Whatever happened to "Republicans"???

It would be simple math if it were in fact the way it is.

I've asked this one before, to only hear a roaring silence: Can you give some evidence of how the Geriatric Old Party has moved even a little bit toward what has been traditionally known as "the right"??

Also, your math might well work out if you look to the left in order to peel off a few knock-'em-over-with-a-feather squish "moderates" -who by their very description have no real core political beliefs- but what of the people who have been so alienated and disgusted with squishy sellout republicans that they're voting CP, LP, and/or are just staying home??

Please list all the self-described moderate Republicans in the House and the Senate.

I count two self-described Republican moderates in the Senate.

And please list all elected Republicans who support abortion.

The fact that there is even the term "RINOs," let alone a systematic campaign to unseat them from within the party from the likes of The Club for Deficits, er, excuse me, The Club for "Growth", is all one needs to know about the direction of the party.
 
Last edited:
OK...So you're basing your opinion of what's "right wing" by self-describers in the Republican Party and the abortion issue?

Let me rephrase....What have any republican politicians actually done, insofar as legislative acts rather than campaign rhetoric are concerned, that leads you to this conclusion that they've moved to the right???
 
It would be simple math if it were in fact the way it is.

I've asked this one before, to only hear a roaring silence: Can you give some evidence of how the Geriatric Old Party has moved even a little bit toward what has been traditionally known as "the right"??

Also, your math might well work out if you look to the left in order to peel off a few knock-'em-over-with-a-feather squish "moderates" -who by their very description have no real core political beliefs- but what of the people who have been so alienated and disgusted with squishy sellout republicans that they're voting CP, LP, and/or are just staying home??

Please list all the self-described moderate Republicans in the House and the Senate.

I count two self-described Republican moderates in the Senate.

And please list all elected Republicans who support abortion.

The fact that there is even the term "RINOs," let alone a systematic campaign to unseat them from within the party from the likes of The Club for Deficits, er, excuse me, The Club for "Growth", is all one needs to know about the direction of the party.
just TWO????
hell, i have two in the senate from MY stte
and they arent the only two
 
OK...So you're basing your opinion of what's "right wing" by self-describers in the Republican Party and the abortion issue?

Let me rephrase....What have any republican politicians actually done, insofar as legislative acts rather than campaign rhetoric are concerned, that leads you to this conclusion that they've moved to the right???
they've continually moved to the left
thats why they lost
 
Last edited:
It would be simple math if it were in fact the way it is.

I've asked this one before, to only hear a roaring silence: Can you give some evidence of how the Geriatric Old Party has moved even a little bit toward what has been traditionally known as "the right"??

Also, your math might well work out if you look to the left in order to peel off a few knock-'em-over-with-a-feather squish "moderates" -who by their very description have no real core political beliefs- but what of the people who have been so alienated and disgusted with squishy sellout republicans that they're voting CP, LP, and/or are just staying home??

Please list all the self-described moderate Republicans in the House and the Senate.

I count two self-described Republican moderates in the Senate.

And please list all elected Republicans who support abortion.

The fact that there is even the term "RINOs," let alone a systematic campaign to unseat them from within the party from the likes of The Club for Deficits, er, excuse me, The Club for "Growth", is all one needs to know about the direction of the party.
just TWO????
hell, i have two in the senate from MY stte
and they arent the only two

Actually, they are the two I was thinking about. Could you name any other Republican Senators who call themselves moderates?
 
Please list all the self-described moderate Republicans in the House and the Senate.

I count two self-described Republican moderates in the Senate.

And please list all elected Republicans who support abortion.

The fact that there is even the term "RINOs," let alone a systematic campaign to unseat them from within the party from the likes of The Club for Deficits, er, excuse me, The Club for "Growth", is all one needs to know about the direction of the party.
just TWO????
hell, i have two in the senate from MY stte
and they arent the only two

Actually, they are the two I was thinking about. Could you name any other Republican Senators who call themselves moderates?
specter
of course he is leaving the party

Hagel
McCain
 
Actually, they are the two I was thinking about. Could you name any other Republican Senators who call themselves moderates?
Wait a minute.....

What does self-description have to do with any of this??

Barry Obolshevik ran as a tax cutter.

Bubba Clinton declared that "the era of big gubmint is over".

Socialists bristle and run like mad from the "liberal" tag, campaign like the next coming of Reagan, yet still govern like the socialists that they are....Likewise, republicans campaign like libertarians, and govern like the "liberals" they claim to oppose.

I fail t see how self-description is relevant.
 
Actually, they are the two I was thinking about. Could you name any other Republican Senators who call themselves moderates?
Wait a minute.....

What does self-description have to do with any of this??

Barry Obolshevik ran as a tax cutter.

Bubba Clinton declared that "the era of big gubmint is over".

Socialists bristle and run like mad from the "liberal" tag, campaign like the next coming of Reagan, yet still govern like the socialists that they are....Likewise, republicans campaign like libertarians, and govern like the "liberals" they claim to oppose.

I fail t see how self-description is relevant.

It is entirely relevant because it demonstrates the acceptance of moderates in the party by the base. If somebody feels comfortable to stand up and say they are a moderate, then it shows a broad acceptance in the party. If moderates refuse to do so - whether or not they actually are - then it shows that they are uncomfortable because it creates problems for them within the rest of the party.

FFS, listen to what Newt Gingrich said not too long ago

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a potential presidential candidate in 2012, insisted he didn't want to pick a fight with Cheney. But Gingrich offered this advice: "I think Republicans are going to be very foolish if they run around deciding they're going to see how much they can purge us down to the smallest possible base."

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell: In GOP, Says Party Must Be More Inclusive - kdka.com

When a guy like Gingrich is telling you there is a problem, closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and denying its happening is bizarre.
 
Action, Toro, ACTION!!!!

Those assholes have talked and campaigned like libertarians since at least the day I was born.

What have they DONE, as in actually accomplished, that leads you to this complete hallucination that the party has moved even somewhat to the right, let alone the "hard right" we keep hearing about??

Please show results, not rhetoric.
 
JR,

You too must be a product of the USA education system for you are even more ignorant of facts than is Hairy Rectum. GDP is no measure of the wealth of a nations citizenry. How silly you are. I suggest you move to the Great White North and get some quality education. By the way, how does it feel living in the largest socialist cess-pool the world has ever known. My, my but how far the U nited S oviets of A merica has fallen.


There is an attack on the very principles that this nation was founded upon. But talking solely about who is economically superior there isn't even a discussion. As you very well know.


Yes, but we voted the miscreants out of office.


Not yet, but 2010 is right around the corner.
 
Carter might have been a nice guy....but he was a wuss....ive known nice guys who were not wussies...Carter was in the Navy....so i thought he would at least have one ball in his sack.....and i would sure like to see this country start manufacturing things like we used to....

Do you know who Lee Atwater is? He was the Karl Rove before Rove was around. Lee was a son of a bitch.

.

Without Lee Atwater, Reagan would have lost. He's even the guy who came up with Willie Horton to attack Dukakis.

_________________

Do you have any real formal education?

Lee Atwater was a secondary advisor during the Reagan years. He did not ascend to heading an election campaign until HW Bush. During the Reagan years, Atwater worked under Ed Rollins - a noted moderate. Rollins considered Atwater overly aggressive at times, which was true. He was a rough n tumble political operative who did play a part in the now infamous (and very effective) Willie Horton furlough issue. (An issue that was originally brought up by then-Democrat Senator Al Gore during the primary campaign.)

To attempt to paint Reagan's overwhelming election victories in both 1980 and 1984, which rank among the most lopsided electoral victories in American history, as results of some secondary political advisor, is astounding in its absurdity. No, Reagan was a far greater political figure than your weak attempt here to minimilize his dominance of the American political landscape of the 1980s.

ElectoralCollege1980-Large.png


electoral-1984-s.jpg


And by the way, the Dukakis campaign was a disaster - he was seen as weak on defense, weak on crime - basically another East Coast liberal. And Dukakis himself only furthered that image...

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1md5WIgcjg8[/ame]
At the end of "Boogie Man", Rollins reveals that Lee's Bible was still in it's cellophane wrapper when they went through his things. He'd made a big thing of apologizing and even converted to Catholicism on his death bed. Rollins said he was playing games right at the end.
 
Action, Toro, ACTION!!!!

Those assholes have talked and campaigned like libertarians since at least the day I was born.

Who said anything about libertarians? Conservatives and libertarians ain't the same thing.

When the Republican party starts accepting gay marriage, then talk to me about libertarianism.
 
Last edited:
I have been a member of the Republican party all my life since I first voted for Barry Goldwater. However, this does not mean I have not voted for a qualified person for the office over the years. What does it mean to be a rebublican, well by today's standards depending on the what news media outlet you listen to the gap is very wide. If you happen to listen to the All Obama Network MSNBC then you would think a republican was someone who was plotting to steal your last dime in your jar you have hidden under your bed and gaurding the gates of the local emergency room to keep you from entering. If you listen to Fox then you would have a different view, to them a republican is someone who has to adhere to a rigid set of principles or else they don't belong in the club. So I prefer to make up my own mind as to where they are and answer the thread question this way. Here is one republican I am not going anywhere, I believe that the Govt. of this country has an obligation to its citizens that the constitution clearly states and the elected officials are nothing but stweards of the constitution to see that will of the people as it applies is carried out. I believe that the Fed. Govt. should be small and have limited responsiblities and only those that are expressed in the constitution! for example, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, etc. I do not belive the Govt, has, nor should it have the ability to interfere in the personal lives of its citizens no matter what that is. So for all those who are confused as to what it means to be a rebublican and have been getting their respective definitions from the news media, I thought perhaps a little perspective from a real republican would be a change. It hopefully will show that those that claim "this is what the party stands for" and all those who dont believe are exluded while assuming the mantle of the party by self annointment are meaningless. There are many many many good republicans that understand the founding principles of this nation and wish only the best for this nation and to see it prosper once again and remain strong and vital and free. So in the spirit of unity as our new president likes to boast so much about I would like the many out there who spend their time affixing labels to others to take a look at the very people they are labeling. Teachers, Police Officers, Soilders, Mothers, Fathers, Daughters, Sons, all of them republicans and think about it some before throwing them all in one pot.
 
Do you know who Lee Atwater is? He was the Karl Rove before Rove was around. Lee was a son of a bitch.

.

Without Lee Atwater, Reagan would have lost. He's even the guy who came up with Willie Horton to attack Dukakis.

_________________

Do you have any real formal education?

Lee Atwater was a secondary advisor during the Reagan years. He did not ascend to heading an election campaign until HW Bush. During the Reagan years, Atwater worked under Ed Rollins - a noted moderate. Rollins considered Atwater overly aggressive at times, which was true. He was a rough n tumble political operative who did play a part in the now infamous (and very effective) Willie Horton furlough issue. (An issue that was originally brought up by then-Democrat Senator Al Gore during the primary campaign.)

To attempt to paint Reagan's overwhelming election victories in both 1980 and 1984, which rank among the most lopsided electoral victories in American history, as results of some secondary political advisor, is astounding in its absurdity. No, Reagan was a far greater political figure than your weak attempt here to minimilize his dominance of the American political landscape of the 1980s.

ElectoralCollege1980-Large.png


electoral-1984-s.jpg


And by the way, the Dukakis campaign was a disaster - he was seen as weak on defense, weak on crime - basically another East Coast liberal. And Dukakis himself only furthered that image...

YouTube - Dukakis Tank Disaster 1988
At the end of "Boogie Man", Rollins reveals that Lee's Bible was still in it's cellophane wrapper when they went through his things. He'd made a big thing of apologizing and even converted to Catholicism on his death bed. Rollins said he was playing games right at the end.

Wasn't it a good documentary? I love it that right wingers miss all these shows because they refuse to watch "LIBERAL" stations like PBS.

And then they deny the facts that we learn because they think it is just liberal slant.

Little do they know, they interview Republicans too.

Bob Dole wanted to kill Lee Atwater. :lol: Much like McCain wanted to kill Rove I'm sure.

Lee was a son of a bitch for sure.

But all is fair in politics. Clearly his methods worked.
 
I have been a member of the Republican party all my life since I first voted for Barry Goldwater. However, this does not mean I have not voted for a qualified person for the office over the years. What does it mean to be a rebublican, well by today's standards depending on the what news media outlet you listen to the gap is very wide. If you happen to listen to the All Obama Network MSNBC then you would think a republican was someone who was plotting to steal your last dime in your jar you have hidden under your bed and gaurding the gates of the local emergency room to keep you from entering. If you listen to Fox then you would have a different view, to them a republican is someone who has to adhere to a rigid set of principles or else they don't belong in the club. So I prefer to make up my own mind as to where they are and answer the thread question this way. Here is one republican I am not going anywhere, I believe that the Govt. of this country has an obligation to its citizens that the constitution clearly states and the elected officials are nothing but stweards of the constitution to see that will of the people as it applies is carried out. I believe that the Fed. Govt. should be small and have limited responsiblities and only those that are expressed in the constitution! for example, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, etc. I do not belive the Govt, has, nor should it have the ability to interfere in the personal lives of its citizens no matter what that is. So for all those who are confused as to what it means to be a rebublican and have been getting their respective definitions from the news media, I thought perhaps a little perspective from a real republican would be a change. It hopefully will show that those that claim "this is what the party stands for" and all those who dont believe are exluded while assuming the mantle of the party by self annointment are meaningless. There are many many many good republicans that understand the founding principles of this nation and wish only the best for this nation and to see it prosper once again and remain strong and vital and free. So in the spirit of unity as our new president likes to boast so much about I would like the many out there who spend their time affixing labels to others to take a look at the very people they are labeling. Teachers, Police Officers, Soilders, Mothers, Fathers, Daughters, Sons, all of them republicans and think about it some before throwing them all in one pot.

Those are just montras or talking points. Everyone can agree with what you have said. But when we start talking specifics, you Republicans are wrong on just about everything. Why don't you be specific and I'll prove it.

Small government that doesn't overspend? No shit. Which party does that?

No one likes bad regulations. But can you name any specific bad ones? Because the GOP removed necessary regulations so companies could make more profit. Do you disagree with regulations that say corporations can't pollute? Notice they never talk about specific regulations. As if its zero or too many, nothing in between?

MSNBC is the Democratic station. Damn straight. Its about time we have a station. It wasn't this good during the Bush years. Or not until a couple years ago. What took so long? And I defy you to show me when they are wrong. But Fox does lie. Can't you see their real agenda? American workers are too expensive. They want to kill the middle class. Healthcare, cost of living, gas prices, college tuition, wages down even though profits are up.

And not only is it a fact that Fox lies, a judge ruled that they have the right to lie. Need proof? I can find it if necessary.

The GOP says they stand for all the things you mentioned, but do they really? Or do they just say those things so they can carry out their real agenda? They serve the corporations and are anti poor/middle class. Its obvious. Hasn't hurt you? Well you're a baby boomer. The same way you guys are selling off all your assets and draining the system with SS, the GOP is selling off America and they emptied the treasury. And they're selling off our company cheap. Ports to dubia? Corporations hiring illegals. China just bought Hummer.

The GOP wants small government because they don't want it to have the power to stop the corporations. FREE TRADE will kill the middle class if we let them go too far. And they almost have.

American healthcare is a joke. We need single payer. But the GOP will protect the insurance providers while American citizens die.

Life Liberty and the Persuit of Happyness. LIFE!!!!

PS. Some Dems suck too. Max Baucus is protecting the insurance providers who are gouging us and I want to take him down!!!!

But you should love him.
 
Real Americans are sitting back waiting for you liberal idiots to run it into the dirt. (well
on the way), then, when people see what liberalism (socialism) does for them, we'll
regain power. This is just a process of people coming back to their senses.
 
Real Americans are sitting back waiting for you liberal idiots to run it into the dirt. (well
on the way), then, when people see what liberalism (socialism) does for them, we'll
regain power. This is just a process of people coming back to their senses.

No one said it was going to be easy undoing what the GOP did.

But you are right. Voters are really dumb. They'll vote out the party that can't fix the problems and vote back in the party that created the problems in the first place.
 
Well hello again sealy. been a long time, I don't think I was actually defending Fox or for that matter MSNBC in my last post here. In fact if I were a democrat I would be overjoyed at the number of choices I had in media outlets. the list is endless. Some don't beat the drum as loudly as MSNBC thats true, still though I think you will agree that the media is perhaps a little more democrat friendly than it is republican. As for the China issue, and trade in general remind me again who signed the China Trade agreement in 2000 and NAFTA in 1993? I'm sure that had nothing to do with any american jobs going overseas though because a democrat was in office at the time. As for Healthcare, all those who wish Govt. run healthcare all I will say is this, take the time to visit your local VA hospital or if you cannot do that then take a look at how well the Govt. has run Amtrak then ask yourself if this is the Govt. you want building your cars and providing your healthcare for you? The fact is the govt. has had the constitutional power to regulate commerce i.e. healthcare insurance industry but they have choosen not to. The Govt. has zero constitutional authority to provide healthcare insurance to you or to me or for that matter to dictate to you or to me what we can and cannot do with that coverage. If we had a congress that would simply regulate as they have the power to do with the insurance industry then the number of choices and availibilty would increase therefor reducing the cost and making it affordable. Even then there are going to be people WHO DO NOT want coverage and unless we have up and decided this is no longer a free nation, we cannot force them constitutionally to do so. I agree the word R or D does not make someone automatically smart or dumb however I do believe that the original question was asked where the republicans are and I thought I might tell someone well there are many there. It's just my opnion in todays media which is dominated by one side , often rebublicans are seen as monolithic when that is not the case at all.
 

Forum List

Back
Top