Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?

Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.

"As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV."

They won't be laughing for much longer, President Trump will get the last laugh, as Patriots everywhere in the Western world already know, because we'll get the last laugh also.

We have very good friends now in the White House, friends who share our view, friends who are willing to help us achieve our joint aims. ...
Judge a person by the friends he keeps.


.

Yes and those are good people who share our World view, as I said what are the Western Traitors going to do to stop our joint World view from being carried out? Are they going to put sanctions on America? Are they going to invade America?

If those Western Traitors do not learn to keep their mouths shut and get to the back of the bus, then America can cause their nations catastrophic damage both economically and in other ways.
Recently, the Americans have been making war in the Middle East and North Africa. It looks like they will leave us in the European Union alone in more than one sense.


.

.

"Recently, the Americans have been making war in the Middle East and North Africa."

Yes that was Obama and Hillary would have continued the disaster policy, it's Obama's fault that we have all these feral Kebab's and feral Sub-Saharan Africans squatting in my Continent NOBODY wants these sand people except Traitors.
 
Conservatives are too broke to shop at Nordstrom anyway (jk).

Obama didn't criticize all police officers. His issue was wit the trigger happy cops. Police officers do a lot of good work. But there needs to be reforms in the police department.
Reform like what happened in Baltimore and Ferguson? Liberals are such stupid people.

 
Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.
Well at least he doesn't need a teleprompter 24/7 to keep from boring the shit out of everyone.
It is clear he doesn't use a teleprompter which requires a person to be able to read. Have to seen the new so-called president of the USA trying to read. Mercy!



.
Yes I have. But as usual you went out in the weeds. Trump sometimes reads from a teleprompter, but he feels he's more effective speaking off the cuff. Obama needs the questions in advance, like Hillary so their answers can be focus-grouped to death. Obama/ Hillary are the most manufactured empty-suits I've ever seen.
 
Last edited:
Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.

"As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV."

They won't be laughing for much longer, President Trump will get the last laugh, as Patriots everywhere in the Western world already know, because we'll get the last laugh also.

We have very good friends now in the White House, friends who share our view, friends who are willing to help us achieve our joint aims. ...
Judge a person by the friends he keeps.


.
With friends like France and Germany right now, I would be better off with a Muslim. Both want to destroy the US just Muslims are out front about it.
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​
Hmmm, that is a hard choice. Let me think, Nordstrom goes out and takes Ivanka Trump's line off stating that sales have gone down, but could it be that because they took her items off the shelf before the sales went down, they are trying to justify their actions? I have seen conservative books which are best sellers end up starting at the back of the store where they are hard to find, because liberals hate anything that counters their continuing push for immorality and Marxist ways. So here is the People's President's Daughter who she herself identifies as liberal, being kicked to the street, and do you think she will be liberal for long? Yep liberals are so stupid like Obama and Hillary who threw many White and Black Democrats under the bus, because they hate fossil fuels. Then they wondered why those White and Black Democrats didn't vote for the failed vagina candidate.

Liberal are the stupidest people in the Universe.

View attachment 111492
Trump is not the people's President. Far from it. He did not get a majority of their votes, people are out protesting against him continuously, and his approval ratings for a new President are the lowest in history, his disapproval ratings for a new President the highest in history. There is nothing to indicate he is the "people's president".
You libtards are the stupidest people in the Universe. Once again let me explain how your Representative Republic works.

Trump go the majority of the peoples vote in the majority of states in the US, he won, the failed vagina candidate didn't.

THIS COUNTRY IS NOT A DEMOCRACY BUT A REPUBLIC AND IF YOU DONT LIKE IT, CUBA HAS BEEN OPENED BY THE EX SOCIALIST PRESIDENT BEFORE TRUMP, ON YOUR WAY THERE LEAVE YOUR PASSPORT AT THE BORDER AND ENJOY YOUR SOCIALIST UTOPIAN PARADISE, AS WE THE PEOPLE DONT LIKE YOU ANYMORE AND DONT WANT YOUR SORRY ASS PETULANT LIBERAL BODY HERE ANYMORE. Damn it is hard to get through a thick skulled liberal(I know redundant statement)
 
Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.

"As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV."

They won't be laughing for much longer, President Trump will get the last laugh, as Patriots everywhere in the Western world already know, because we'll get the last laugh also.

We have very good friends now in the White House, friends who share our view, friends who are willing to help us achieve our joint aims. ...
Judge a person by the friends he keeps.


.
With friends like France and Germany right now, I would be better off with a Muslim. Both want to destroy the US just Muslims are out front about it.
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​
Hmmm, that is a hard choice. Let me think, Nordstrom goes out and takes Ivanka Trump's line off stating that sales have gone down, but could it be that because they took her items off the shelf before the sales went down, they are trying to justify their actions? I have seen conservative books which are best sellers end up starting at the back of the store where they are hard to find, because liberals hate anything that counters their continuing push for immorality and Marxist ways. So here is the People's President's Daughter who she herself identifies as liberal, being kicked to the street, and do you think she will be liberal for long? Yep liberals are so stupid like Obama and Hillary who threw many White and Black Democrats under the bus, because they hate fossil fuels. Then they wondered why those White and Black Democrats didn't vote for the failed vagina candidate.

Liberal are the stupidest people in the Universe.

View attachment 111492
Trump is not the people's President. Far from it. He did not get a majority of their votes, people are out protesting against him continuously, and his approval ratings for a new President are the lowest in history, his disapproval ratings for a new President the highest in history. There is nothing to indicate he is the "people's president".
You libtards are the stupidest people in the Universe. Once again let me explain how your Representative Republic works.

Trump go the majority of the peoples vote in the majority of states in the US, he won, the failed vagina candidate didn't.

THIS COUNTRY IS NOT A DEMOCRACY BUT A REPUBLIC AND IF YOU DONT LIKE IT, CUBA HAS BEEN OPENED BY THE EX SOCIALIST PRESIDENT BEFORE TRUMP, ON YOUR WAY THERE LEAVE YOUR PASSPORT AT THE BORDER AND ENJOY YOUR SOCIALIST UTOPIAN PARADISE, AS WE THE PEOPLE DONT LIKE YOU ANYMORE AND DONT WANT YOUR SORRY ASS PETULANT LIBERAL BODY HERE ANYMORE. Damn it is hard to get through a thick skulled liberal(I know redundant statement)

"With friends like France and Germany"

Both under the current leadership are to be considered foes and the latter nation is putting the entire security of our Continent and our peoples at mortal risk.
 
Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.

"As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV."

They won't be laughing for much longer, President Trump will get the last laugh, as Patriots everywhere in the Western world already know, because we'll get the last laugh also.

We have very good friends now in the White House, friends who share our view, friends who are willing to help us achieve our joint aims. ...
Judge a person by the friends he keeps.


.
If that were the case then why is it not a problem that Obama/Hillary is/are friends with George Soros, Bill Ayers, The Muslim Brotherhood, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Black Lives Matter, The New Black Panther Party, The Weathermen, Cher, Madonna, and Ashley Judd.

With friends like this.....Muslims: When We Take Over Europe, We will Make It Legal to Rape White Women
 
Last edited:
Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.
Well at least he doesn't need a teleprompter 24/7 to keep from boring the shit out of everyone.


Actually he needs to use one very, very badly. That he does not is a big part of his problem.
But the so-called president cannot read. Didn't you know?


.

He does seem barely literate at best. I mean when Merriam Webster is trolling you...

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary Has Been Trolling Trump On Twitter For Months
Believing so-called President Trump is hardly literate puts me in good company.



.
Maybe Madonna might have sex with you.
 
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​

Obama showed police great disrespect, but he showed no such disrespect for BLM etc.

Here is President Trump from yesterday meeting with US County Sheriffs that he invited to the White House, they know like the police that they have a friend in President Trump and also in Attorney-General Jefferson B. Sessions III.

 
Every time Obama got up in front of a teleprompter I was just disgusted how much he talked down this great country. That is not a joke, but a worthless fucktard. But hey, Eloy, if you don't like what Trump is doing, Cuba is open, go there and have your socialist utopian paradise, just leave your passport at the border. The US citizens don't want you here any more.
I do not live in the USA. Couldn't you tell?
Not really, as all liberals are stupid no matter where they are, and all think alike.

You know we're not all mindless idiots. Some of us are, but some of us aren't. You just see the mindless ones more because they scream the loudest and get the most coverage from CNN, and are used as examples by the right to prove that the left is just a gathering of poop-throwing monkeys.

It's easy to focus on the bad slice of the pie.
That's true to a large extent but it's liberalism itself that's the underlying problem. It's based on naive thinking and beliefs, not reality. It's what we all are as kids needing parents to care for us and providing our basic needs and making things right.

It stands in direct opposition of those who want to move out and make a life of their own. We don't need/want mother calling the shots.
People who need people are the luckiest people in the world.



.
Problem is you Snowflakes need like minded people to back up your Bullshit.
 
As opposed to a slick talking politician who is politically correct, but corrupt to the core?
No, in contrast to a high schooler who can actually put two sentences together.

No...you want the polished rat.
Butt hurt sucks don't it?
America would be better served by a president who is actually literate and able to write more than his signature on illegal executive orders.


.
How the fuck would you know, if you don't live here, then you don't have a clue, and also have no skin in the game. Take care of your own country, and leave the rest of US alone. People who butt into the affairs of others, are so fucking worthless liberal, that is why the US went for Trump, not the failed vagina candidate.
Now watch your language or people will think you cannot speak properly.
Where I live we have newspapers and TV. People in Europe are well-informed. Honestly, whenever I see Trump on TV I have to chuckle. What a thick jackass the so-called president is.


.
No, you have proven you get your facts from made up talking points. Their are obviously read to you, because you obviously didn't read the op's post.
 
Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.

"As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV."

They won't be laughing for much longer, President Trump will get the last laugh, as Patriots everywhere in the Western world already know, because we'll get the last laugh also.

We have very good friends now in the White House, friends who share our view, friends who are willing to help us achieve our joint aims. ...
Judge a person by the friends he keeps.


.
Yes and Obama surrounded himself with American hating thugs and Muslims.
 
Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.

"As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV."

They won't be laughing for much longer, President Trump will get the last laugh, as Patriots everywhere in the Western world already know, because we'll get the last laugh also.

We have very good friends now in the White House, friends who share our view, friends who are willing to help us achieve our joint aims. ...
Judge a person by the friends he keeps.


.
Yes and Obama surrounded himself with American hating thugs and Muslims.
Doesnt-Mean-They-Are-Muslim-Terrorists-Obama-Funny-Meme-Image.jpg.cf.jpg
 
Let's face it. As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV. You know, it is clear that when he is talking, Trump does not know how to finish a sentence when he begins one. He is a scatterbrain who appeals to daytime TV viewers.


.

"As a so-called president, Donald Trump is a joke. People must be laughing every time they see him on TV."

They won't be laughing for much longer, President Trump will get the last laugh, as Patriots everywhere in the Western world already know, because we'll get the last laugh also.

We have very good friends now in the White House, friends who share our view, friends who are willing to help us achieve our joint aims. ...
Judge a person by the friends he keeps.


.
Yes and Obama surrounded himself with American hating thugs and Muslims.
Doesnt-Mean-They-Are-Muslim-Terrorists-Obama-Funny-Meme-Image.jpg.cf.jpg
John F'ing Kerry(who won 3 purple hearts) says it best, "straight from the horses mouth".

 
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​

.
Is this a trick question? Nordstrom is the fashion police.
 
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​

Since Trump is the worst president ever, that should answer your question.
 
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​

false equivalency from bigoted nutty muddy.

try again.... this time do it without your insane Obama derangement and with some semblance of rational thought about the sociopath you voted for.
 
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​

Since Trump is the worst president ever, that should answer your question.
If he is the worst president to you petulant spoiled little liberal brats, then he must be the best president ever. Thanks for pointing that out NYCarbinated... I am rolling on the floor laughing my ass off, on how stupid you are.

 
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​

Since Trump is the worst president ever, that should answer your question.
If he is the worst president to you petulant spoiled little liberal brats, then he must be the best president ever. Thanks for pointing that out NYCarbinated... I am rolling on the floor laughing my ass off, on how stupid you are.



Try again in your adult voice, if you have one.
 
This is an example of Democrats jumping on the bandwagon to support the wealthy. How things change when they see a chance to score political points. In their zeal to trash the current administration, they've fallen into a trap and shown us how hypocritical they are.

PRESIDENT Trump tweeted yesterday that Nordstrom was being unfair to his daughter. The left, as usual, used this as an excuse to make false claims that he was nuts. That he was dangerous. On the contrary, what is more dangerous; A president that criticizes unfair business practices or a president who has been conducting a war against law enforcement. This criticism from the left isn't so much about what is right or wrong, but about what feeds an agenda and fills their coffers.
Right now the left is trashing PRESIDENT Trump on the behalf of a bunch of guys who have huge compensation packages, the kind of which were a source of scorn by these same exact Democrats only a few years ago. After all Barack Obama said; "There comes a time when you've made enough money". Apparently this doesn't apply if Democrats can use you to attack Republicans and especially attack Bush....er I mean Trump. So if the Democrats need a tax increase or need to get low-income voters on their side, they trash the evil rich. Now they're using the rich to attack PRESIDENT Trump. In effect, they are on the side of the rich man.


Blog: Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
February 9, 2017
Which is better: a president who criticizes the police or one who criticizes Nordstrom?
By Ed Straker
President Trump is being criticized for making critical comments of Nordstrom, which just dropped his daughter's product lines. Nordstrom claims that it is dropping her products due to economic reasons, but it is a big coincidence that Nordstrom, TJ Maxx, Marshalls, Neiman Marcus, and other retailers are dropping Trump products just as President Trump took office. The fact is that Nordstrom and other stores fear pressure from the left for selling Trump-branded products and so are proactively caving in to pressure. One wonders: if President Obama had sold an Obama-branded marijuana cigarette, would stores in California and Colorado be as quick to drop his product line when he became president? Probably not.

Predictably, the media are upset that Trump criticized Nordstrom for dropping his daughter's product line, calling it an "ethical dilemma." But the media saw no dilemma of any kind, ethical or otherwise, when President Obama and his henchman Eric Holder and his henchwoman Loretta Lynch went after the police forces of America and labeled them racist oppressors, feeding fuel to the fire to Black Lives Matter rioters everywhere and disincentivizing the police to do their jobs properly.

But you see, that was different, because that was about race and social justice. This is about Trump's products.

But taking a look at the list of corporate officers who run Nordstrom, I was a little surprised to find that of the top 13 officers, only one is a woman (predictably, human resources). That sounds more than a little sexist to me. What if Trump had criticized Nordstrom for being sexist? Would the media have minded?

And I couldn't help but notice that the three co-presidents of Nordstrom each make more than five million dollars a year in base compensation. ${Instrument_CompanyName} ${Instrument_Ric} People | Reuters.com
I have to wonder how many times that salary is compared to the basic sales clerk who works at Nordstrom. Isn't that enormous gap only fueling inequality?

How do you feel about the media defending a company that marginalizes women and pays huge salaries at the expense of its workers? In light of that, isn't the media's hand-wringing over such a racist, sexist, classist mega-corporation a reflection of their own lack of moral virtue?​

Since Trump is the worst president ever, that should answer your question.
Yeah and you know this from only a few days into his first term. Why wait for his policies to take effect.
 

Forum List

Back
Top