cnelsen
Gold Member
- Banned
- #1
What group are you completely forbidden to criticize? White people, of course.
To help dismantle this rancid system of white privilege and supremacy, a helpful group known as the Anti-Defamation League of B’Nai Brith assists media giants in ferreting out and then smashing “hate” with the unrelenting zeal of steel-toed clog-dancers squashing cockroaches.
Now the well-financed and tightly organized rabbinical hate group has crowbarred its way into setting ideological policy for YouTube, the third most highly trafficked website in the USA that is visited by a staggering two-thirds of all Americans monthly.
YouTube is partnering with such obviously unbiased organizations as the ADL, the No Hate Speech Movement, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue to neuter any videos that contain “controversial or religious content:”
We’ll soon be applying tougher treatment to videos that aren’t illegal but have been flagged by users as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism. If we find that these videos don’t violate our policies but contain controversial religious or supremacist content, they will be placed in a limited state. The videos will remain on YouTube behind an interstitial, won’t be recommended, won’t be monetized, and won’t have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes.
According Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL’s head Hebrew:
Google has been a leader in this area from the beginning. The reality is extremists and terrorists continue to migrate to and exploit various other social media platforms. We hope that those platforms can learn from and emulate what YouTube is doing to proactively identify and remove extremist content.
YouTube also plans to employ robots that will filter out any speech that the ADL deems to be unacceptable. Would it be overstepping the bounds of decency to insinuate that the ADL are a real bunch of schmendricks?
Now the well-financed and tightly organized rabbinical hate group has crowbarred its way into setting ideological policy for YouTube, the third most highly trafficked website in the USA that is visited by a staggering two-thirds of all Americans monthly.
YouTube is partnering with such obviously unbiased organizations as the ADL, the No Hate Speech Movement, and the Institute for Strategic Dialogue to neuter any videos that contain “controversial or religious content:”
We’ll soon be applying tougher treatment to videos that aren’t illegal but have been flagged by users as potential violations of our policies on hate speech and violent extremism. If we find that these videos don’t violate our policies but contain controversial religious or supremacist content, they will be placed in a limited state. The videos will remain on YouTube behind an interstitial, won’t be recommended, won’t be monetized, and won’t have key features including comments, suggested videos, and likes.
According Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL’s head Hebrew:
Google has been a leader in this area from the beginning. The reality is extremists and terrorists continue to migrate to and exploit various other social media platforms. We hope that those platforms can learn from and emulate what YouTube is doing to proactively identify and remove extremist content.
YouTube also plans to employ robots that will filter out any speech that the ADL deems to be unacceptable. Would it be overstepping the bounds of decency to insinuate that the ADL are a real bunch of schmendricks?
