2ndAmendment
Active Member
^people can starve if they don't have welfare.
Not if they get a fucquing JOB!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^people can starve if they don't have welfare.
So I see progressives think women or walking vaginas as democrats think of them are to stupid to take care of their own selves....To dumb to hold a job...to much of a whore to say no to a man....To selfish to take care of a living human.
You democrats are sexists assholes
I can't speak for all conservatives but I have never been presented with any reason that obligates me to pay for someone else's contraceptives, abortions or support their children.
Guess what?
Nobody has ever expected you to pay for abortions. But if you object to low cost contraception and low cost childcare you have no right to bitch about the number of abortions in this country
If the low cost is subsidized through government funds I oppose the use of public money for this purpose. Now if an organization were set up to gather voluntary charitable donations to pay for these expenses, that's perfectly acceptable.
So I see progressives think women or walking vaginas as democrats think of them are to stupid to take care of their own selves....To dumb to hold a job...to much of a whore to say no to a man....To selfish to take care of a living human.
You democrats are sexists assholes
Guess what?
Women have been getting banged up for a million years. You may look at them as whores but the men are equally responsible.
many women that have abortions were on birth control or using contraceptives.
^people can starve if they don't have welfare.
Not if they get a fucquing JOB!
many women that have abortions were on birth control or using contraceptives.
The anti choicers refuse to believe this. They think women who have abortions are whores who can't keep their legs closed.
I keep hearing girls say they should have the right to receive free birth control, and that us men shouldn't get into it. Guess they forgot that birth control is funded by the tax payers, many of whom actually happen to be men. So, our opinion on the matter kinda sorta matters.
Anyways, if we take away birth control, we'd probably be stuck paying for abortions. Which is a big issue for me since I'm 100% pro-life and I think those that are pro-choice should exercise their right to not have sex sometimes. Rape however, is a different story.
And finally, if we get rid of both birth control and abortions, we will ultimately be forced to pay for the welfare of these families and single mothers who have those unprecedented babies.
So, which one would you feel better paying for?
Conservatives should want to pay for birth control, because it is cheaper in the long one, and birth control is more moral than an abortion.
how bout condoms or anal/ oral sex?
I think people would prefer to have normal sex, don't you think?
What's better? Paying for Birth Control, Abortions, or Welfare?
I keep hearing girls say they should have the right to receive free birth control, and that us men shouldn't get into it. Guess they forgot that birth control is funded by the tax payers, many of whom actually happen to be men.
The question (if it's even still a question) is whether private insurance companies should be required to provide coverage of contraception without co-pays. That means it's financed by everyone who is enrolled in that insurance pool, male or female, and paying premiums.
many women that have abortions were on birth control or using contraceptives.
I keep hearing girls say they should have the right to receive free birth control, and that us men shouldn't get into it. Guess they forgot that birth control is funded by the tax payers, many of whom actually happen to be men. So, our opinion on the matter kinda sorta matters.
Your question is flawed.I keep hearing girls say they should have the right to receive free birth control, and that us men shouldn't get into it. Guess they forgot that birth control is funded by the tax payers, many of whom actually happen to be men. So, our opinion on the matter kinda sorta matters.
Anyways, if we take away birth control, we'd probably be stuck paying for abortions. Which is a big issue for me since I'm 100% pro-life and I think those that are pro-choice should exercise their right to not have sex sometimes. Rape however, is a different story.
And finally, if we get rid of both birth control and abortions, we will ultimately be forced to pay for the welfare of these families and single mothers who have those unprecedented babies.
So, which one would you feel better paying for?
What's better? Paying for Birth Control, Abortions, or Welfare?
You forgot the best option:
Allowing the individual to make his own decisions free from government interference.