Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What if other states use the same legal reasons for GUNS - with anti-gun citizen vigilantes going after gun owners. Maybe states like New York will enact such laws.
It's a brave new world. If this {civil punitive damage enforcement angle} works to circumvent Supreme Court precedent for the States, why not for the Bill of Rights too. Hell, those weren't for the States anyway, right?
Amen! These NaziCon zealots should be careful what they wish for!
/——-/ Lakhota sez “Keep killing those babies for fun and profit.”SCOTUS has gone full Taliban in upholding the new draconian Texas abortion laws!
SCOTUS and their NaziCon zealots are not pro-life - they are pro-birth. They have no regard for the mental/physical/financial reasons that women seek abortions. They don't care!
What if other states use the same legal reasons for GUNS - with anti-gun citizen vigilantes going after gun owners. Maybe states like New York will enact such laws. It can happen!
/——-/ We wish that you libtards stop killing babies and selling their body parts.Amen! These NaziCon zealots should be careful what they wish for!
The Supreme Court sets precedent with it's interpretation of the Constitution which includes the all the Amendments. If a State is allowed to set aside a precedent with a new and arbitrary enforcement process then why shouldn't it apply to other precedent setting decisions the court has made? Could a state ban some guns and set up a bounty on anyone who turns someone in who has one? Probably set a bounty on sellers, resellers, manufactures.....Just let anyone sue them too.So you think abortion is in the bill of rights. OMG you're stupid and a racist
The Supreme Court sets precedent with it's interpretation of the Constitution which includes the all the Amendments. If a State is allowed to set aside a precedent with a new and arbitrary enforcement process then why shouldn't it apply to other precedent setting decisions the court has made? Could a state ban some guns and set up a bounty on anyone who turns someone in who has one? Probably set a bounty on sellers, resellers, manufactures.....Just let anyone sue them too.
It is absurd, of course. So is the Texas law.
ALL LIVES MATTERSCOTUS has gone full Taliban in upholding the new draconian Texas abortion laws!
SCOTUS and their NaziCon zealots are not pro-life - they are pro-birth. They have no regard for the mental/physical/financial reasons that women seek abortions. They don't care!
What if other states use the same legal reasons for GUNS - with anti-gun citizen vigilantes going after gun owners. Maybe states like New York will enact such laws. It can happen!
Racist! Only black thug's lives matter!ALL LIVES MATTER
Show the part in the Constitution that says the Supreme Court can make up Constitutional law much less new rights in the bill of rights.
According to the 10th amendment, the Texas abortion law is up to Texas. I don't care for the law much either. But what's absurd is reading the Constitution and thinking it ways anything about abortion. Hint, it doesn't
Show the part in the Constitution that says the Supreme Court can make up Constitutional law much less new rights in the bill of rights.
According to the 10th amendment, the Texas abortion law is up to Texas. I don't care for the law much either. But what's absurd is reading the Constitution and thinking it ways anything about abortion. Hint, it doesn't
That ain't how the Constitution works.We've talked about legal precedent before.
Sure it does. Women and men, have a right to privacy....it isn't just for men. It's not the government's business that you may or may not be pregnant.
If I am understanding this correctly, that's why Texas put in no govt penalties for doctors etc to perform an abortion, past the 6 weeks pregnant/ Fetal heartbeat...Texas set up in civil law, for vigilante penalties brought by the citizens....even non citizens, not related to the woman can bring these new suits, and if they win, collect $10,000 per doctor etc lawsuit....and get their court costs paid by the doctor as well....a BOUNTY.... If the doctor wins the case, the doctor still has to pay his own court costs....not the person suing....
Texas legislature did it this way because with certainty, it is unconstitutional for govt to pass this law, but if they give no penalty or $10,000 fine, then the doctor can't file suit for the govt hurting them, because it is not the govt, it is citizens.
I call bull shit on that crazy ass alleged loophole, the Texan legislature thinks is their way around the law and constitution.
States have to follow what is Constitutional... the constitution says so. Right now, via roe v wade, and several other landmark cases, abortion is legal and constitutional, up until the point of viability.
We've talked about legal precedent before.
I didn't make it up silly one, the republican leaning supreme court in Roe v wade established such.Sawish!
This is how democrats argue. It's just slight of hand.
Our privacy is protected by the 10th amendment. But the 10th amendment is a sledge hammer, you don't like it. So you ignore it, you literally pretend it doesn't exist.
So now how do you protect your version of privacy which only applies to abortion? You MAKE IT UP. You create a tiny selective right to privacy to replace the sledge hammer privacy protection you destroyed
You pretended not to understand then, why should I think you'd do otherwise now? You are not credible.Begging the question. You really aren't smart? You don't grasp what you just argued, do you? Be honest
This is a sincere poll. I would appreciate honest answers. If you're willing, I would also appreciate your reasons. I will not criticize your choice. I would just honestly like to know where USMB posters stand on this issue.
NOTE: I know there are many possible variables, but this poll assumes "typical" circumstances. In other words, this is a superficial poll that assumes "normal/average" circumstances - meaning no rape, incest, health, deformity, financial, or other extenuating issues.
