Sweet Willy
Rookie
- May 20, 2009
- 2,637
- 180
- 0
- Banned
- #41
Star... you are barking up the wrong tree. My entire point is to NOT spend anymore money on the issue. Period. We can get the illegals out without spending anymore money than we already do.
Your claims about them being a net positive, economically, are as extreme and full of holes as the other extremes who say they cost us some huge amount of money. Neither extreme is true, the truth is in the middle, as always. They cost us an amount of money and a social cost through lower wages in our labor market.
At any rate, you aren't making any more of a realistic argument than the people who want to unleash the military on the illegals and evidently, you can't identify who may be an asset to your cause to at least keep the illegals from being brutalized.
Your claims about them being a net positive, economically, are as extreme and full of holes as the other extremes who say they cost us some huge amount of money. Neither extreme is true, the truth is in the middle, as always. They cost us an amount of money and a social cost through lower wages in our labor market.
At any rate, you aren't making any more of a realistic argument than the people who want to unleash the military on the illegals and evidently, you can't identify who may be an asset to your cause to at least keep the illegals from being brutalized.