Which Conspiracy Theory is MOST Likely True?

[Soupnazi630]

Nope.

You lose the game.

Conspiracies are real, conspiracy theories are fiction.

We'll just go by who has the high ratings here.

Thus, you are less reliable to the board than the folks that are telling you that you are just a stubborn ass troll.

Wrong we will not go by such a standard as popularity and consensus does not equal truth or lead to truth.

The fact is that conspiracy theory is quite fictional the so called researchers cherry pick unimportant facts to support pre ordained conclusions and willfully ignore evidence which contradict them.

Conspiracies are mundane and happen every day.

Those are simple facts deal with them.

It is not about ratings or popularity it is about evidence and facts which consistently debunks conspiracy theory

Nah. . . folks know you are a liar.

No they do not , only a few trolls make the false claim, and you cannot cite one lie from me which proves you are the liar.

Anyone can call someone else a name, cite one lie from me or your accusation is proven the lie.

Sure. I'll cite two lies.

Maybe none of them are, but, which is the most believable and/or likely to be true?

- The Moon Landing Was Faked
- The Government is hiding UFO/Alien Evidence
- JFK Murder was a Mafia job
- Obama Wasn't Born in the US
- Cure for Cancer is being withheld

a much better TITLE would be which conspiracy is most likely true.I am surprised you left out 9/11 being an inside job

the thread title SHOULD read that because ALL of them have been proven too many times to remember over the years to be true,there is no theory involved.

there have been MANY threads on all these subjects created by very smart intelligent people here many times in this section over the years who have proven all of them to be true.

actually one of them is NOT true.JFK's murder was not a solo mafia job.The CIA did it same as they did 9/11. the mafia was involved in it for sure but at a much lower level.they did not have the power to pull the operation off like controlling the media,setting up oswald like he was or lowering the secret service protection on him.the CIA however DID have that power,here get educated.lol






E Howard Hunt a CIA operative who was arrested in the watergate burglury and who denied for years he was in dallas that day,confessed on his deathbed confession he WAS in dallas as part of a CIA operation to kill him.

Those videos are fiction and long since debunked.

You have been schooled on the facts proving you wrong but as i pointed out in an earlier post you just lack the maturity to face facts.

Oswald killed Kennedy alone and 911 was not an inside job.

Most sane rational folks know that those towers weren't taken down by planes, and every one knows that Oswald was a patsy.

Thus, you are a liar.

Quite wrong.

All rational and sane people know that the planes and the resulting fire brought down the towers. Massive evidence proves this fact and you cannot offer any evidence to the contrary.

The evidence proves Oswald acted alone and no evidence refutes that fact.

Thus you are the liar and proven so.

Sorry loser but it is irrelevant what others think, once again read this slowly. Consensus does not equal or lead to truth.

Evidence does and the evidence proves you a coward who has been owned and crushed.

 

[MisterBeale]

We'll just go by who has the high ratings here.

Thus, you are less reliable to the board than the folks that are telling you that you are just a stubborn ass troll.

Wrong we will not go by such a standard as popularity and consensus does not equal truth or lead to truth.

The fact is that conspiracy theory is quite fictional the so called researchers cherry pick unimportant facts to support pre ordained conclusions and willfully ignore evidence which contradict them.

Conspiracies are mundane and happen every day.

Those are simple facts deal with them.

It is not about ratings or popularity it is about evidence and facts which consistently debunks conspiracy theory

Nah. . . folks know you are a liar.

No they do not , only a few trolls make the false claim, and you cannot cite one lie from me which proves you are the liar.

Anyone can call someone else a name, cite one lie from me or your accusation is proven the lie.

Sure. I'll cite two lies.

Maybe none of them are, but, which is the most believable and/or likely to be true?

- The Moon Landing Was Faked
- The Government is hiding UFO/Alien Evidence
- JFK Murder was a Mafia job
- Obama Wasn't Born in the US
- Cure for Cancer is being withheld

a much better TITLE would be which conspiracy is most likely true.I am surprised you left out 9/11 being an inside job

the thread title SHOULD read that because ALL of them have been proven too many times to remember over the years to be true,there is no theory involved.

there have been MANY threads on all these subjects created by very smart intelligent people here many times in this section over the years who have proven all of them to be true.

actually one of them is NOT true.JFK's murder was not a solo mafia job.The CIA did it same as they did 9/11. the mafia was involved in it for sure but at a much lower level.they did not have the power to pull the operation off like controlling the media,setting up oswald like he was or lowering the secret service protection on him.the CIA however DID have that power,here get educated.lol






E Howard Hunt a CIA operative who was arrested in the watergate burglury and who denied for years he was in dallas that day,confessed on his deathbed confession he WAS in dallas as part of a CIA operation to kill him.

Those videos are fiction and long since debunked.

You have been schooled on the facts proving you wrong but as i pointed out in an earlier post you just lack the maturity to face facts.

Oswald killed Kennedy alone and 911 was not an inside job.

Most sane rational folks know that those towers weren't taken down by planes, and every one knows that Oswald was a patsy.

Thus, you are a liar.

Quite wrong.

All rational and sane people know that the planes and the resulting fire brought down the towers. Massive evidence proves this fact and you cannot offer any evidence to the contrary.

The evidence proves Oswald acted alone and no evidence refutes that fact.

Thus you are the liar and proven so.

Sorry loser but it is irrelevant what others think, once again read this slowly. Consensus does not equal or lead to truth.

Evidence does and the evidence proves you a coward who has been owned and crushed.

Now you are just trolling.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong we will not go by such a standard as popularity and consensus does not equal truth or lead to truth.

The fact is that conspiracy theory is quite fictional the so called researchers cherry pick unimportant facts to support pre ordained conclusions and willfully ignore evidence which contradict them.

Conspiracies are mundane and happen every day.

Those are simple facts deal with them.

It is not about ratings or popularity it is about evidence and facts which consistently debunks conspiracy theory

Nah. . . folks know you are a liar.

No they do not , only a few trolls make the false claim, and you cannot cite one lie from me which proves you are the liar.

Anyone can call someone else a name, cite one lie from me or your accusation is proven the lie.

Sure. I'll cite two lies.

Maybe none of them are, but, which is the most believable and/or likely to be true?

- The Moon Landing Was Faked
- The Government is hiding UFO/Alien Evidence
- JFK Murder was a Mafia job
- Obama Wasn't Born in the US
- Cure for Cancer is being withheld

a much better TITLE would be which conspiracy is most likely true.I am surprised you left out 9/11 being an inside job

the thread title SHOULD read that because ALL of them have been proven too many times to remember over the years to be true,there is no theory involved.

there have been MANY threads on all these subjects created by very smart intelligent people here many times in this section over the years who have proven all of them to be true.

actually one of them is NOT true.JFK's murder was not a solo mafia job.The CIA did it same as they did 9/11. the mafia was involved in it for sure but at a much lower level.they did not have the power to pull the operation off like controlling the media,setting up oswald like he was or lowering the secret service protection on him.the CIA however DID have that power,here get educated.lol






E Howard Hunt a CIA operative who was arrested in the watergate burglury and who denied for years he was in dallas that day,confessed on his deathbed confession he WAS in dallas as part of a CIA operation to kill him.

Those videos are fiction and long since debunked.

You have been schooled on the facts proving you wrong but as i pointed out in an earlier post you just lack the maturity to face facts.

Oswald killed Kennedy alone and 911 was not an inside job.

Most sane rational folks know that those towers weren't taken down by planes, and every one knows that Oswald was a patsy.

Thus, you are a liar.

Quite wrong.

All rational and sane people know that the planes and the resulting fire brought down the towers. Massive evidence proves this fact and you cannot offer any evidence to the contrary.

The evidence proves Oswald acted alone and no evidence refutes that fact.

Thus you are the liar and proven so.

Sorry loser but it is irrelevant what others think, once again read this slowly. Consensus does not equal or lead to truth.

Evidence does and the evidence proves you a coward who has been owned and crushed.

Now you are just trolling.

Wrong as you clearly do not get what trolling means.

The fact remains what I stated it accurate and true and you cannot refute it.

 

[MisterBeale]

Nah. . . folks know you are a liar.

No they do not , only a few trolls make the false claim, and you cannot cite one lie from me which proves you are the liar.

Anyone can call someone else a name, cite one lie from me or your accusation is proven the lie.

Sure. I'll cite two lies.

a much better TITLE would be which conspiracy is most likely true.I am surprised you left out 9/11 being an inside job

the thread title SHOULD read that because ALL of them have been proven too many times to remember over the years to be true,there is no theory involved.

there have been MANY threads on all these subjects created by very smart intelligent people here many times in this section over the years who have proven all of them to be true.

actually one of them is NOT true.JFK's murder was not a solo mafia job.The CIA did it same as they did 9/11. the mafia was involved in it for sure but at a much lower level.they did not have the power to pull the operation off like controlling the media,setting up oswald like he was or lowering the secret service protection on him.the CIA however DID have that power,here get educated.lol






E Howard Hunt a CIA operative who was arrested in the watergate burglury and who denied for years he was in dallas that day,confessed on his deathbed confession he WAS in dallas as part of a CIA operation to kill him.

Those videos are fiction and long since debunked.

You have been schooled on the facts proving you wrong but as i pointed out in an earlier post you just lack the maturity to face facts.

Oswald killed Kennedy alone and 911 was not an inside job.

Most sane rational folks know that those towers weren't taken down by planes, and every one knows that Oswald was a patsy.

Thus, you are a liar.

Quite wrong.

All rational and sane people know that the planes and the resulting fire brought down the towers. Massive evidence proves this fact and you cannot offer any evidence to the contrary.

The evidence proves Oswald acted alone and no evidence refutes that fact.

Thus you are the liar and proven so.

Sorry loser but it is irrelevant what others think, once again read this slowly. Consensus does not equal or lead to truth.

Evidence does and the evidence proves you a coward who has been owned and crushed.

Now you are just trolling.

Wrong as you clearly do not get what trolling means.

The fact remains what I stated it accurate and true and you cannot refute it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

No they do not , only a few trolls make the false claim, and you cannot cite one lie from me which proves you are the liar.

Anyone can call someone else a name, cite one lie from me or your accusation is proven the lie.

Sure. I'll cite two lies.

Those videos are fiction and long since debunked.

You have been schooled on the facts proving you wrong but as i pointed out in an earlier post you just lack the maturity to face facts.

Oswald killed Kennedy alone and 911 was not an inside job.

Most sane rational folks know that those towers weren't taken down by planes, and every one knows that Oswald was a patsy.

Thus, you are a liar.

Quite wrong.

All rational and sane people know that the planes and the resulting fire brought down the towers. Massive evidence proves this fact and you cannot offer any evidence to the contrary.

The evidence proves Oswald acted alone and no evidence refutes that fact.

Thus you are the liar and proven so.

Sorry loser but it is irrelevant what others think, once again read this slowly. Consensus does not equal or lead to truth.

Evidence does and the evidence proves you a coward who has been owned and crushed.

Now you are just trolling.

Wrong as you clearly do not get what trolling means.

The fact remains what I stated it accurate and true and you cannot refute it.

Resorting to memes now.

Thus proving my point.

You have no evidence which is typical of all conspiracy theory fools

 

[ranfunck]

You make it so clear that you are a paid peace of shit troll. fuck you and your handler.

 

[Soupnazi630]

You make it so clear that you are a paid peace of shit troll. fuck you and your handler.

Thank you for conceding that I am correct.

There are no paid posters here as you know and cannot refute,

But the fact is the evidence proves you and Dale Smith and LARAM and all the other conspiracy fools wrong.

When one cannot post evidence but instead has to resort to insults as you just did it proves you are outclassed and defeated and know it,

You just admitted you are proven wrong and you are an imferior little person

 

[ranfunck]

You fucking moron it has been posted but you are not smart enough to get it or refuse to except it.
fucking troll

 

[Soupnazi630]

You fucking moron it has been posted but you are not smart enough to get it or refuse to except it.
fucking troll

No it has not been posted.

You and others posted false assertions which were easily, massively and completely debunked and proven false and you know it.

You posted no evidence and neither did Dale Smith or LARAM or any of the other conspiracy fools.

You continue to prove it with your juvenile language which is a de facto admission that you are wrong and you know it,

Thanks for acknowledging you lost and are a liar and bested.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Notice that there were FIVE farts on page 17 from the nazi paid shill guys?


Sure. I'll cite two lies.

Most sane rational folks know that those towers weren't taken down by planes, and every one knows that Oswald was a patsy.

Thus, you are a liar.


You fucking moron it has been posted but you are not smart enough to get it or refuse to except it.
fucking troll

You make it so clear that you are a paid peace of shit troll. fuck you and your handler.


100% CRYSTAL CLEAR.

here is the message to not only him but I hope his handler sees from me as well .

 

[LA RAM FAN]

the UNDERSTATEMENT of the century.



His handler is the most deluded boss a person could EVER have for a boss the stuff he instructs him to post.

 

[Soupnazi630]

the UNDERSTATEMENT of the century.



His handler is the most deluded boss a person could EVER have for a boss the stuff he instructs him to post.

Yes it applies to you.

The facts and evidence prove you wrong always and you know it yet you still sling shit like the loser you are.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Notice that there were FIVE farts on page 17 from the nazi paid shill guys?


make that SIX farts now from the paid shill of Langley.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Notice that there were FIVE farts on page 17 from the nazi paid shill guys?


make that SIX farts now from the paid shill of Langley.

There are no paid shills and you are the only one farting as everyone knows.

 

[ranfunck]

Do you know what the Smith-Mondt Act. is?

 

[KissMy]

- Other

Bush allowed 9/11 attacks to happen & didn't want to capture Bin Laden.

As silly as the other ones.

That has real evidence. The others are all theory with no evidence.

Thats progress for you the fact unlike him,you at least got one foot in the door there that there is real evidence that Bush allowed 9/11 to happen on purpose and did not go after Bin Laden.

Now the next step is for you is stop ignoring the evidence that the towers were brought down by explosives only seeing what you want to see the same way this OTHER paid shill you are talking with only sees what he wants to see when it comes to the JFK assassination.LOL

I did forget to include that 9/11s corresponding Anthrax Attacks on the press & Democrats did come from the US military that was under Bush control.

No evidence of it or of Bush allowing 911 to happen

It's a proven fact that Bush knew who, what, where, when, why & how Al Qaeda would attack NYC WTC on 9/11. Condoleezza Rice repeatedly quoted Bush as saying he was "tired of swatting at flies!" Bush did not take actions to prevent the 9/11 attack he knew was coming! Rice & others repeatedly said Bush wanted a comprehensive global war on the terror network, instead of defending US against the attacks. The US Military Anthrax Attacked US. Bush's High School friend General Tommy Franks issued the repeated "Stand Down" orders to our troops that allowed Bin Laden to escape!

JANUARY 25, 2001: Clarke memo to Bush Admin "Policy Initiative The Al-Qaeda Network" Attached was Clinton's comprehensive strategy to destroy Al Qaeda. Clarke wrote "Al Qaeda is not some narrow, little terrorist issue that needs to be included in broader regional policy." Al Qaeda is a large powerful network that comprehensive multi-regional policy must focus on & plan around. Key decisions must be made now concerning covert aid to keep the Northern Alliance alive when fighting began again in Afghanistan in the spring, and covert aid to the Uzbeks. Decisions should be made soon on messages to the Taliban and Pakistan over the al Qaeda sanctuary in Afghanistan, on possible new money for CIA operations, and on "when and how to respond to the attack on the USS Cole." Al Qaeda affects our policy on Afghanistan, Pakistan, North Africa, Central Asia, Morocco, Indonesia, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Islam, Muslim World. The strength of the Al QaedaNetwork destabilizes & limits the support from friendly Arab regimes. We would make a major error if we underestimate the challenge Al Qaeda poses. [Clarke Memo 1/25/2001]

JANUARY 2001: Condoleezza Rice demotes terrorism czar Richard Clarke out of Cabinet access. [9/11 Commission Report]

JANUARY 2001: During Bush's first week in office, Richard Clarke requests cabinet level meeting on al Qaeda and Bin Laden. His request was denied. He did not get it - or permission to brief the president directly on the threat - for nearly eight months. [Washington Post]

JANUARY 29, 2001: 9 days after Bush was inaugurated Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neil reports that "going after Saddam Huissein was Topic A." [CBS News]

FEBRUARY 2001: CIA and FBI finally certify that al Qaeda was responsible for Cole Bombings. [Bill Clinton, Fox News]

MARCH 2001: "Federal Aviation officials reviewed dozens of intelligence reports that warned about Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, some of which specifically discussed airline hijackings and suicide operations"..."Federal Aviation Administration, despite being focused on risks of hijackings overseas, warned airports in the spring of 2001 that "the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable;"

The FAA had indeed considered the possibility that terrorists would hijack a plane and use it as a weapon. The FAA distributed a CD-ROM presentation to airlines and airports that "cited the possibility of a suicide hijacking" Aviation officials amassed so much information about the growing threat posed by terrorists that they conducted classified briefings for security officials at 19 of the nation's busiest airports to warn of the threat posed in particular by Mr. bin Laden, the report said." [NYT]

APRIL 2001: Bush administration finally has deputy-level cabinet meeting on al Qeada. Clarke writes, the meeting "did not go well" Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, scowled and asked, "why we are beginning by talking about this one man, bin Laden." When Clarke told him no foe but al Qaeda "poses an immediate and serious threat to the United States" Wolfowitz said that "Iraqi terrorism posed at least as much of a danger." FBI and CIA representatives backed Clarke in saying they had no such evidence. [Washington Post]

MAY 1, 2001: The CIA Tenet & Black report to the White House stated "a group presently in the United States" was planning a terrorist operation. They asked for CIA authority to attack Al Qaeda & Bin Laden but Bush would not grant it. [NYT, CBS 60 Minutes & Tenet's Book]

JUNE 22, 2001: The presidents daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be "imminent" Neoconservative leaders at Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, who is a greater threat. Intelligence officials protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives; suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day. [NYT]

MAY 29, 2001: Four Bin Laden followers found guilty of murder at trial. Four followers of Osama bin Laden are found guilty of charges stemming from the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al-Owhali, Khalfan Khamis Mohamed, Mohammed Saddiq Odeh, and Wadih El Hage are convicted of charges including murder, conspiracy and perjury after a nine-week federal trial during which prosecutors called over 90 witnesses, including al Qaeda informants and survivors of the bombings. Owhali and Mohamed face the death penalty at their sentencing, while Odeh and El Hage face life in prison. [PBS]

JUNE 29, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "The U.S. is not the target of a disinformation campaign by Usama Bin Laden" the document recited much of the evidence, including an interview that month with a Middle Eastern journalist in which Bin Laden aides warned of a coming attack, as well as competitive pressures that the terrorist leader was feeling, given the number of Islamists being recruited for the separatist Russian region of Chechnya. [NYT]

JUNE 2001: Bush give speech to NATO allies on top five defense issues, and the "only reference to extremists was in Macedonia." [Washington Post]

JULY 9, 2001: The C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed June 29 2001. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, expected the planned near-term attacks to have "dramatic consequences"; including major casualties... Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counter-terrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counter-terrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else. [NYT]

JULY 10, 2001: Cofer Black and George Tenet met with Condoleezza Rice to inform her about communications intercepts and other top-secret intelligence showing the increasing likelihood that al-Qaeda would soon attack the United States. They asked for CIA authority to attack Al Qaeda & Bin Laden but Bush would not grant it. Rice listened but was unconvinced, having other priorities on which to focus. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld questioned the information suggesting it was a deception meant to gauge the U.S. response. [Washington Post, CBS 60 Minutes & Tenet's Book]

AUGUST 6, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S." FBI information indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York. [National Archive]

SEPTEMBER 4, 2001: 8 months after Clarke demands Comprehensive Strategy to Fight Al-Qaeda, Bush finally holds the principals meeting to concoct an Al Qaeda strategy.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001: Russian President Putin calls President Bush & warns him that Al Qaeda has just started it's major international attack they have been plotting.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: Al-Qaeda attacks reach the USA. Prior to this attack Bush knew Who, What, Where. When, Why & How the attack would happen. Bush thought Bin Laden was bluffing to distract him from Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

September 11, 2001: Passengers on Air Force One Are Given the Anti-Anthrax Drug Cipro

A week later Anthrax Letters Targeting Democrats & Reporters began to arrive. These letters were Mailed by US Military's Bruce Edwards Ivins & Contained US Military Anthrax. Ivins was the senior biodefense researcher at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland,

October 5-November 21, 2001: Anthrax Letters Kill Five, Heighten Terrorist Attack Fears

When our US soldiers had Osama Bin Laden trapped in Torra Bora Afghanistan, Bush's high school friend General Tommy Franks ordered our soldiers to stand down, allowing Bin Laden to escape. Bush said he did not care about Bin Laden.

 

[Skylar]

As silly as the other ones.

That has real evidence. The others are all theory with no evidence.

Thats progress for you the fact unlike him,you at least got one foot in the door there that there is real evidence that Bush allowed 9/11 to happen on purpose and did not go after Bin Laden.

Now the next step is for you is stop ignoring the evidence that the towers were brought down by explosives only seeing what you want to see the same way this OTHER paid shill you are talking with only sees what he wants to see when it comes to the JFK assassination.LOL

I did forget to include that 9/11s corresponding Anthrax Attacks on the press & Democrats did come from the US military that was under Bush control.

No evidence of it or of Bush allowing 911 to happen

It's a proven fact that Bush knew who, what, where, when, why & how Al Qaeda would attack NYC WTC on 9/11.

No it isn't. Its an allegation....and a poorly supported one. As you demonstrated in your follow up to the imaginary 'proven fact'.

MARCH 2001: "Federal Aviation officials reviewed dozens of intelligence reports that warned about Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, some of which specifically discussed airline hijackings and suicide operations"..."Federal Aviation Administration, despite being focused on risks of hijackings overseas, warned airports in the spring of 2001 that "the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable;"

And dozens of other possibilities including car bombings and embassy attacks. Negating your premise that Bush knew 'exactly what Osama Bin Laden' was going to do and where. There was no specific time table, no specific target that was indicated was going to be hit. But a laundry list of potential targets that *may* be hit.

That's not foreknowledge. Or even actionable. But a list of vague possibilities with no time line.

The FAA had indeed considered the possibility that terrorists would hijack a plane and use it as a weapon. The FAA distributed a CD-ROM presentation to airlines and airports that "cited the possibility of a suicide hijacking" Aviation officials amassed so much information about the growing threat posed by terrorists that they conducted classified briefings for security officials at 19 of the nation's busiest airports to warn of the threat posed in particular by Mr. bin Laden, the report said." [NYT]

You're proving my point. 'Considering the possibility' isn't foreknowledge of an exact attack on an exact day. Yet your claims are that Bush knew exactly when, how and where.

He didn't.

JUNE 22, 2001: The presidents daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be "imminent" Neoconservative leaders at Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, who is a greater threat. Intelligence officials protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives; suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day. [NYT]

An attack 'may be imminent' isn't actionable or specific. It doesn't designate a specific place, method of attack, time line....anything. You're again proving my point.

AUGUST 6, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S." FBI information indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York. [National Archive]

The August 6th memo was a laundry list of possible targets both internationally and domestically. It cited border crossings from Canada, embassy bombings in East Africa, contacts in California, and 70 separate investigations spread across the country.

No 'federal building' in NY was hit on 911. Nothing you've shown even suggests that Bush had actionable evidence on exact hijackings or attacks. But instead, vague warnings about possible attacks on a variety of targets......with hijackings mentioned conceptually.

So much for your 'proven fact' nonsense.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001: Russian President Putin calls President Bush & warns him that Al Qaeda has just started it's major international attack they have been plotting.

Please back this up with evidence.

 

[Soupnazi630]

As silly as the other ones.

That has real evidence. The others are all theory with no evidence.

Thats progress for you the fact unlike him,you at least got one foot in the door there that there is real evidence that Bush allowed 9/11 to happen on purpose and did not go after Bin Laden.

Now the next step is for you is stop ignoring the evidence that the towers were brought down by explosives only seeing what you want to see the same way this OTHER paid shill you are talking with only sees what he wants to see when it comes to the JFK assassination.LOL

I did forget to include that 9/11s corresponding Anthrax Attacks on the press & Democrats did come from the US military that was under Bush control.

No evidence of it or of Bush allowing 911 to happen

It's a proven fact that Bush knew who, what, where, when, why & how Al Qaeda would attack NYC WTC on 9/11. Condoleezza Rice repeatedly quoted Bush as saying he was "tired of swatting at flies!" Bush did not take actions to prevent the 9/11 attack he knew was coming! Rice & others repeatedly said Bush wanted a comprehensive global war on the terror network, instead of defending US against the attacks. The US Military Anthrax Attacked US. Bush's High School friend General Tommy Franks issued the repeated "Stand Down" orders to our troops that allowed Bin Laden to escape!

JANUARY 25, 2001: Clarke memo to Bush Admin "Policy Initiative The Al-Qaeda Network" Attached was Clinton's comprehensive strategy to destroy Al Qaeda. Clarke wrote "Al Qaeda is not some narrow, little terrorist issue that needs to be included in broader regional policy." Al Qaeda is a large powerful network that comprehensive multi-regional policy must focus on & plan around. Key decisions must be made now concerning covert aid to keep the Northern Alliance alive when fighting began again in Afghanistan in the spring, and covert aid to the Uzbeks. Decisions should be made soon on messages to the Taliban and Pakistan over the al Qaeda sanctuary in Afghanistan, on possible new money for CIA operations, and on "when and how to respond to the attack on the USS Cole." Al Qaeda affects our policy on Afghanistan, Pakistan, North Africa, Central Asia, Morocco, Indonesia, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Islam, Muslim World. The strength of the Al QaedaNetwork destabilizes & limits the support from friendly Arab regimes. We would make a major error if we underestimate the challenge Al Qaeda poses. [Clarke Memo 1/25/2001]

JANUARY 2001: Condoleezza Rice demotes terrorism czar Richard Clarke out of Cabinet access. [9/11 Commission Report]

JANUARY 2001: During Bush's first week in office, Richard Clarke requests cabinet level meeting on al Qaeda and Bin Laden. His request was denied. He did not get it - or permission to brief the president directly on the threat - for nearly eight months. [Washington Post]

JANUARY 29, 2001: 9 days after Bush was inaugurated Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neil reports that "going after Saddam Huissein was Topic A." [CBS News]

FEBRUARY 2001: CIA and FBI finally certify that al Qaeda was responsible for Cole Bombings. [Bill Clinton, Fox News]

MARCH 2001: "Federal Aviation officials reviewed dozens of intelligence reports that warned about Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, some of which specifically discussed airline hijackings and suicide operations"..."Federal Aviation Administration, despite being focused on risks of hijackings overseas, warned airports in the spring of 2001 that "the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable;"

The FAA had indeed considered the possibility that terrorists would hijack a plane and use it as a weapon. The FAA distributed a CD-ROM presentation to airlines and airports that "cited the possibility of a suicide hijacking" Aviation officials amassed so much information about the growing threat posed by terrorists that they conducted classified briefings for security officials at 19 of the nation's busiest airports to warn of the threat posed in particular by Mr. bin Laden, the report said." [NYT]

APRIL 2001: Bush administration finally has deputy-level cabinet meeting on al Qeada. Clarke writes, the meeting "did not go well" Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, scowled and asked, "why we are beginning by talking about this one man, bin Laden." When Clarke told him no foe but al Qaeda "poses an immediate and serious threat to the United States" Wolfowitz said that "Iraqi terrorism posed at least as much of a danger." FBI and CIA representatives backed Clarke in saying they had no such evidence. [Washington Post]

MAY 1, 2001: The CIA Tenet & Black report to the White House stated "a group presently in the United States" was planning a terrorist operation. They asked for CIA authority to attack Al Qaeda & Bin Laden but Bush would not grant it. [NYT, CBS 60 Minutes & Tenet's Book]

JUNE 22, 2001: The presidents daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be "imminent" Neoconservative leaders at Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, who is a greater threat. Intelligence officials protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives; suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day. [NYT]

MAY 29, 2001: Four Bin Laden followers found guilty of murder at trial. Four followers of Osama bin Laden are found guilty of charges stemming from the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al-Owhali, Khalfan Khamis Mohamed, Mohammed Saddiq Odeh, and Wadih El Hage are convicted of charges including murder, conspiracy and perjury after a nine-week federal trial during which prosecutors called over 90 witnesses, including al Qaeda informants and survivors of the bombings. Owhali and Mohamed face the death penalty at their sentencing, while Odeh and El Hage face life in prison. [PBS]

JUNE 29, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "The U.S. is not the target of a disinformation campaign by Usama Bin Laden" the document recited much of the evidence, including an interview that month with a Middle Eastern journalist in which Bin Laden aides warned of a coming attack, as well as competitive pressures that the terrorist leader was feeling, given the number of Islamists being recruited for the separatist Russian region of Chechnya. [NYT]

JUNE 2001: Bush give speech to NATO allies on top five defense issues, and the "only reference to extremists was in Macedonia." [Washington Post]

JULY 9, 2001: The C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed June 29 2001. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, expected the planned near-term attacks to have "dramatic consequences"; including major casualties... Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counter-terrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counter-terrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else. [NYT]

JULY 10, 2001: Cofer Black and George Tenet met with Condoleezza Rice to inform her about communications intercepts and other top-secret intelligence showing the increasing likelihood that al-Qaeda would soon attack the United States. They asked for CIA authority to attack Al Qaeda & Bin Laden but Bush would not grant it. Rice listened but was unconvinced, having other priorities on which to focus. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld questioned the information suggesting it was a deception meant to gauge the U.S. response. [Washington Post, CBS 60 Minutes & Tenet's Book]

AUGUST 6, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S." FBI information indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York. [National Archive]

SEPTEMBER 4, 2001: 8 months after Clarke demands Comprehensive Strategy to Fight Al-Qaeda, Bush finally holds the principals meeting to concoct an Al Qaeda strategy.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001: Russian President Putin calls President Bush & warns him that Al Qaeda has just started it's major international attack they have been plotting.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: Al-Qaeda attacks reach the USA. Prior to this attack Bush knew Who, What, Where. When, Why & How the attack would happen. Bush thought Bin Laden was bluffing to distract him from Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

September 11, 2001: Passengers on Air Force One Are Given the Anti-Anthrax Drug Cipro

A week later Anthrax Letters Targeting Democrats & Reporters began to arrive. These letters were Mailed by US Military's Bruce Edwards Ivins & Contained US Military Anthrax. Ivins was the senior biodefense researcher at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland,

October 5-November 21, 2001: Anthrax Letters Kill Five, Heighten Terrorist Attack Fears

When our US soldiers had Osama Bin Laden trapped in Torra Bora Afghanistan, Bush's high school friend General Tommy Franks ordered our soldiers to stand down, allowing Bin Laden to escape. Bush said he did not care about Bin Laden.

it is not a proven fact it is a very weak assertion with no supporting evidence.

The various sources you cite give only generalities they do not give specifics.

 

[KissMy]

That has real evidence. The others are all theory with no evidence.

Thats progress for you the fact unlike him,you at least got one foot in the door there that there is real evidence that Bush allowed 9/11 to happen on purpose and did not go after Bin Laden.

Now the next step is for you is stop ignoring the evidence that the towers were brought down by explosives only seeing what you want to see the same way this OTHER paid shill you are talking with only sees what he wants to see when it comes to the JFK assassination.LOL

I did forget to include that 9/11s corresponding Anthrax Attacks on the press & Democrats did come from the US military that was under Bush control.

No evidence of it or of Bush allowing 911 to happen

It's a proven fact that Bush knew who, what, where, when, why & how Al Qaeda would attack NYC WTC on 9/11. Condoleezza Rice repeatedly quoted Bush as saying he was "tired of swatting at flies!" Bush did not take actions to prevent the 9/11 attack he knew was coming! Rice & others repeatedly said Bush wanted a comprehensive global war on the terror network, instead of defending US against the attacks. The US Military Anthrax Attacked US. Bush's High School friend General Tommy Franks issued the repeated "Stand Down" orders to our troops that allowed Bin Laden to escape!

JANUARY 25, 2001: Clarke memo to Bush Admin "Policy Initiative The Al-Qaeda Network" Attached was Clinton's comprehensive strategy to destroy Al Qaeda. Clarke wrote "Al Qaeda is not some narrow, little terrorist issue that needs to be included in broader regional policy." Al Qaeda is a large powerful network that comprehensive multi-regional policy must focus on & plan around. Key decisions must be made now concerning covert aid to keep the Northern Alliance alive when fighting began again in Afghanistan in the spring, and covert aid to the Uzbeks. Decisions should be made soon on messages to the Taliban and Pakistan over the al Qaeda sanctuary in Afghanistan, on possible new money for CIA operations, and on "when and how to respond to the attack on the USS Cole." Al Qaeda affects our policy on Afghanistan, Pakistan, North Africa, Central Asia, Morocco, Indonesia, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Islam, Muslim World. The strength of the Al QaedaNetwork destabilizes & limits the support from friendly Arab regimes. We would make a major error if we underestimate the challenge Al Qaeda poses. [Clarke Memo 1/25/2001]

JANUARY 2001: Condoleezza Rice demotes terrorism czar Richard Clarke out of Cabinet access. [9/11 Commission Report]

JANUARY 2001: During Bush's first week in office, Richard Clarke requests cabinet level meeting on al Qaeda and Bin Laden. His request was denied. He did not get it - or permission to brief the president directly on the threat - for nearly eight months. [Washington Post]

JANUARY 29, 2001: 9 days after Bush was inaugurated Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neil reports that "going after Saddam Huissein was Topic A." [CBS News]

FEBRUARY 2001: CIA and FBI finally certify that al Qaeda was responsible for Cole Bombings. [Bill Clinton, Fox News]

MARCH 2001: "Federal Aviation officials reviewed dozens of intelligence reports that warned about Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, some of which specifically discussed airline hijackings and suicide operations"..."Federal Aviation Administration, despite being focused on risks of hijackings overseas, warned airports in the spring of 2001 that "the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable;"

The FAA had indeed considered the possibility that terrorists would hijack a plane and use it as a weapon. The FAA distributed a CD-ROM presentation to airlines and airports that "cited the possibility of a suicide hijacking" Aviation officials amassed so much information about the growing threat posed by terrorists that they conducted classified briefings for security officials at 19 of the nation's busiest airports to warn of the threat posed in particular by Mr. bin Laden, the report said." [NYT]

APRIL 2001: Bush administration finally has deputy-level cabinet meeting on al Qeada. Clarke writes, the meeting "did not go well" Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, scowled and asked, "why we are beginning by talking about this one man, bin Laden." When Clarke told him no foe but al Qaeda "poses an immediate and serious threat to the United States" Wolfowitz said that "Iraqi terrorism posed at least as much of a danger." FBI and CIA representatives backed Clarke in saying they had no such evidence. [Washington Post]

MAY 1, 2001: The CIA Tenet & Black report to the White House stated "a group presently in the United States" was planning a terrorist operation. They asked for CIA authority to attack Al Qaeda & Bin Laden but Bush would not grant it. [NYT, CBS 60 Minutes & Tenet's Book]

JUNE 22, 2001: The presidents daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be "imminent" Neoconservative leaders at Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, who is a greater threat. Intelligence officials protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives; suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day. [NYT]

MAY 29, 2001: Four Bin Laden followers found guilty of murder at trial. Four followers of Osama bin Laden are found guilty of charges stemming from the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al-Owhali, Khalfan Khamis Mohamed, Mohammed Saddiq Odeh, and Wadih El Hage are convicted of charges including murder, conspiracy and perjury after a nine-week federal trial during which prosecutors called over 90 witnesses, including al Qaeda informants and survivors of the bombings. Owhali and Mohamed face the death penalty at their sentencing, while Odeh and El Hage face life in prison. [PBS]

JUNE 29, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "The U.S. is not the target of a disinformation campaign by Usama Bin Laden" the document recited much of the evidence, including an interview that month with a Middle Eastern journalist in which Bin Laden aides warned of a coming attack, as well as competitive pressures that the terrorist leader was feeling, given the number of Islamists being recruited for the separatist Russian region of Chechnya. [NYT]

JUNE 2001: Bush give speech to NATO allies on top five defense issues, and the "only reference to extremists was in Macedonia." [Washington Post]

JULY 9, 2001: The C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed June 29 2001. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, expected the planned near-term attacks to have "dramatic consequences"; including major casualties... Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counter-terrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counter-terrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else. [NYT]

JULY 10, 2001: Cofer Black and George Tenet met with Condoleezza Rice to inform her about communications intercepts and other top-secret intelligence showing the increasing likelihood that al-Qaeda would soon attack the United States. They asked for CIA authority to attack Al Qaeda & Bin Laden but Bush would not grant it. Rice listened but was unconvinced, having other priorities on which to focus. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld questioned the information suggesting it was a deception meant to gauge the U.S. response. [Washington Post, CBS 60 Minutes & Tenet's Book]

AUGUST 6, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S." FBI information indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York. [National Archive]

SEPTEMBER 4, 2001: 8 months after Clarke demands Comprehensive Strategy to Fight Al-Qaeda, Bush finally holds the principals meeting to concoct an Al Qaeda strategy.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001: Russian President Putin calls President Bush & warns him that Al Qaeda has just started it's major international attack they have been plotting.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: Al-Qaeda attacks reach the USA. Prior to this attack Bush knew Who, What, Where. When, Why & How the attack would happen. Bush thought Bin Laden was bluffing to distract him from Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

September 11, 2001: Passengers on Air Force One Are Given the Anti-Anthrax Drug Cipro

A week later Anthrax Letters Targeting Democrats & Reporters began to arrive. These letters were Mailed by US Military's Bruce Edwards Ivins & Contained US Military Anthrax. Ivins was the senior biodefense researcher at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland,

October 5-November 21, 2001: Anthrax Letters Kill Five, Heighten Terrorist Attack Fears

When our US soldiers had Osama Bin Laden trapped in Torra Bora Afghanistan, Bush's high school friend General Tommy Franks ordered our soldiers to stand down, allowing Bin Laden to escape. Bush said he did not care about Bin Laden.

it is not a proven fact it is a very weak assertion with no supporting evidence.

The various sources you cite give only generalities they do not give specifics.

Sorry you can't read & comprehend. Try this 1 minute video!

 

[Soupnazi630]

Thats progress for you the fact unlike him,you at least got one foot in the door there that there is real evidence that Bush allowed 9/11 to happen on purpose and did not go after Bin Laden.

Now the next step is for you is stop ignoring the evidence that the towers were brought down by explosives only seeing what you want to see the same way this OTHER paid shill you are talking with only sees what he wants to see when it comes to the JFK assassination.LOL

I did forget to include that 9/11s corresponding Anthrax Attacks on the press & Democrats did come from the US military that was under Bush control.

No evidence of it or of Bush allowing 911 to happen

It's a proven fact that Bush knew who, what, where, when, why & how Al Qaeda would attack NYC WTC on 9/11. Condoleezza Rice repeatedly quoted Bush as saying he was "tired of swatting at flies!" Bush did not take actions to prevent the 9/11 attack he knew was coming! Rice & others repeatedly said Bush wanted a comprehensive global war on the terror network, instead of defending US against the attacks. The US Military Anthrax Attacked US. Bush's High School friend General Tommy Franks issued the repeated "Stand Down" orders to our troops that allowed Bin Laden to escape!

JANUARY 25, 2001: Clarke memo to Bush Admin "Policy Initiative The Al-Qaeda Network" Attached was Clinton's comprehensive strategy to destroy Al Qaeda. Clarke wrote "Al Qaeda is not some narrow, little terrorist issue that needs to be included in broader regional policy." Al Qaeda is a large powerful network that comprehensive multi-regional policy must focus on & plan around. Key decisions must be made now concerning covert aid to keep the Northern Alliance alive when fighting began again in Afghanistan in the spring, and covert aid to the Uzbeks. Decisions should be made soon on messages to the Taliban and Pakistan over the al Qaeda sanctuary in Afghanistan, on possible new money for CIA operations, and on "when and how to respond to the attack on the USS Cole." Al Qaeda affects our policy on Afghanistan, Pakistan, North Africa, Central Asia, Morocco, Indonesia, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Islam, Muslim World. The strength of the Al QaedaNetwork destabilizes & limits the support from friendly Arab regimes. We would make a major error if we underestimate the challenge Al Qaeda poses. [Clarke Memo 1/25/2001]

JANUARY 2001: Condoleezza Rice demotes terrorism czar Richard Clarke out of Cabinet access. [9/11 Commission Report]

JANUARY 2001: During Bush's first week in office, Richard Clarke requests cabinet level meeting on al Qaeda and Bin Laden. His request was denied. He did not get it - or permission to brief the president directly on the threat - for nearly eight months. [Washington Post]

JANUARY 29, 2001: 9 days after Bush was inaugurated Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neil reports that "going after Saddam Huissein was Topic A." [CBS News]

FEBRUARY 2001: CIA and FBI finally certify that al Qaeda was responsible for Cole Bombings. [Bill Clinton, Fox News]

MARCH 2001: "Federal Aviation officials reviewed dozens of intelligence reports that warned about Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, some of which specifically discussed airline hijackings and suicide operations"..."Federal Aviation Administration, despite being focused on risks of hijackings overseas, warned airports in the spring of 2001 that "the intent of the hijacker is not to exchange hostages for prisoners, but to commit suicide in a spectacular explosion, a domestic hijacking would probably be preferable;"

The FAA had indeed considered the possibility that terrorists would hijack a plane and use it as a weapon. The FAA distributed a CD-ROM presentation to airlines and airports that "cited the possibility of a suicide hijacking" Aviation officials amassed so much information about the growing threat posed by terrorists that they conducted classified briefings for security officials at 19 of the nation's busiest airports to warn of the threat posed in particular by Mr. bin Laden, the report said." [NYT]

APRIL 2001: Bush administration finally has deputy-level cabinet meeting on al Qeada. Clarke writes, the meeting "did not go well" Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, scowled and asked, "why we are beginning by talking about this one man, bin Laden." When Clarke told him no foe but al Qaeda "poses an immediate and serious threat to the United States" Wolfowitz said that "Iraqi terrorism posed at least as much of a danger." FBI and CIA representatives backed Clarke in saying they had no such evidence. [Washington Post]

MAY 1, 2001: The CIA Tenet & Black report to the White House stated "a group presently in the United States" was planning a terrorist operation. They asked for CIA authority to attack Al Qaeda & Bin Laden but Bush would not grant it. [NYT, CBS 60 Minutes & Tenet's Book]

JUNE 22, 2001: The presidents daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be "imminent" Neoconservative leaders at Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, who is a greater threat. Intelligence officials protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives; suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day. [NYT]

MAY 29, 2001: Four Bin Laden followers found guilty of murder at trial. Four followers of Osama bin Laden are found guilty of charges stemming from the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania. Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al-Owhali, Khalfan Khamis Mohamed, Mohammed Saddiq Odeh, and Wadih El Hage are convicted of charges including murder, conspiracy and perjury after a nine-week federal trial during which prosecutors called over 90 witnesses, including al Qaeda informants and survivors of the bombings. Owhali and Mohamed face the death penalty at their sentencing, while Odeh and El Hage face life in prison. [PBS]

JUNE 29, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "The U.S. is not the target of a disinformation campaign by Usama Bin Laden" the document recited much of the evidence, including an interview that month with a Middle Eastern journalist in which Bin Laden aides warned of a coming attack, as well as competitive pressures that the terrorist leader was feeling, given the number of Islamists being recruited for the separatist Russian region of Chechnya. [NYT]

JUNE 2001: Bush give speech to NATO allies on top five defense issues, and the "only reference to extremists was in Macedonia." [Washington Post]

JULY 9, 2001: The C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed June 29 2001. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, expected the planned near-term attacks to have "dramatic consequences"; including major casualties... Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counter-terrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counter-terrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else. [NYT]

JULY 10, 2001: Cofer Black and George Tenet met with Condoleezza Rice to inform her about communications intercepts and other top-secret intelligence showing the increasing likelihood that al-Qaeda would soon attack the United States. They asked for CIA authority to attack Al Qaeda & Bin Laden but Bush would not grant it. Rice listened but was unconvinced, having other priorities on which to focus. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld questioned the information suggesting it was a deception meant to gauge the U.S. response. [Washington Post, CBS 60 Minutes & Tenet's Book]

AUGUST 6, 2001: Bush receives Presidential Daiy Brief entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S." FBI information indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York. [National Archive]

SEPTEMBER 4, 2001: 8 months after Clarke demands Comprehensive Strategy to Fight Al-Qaeda, Bush finally holds the principals meeting to concoct an Al Qaeda strategy.

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001: Russian President Putin calls President Bush & warns him that Al Qaeda has just started it's major international attack they have been plotting.

SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: Al-Qaeda attacks reach the USA. Prior to this attack Bush knew Who, What, Where. When, Why & How the attack would happen. Bush thought Bin Laden was bluffing to distract him from Saddam Hussein in Iraq.

September 11, 2001: Passengers on Air Force One Are Given the Anti-Anthrax Drug Cipro

A week later Anthrax Letters Targeting Democrats & Reporters began to arrive. These letters were Mailed by US Military's Bruce Edwards Ivins & Contained US Military Anthrax. Ivins was the senior biodefense researcher at the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Maryland,

October 5-November 21, 2001: Anthrax Letters Kill Five, Heighten Terrorist Attack Fears

When our US soldiers had Osama Bin Laden trapped in Torra Bora Afghanistan, Bush's high school friend General Tommy Franks ordered our soldiers to stand down, allowing Bin Laden to escape. Bush said he did not care about Bin Laden.

it is not a proven fact it is a very weak assertion with no supporting evidence.

The various sources you cite give only generalities they do not give specifics.

Sorry you can't read & comprehend. Try this 1 minute video!

I can read and comprehend.

You are the one having problems with reading comprehension.

One more time slow boy none of the quotes you provided prove your assertion. They do not give specifics which you insisted is proven.

It is not proven and you are lying to claim that it is. The video is meaningless