What the Sessions Obsession Traches me about President Trump

Russian informers are NOT the Russian government. And the Democrats didn't pay them. A PAC did.

Members of the Trump campaign admitted meeting with Russian government officials for the purpose of having Putin help elect Trump. Your tiny mind may not see the difference, but it's HUGE.

Why do you post outlandish lies like this? Are looking for a job with the Washington Post, NY Times or CNN?
 
what in the world do you think Hillary did to go to jail for?

Ah, the snowflake wants to play the favorite game of all snowflakes, the 'Stupid' game.

Hillary used an un-authorized personal laptop that was not encrypted as required by the law and was not secured properly as required by the law...
- All of these are individual criminal counts.

Hillary had both unclassified information and classified information on the same hard-drive and treated it as if it was unclassified. All items on a hard-drive will be classified according to the highest classification level of an item on the hard drive. That means an unclassified document on a classified SECRET server must be treated as a SECRET document.
- Each violation is a criminal count

Hillary gave persons who had no security clearances (or who had clearances but not high enough to have access to her information) access to classified information...people such as her lawyers, her IT tech, the IT company that illegally stored her server in their bathroom, and her MAID.
- This is a CRIME...a serious one.

Every official document found that she refused to turn into the State Department is a violation of both the FOIA AND The Federal Records Act. 1 document constitutes 2 criminal counts for violating the FOIA and the Federal Record Act.
-- Not counting the documents founds found before now, the FBI just released over 400 new official documents Hillary never turned over to the State Department ACCORDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT.
**** THAT MEANS OVER 800 ELIGIBLE CRIMINAL COUNTS AGAINST HILLARY OF CRIMINAL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOIA AND THE FEDERSL RECORDS ACT WAS JUST REVEALED.

I REALLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHO YOU SNOWFLAKES THINK YOU ARE CONTINUING TO FOOL BY CLAIMING HILLARY COMMITTED ANY CRIMES...YOURSELF, MAYBE?!

ANYONE WHO EVER WORKED WITH CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AND ANY 1ST YEAR LAW STUDENT COULD TELLYOU AS SOON AS THIS STORY BROKE AND DETAILS STARTED COMING OUT THAT HILLARY BROKE ENOUGH LAWS TO SPEND THE REST OF HER LIFE IN PRISON.
let me stop you right from the beginning...Hillary and her team, did not know they syd Blumenthal emails sent to them, had classified information in them...these emails from an outside source had information that the CIA felt should be classified information and they classified this information when they discovered it.... the State department who got this same information from Blumenthal, did not believe it was classified information by our government because they never got this information from our government...they only received it from the outside the gvt source. This is why none of the 4 critical email chains were never marked classified...they didn't come from our top secret govt files.

you can not prosecute a person of any level for that....period.

You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... her and her staff never did that.... end of story.

You have just addressed less than .01% of the story, and got that wrong too! Great job!

You should be on Hillary's defense team. With you on the team, she will get the longest sentence in recorded criminal history!
 
what in the world do you think Hillary did to go to jail for?

Ah, the snowflake wants to play the favorite game of all snowflakes, the 'Stupid' game.

Hillary used an un-authorized personal laptop that was not encrypted as required by the law and was not secured properly as required by the law...
- All of these are individual criminal counts.

Hillary had both unclassified information and classified information on the same hard-drive and treated it as if it was unclassified. All items on a hard-drive will be classified according to the highest classification level of an item on the hard drive. That means an unclassified document on a classified SECRET server must be treated as a SECRET document.
- Each violation is a criminal count

Hillary gave persons who had no security clearances (or who had clearances but not high enough to have access to her information) access to classified information...people such as her lawyers, her IT tech, the IT company that illegally stored her server in their bathroom, and her MAID.
- This is a CRIME...a serious one.

Every official document found that she refused to turn into the State Department is a violation of both the FOIA AND The Federal Records Act. 1 document constitutes 2 criminal counts for violating the FOIA and the Federal Record Act.
-- Not counting the documents founds found before now, the FBI just released over 400 new official documents Hillary never turned over to the State Department ACCORDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT.
**** THAT MEANS OVER 800 ELIGIBLE CRIMINAL COUNTS AGAINST HILLARY OF CRIMINAL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOIA AND THE FEDERSL RECORDS ACT WAS JUST REVEALED.

I REALLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHO YOU SNOWFLAKES THINK YOU ARE CONTINUING TO FOOL BY CLAIMING HILLARY COMMITTED ANY CRIMES...YOURSELF, MAYBE?!

ANYONE WHO EVER WORKED WITH CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AND ANY 1ST YEAR LAW STUDENT COULD TELLYOU AS SOON AS THIS STORY BROKE AND DETAILS STARTED COMING OUT THAT HILLARY BROKE ENOUGH LAWS TO SPEND THE REST OF HER LIFE IN PRISON.

Except that people with actual LAW DEGREES and who have worked as FEDERAL PROSECUTORS reviewed the evidence which YOU haven't seen and decided that what she didn't break the law.

Republicans even.

There is no evidence that anyone reviewed the evidence. All we have is Comey's claim that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue charges. Really? Who were they? Where are their written opinions?
 
what in the world do you think Hillary did to go to jail for?

Ah, the snowflake wants to play the favorite game of all snowflakes, the 'Stupid' game.

Hillary used an un-authorized personal laptop that was not encrypted as required by the law and was not secured properly as required by the law...
- All of these are individual criminal counts.

Hillary had both unclassified information and classified information on the same hard-drive and treated it as if it was unclassified. All items on a hard-drive will be classified according to the highest classification level of an item on the hard drive. That means an unclassified document on a classified SECRET server must be treated as a SECRET document.
- Each violation is a criminal count

Hillary gave persons who had no security clearances (or who had clearances but not high enough to have access to her information) access to classified information...people such as her lawyers, her IT tech, the IT company that illegally stored her server in their bathroom, and her MAID.
- This is a CRIME...a serious one.

Every official document found that she refused to turn into the State Department is a violation of both the FOIA AND The Federal Records Act. 1 document constitutes 2 criminal counts for violating the FOIA and the Federal Record Act.
-- Not counting the documents founds found before now, the FBI just released over 400 new official documents Hillary never turned over to the State Department ACCORDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT.
**** THAT MEANS OVER 800 ELIGIBLE CRIMINAL COUNTS AGAINST HILLARY OF CRIMINAL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOIA AND THE FEDERSL RECORDS ACT WAS JUST REVEALED.

I REALLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHO YOU SNOWFLAKES THINK YOU ARE CONTINUING TO FOOL BY CLAIMING HILLARY COMMITTED ANY CRIMES...YOURSELF, MAYBE?!

ANYONE WHO EVER WORKED WITH CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AND ANY 1ST YEAR LAW STUDENT COULD TELLYOU AS SOON AS THIS STORY BROKE AND DETAILS STARTED COMING OUT THAT HILLARY BROKE ENOUGH LAWS TO SPEND THE REST OF HER LIFE IN PRISON.
let me stop you right from the beginning...Hillary and her team, did not know they syd Blumenthal emails sent to them, had classified information in them...these emails from an outside source had information that the CIA felt should be classified information and they classified this information when they discovered it.... the State department who got this same information from Blumenthal, did not believe it was classified information by our government because they never got this information from our government...they only received it from the outside the gvt source. This is why none of the 4 critical email chains were never marked classified...they didn't come from our top secret govt files.

you can not prosecute a person of any level for that....period.

You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... her and her staff never did that.... end of story.
None of what you stated is supported by actual LAW.

Hillary was warned not to have her own personal server, She chose to. Comey testified not only did she have classified on her server she did indeed send Classified.

None of what you stayed erases the other crimes:
- Illegal handling
- Illegal Storage
- Illegal sharing of classified
- Hundreds of criminal violations of the FOIA
- Hundreds ofciolations of the Federal Records Act

She also committed Criminal Obstruction of Justice - the FBI orderedher to save and turn in EVERYTHING on her server and devices
- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by destroying thousands of e-mails/ documents

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by further destroying more evidence by using BleachBit wipe her hard drive

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by her staff illegally destroying devices with a hammer; all of the devices were never recovered, and those turned in WERE MISSING THEIR SIM CARDS

"You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... "
- YOU COULD NOT BE ANYMORE WRONG!
Being in / coming from a Top Secret File is NOT what makes something Top Secret.

...GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY, C4A, I KNOW YOU ARE NOT THIS STUPID, TO TRY TO CLAIM HILLARY DID NOT BREAK LAWS IN THE FACE OF SO MUCH EVIDENCE.

Again, ANYONE whoever worked with classified, a 1st year law student, could tell you HULLARY BROKE HUNDREDS OF LAWS!

I got it - Hillary is a Democrat and is yo gurl...I understand LOYALTY...but not at the expense of honesty and integrity.
No Easy, no no and no...we do not prosecute people for breaking rules, we may punish them but we do not put them in jail for mistakes, especially people who have held very high positions within our govt and have dedicated their life to the government and Public Service....like Petraeus who was not simply careless, but committed the crime with intent, he knew he was doing wrong and CHOSE to do it anyway....and he got a misdemeanor charge for it even though it was a felony initially but plea bargained it down.... Now if what Petraeus did was just a misdemeanor then what Hillary did with breaking the rules and being careless, had to be less than Petraeus.... and that is precisely how it turn out....that is called Justice.

Petraus is a piker compared to what Hillary did!

We have a sailor serving a prison sentence for taking photographs of a treadmill on a submarine!
 
what in the world do you think Hillary did to go to jail for?

Ah, the snowflake wants to play the favorite game of all snowflakes, the 'Stupid' game.

Hillary used an un-authorized personal laptop that was not encrypted as required by the law and was not secured properly as required by the law...
- All of these are individual criminal counts.

Hillary had both unclassified information and classified information on the same hard-drive and treated it as if it was unclassified. All items on a hard-drive will be classified according to the highest classification level of an item on the hard drive. That means an unclassified document on a classified SECRET server must be treated as a SECRET document.
- Each violation is a criminal count

Hillary gave persons who had no security clearances (or who had clearances but not high enough to have access to her information) access to classified information...people such as her lawyers, her IT tech, the IT company that illegally stored her server in their bathroom, and her MAID.
- This is a CRIME...a serious one.

Every official document found that she refused to turn into the State Department is a violation of both the FOIA AND The Federal Records Act. 1 document constitutes 2 criminal counts for violating the FOIA and the Federal Record Act.
-- Not counting the documents founds found before now, the FBI just released over 400 new official documents Hillary never turned over to the State Department ACCORDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT.
**** THAT MEANS OVER 800 ELIGIBLE CRIMINAL COUNTS AGAINST HILLARY OF CRIMINAL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOIA AND THE FEDERSL RECORDS ACT WAS JUST REVEALED.

I REALLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHO YOU SNOWFLAKES THINK YOU ARE CONTINUING TO FOOL BY CLAIMING HILLARY COMMITTED ANY CRIMES...YOURSELF, MAYBE?!

ANYONE WHO EVER WORKED WITH CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AND ANY 1ST YEAR LAW STUDENT COULD TELLYOU AS SOON AS THIS STORY BROKE AND DETAILS STARTED COMING OUT THAT HILLARY BROKE ENOUGH LAWS TO SPEND THE REST OF HER LIFE IN PRISON.

Except that people with actual LAW DEGREES and who have worked as FEDERAL PROSECUTORS reviewed the evidence which YOU haven't seen and decided that what she didn't break the law.

Republicans even.

There is no evidence that anyone reviewed the evidence. All we have is Comey's claim that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue charges. Really? Who were they? Where are their written opinions?

Comey miracled himself into a one man grand jury.
 
Russian informers are NOT the Russian government. And the Democrats didn't pay them. A PAC did.

Members of the Trump campaign admitted meeting with Russian government officials for the purpose of having Putin help elect Trump. Your tiny mind may not see the difference, but it's HUGE.

They weren't Russian government officials at Don Jr.'s meeting. But the fairy tale dossier supposedly came from Kremlin officials.

Deal with it.

"Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steele — a former British spy who founded his own opposition research firm in London — to collect information about Trump's ties to Russia from the high-level government sources he had developed during his years working for MI6 in Moscow. The memos Steele wrote between June and November 2016 citing Kremlin officials were sent back to Fusion and compiled into a dossier that was published in full by Buzzfeed in January.

Scott Olson, a former FBI agent who spent 20 years at the bureau and specialized in counterintelligence, said he believed the Trump Jr. episode with Veselnitskaya and the Steele dossier to be "very nearly equivalent."

"The only distinction is in who initiated: Jr. accepted an offer and the Democrats made a request," Olson said. (Republicans made the initial request and Democrats took over later).

"But fundamentally both were interacting with Russians to gain information," Olson said. "Those who claim the situations are different should be asked to explain how."

So explain how they are different?

Trump's allies have a dubious new talking point about the Steele dossier and the Russia meeting
 
what in the world do you think Hillary did to go to jail for?

Ah, the snowflake wants to play the favorite game of all snowflakes, the 'Stupid' game.

Hillary used an un-authorized personal laptop that was not encrypted as required by the law and was not secured properly as required by the law...
- All of these are individual criminal counts.

Hillary had both unclassified information and classified information on the same hard-drive and treated it as if it was unclassified. All items on a hard-drive will be classified according to the highest classification level of an item on the hard drive. That means an unclassified document on a classified SECRET server must be treated as a SECRET document.
- Each violation is a criminal count

Hillary gave persons who had no security clearances (or who had clearances but not high enough to have access to her information) access to classified information...people such as her lawyers, her IT tech, the IT company that illegally stored her server in their bathroom, and her MAID.
- This is a CRIME...a serious one.

Every official document found that she refused to turn into the State Department is a violation of both the FOIA AND The Federal Records Act. 1 document constitutes 2 criminal counts for violating the FOIA and the Federal Record Act.
-- Not counting the documents founds found before now, the FBI just released over 400 new official documents Hillary never turned over to the State Department ACCORDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT.
**** THAT MEANS OVER 800 ELIGIBLE CRIMINAL COUNTS AGAINST HILLARY OF CRIMINAL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOIA AND THE FEDERSL RECORDS ACT WAS JUST REVEALED.

I REALLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHO YOU SNOWFLAKES THINK YOU ARE CONTINUING TO FOOL BY CLAIMING HILLARY COMMITTED ANY CRIMES...YOURSELF, MAYBE?!

ANYONE WHO EVER WORKED WITH CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AND ANY 1ST YEAR LAW STUDENT COULD TELLYOU AS SOON AS THIS STORY BROKE AND DETAILS STARTED COMING OUT THAT HILLARY BROKE ENOUGH LAWS TO SPEND THE REST OF HER LIFE IN PRISON.
let me stop you right from the beginning...Hillary and her team, did not know they syd Blumenthal emails sent to them, had classified information in them...these emails from an outside source had information that the CIA felt should be classified information and they classified this information when they discovered it.... the State department who got this same information from Blumenthal, did not believe it was classified information by our government because they never got this information from our government...they only received it from the outside the gvt source. This is why none of the 4 critical email chains were never marked classified...they didn't come from our top secret govt files.

you can not prosecute a person of any level for that....period.

You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... her and her staff never did that.... end of story.
None of what you stated is supported by actual LAW.

Hillary was warned not to have her own personal server, She chose to. Comey testified not only did she have classified on her server she did indeed send Classified.

None of what you stayed erases the other crimes:
- Illegal handling
- Illegal Storage
- Illegal sharing of classified
- Hundreds of criminal violations of the FOIA
- Hundreds ofciolations of the Federal Records Act

She also committed Criminal Obstruction of Justice - the FBI orderedher to save and turn in EVERYTHING on her server and devices
- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by destroying thousands of e-mails/ documents

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by further destroying more evidence by using BleachBit wipe her hard drive

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by her staff illegally destroying devices with a hammer; all of the devices were never recovered, and those turned in WERE MISSING THEIR SIM CARDS

"You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... "
- YOU COULD NOT BE ANYMORE WRONG!
Being in / coming from a Top Secret File is NOT what makes something Top Secret.

...GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY, C4A, I KNOW YOU ARE NOT THIS STUPID, TO TRY TO CLAIM HILLARY DID NOT BREAK LAWS IN THE FACE OF SO MUCH EVIDENCE.

Again, ANYONE whoever worked with classified, a 1st year law student, could tell you HULLARY BROKE HUNDREDS OF LAWS!

I got it - Hillary is a Democrat and is yo gurl...I understand LOYALTY...but not at the expense of honesty and integrity.
No Easy, no no and no...we do not prosecute people for breaking rules, we may punish them but we do not put them in jail for mistakes, especially people who have held very high positions within our govt and have dedicated their life to the government and Public Service....like Petraeus who was not simply careless, but committed the crime with intent, he knew he was doing wrong and CHOSE to do it anyway....and he got a misdemeanor charge for it even though it was a felony initially but plea bargained it down.... Now if what Petraeus did was just a misdemeanor then what Hillary did with breaking the rules and being careless, had to be less than Petraeus.... and that is precisely how it turn out....that is called Justice.

Petraus is a piker compared to what Hillary did!

We have a sailor serving a prison sentence for taking photographs of a treadmill on a submarine!
fortunately for civilians, military laws and code doesn't apply to them....they are different ya know?
 
Russian informers are NOT the Russian government. And the Democrats didn't pay them. A PAC did.

Members of the Trump campaign admitted meeting with Russian government officials for the purpose of having Putin help elect Trump. Your tiny mind may not see the difference, but it's HUGE.

They weren't Russian government officials at Don Jr.'s meeting. But the fairy tale dossier supposedly came from Kremlin officials.

Deal with it.

"Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steele — a former British spy who founded his own opposition research firm in London — to collect information about Trump's ties to Russia from the high-level government sources he had developed during his years working for MI6 in Moscow. The memos Steele wrote between June and November 2016 citing Kremlin officials were sent back to Fusion and compiled into a dossier that was published in full by Buzzfeed in January.

Scott Olson, a former FBI agent who spent 20 years at the bureau and specialized in counterintelligence, said he believed the Trump Jr. episode with Veselnitskaya and the Steele dossier to be "very nearly equivalent."

"The only distinction is in who initiated: Jr. accepted an offer and the Democrats made a request," Olson said. (Republicans made the initial request and Democrats took over later).

"But fundamentally both were interacting with Russians to gain information," Olson said. "Those who claim the situations are different should be asked to explain how."

So explain how they are different?

Trump's allies have a dubious new talking point about the Steele dossier and the Russia meeting
FYI!
your link THAT you provided explains it, just read it in full instead of stopping halfway....
 
Ah, the snowflake wants to play the favorite game of all snowflakes, the 'Stupid' game.

Hillary used an un-authorized personal laptop that was not encrypted as required by the law and was not secured properly as required by the law...
- All of these are individual criminal counts.

Hillary had both unclassified information and classified information on the same hard-drive and treated it as if it was unclassified. All items on a hard-drive will be classified according to the highest classification level of an item on the hard drive. That means an unclassified document on a classified SECRET server must be treated as a SECRET document.
- Each violation is a criminal count

Hillary gave persons who had no security clearances (or who had clearances but not high enough to have access to her information) access to classified information...people such as her lawyers, her IT tech, the IT company that illegally stored her server in their bathroom, and her MAID.
- This is a CRIME...a serious one.

Every official document found that she refused to turn into the State Department is a violation of both the FOIA AND The Federal Records Act. 1 document constitutes 2 criminal counts for violating the FOIA and the Federal Record Act.
-- Not counting the documents founds found before now, the FBI just released over 400 new official documents Hillary never turned over to the State Department ACCORDING TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT.
**** THAT MEANS OVER 800 ELIGIBLE CRIMINAL COUNTS AGAINST HILLARY OF CRIMINAL NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOIA AND THE FEDERSL RECORDS ACT WAS JUST REVEALED.

I REALLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHO YOU SNOWFLAKES THINK YOU ARE CONTINUING TO FOOL BY CLAIMING HILLARY COMMITTED ANY CRIMES...YOURSELF, MAYBE?!

ANYONE WHO EVER WORKED WITH CLASSIFIED INFORMATION AND ANY 1ST YEAR LAW STUDENT COULD TELLYOU AS SOON AS THIS STORY BROKE AND DETAILS STARTED COMING OUT THAT HILLARY BROKE ENOUGH LAWS TO SPEND THE REST OF HER LIFE IN PRISON.
let me stop you right from the beginning...Hillary and her team, did not know they syd Blumenthal emails sent to them, had classified information in them...these emails from an outside source had information that the CIA felt should be classified information and they classified this information when they discovered it.... the State department who got this same information from Blumenthal, did not believe it was classified information by our government because they never got this information from our government...they only received it from the outside the gvt source. This is why none of the 4 critical email chains were never marked classified...they didn't come from our top secret govt files.

you can not prosecute a person of any level for that....period.

You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... her and her staff never did that.... end of story.
None of what you stated is supported by actual LAW.

Hillary was warned not to have her own personal server, She chose to. Comey testified not only did she have classified on her server she did indeed send Classified.

None of what you stayed erases the other crimes:
- Illegal handling
- Illegal Storage
- Illegal sharing of classified
- Hundreds of criminal violations of the FOIA
- Hundreds ofciolations of the Federal Records Act

She also committed Criminal Obstruction of Justice - the FBI orderedher to save and turn in EVERYTHING on her server and devices
- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by destroying thousands of e-mails/ documents

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by further destroying more evidence by using BleachBit wipe her hard drive

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by her staff illegally destroying devices with a hammer; all of the devices were never recovered, and those turned in WERE MISSING THEIR SIM CARDS

"You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... "
- YOU COULD NOT BE ANYMORE WRONG!
Being in / coming from a Top Secret File is NOT what makes something Top Secret.

...GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY, C4A, I KNOW YOU ARE NOT THIS STUPID, TO TRY TO CLAIM HILLARY DID NOT BREAK LAWS IN THE FACE OF SO MUCH EVIDENCE.

Again, ANYONE whoever worked with classified, a 1st year law student, could tell you HULLARY BROKE HUNDREDS OF LAWS!

I got it - Hillary is a Democrat and is yo gurl...I understand LOYALTY...but not at the expense of honesty and integrity.
No Easy, no no and no...we do not prosecute people for breaking rules, we may punish them but we do not put them in jail for mistakes, especially people who have held very high positions within our govt and have dedicated their life to the government and Public Service....like Petraeus who was not simply careless, but committed the crime with intent, he knew he was doing wrong and CHOSE to do it anyway....and he got a misdemeanor charge for it even though it was a felony initially but plea bargained it down.... Now if what Petraeus did was just a misdemeanor then what Hillary did with breaking the rules and being careless, had to be less than Petraeus.... and that is precisely how it turn out....that is called Justice.

Petraus is a piker compared to what Hillary did!

We have a sailor serving a prison sentence for taking photographs of a treadmill on a submarine!
fortunately for civilians, military laws and code doesn't apply to them....they are different ya know?
'Breaking Rules'? WTF is wrong with you, C4A? The FOIA and Federal Records Act are LAWS, not 'Rules'. Violating them are CRIMES. Violating them, as specified in the laws I posted a while back are punishable by heavy fines and PRISON TIME.

Stop your bullshit already. You damn-well know Hillary broke the law....or I gave you way too much credit, and you are an idiot.
 
Why can Trump and family donate to democrats and it's ok but not ok for these investigators?
You seriously have to ask that question? Someone really needs to explain the massive conflicts of interest to you?

Bwuhahahaha..... snowflakes.
 
Why can Trump and family donate to democrats and it's ok but not ok for these investigators?
You seriously have to ask that question? Someone really needs to explain the massive conflicts of interest to you?

Bwuhahahaha..... snowflakes.
there is no conflict of interest. who one votes for or donates to, is their constitutional right,,,and is not a conflict in this Russian investigation, period.
 
President Trump was willing to let the whole sordid Hillary affair go so the country could concentrate on higher priorities but liberals and the media instead decided to launch a witch hunt into Trump and his team. Trump is saying you want to have an investigation war fine its on!
some day you won't have Hillary to use as a punching bag, What will you all ever do without her? who's your next boogeyman and punching bag gonna be?
 
The only obsession concerning Sessions is in the media. Hardly anybody noticed when Obama's A.G. was replaced.
Maybe that's because Obama wasn't being investigated by three committees in Congress and a Special Counsel at the time. Trump would love to shut down Mueller. Sessions is in his way at the moment, and we learned yesterday that a lot of Senate Republicans are on Sessions' side. It will not go well if Trump persists in this. If he didn't do anything wrong, he should just let the investigations proceed.
 
there is no conflict of interest.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong?

No conflict of interest?

The Democrats loathe Trump, and Mueller's panel is filled with nothi g but Trump-hating Democrats.

One of his members is Hillary Clinton's lawyer.

Another is a lawyer whise boss / mentor / friend was fired by Trump.

Yeah, no conflict of interests to be found.

Reverse the situation - imagine Obama being investigated by a group of Republicans under the same circumstances...suddenly, I imagine, snowflakes would be screaming 'conflict of interest', 'witch hunt', 'racists', 'set-up', etc...
 
let me stop you right from the beginning...Hillary and her team, did not know they syd Blumenthal emails sent to them, had classified information in them...these emails from an outside source had information that the CIA felt should be classified information and they classified this information when they discovered it.... the State department who got this same information from Blumenthal, did not believe it was classified information by our government because they never got this information from our government...they only received it from the outside the gvt source. This is why none of the 4 critical email chains were never marked classified...they didn't come from our top secret govt files.

you can not prosecute a person of any level for that....period.

You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... her and her staff never did that.... end of story.
None of what you stated is supported by actual LAW.

Hillary was warned not to have her own personal server, She chose to. Comey testified not only did she have classified on her server she did indeed send Classified.

None of what you stayed erases the other crimes:
- Illegal handling
- Illegal Storage
- Illegal sharing of classified
- Hundreds of criminal violations of the FOIA
- Hundreds ofciolations of the Federal Records Act

She also committed Criminal Obstruction of Justice - the FBI orderedher to save and turn in EVERYTHING on her server and devices
- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by destroying thousands of e-mails/ documents

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by further destroying more evidence by using BleachBit wipe her hard drive

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by her staff illegally destroying devices with a hammer; all of the devices were never recovered, and those turned in WERE MISSING THEIR SIM CARDS

"You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... "
- YOU COULD NOT BE ANYMORE WRONG!
Being in / coming from a Top Secret File is NOT what makes something Top Secret.

...GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY, C4A, I KNOW YOU ARE NOT THIS STUPID, TO TRY TO CLAIM HILLARY DID NOT BREAK LAWS IN THE FACE OF SO MUCH EVIDENCE.

Again, ANYONE whoever worked with classified, a 1st year law student, could tell you HULLARY BROKE HUNDREDS OF LAWS!

I got it - Hillary is a Democrat and is yo gurl...I understand LOYALTY...but not at the expense of honesty and integrity.
No Easy, no no and no...we do not prosecute people for breaking rules, we may punish them but we do not put them in jail for mistakes, especially people who have held very high positions within our govt and have dedicated their life to the government and Public Service....like Petraeus who was not simply careless, but committed the crime with intent, he knew he was doing wrong and CHOSE to do it anyway....and he got a misdemeanor charge for it even though it was a felony initially but plea bargained it down.... Now if what Petraeus did was just a misdemeanor then what Hillary did with breaking the rules and being careless, had to be less than Petraeus.... and that is precisely how it turn out....that is called Justice.

Petraus is a piker compared to what Hillary did!

We have a sailor serving a prison sentence for taking photographs of a treadmill on a submarine!
fortunately for civilians, military laws and code doesn't apply to them....they are different ya know?
'Breaking Rules'? WTF is wrong with you, C4A? The FOIA and Federal Records Act are LAWS, not 'Rules'. Violating them are CRIMES. Violating them, as specified in the laws I posted a while back are punishable by heavy fines and PRISON TIME.

Stop your bullshit already. You damn-well know Hillary broke the law....or I gave you way too much credit, and you are an idiot.
Folks on the right keep telling the left to "get over it; you lost." Well, it seems to me that you are having the same issue yourself. Hillary was investigated up the ass and the FBI director, who was NOT on anyone's "side" determined that the case could not be SUCCESSFULLY prosecuted. That is what they do over there, collect evidence and see if it's enough to prosecute. Lynch had already stepped back from making that decision because of the meeting on the tarmac (I swear to God she pulled that stupid meeting in order to get out of the hot seat on this one). Comey explained and it was perfectly understandable although disappointing.

You LOST. It's OVER. So get over it.
 
Russian informers are NOT the Russian government. And the Democrats didn't pay them. A PAC did.

Members of the Trump campaign admitted meeting with Russian government officials for the purpose of having Putin help elect Trump. Your tiny mind may not see the difference, but it's HUGE.

Why do you post outlandish lies like this? Are looking for a job with the Washington Post, NY Times or CNN?
why reply to them in any fashion and validate them either way?

we need to just leave stupid be for awhile.
 
If he didn't do anything wrong, he should just let the investigations proceed.





PRECISELY!
Investigations into what?

There was never a crime to investigate. There was never any evidence of any crime to investigate.

Snowflakes demanded an investigation into their false accusations to which they have never had proof to support.
 
None of what you stated is supported by actual LAW.

Hillary was warned not to have her own personal server, She chose to. Comey testified not only did she have classified on her server she did indeed send Classified.

None of what you stayed erases the other crimes:
- Illegal handling
- Illegal Storage
- Illegal sharing of classified
- Hundreds of criminal violations of the FOIA
- Hundreds ofciolations of the Federal Records Act

She also committed Criminal Obstruction of Justice - the FBI orderedher to save and turn in EVERYTHING on her server and devices
- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by destroying thousands of e-mails/ documents

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by further destroying more evidence by using BleachBit wipe her hard drive

- She criminally disobeyed an order from the FBI by her staff illegally destroying devices with a hammer; all of the devices were never recovered, and those turned in WERE MISSING THEIR SIM CARDS

"You had to take the files from government top secret files in order for it to be a crime.... "
- YOU COULD NOT BE ANYMORE WRONG!
Being in / coming from a Top Secret File is NOT what makes something Top Secret.

...GOOD GOD ALMIGHTY, C4A, I KNOW YOU ARE NOT THIS STUPID, TO TRY TO CLAIM HILLARY DID NOT BREAK LAWS IN THE FACE OF SO MUCH EVIDENCE.

Again, ANYONE whoever worked with classified, a 1st year law student, could tell you HULLARY BROKE HUNDREDS OF LAWS!

I got it - Hillary is a Democrat and is yo gurl...I understand LOYALTY...but not at the expense of honesty and integrity.
No Easy, no no and no...we do not prosecute people for breaking rules, we may punish them but we do not put them in jail for mistakes, especially people who have held very high positions within our govt and have dedicated their life to the government and Public Service....like Petraeus who was not simply careless, but committed the crime with intent, he knew he was doing wrong and CHOSE to do it anyway....and he got a misdemeanor charge for it even though it was a felony initially but plea bargained it down.... Now if what Petraeus did was just a misdemeanor then what Hillary did with breaking the rules and being careless, had to be less than Petraeus.... and that is precisely how it turn out....that is called Justice.

Petraus is a piker compared to what Hillary did!

We have a sailor serving a prison sentence for taking photographs of a treadmill on a submarine!
fortunately for civilians, military laws and code doesn't apply to them....they are different ya know?
'Breaking Rules'? WTF is wrong with you, C4A? The FOIA and Federal Records Act are LAWS, not 'Rules'. Violating them are CRIMES. Violating them, as specified in the laws I posted a while back are punishable by heavy fines and PRISON TIME.

Stop your bullshit already. You damn-well know Hillary broke the law....or I gave you way too much credit, and you are an idiot.
Folks on the right keep telling the left to "get over it; you lost." Well, it seems to me that you are having the same issue yourself. Hillary was investigated up the ass and the FBI director, who was NOT on anyone's "side" determined that the case could not be SUCCESSFULLY prosecuted. That is what they do over there, collect evidence and see if it's enough to prosecute. Lynch had already stepped back from making that decision because of the meeting on the tarmac (I swear to God she pulled that stupid meeting in order to get out of the hot seat on this one). Comey explained and it was perfectly understandable although disappointing.

You LOST. It's OVER. So get over it.
Why do you keep denying what you know is fact?

Hillary shared classified with her maid. Do you think that is legal? Yes or no?
 

Forum List

Back
Top