Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
My favorite:
"Poland, 650 of the world's top climatologists stood up and said man-made global warming is a media generated myth without basis. Said climatologist Dr. David Gee, Chairman of the International Geological Congress, "For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming?""
There's the problem ... many have already, and they were *gasp* still ignored even on here.
An example of one of these ignored research reports would be ..... (please fill in blank) ????
Just give me the name of one if you have no link. You'd think that if there was this massive conspiracy to make all evidence against AGW disappear, and that if you realized this, you'd at least bother to write down the names of these reports before they disappear, right? Or you are you just full of shit?
I cited several on the many threads here on the fantasy of GW. One was a study on the ice sheets of Greenland that was a 20+ year study which found that, contrary to the GW crowd belief the their extensive probe data over 20 years did not support the theory that the ice sheets were rapidly melting. Published in the journal Nature last summer, you look it up. There were also Russian studies similarly demonstrating the falseness of the GW claims.
Anthropogenic Global Warming - Fact or Hoax? An editorial by James A. Peden
Global Warming Hoax: A Skeptical Beginner's Guide Part II | Skeptics Global Warming
Moonbattery: Blowing Holes in the Global Warming Hoax
It's time to pray for global warming, says Flint Journal columnist John Tomlinson - Flint, Michigan Columns, Letters & Opinion - The Flint Journal MLive.com
... and the denial begins in ... 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
James A Peden is a web and ecommerce designer
Michael Duvinek is a blogger and furniture salesman who fully admits to not taking his work that you linked seriously " I take a rather sarcastic approach to reporting..."
Van Helsing, the author of your third link, is a fictional character from a novel
Your last link is an editorial by John Tomlinson, a conservative columnist
I guess when you said that studies had been ignored, I thought you meant actual scientific studies performed by actual real life scientists, not blog entries written by fictional characters from the book "Dracula"
My bad.
An example of one of these ignored research reports would be ..... (please fill in blank) ????
Just give me the name of one if you have no link. You'd think that if there was this massive conspiracy to make all evidence against AGW disappear, and that if you realized this, you'd at least bother to write down the names of these reports before they disappear, right? Or you are you just full of shit?
I cited several on the many threads here on the fantasy of GW. One was a study on the ice sheets of Greenland that was a 20+ year study which found that, contrary to the GW crowd belief the their extensive probe data over 20 years did not support the theory that the ice sheets were rapidly melting. Published in the journal Nature last summer, you look it up. There were also Russian studies similarly demonstrating the falseness of the GW claims.
How about you look it up and get back with a more specific reference than "some article in Nature last summer", and until then I'll just assume you're full of crap.
Anthropogenic Global Warming - Fact or Hoax? An editorial by James A. Peden
Global Warming Hoax: A Skeptical Beginner's Guide Part II | Skeptics Global Warming
Moonbattery: Blowing Holes in the Global Warming Hoax
It's time to pray for global warming, says Flint Journal columnist John Tomlinson - Flint, Michigan Columns, Letters & Opinion - The Flint Journal MLive.com
... and the denial begins in ... 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...
James A Peden is a web and ecommerce designer
Michael Duvinek is a blogger and furniture salesman who fully admits to not taking his work that you linked seriously " I take a rather sarcastic approach to reporting..."
Van Helsing, the author of your third link, is a fictional character from a novel
Your last link is an editorial by John Tomlinson, a conservative columnist
I guess when you said that studies had been ignored, I thought you meant actual scientific studies performed by actual real life scientists, not blog entries written by fictional characters from the book "Dracula"
My bad.
See ... denial, right on cue.
None of the sources supporting Global Warming are any more credible ... because every single one of those scientific groups is funded by Gore or a left-wingnut special interest group
. The wingnuts (left or right) are just pointless to listen to anyway. Gore however is making a HUGE profit off this Global Warming scare
... so of course anyone he funds will be able to make it look like science agrees on it.
I cited several on the many threads here on the fantasy of GW. One was a study on the ice sheets of Greenland that was a 20+ year study which found that, contrary to the GW crowd belief the their extensive probe data over 20 years did not support the theory that the ice sheets were rapidly melting. Published in the journal Nature last summer, you look it up. There were also Russian studies similarly demonstrating the falseness of the GW claims.
How about you look it up and get back with a more specific reference than "some article in Nature last summer", and until then I'll just assume you're full of crap.
Typical response from your ilk. Another lazy grad student. {sigh}
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, and World Radiation Center are funded by private companies ...
most on the lists are those which produce and sell environmentally "friendly" products. So what do you suppose their research is going to help?
Here is a very non-biased source for recycling information which shows what's wrong on both sides:
Recycling Myths Debunked - National Recycling Week - Interesting Recycling Facts - Popular Mechanics
The attempts of environmentalists to bolster the myth of human-induced global warming is downright immoral. Philip Stott, Professor of Biogeography, University of London
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, and World Radiation Center are funded by private companies ...
I thought you said all global warming research was funded by either Al Gore or left wingnut special interest groups? Which left wingnut special interest group funds those labs?
most on the lists are those which produce and sell environmentally "friendly" products. So what do you suppose their research is going to help?
On what list are you referring to?
Here is a very non-biased source for recycling information which shows what's wrong on both sides:
Recycling Myths Debunked - National Recycling Week - Interesting Recycling Facts - Popular Mechanics
Sorry, I don't see what the truth or lack of truth of global warming has to do with recycling. yes, if global warming is true, recycling may or may not help or hurt it - but it won't change whether or not its true.
The attempts of environmentalists to bolster the myth of human-induced global warming is downright immoral. Philip Stott, Professor of Biogeography, University of London
Stott is retired and hasn't ever published a scholarly article on the climate.
If you've got any peer reviewed and published scientific articles written by real life scientists - I'd love to see them. Until then, just please don't waste my time.
First ... Gore owns all the "green" producing private companies ... duh ... and special interest groups are often run by companies that want to make their products sell more.
Since you avoided the videos I posted, you obviously don't care about seeing the facts anyway.
In Seattle we are experiencing our THIRD snowstorm in as many months, of course it probably won't hang on too long like that last two. So ... even I am now asking: Aren't we suppose to be getting warmer? There's another storm heading from the East to, hitting eastern states that they mentioned. Right now I am seeing an inch fall ... right in downtown.
ugh....everytime there's a cold day or a snowstorm, it gives global warming deniers impetus to advance their, well, denials.
The climate is warming slowly. It's not supposed to be overnight. Scientists anticipate at least a 2 degree (Celsius) jump for the average global temperature by the second half of this century, but it could be far more than that. It's an urgent problem, but it doesn't mean that winter is over yet. Cold days and snow storms still happen for the time being, but if you keep track of the amount of days (per year) when the daytime high never reaches above freezing point (32 F) -in places where winter temperatures are supposed to almost always be below freezing point, like most of the northern USA- you'll probably notice that number of freezing days dwindling over the years. That's certainly what's happening here in Chicago, where I live. We still get snow and bitter cold days, but the number of days below freezing point is fewer than what I remember growing up. This season, we had a pretty normal December and January, with cold days and ample snow, but February this year has been unseasonably warm. And I'm not talking about a few days here or there; I'm talking about the entire month of February. Right now, as we speak, it feels like early spring outside. It feels like it's the last week of March. Yesterday I didn't need a jacket in the afternoon; it's not supposed to be like this for at least another month. And back in the fall, the leaves started changing colors later than normal. For about 2 years in a row, October felt more like September, and November felt more like October. But you know, when warm winter days like this occur (and they occur more and more often), the global warming deniers go into hiding. But when a snow storm hits the news, then all the deniers have a party, and go on their usual evirosceptic rampage. But where are all the deniers on a warm day like today? The sad reality is that according to NASA, the ten warmest years on record as of January 2008 had all ocurred after 1998. Yikes! But leave it to global warming deniers to downplay science and go into hiding on warm days like today.
There's a lot of industries out there tied to fossil fuels who have hired the same PR folks who were employed in the 1980s to deny the negative health effects of smoking. These PR firms are now working hard to mislead the public; they're trying to create the impression that scientists are in disagreement with each other global warming and its causes, and they're also trying to create the impression that evidence used by scientists is murky. Don't fall for this bullshit, folks. You might come across some news articles that present "new evidence" suggesting that global warming may not be happening, but know that these sceptic articles are fabricated by the PR firms, and not a single sceptic article has ever been published in a scientific peer-reviewed journal.
First, don't quote NASA as a reference for GW. They have been exposed as cooking the numbers to support this whacko warming nonsense. Why, political agenda of the folks in that department. This is about control nothing more or less than that.
Second, it would make sense if it was a few less cold days per year. That would support your argument. But, in fact, what people all over the country have been treated to, especially the last two winters, is colder than normal temps. In the DC area we had the 13th coldest winter on record here. THIS YEAR! We the Potomac was frozen over for weeks this winter for the first time since I moved back here in 1991.
I know, I know.....who am I going to believe you or my lying eyes.
First ... Gore owns all the "green" producing private companies ... duh ... and special interest groups are often run by companies that want to make their products sell more.
So you're telling me that Al Gore owns a company which owns the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory? Or are you telling me its owned by a special interest group? What is the name of the company or special interest group that owns it? What about the World Radiation Center? Also Al Gore?
Since you avoided the videos I posted, you obviously don't care about seeing the facts anyway.
If you had facts, you'd have real scientific literature by real scienctists published in real scientific journals, instead of just a bunch of crackpot bloggers, youtube videos, fictional characters, and retirees.
I mean honestly - you posted a blog entry written by some guy named "Van Helsing" as evidence of scientific truth - are you fucking serious?
If you had facts, you'd have real scientific literature by real scienctists published in real scientific journals.
If you had facts, you'd have real scientific literature by real scienctists published in real scientific journals.
No one can take anything you say until you review the opposite side, so watch the clips or prove you are ignoring all opposing arguments thus making your points completely invalid.
If you had facts, you'd have real scientific literature by real scienctists published in real scientific journals.
No one can take anything you say until you review the opposite side, so watch the clips or prove you are ignoring all opposing arguments thus making your points completely invalid.
If you had facts, you'd have real scientific literature by real scienctists published in real scientific journals.
