White House Confirms It's Purging Disloyal Employees 'From the Bowels of the Federal Government

Why the fuck would anyone want people on the team who are working against and undermining you?

View attachment 309205
Lol...why the fuck would anyone want a president that only wants yes men around him?
Who said anything about yes men?

Isn’t that what the Trump purge is all about. It is getting rid of those that don’t tow the Trump line without question. The Trump administration wants sycophants not truth tellers. Loyalist above all else is the prime qualification for a position with Trump.
 
TeemingWhiteGalapagosmockingbird-size_restricted.gif
 
You probably never heard of it before because it probably never happened before. My wife is a federal government employee, and every time the country changes the president, the administration in her dept gets changed. And we are talking about an insignificant USDA office.

Trumps mistake was that he didn't change these people out as soon as he took office, like his predecessors did.

Mark

I worked for NASA ages ago. Every time there was a new administration - we got reorganized, new political appointees etc. But this is not referring to that - the article is stating, that according to one person quoted - they are going further than political appointees.

1394569673584-04UX55HLQ0YQFP50CH8L
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #44
The federal government has three branches, the executive, the legislative, the judicial.

The President is the elected leader of the executive branch.

People who work in the executive branch serve the President, and if they cannot do that, they should seek alternative employment.

Not exactly. If they are political appointees then yes, they serve at the pleasure of the president. Otherwise - they serve their country, their agency, or the office of the president. If they are not political appointees they are protected by civil service laws from political retaliation.
That should change. No one in the executive branch should be protected from accountability to the President.

I disagree. Political retaliation is not accountability.
 
Why the fuck would anyone want people on the team who are working against and undermining you?

View attachment 309205
Lol...why the fuck would anyone want a president that only wants yes men around him?
Who said anything about yes men?

Isn’t that what the Trump purge is all about. It is getting rid of those that don’t tow the Trump line without question. The Trump administration wants sycophants not truth tellers. Loyalist above all else is the prime qualification for a position with Trump.
DudeOpinion.jpg
 
You probably never heard of it before because it probably never happened before. My wife is a federal government employee, and every time the country changes the president, the administration in her dept gets changed. And we are talking about an insignificant USDA office.

Trumps mistake was that he didn't change these people out as soon as he took office, like his predecessors did.

Mark

I worked for NASA ages ago. Every time there was a new administration - we got reorganized, new political appointees etc. But this is not referring to that - the article is stating, that according to one person quoted - they are going further than political appointees.
Who axed the shuttle program

:dunno::dunno:
 
You probably never heard of it before because it probably never happened before. My wife is a federal government employee, and every time the country changes the president, the administration in her dept gets changed. And we are talking about an insignificant USDA office.

Trumps mistake was that he didn't change these people out as soon as he took office, like his predecessors did.

Mark

I worked for NASA ages ago. Every time there was a new administration - we got reorganized, new political appointees etc. But this is not referring to that - the article is stating, that according to one person quoted - they are going further than political appointees.

From your link:

The administration is examining employees throughout the government to find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump,

So an employee undermining the boss wouldn't have had repercussions i the Obama administration?

Mark
 
Trump...as usual...conflates loyalty to the country (or the office of the president) with loyalty to him, personally. Perhaps that should be fealty.

Can't recall this sort of things happening before. I wonder if this means combing Facebook and private lives?


White House Confirms It's Purging Disloyal Employees 'From the Bowels of the Federal Government'

The White House this week confirmed it is combing through federal agencies to identify employees not sufficiently loyal to President Trump to facilitate their ouster, sparking concerns the administration could run afoul of long-established civil service laws.

The administration is examining employees throughout the government to find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump, White House spokesman Hogan Gidley said on Fox News Monday. Gidley did not specifically mention career employees, who are statutorily protected against political retaliation, but did note the “millions” of individuals agencies employ. By contrast, there are only about 4,000 political appointees in government.

“It’s not a secret that we want people in positions that work with this president, not against him, and too often we have people in this government—I mean the federal government is massive, with millions of people—and there are a lot people out there taking action against this president and when we find them we will take appropriate action,” Gidley said.

His comments followed reports in Axios that the administration maintains “deep state” hit lists of employees to fire and the president has tasked the head of the Presidential Personnel Office, Johnny McEntee, to purge “bad people” who are not loyal to him. The latter report mentioned only political appointees, who serve at the pleasure of the president and can be dismissed at will, but Gidley’s comments this week appeared to go further.

“Time and time again we see in the media reports from people in the bowels of the federal government working against this president,” he said.

Gidley added that unelected federal workers were pushing “their own selfish political agenda” rather than advancing and executing Trump’s.

The latest comments do not mark the first time the Trump administration has stretched the limits of what is allowable under civil service protections. The number of federal employees proving their agencies took prohibited personnel practices against them reached an all-time high in Trump’s first year in office, according to the Office of Special Counsel. The State Department’s inspector general released two reports this year finding that the department illegally engaged in the political targeting of career employees. Federal law prohibits agencies from discriminating against any employee on the basis of political affiliation, or for any federal official to “coerce any applicant or employee to engage in political activity, or to retaliate against such individuals based on partisan politics.”
Shocking! Like the Vichy French captain Renault said in Casablanca . Yawn.
 
Obama's Military Coup Purges 197 Officers In Five Years | Investor's Business Daily

3-billy-dale.jpg


Selective memory of the Dems.............When you want outrage simply look at what your side has done in the past and Cry me a River when we DON'T CARE that some of your old political plants are being reassigned or FIRED.....

Oh well.........too dang bad.

We aren't talking about political appointees - as I said, already, those serve at the pleasure of the president.
The 4th Tier of the Gov't you mean.............the ones releasing PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS of the President with Foreign Leaders.............Which is covered under the Executive powers...................

Why the hell would Trump keep spies who serve the DNC and not the country.........Do your stinking jobs and LEAVE the dang politics out of it...............OR FIND NEW EMPLOYMENT ELSEWHERE.......

They WERE NOT ELECTED...........too dang bad when they have to go to the REAL WORLD of employment and jobs of the average American.
 
The federal government has three branches, the executive, the legislative, the judicial.

The President is the elected leader of the executive branch.

People who work in the executive branch serve the President, and if they cannot do that, they should seek alternative employment.

Not exactly. If they are political appointees then yes, they serve at the pleasure of the president. Otherwise - they serve their country, their agency, or the office of the president. If they are not political appointees they are protected by civil service laws from political retaliation.
That should change. No one in the executive branch should be protected from accountability to the President.

I disagree. Political retaliation is not accountability.
Oh so...............you want Trump to Bend over with NO VASOLINE while the LEFTIST HACKS in Gov't try to FRAME HIM.......

Boo Hoo

:CryingCow:
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #52
You probably never heard of it before because it probably never happened before. My wife is a federal government employee, and every time the country changes the president, the administration in her dept gets changed. And we are talking about an insignificant USDA office.

Trumps mistake was that he didn't change these people out as soon as he took office, like his predecessors did.

Mark

I worked for NASA ages ago. Every time there was a new administration - we got reorganized, new political appointees etc. But this is not referring to that - the article is stating, that according to one person quoted - they are going further than political appointees.

From your link:

The administration is examining employees throughout the government to find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump,

So an employee undermining the boss wouldn't have had repercussions i the Obama administration?

Mark


I'm referring to those who are not political appointees. There are labor laws that govern their hiring and firing. When you say: "find anyone taking action officials decide represents an effort to undermine Trump"...

What is defined as "undermining" Trump? Who defines it? Is a attending a climate change rally in your private life "undermining" Trump?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #53
Obama's Military Coup Purges 197 Officers In Five Years | Investor's Business Daily

3-billy-dale.jpg


Selective memory of the Dems.............When you want outrage simply look at what your side has done in the past and Cry me a River when we DON'T CARE that some of your old political plants are being reassigned or FIRED.....

Oh well.........too dang bad.

We aren't talking about political appointees - as I said, already, those serve at the pleasure of the president.
The 4th Tier of the Gov't you mean.............the ones releasing PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS of the President with Foreign Leaders.............Which is covered under the Executive powers...................

Why the hell would Trump keep spies who serve the DNC and not the country.........Do your stinking jobs and LEAVE the dang politics out of it...............OR FIND NEW EMPLOYMENT ELSEWHERE.......

They WERE NOT ELECTED...........too dang bad when they have to go to the REAL WORLD of employment and jobs of the average American.


Why the hell would you want spies who serve Trump and not the country?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #54
The federal government has three branches, the executive, the legislative, the judicial.

The President is the elected leader of the executive branch.

People who work in the executive branch serve the President, and if they cannot do that, they should seek alternative employment.

Not exactly. If they are political appointees then yes, they serve at the pleasure of the president. Otherwise - they serve their country, their agency, or the office of the president. If they are not political appointees they are protected by civil service laws from political retaliation.
That should change. No one in the executive branch should be protected from accountability to the President.

I disagree. Political retaliation is not accountability.
Oh so...............you want Trump to Bend over with NO VASOLINE while the LEFTIST HACKS in Gov't try to FRAME HIM.......

Boo Hoo

:CryingCow:


So you support political retaliation?
 
Why the fuck would anyone want people on the team who are working against and undermining you?

View attachment 309205
Lol...why the fuck would anyone want a president that only wants yes men around him?
Who said anything about yes men?

Isn’t that what the Trump purge is all about. It is getting rid of those that don’t tow the Trump line without question. The Trump administration wants sycophants not truth tellers. Loyalist above all else is the prime qualification for a position with Trump.
View attachment 309211
No..look at who Trump has appointed as director of personnel. A 29 year old whose name is Johnny McEntee whose sole job is to weed out those not suitably loyal to Trump.

What this kid, Johnny McEntee, really is is Trump’s equivalent of a Soviet commissar. He is in charge of political education and loyalty to the leader. Those not sufficiently loyal will be purged.

But hey live in your world of denial.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...0e6c56-54c1-11ea-b119-4faabac6674f_story.html
 
Last edited:
The President of the United States was elected by the American people.

Bureaucrats are not elected by the American people.

When bureaucrats work against the President, they work against the will of the American people.
 
Obama's Military Coup Purges 197 Officers In Five Years | Investor's Business Daily

3-billy-dale.jpg


Selective memory of the Dems.............When you want outrage simply look at what your side has done in the past and Cry me a River when we DON'T CARE that some of your old political plants are being reassigned or FIRED.....

Oh well.........too dang bad.

We aren't talking about political appointees - as I said, already, those serve at the pleasure of the president.
The 4th Tier of the Gov't you mean.............the ones releasing PRIVATE CONVERSATIONS of the President with Foreign Leaders.............Which is covered under the Executive powers...................

Why the hell would Trump keep spies who serve the DNC and not the country.........Do your stinking jobs and LEAVE the dang politics out of it...............OR FIND NEW EMPLOYMENT ELSEWHERE.......

They WERE NOT ELECTED...........too dang bad when they have to go to the REAL WORLD of employment and jobs of the average American.


Why the hell would you want spies who serve Trump and not the country?
Why the hell would you want spies who Serve the DNC and use their jobs to ATTACK TRUMP and become Traitors TO THIS COUNTRY.

Not only did the TRAITOR who whistleblow..........get the story wrong on the conversation............HE DIDN'T HAVE THE BALLS TO COME FORWARD..............Oh that's right.............he was SUPPOSEDLY IN FEAR OF HIS LIFE....

LOL.............Your side just gave the country the most lame Day Time Serial Series in history.....No wonder your ratings with the Country are in the dumps.
 
I hope the sewage system is good in DC. It's gonna take a bunch of toilet flushes to wash those disloyal turds all the way to the treatment plant.
 
The President of the United States was elected by the American people.

Bureaucrats are not elected by the American people.

When bureaucrats work against the President, they work against the will of the American people.
Damn Skippy...........and HIGH TIME that they are reminded that they WERE NOT ELECTED.........They can go join the Rat Race of the average American if they don't like it.

They have no place other than do their jobs and advise.............Somewhere along the line they think THEY SHOULD DECIDE FOR AMERICANS.........and not those we elect.
 

Forum List

Back
Top