What will we be "mandated" to buy next?

you know... it strikes me that if the mandate were that you buy a gun, you wouldn't be complaining.

just saying.

now THAT'S sad...



How fucking dare you imply that I would be ok that anyone be forced to buy anything.

apologies if i'm wrong.

i know that's the case for a lot of people on your side of the aisle.

Please name one American from moderate to full blown lunatic fringe consevative that would support forcing people to buy arms.
 
Any thoughts on that?

Since the Fed can now force us to buy hc ins, there's no end of things that can be mandated, for our own good.

I'm thinking life ins. Those evul grave diggers demand thousands of dollars just to dig a hole and put your loved one in it.

Forcing everone to get it, and giving it free to the poor will lower the cost of premiums and make certain no one ever has to pony up for any of the costs of dying.

plus all those evul life insurance companies = about $14 trillion dollar industry, so we should put more government regs on them.



This is a sad sad day for freedom.

Broccoli. Haven't you heard?

Mandating you to buy HC is the same as taxing you and providing it for you.

Obama was stupid when he was trying to create the universal coverage that would look acceptable to Republicans. He should have simply expanded Medicare to everyone. Same result and nobody would allege that it is unconstitutional.
 
Last edited:
Any thoughts on that?

Since the Fed can now force us to buy hc ins, there's no end of things that can be mandated, for our own good...

not true. the commerce clause is not in play.

you need new talking points and/or a refund for what passes for your education

:eek:

So we are not going to be forced to buy ins?

did I miss that part? or are we just going to be taxed for not having ins?


it's the fucking same thing. Using semantics and calling something a tax is just a lie.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
Any thoughts on that?

Since the Fed can now force us to buy hc ins, there's no end of things that can be mandated, for our own good...

not true. the commerce clause is not in play.

you need new talking points and/or a refund for what passes for your education

:eek:

So we are not going to be forced to buy ins?

did I miss that part? or are we just going to be taxed for not having ins?


it's the fucking same thing. Using semantics and calling something a tax is just a lie.

No.. it's not the same thing.
 
Any thoughts on that?

Since the Fed can now force us to buy hc ins, there's no end of things that can be mandated, for our own good.

I'm thinking life ins. Those evul grave diggers demand thousands of dollars just to dig a hole and put your loved one in it.

Forcing everone to get it, and giving it free to the poor will lower the cost of premiums and make certain no one ever has to pony up for any of the costs of dying.

plus all those evul life insurance companies = about $14 trillion dollar industry, so we should put more government regs on them.

This is a sad sad day for freedom.



you know... it strikes me that if the mandate were that you buy a gun, you wouldn't be complaining.

just saying.

now THAT'S sad...

What do you base that Idea on? Your own Person Beliefs? Or have you actually seem people Advocate allowing the Government to force people to buy guns?

You are such a Hack honey. Just sayin

I would oppose the Federal Government forcing me to Buy anything.

i'm not.. .but this board is so full of hacks that i made an assumption...

a reasonable one given some of the wackadoodles on the board. who've actually SAID that people should have to have guns.

however, i put my money where my mouth is:

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/231536-a-question-for-rightwingers.html

i'm hardly a hack... and you can kindly kiss my buttocks. though it's always amusing when one of the worst hacks calls me one.
 
Any thoughts on that?

Since the Fed can now force us to buy hc ins, there's no end of things that can be mandated, for our own good...

not true. the commerce clause is not in play.

you need new talking points and/or a refund for what passes for your education

:eek:

1) So we are not going to be forced to buy ins?

did I miss that part? or are we just going to be taxed for not having ins?


2) it's the fucking same thing. Using semantics and calling something a tax is just a lie.

stuck on stupid? reading and comprehension not your strong suit?

1) "there's no end of things that can be mandated, for our own good."

2) A tax is something the IRS is involved in.

sorry, but you truly are in need of an education

:cool:
 
not true. the commerce clause is not in play.

you need new talking points and/or a refund for what passes for your education

:eek:

So we are not going to be forced to buy ins?

did I miss that part? or are we just going to be taxed for not having ins?


it's the fucking same thing. Using semantics and calling something a tax is just a lie.

No.. it's not the same thing.


Yes it is.

Originally: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be fined (penalty).

After today's ruling: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be taxed.

What's different?
 
Any thoughts on that?

Since the Fed can now force us to buy hc ins, there's no end of things that can be mandated, for our own good.

I'm thinking life ins. Those evul grave diggers demand thousands of dollars just to dig a hole and put your loved one in it.

Forcing everone to get it, and giving it free to the poor will lower the cost of premiums and make certain no one ever has to pony up for any of the costs of dying.

plus all those evul life insurance companies = about $14 trillion dollar industry, so we should put more government regs on them.



This is a sad sad day for freedom.

One isn’t ‘mandated’ to buy anything now.

The real question is: are conservatives being willfully ignorance as the to the facts of the ACA or are they continuing to repeat lies for partisan reasons.
 
So we are not going to be forced to buy ins?

did I miss that part? or are we just going to be taxed for not having ins?


it's the fucking same thing. Using semantics and calling something a tax is just a lie.

No.. it's not the same thing.


Yes it is.

Originally: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be fined (penalty).

After today's ruling: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be taxed.

What's different?


Correct. Fine? Tax? What IS the difference? Government is still exacting your property regardless.
 
No.. it's not the same thing.


Yes it is.

Originally: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be fined (penalty).

After today's ruling: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be taxed.

What's different?


Correct. Fine? Tax? What IS the difference? Government is still exacting your property regardless.

And they're still fining you (under the guise of a tax) for not doing something.
 
So we are not going to be forced to buy ins?

did I miss that part? or are we just going to be taxed for not having ins?


it's the fucking same thing. Using semantics and calling something a tax is just a lie.

No.. it's not the same thing.


Yes it is.

Originally: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be fined (penalty).

After today's ruling: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be taxed.

What's different?

Being FORCED to buy insurance and paying a tax if you don't are not the same. No one is holding a gun to your head.

And of all the things to protest paying for... there are a lot more protest-worthy things, things we can blame Obama for as well.
 
Any thoughts on that?

Since the Fed can now force us to buy hc ins, there's no end of things that can be mandated, for our own good.

I'm thinking life ins. Those evul grave diggers demand thousands of dollars just to dig a hole and put your loved one in it.

Forcing everone to get it, and giving it free to the poor will lower the cost of premiums and make certain no one ever has to pony up for any of the costs of dying.

plus all those evul life insurance companies = about $14 trillion dollar industry, so we should put more government regs on them.



This is a sad sad day for freedom.

Ask the Heritage Foundation and all the repubs who were for it for 10 years before they were against it
 
No.. it's not the same thing.


Yes it is.

Originally: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be fined (penalty).

After today's ruling: if you don't purchase health insurance you will be taxed.

What's different?

Being FORCED to buy insurance and paying a tax if you don't are not the same. No one is holding a gun to your head.

And of all the things to protest paying for... there are a lot more protest-worthy things, things we can blame Obama for as well.

The federal gov't will nail you if don't purchase insurance. Call it a tax or a penalty -- it doesn't change what it is. Sounds like forcing to me.
 

Forum List

Back
Top