destroy Israel (which is what "return" means to begin with)?

Not a whole lot.

But how much does it cost to keep the issue of "return" on the international agenda?

About $1.2 billion a year, which is UNRWA's budget.

(full article online)

Chris Gunness indirectly admits that @UNRWA exists not to help "refugees" but to help eliminate Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

Israel has always been trying to dump its refugees onto someone else.

 

[rylah]

Washington Post article about UNRWA, but one section needs to be analyzed a bit further.

As far as I know, no one has directly ever asked UNRWA why two millions full Jordanian citizens should still be considered "refugees" and why they should deserve some 40% of all UNRWA funds. But the question has been floating out there, and UNRWA spokeperson Chris Gunness indirectly addressed it in this quote:

“They have to decide,” said UNRWA spokesman Christopher Gunness. “We couldn’t say to you, ‘You’re a citizen now’ ” — as Jordan has declared some 2 million Palestinians in that country — “ ‘you have to give up the right of return.’ ”Gunness is admitting that Jordanian Palestinians are not really refugees, but that UNRWA exists in Jordan in order to maintain the fiction that there is a "right of return" for Palestinians even if they are full citizens of any country worldwide.

Now, how much money does it cost to tell Palestinians that they have the right to "return" and destroy Israel (which is what "return" means to begin with)?

Not a whole lot.

But how much does it cost to keep the issue of "return" on the international agenda?

About $1.2 billion a year, which is UNRWA's budget.

(full article online)

Chris Gunness indirectly admits that @UNRWA exists not to help "refugees" but to help eliminate Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

Israel has always been trying to dump its refugees onto someone else.

You turn facts upside down, unlike the UNRWA generational welfare cheats,
in 1952 Israel has official taken responsibility of its' refugees and for the course of a decade resettled 850,000 of them.

Q.When are Arabs going to grant their own people the same rights and compensate for the property loss caused on both sides?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Washington Post article about UNRWA, but one section needs to be analyzed a bit further.

As far as I know, no one has directly ever asked UNRWA why two millions full Jordanian citizens should still be considered "refugees" and why they should deserve some 40% of all UNRWA funds. But the question has been floating out there, and UNRWA spokeperson Chris Gunness indirectly addressed it in this quote:

“They have to decide,” said UNRWA spokesman Christopher Gunness. “We couldn’t say to you, ‘You’re a citizen now’ ” — as Jordan has declared some 2 million Palestinians in that country — “ ‘you have to give up the right of return.’ ”Gunness is admitting that Jordanian Palestinians are not really refugees, but that UNRWA exists in Jordan in order to maintain the fiction that there is a "right of return" for Palestinians even if they are full citizens of any country worldwide.

Now, how much money does it cost to tell Palestinians that they have the right to "return" and destroy Israel (which is what "return" means to begin with)?

Not a whole lot.

But how much does it cost to keep the issue of "return" on the international agenda?

About $1.2 billion a year, which is UNRWA's budget.

(full article online)

Chris Gunness indirectly admits that @UNRWA exists not to help "refugees" but to help eliminate Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

Israel has always been trying to dump its refugees onto someone else.

You turn facts upside down, unlike the UNRWA generational welfare cheats,
in 1952 Israel has official taken responsibility of its' refugees and for the course of a decade resettled 850,000 of them.

Q.When are Arabs going to grant their own people the same rights and compensate for the property loss caused on both sides?

Two separate and unrelated issues.

 

[rylah]

Washington Post article about UNRWA, but one section needs to be analyzed a bit further.

As far as I know, no one has directly ever asked UNRWA why two millions full Jordanian citizens should still be considered "refugees" and why they should deserve some 40% of all UNRWA funds. But the question has been floating out there, and UNRWA spokeperson Chris Gunness indirectly addressed it in this quote:

“They have to decide,” said UNRWA spokesman Christopher Gunness. “We couldn’t say to you, ‘You’re a citizen now’ ” — as Jordan has declared some 2 million Palestinians in that country — “ ‘you have to give up the right of return.’ ”Gunness is admitting that Jordanian Palestinians are not really refugees, but that UNRWA exists in Jordan in order to maintain the fiction that there is a "right of return" for Palestinians even if they are full citizens of any country worldwide.

Now, how much money does it cost to tell Palestinians that they have the right to "return" and destroy Israel (which is what "return" means to begin with)?

Not a whole lot.

But how much does it cost to keep the issue of "return" on the international agenda?

About $1.2 billion a year, which is UNRWA's budget.

(full article online)

Chris Gunness indirectly admits that @UNRWA exists not to help "refugees" but to help eliminate Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

Israel has always been trying to dump its refugees onto someone else.

You turn facts upside down, unlike the UNRWA generational welfare cheats,
in 1952 Israel has official taken responsibility of its' refugees and for the course of a decade resettled 850,000 of them.

Q.When are Arabs going to grant their own people the same rights and compensate for the property loss caused on both sides?

Two separate and unrelated issues.

Your logic just doesn't work,
how can one demand a special status as a refugee while enjoying 2-3 registered nationalities?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Washington Post article about UNRWA, but one section needs to be analyzed a bit further.

As far as I know, no one has directly ever asked UNRWA why two millions full Jordanian citizens should still be considered "refugees" and why they should deserve some 40% of all UNRWA funds. But the question has been floating out there, and UNRWA spokeperson Chris Gunness indirectly addressed it in this quote:

“They have to decide,” said UNRWA spokesman Christopher Gunness. “We couldn’t say to you, ‘You’re a citizen now’ ” — as Jordan has declared some 2 million Palestinians in that country — “ ‘you have to give up the right of return.’ ”Gunness is admitting that Jordanian Palestinians are not really refugees, but that UNRWA exists in Jordan in order to maintain the fiction that there is a "right of return" for Palestinians even if they are full citizens of any country worldwide.

Now, how much money does it cost to tell Palestinians that they have the right to "return" and destroy Israel (which is what "return" means to begin with)?

Not a whole lot.

But how much does it cost to keep the issue of "return" on the international agenda?

About $1.2 billion a year, which is UNRWA's budget.

(full article online)

Chris Gunness indirectly admits that @UNRWA exists not to help "refugees" but to help eliminate Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

Israel has always been trying to dump its refugees onto someone else.

You turn facts upside down, unlike the UNRWA generational welfare cheats,
in 1952 Israel has official taken responsibility of its' refugees and for the course of a decade resettled 850,000 of them.

Q.When are Arabs going to grant their own people the same rights and compensate for the property loss caused on both sides?

Two separate and unrelated issues.

Your logic just doesn't work,
how can one demand a special status as a refugee while enjoying 2-3 registered nationalities?

 

[rylah]

Washington Post article about UNRWA, but one section needs to be analyzed a bit further.

As far as I know, no one has directly ever asked UNRWA why two millions full Jordanian citizens should still be considered "refugees" and why they should deserve some 40% of all UNRWA funds. But the question has been floating out there, and UNRWA spokeperson Chris Gunness indirectly addressed it in this quote:

“They have to decide,” said UNRWA spokesman Christopher Gunness. “We couldn’t say to you, ‘You’re a citizen now’ ” — as Jordan has declared some 2 million Palestinians in that country — “ ‘you have to give up the right of return.’ ”Gunness is admitting that Jordanian Palestinians are not really refugees, but that UNRWA exists in Jordan in order to maintain the fiction that there is a "right of return" for Palestinians even if they are full citizens of any country worldwide.

Now, how much money does it cost to tell Palestinians that they have the right to "return" and destroy Israel (which is what "return" means to begin with)?

Not a whole lot.

But how much does it cost to keep the issue of "return" on the international agenda?

About $1.2 billion a year, which is UNRWA's budget.

(full article online)

Chris Gunness indirectly admits that @UNRWA exists not to help "refugees" but to help eliminate Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

Israel has always been trying to dump its refugees onto someone else.

You turn facts upside down, unlike the UNRWA generational welfare cheats,
in 1952 Israel has official taken responsibility of its' refugees and for the course of a decade resettled 850,000 of them.

Q.When are Arabs going to grant their own people the same rights and compensate for the property loss caused on both sides?

Two separate and unrelated issues.

Your logic just doesn't work,
how can one demand a special status as a refugee while enjoying 2-3 registered nationalities?

How many of those so called 'refugees' have at least 2 nationalities?

 

[Sixties Fan]

The Arabs have been using the UN to avoid their own responsibilities of supporting their brethren (Palestinian and other) for decades.

(full article online)

Arab states specifically wanted the UN to be responsible for Palestinians from the start to avoid their own responsibilities ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[toobfreak]

Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

Answer's pretty simple really, without all the empty garbage-headed hate-trolling. The Palestinians were nomadic people like the Israelites who many decades ago when offered a deal to settle with a finite piece of land chose instead to gamble and fight to take the whole piece of pie for themselves and lost. Now they are screwed, it has been sour grapes ever since, and they only have their Arab brothers to thank for it.

 

[Hollie]

Those crafty Jews have invented some new technology that injures Arab-Moslems but can’t be captured on camera.

At least according to those conspiracy addled, paranoid, superstitious Dark Age types who really do struggle to exist in the modern age.




Israel invented a unique way of injuring Palestinians
that "cameras are incapable of revealing,"
says Fatah official
By Itamar Marcus

Israel invented a unique way of injuring Palestinians that "cameras are incapable of revealing," says Fatah official - PMW Bulletins

Israel is well-known for its state of the art inventions and innovations within science, technology, and many other different fields.
Adding to the list of Israeli inventions, a Fatah official explained on official PA TV that Israel has come up with a way of injuring Palestinians that is undetectable by any camera. Even though it is possible for the eye to see "the blue and red marks" of the injuries, the camera cannot record it:

Fatah Salfit Branch Secretary Abd Al-Sattar Awwad: "When an Israeli soldier directly grabs a civilian in this way, his body immediately receives blue or red marks. They have a policy that they can injure in a certain way. They injure a person in this way despite the cameras. The cameras can't reveal this policy that they implement. I've seen their bodies [injured] in this way - blue and red marks - by the occupation forces, which the cameras are incapable of revealing."
[Official PA TV, Topic of the Day, July 10, 2018]

 

[Sixties Fan]

Some photos of the closing ceremonies at Islamic Jihad's summer camps in Gaza.

Didn't your daily camp line-ups look like this?








Their counselor looks like a nice chap.

(full article online)

Look! Islamic Jihad has "summer camp" just like us! ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Shusha]

Those crafty Jews have invented some new technology that injures Arab-Moslems but can’t be captured on camera.

At least according to those conspiracy addled, paranoid, superstitious Dark Age types who really do struggle to exist in the modern age.




Israel invented a unique way of injuring Palestinians
that "cameras are incapable of revealing,"
says Fatah official
By Itamar Marcus

Israel invented a unique way of injuring Palestinians that "cameras are incapable of revealing," says Fatah official - PMW Bulletins

Israel is well-known for its state of the art inventions and innovations within science, technology, and many other different fields.
Adding to the list of Israeli inventions, a Fatah official explained on official PA TV that Israel has come up with a way of injuring Palestinians that is undetectable by any camera. Even though it is possible for the eye to see "the blue and red marks" of the injuries, the camera cannot record it:

Fatah Salfit Branch Secretary Abd Al-Sattar Awwad: "When an Israeli soldier directly grabs a civilian in this way, his body immediately receives blue or red marks. They have a policy that they can injure in a certain way. They injure a person in this way despite the cameras. The cameras can't reveal this policy that they implement. I've seen their bodies [injured] in this way - blue and red marks - by the occupation forces, which the cameras are incapable of revealing."
[Official PA TV, Topic of the Day, July 10, 2018]

Its the super secret hasbara Krav Maga. Where do I sign up?

 

[Sixties Fan]

Shift to UNHCR criteria would strip refugee status from millions of Palestinians

 

[Hollie]

It’s time for another episode of Mr. Mufti Says

In this episode we learn “who are the infidels, and how do you become one”

Jerusalem mufti: Palestinian refugees must not accept compensation for land

Jerusalem mufti: Palestinian refugees must not accept compensation for land
Jerusalem mufti: The Palestinian refugees must not accept compensation for their land—and any who do so are infidels and are betraying Allah and the homeland