Amen to this.Maybe they will start using birth control! What a novel idea, huh?
God bless you always!!!
Holly
P.S. Or even better. There is this thing that I love to call abstinence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Amen to this.Maybe they will start using birth control! What a novel idea, huh?
No, women won’t.My guess is women will not stand for it.
You know if old white men could get pregnant this wouldn't even be an issue.
The new GOP nominee said birth control is "abortion in a pill".
Birth Control didn't become legal for married couples until the late 1960's.
Birth Control didn't become legal for single people until the 1070's.
When abortion was illegal, women died going to what was called "backstreet butchers".
Today's women are NOT the women of the 1950's.
I believe Republicans will manage to overturn Roe vs Wade. Even if they don't actually overturn the law, they will put so many restrictions on the law, it will basically be overturned.
Then what? Will it stay overturned forever?
Will women be thankful that old white men control their bodies?
The cost of the abortion is important and should not be passed on to taxpayers. But the critical element is the fact that innocent human lives are being butchered at the request of selfish women. There is no other way top put it.Even in the highly unlikely event that Roe is overturned, this would in no way criminalize abortion. It would merely remove a Constitutional guarantee to the right of an abortion.
Prior to Roe in 1973, abortion on request was legal in 13 states, legal in certain cases, in three more.
If this decision were passed back to states, I have no doubt most laws would remain just as they currently are.
It would however, have implications to public funding for abortion which, I believe, is the issue that most troubles anti-abortion advocates.
The cost of the abortion is important and should not be passed on to taxpayers. But the critical element is the fact that innocent human lives are being butchered at the request of selfish women. There is no other way top put it.Even in the highly unlikely event that Roe is overturned, this would in no way criminalize abortion. It would merely remove a Constitutional guarantee to the right of an abortion.
Prior to Roe in 1973, abortion on request was legal in 13 states, legal in certain cases, in three more.
If this decision were passed back to states, I have no doubt most laws would remain just as they currently are.
It would however, have implications to public funding for abortion which, I believe, is the issue that most troubles anti-abortion advocates.
No one is trying to regulate an appendectomy or a tonsillectomy.The cost of the abortion is important and should not be passed on to taxpayers. But the critical element is the fact that innocent human lives are being butchered at the request of selfish women. There is no other way top put it.Even in the highly unlikely event that Roe is overturned, this would in no way criminalize abortion. It would merely remove a Constitutional guarantee to the right of an abortion.
Prior to Roe in 1973, abortion on request was legal in 13 states, legal in certain cases, in three more.
If this decision were passed back to states, I have no doubt most laws would remain just as they currently are.
It would however, have implications to public funding for abortion which, I believe, is the issue that most troubles anti-abortion advocates.
I view abortion as a medical procedure. Which is why I think it's strange that there is a Constitutional guarantee of elective abortion but none for an elective appendectomy or tonsillectomy.
No one is trying to regulate an appendectomy or a tonsillectomy.The cost of the abortion is important and should not be passed on to taxpayers. But the critical element is the fact that innocent human lives are being butchered at the request of selfish women. There is no other way top put it.Even in the highly unlikely event that Roe is overturned, this would in no way criminalize abortion. It would merely remove a Constitutional guarantee to the right of an abortion.
Prior to Roe in 1973, abortion on request was legal in 13 states, legal in certain cases, in three more.
If this decision were passed back to states, I have no doubt most laws would remain just as they currently are.
It would however, have implications to public funding for abortion which, I believe, is the issue that most troubles anti-abortion advocates.
I view abortion as a medical procedure. Which is why I think it's strange that there is a Constitutional guarantee of elective abortion but none for an elective appendectomy or tonsillectomy.
I'm guessing that the majority of the men making these decisions for women have wives who are beyond child bearing years and therefore probably think this is no big deal because it doesn't personally affect them.The new GOP nominee said birth control is "abortion in a pill".
Birth Control didn't become legal for married couples until the late 1960's.
Birth Control didn't become legal for single people until the 1070's.
When abortion was illegal, women died going to what was called "backstreet butchers".
Today's women are NOT the women of the 1950's.
I believe Republicans will manage to overturn Roe vs Wade. Even if they don't actually overturn the law, they will put so many restrictions on the law, it will basically be overturned.
Then what? Will it stay overturned forever?
Will women be thankful that old white men control their bodies?
Even in the highly unlikely event that Roe is overturned, this would in no way criminalize abortion. It would merely remove a Constitutional guarantee to the right of an abortion.
Prior to Roe in 1973, abortion on request was legal in 13 states, legal in certain cases, in three more.
If this decision were passed back to states, I have no doubt most laws would remain just as they currently are.
It would however, have implications to public funding for abortion which, I believe, is the issue that most troubles anti-abortion advocates.
In other words, you want it based on a lie.Even in the highly unlikely event that Roe is overturned, this would in no way criminalize abortion. It would merely remove a Constitutional guarantee to the right of an abortion.
Prior to Roe in 1973, abortion on request was legal in 13 states, legal in certain cases, in three more.
If this decision were passed back to states, I have no doubt most laws would remain just as they currently are.
It would however, have implications to public funding for abortion which, I believe, is the issue that most troubles anti-abortion advocates.
Actually, all we need to eliminate the legality of abortion on demand is either the passage of a sanctity of life bill which identifies and defines prenatal human life as protected from elimination by due process federally; which would ban abortion on all levels, or a case similar to Roe, which is argued and won in the Supreme Court on the protection of the sanctity of unborn human life.
In other words, you want it based on a lie.Even in the highly unlikely event that Roe is overturned, this would in no way criminalize abortion. It would merely remove a Constitutional guarantee to the right of an abortion.
Prior to Roe in 1973, abortion on request was legal in 13 states, legal in certain cases, in three more.
If this decision were passed back to states, I have no doubt most laws would remain just as they currently are.
It would however, have implications to public funding for abortion which, I believe, is the issue that most troubles anti-abortion advocates.
Actually, all we need to eliminate the legality of abortion on demand is either the passage of a sanctity of life bill which identifies and defines prenatal human life as protected from elimination by due process federally; which would ban abortion on all levels, or a case similar to Roe, which is argued and won in the Supreme Court on the protection of the sanctity of unborn human life.
Got it!
With a little luck all you liberal clowns will walk off a cliff in protest.The new GOP nominee said birth control is "abortion in a pill".
Birth Control didn't become legal for married couples until the late 1960's.
Birth Control didn't become legal for single people until the 1070's.
When abortion was illegal, women died going to what was called "backstreet butchers".
Today's women are NOT the women of the 1950's.
I believe Republicans will manage to overturn Roe vs Wade. Even if they don't actually overturn the law, they will put so many restrictions on the law, it will basically be overturned.
Then what? Will it stay overturned forever?
Will women be thankful that old white men control their bodies?
With a little luck all you liberal clowns will walk off a cliff in protest.The new GOP nominee said birth control is "abortion in a pill".
Birth Control didn't become legal for married couples until the late 1960's.
Birth Control didn't become legal for single people until the 1070's.
When abortion was illegal, women died going to what was called "backstreet butchers".
Today's women are NOT the women of the 1950's.
I believe Republicans will manage to overturn Roe vs Wade. Even if they don't actually overturn the law, they will put so many restrictions on the law, it will basically be overturned.
Then what? Will it stay overturned forever?
Will women be thankful that old white men control their bodies?
What will happen when Republicans overturn a woman's right to control her own body?
They won't "overturn" it. The matter will simply return to the states, where it belongs.
Most states will continue to recognize a woman’s right to privacy.The new GOP nominee said birth control is "abortion in a pill".
Birth Control didn't become legal for married couples until the late 1960's.
Birth Control didn't become legal for single people until the 1070's.
When abortion was illegal, women died going to what was called "backstreet butchers".
Today's women are NOT the women of the 1950's.
I believe Republicans will manage to overturn Roe vs Wade. Even if they don't actually overturn the law, they will put so many restrictions on the law, it will basically be overturned.
Then what? Will it stay overturned forever?
Will women be thankful that old white men control their bodies?
In states that don’t continue to recognize that right and enact measures which compel a woman to give birth against her will through force of law, the issue will move to the political realm, where advocates of privacy rights will work to remove from office state lawmakers hostile to privacy rights.
Indeed, Republican state lawmakers will be exposed to a political backlash should they support measures compelling women to give birth against their will.
In 40 or 50 years the right to privacy will likely be again recognized in all 50 states, the consequence of either Republican lawmakers voted out of office with measures hostile to privacy rights repealed, or by a future Supreme Court with a majority of justices appointed by Democratic presidents.
Yes, authoritarian conservatives will succeed in denying women their right to privacy – allowing for more government and bigger government to interfere in citizens’ personal lives – but ultimately conservatives will fail, defeated by the American people and their desire to possess their comprehensive rights and protected liberties.