danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #661
Our Space Race and all the spinoff technologies we are benefitting from are due to Command Economics not free market economics.That's fine, but the same point applies. Government control (and that's a good word here) of the economy also exists on a continuum. The question is where, and that is ultimately decided at the ballot box.
There's plenty of space between 100% socialism and none.
,
Are you sure?
What about during periods of transition or in places where there is no government to speak of. Somalia, Peshawar and parts of Afghanistan I've been in are ungovernable. The government has little if any impact on the people there let alone an economy yet it functions fine. During the transition from USSR to failed state, the economy went from total control to zero, yet somehow people bought food, goods and services. Economies can exist entirely without government. In our prison system the inmates have their own economy. Sure it's based on Ramen Noodles and ass blood, but the prison itself can't control it.
Economies and governments are not contingent upon each other, although government cannot exist without economy. Trade between people can exist without a government. It did for most of our existence. There was NO SOCIALISM until the late 1700's as it's defined, it wasn't even a concept drawn out until Engels came along.. So if you ask me, we were better off when there was none.
.