ConservaDerrps
Rookie
- Banned
- #21
ITT: Conservatives are worried about polls showing their useless candidate slipping further behind and blindly grasp at straws.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a moron. It's because there's more registered Democrats than Republicans. Many of the racist Dixiecrats are still registered as Democrat, but vote for the wingnut Republicans in state-wide and National elections. Didn't you ever hear the term, Reagan Democrat?
Utter nonsense. The numbers are fluid and change regularly. Party Affiliation: 36% Democrats, 33% Republicans - Rasmussen Reports
How'd Rasmussen arrive at those figures?
(hint: random sample survey)
How'd Fox arrive at their figures?
(hint: random sample survey)
ITT: Conservatives are worried about polls showing their useless candidate slipping further behind and blindly grasp at straws.
This was august of 2008 Obama McCain poll
"A Reuters-Zogby poll released on Wednesday found the Republican senator leading Barack Obama among likely voters by 46 to 41 per cent, sweeping away a seven-point advantage the Illinois senator held in the same survey a month ago."
And Obama won. See. They are not accurate at all.
This was august of 2008 Obama McCain poll
"A Reuters-Zogby poll released on Wednesday found the Republican senator leading Barack Obama among likely voters by 46 to 41 per cent, sweeping away a seven-point advantage the Illinois senator held in the same survey a month ago."
And Obama won. See. They are not accurate at all.
What a moron. It's because there's more registered Democrats than Republicans. Many of the racist Dixiecrats are still registered as Democrat, but vote for the wingnut Republicans in state-wide and National elections. Didn't you ever hear the term, Reagan Democrat?
Utter nonsense. The numbers are fluid and change regularly. Party Affiliation: 36% Democrats, 33% Republicans - Rasmussen Reports
How'd Rasmussen arrive at those figures?
(hint: random sample survey)
How'd Fox arrive at their figures?
(hint: random sample survey)
I just looked into the new Fox poll and was stunned to see that even they OVERSAMPLED democrats. And not by a little either.
44% democrat to 35% republican http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2012/08/09/fox-news-poll-presidential-race/
Why would anyone even publish such a skewed poll??????????????????
If you look deep into the data you can also see that they have consistantly oversampled democrats from as much as 1% to 9%
With such a small number of respondents polled how can they expect to get a fair sampling of the pulse of the people when nonsense like this is done? I can see why a left leaning establishment may want to skew a poll but why the hell would Fox do the same damn thing?
Utter nonsense. The numbers are fluid and change regularly. Party Affiliation: 36% Democrats, 33% Republicans - Rasmussen Reports
How'd Rasmussen arrive at those figures?
(hint: random sample survey)
How'd Fox arrive at their figures?
(hint: random sample survey)
A "random sample" survey doesn't act like the Mr. Clean magic eraser.
If the random sample over samples for Dims over Republicans, it still over samples. This still leads to skewed results.
"What is the logic for Fox to publish a bogus poll"
Logic.....
......Fox....
...?
ITT: Conservatives are worried about polls showing their useless candidate slipping further behind and blindly grasp at straws.
Click on the link, take off your blinders and learn something for once.
ITT: Conservatives are worried about polls showing their useless candidate slipping further behind and blindly grasp at straws.
Click on the link, take off your blinders and learn something for once.
So they had 9% more Dems? Who the fuck cares? That doesn't mean you toss out the whole fucking poll. It was a random selection of people. Jesus Christ you guys are thick.
ITT: Conservatives are worried about polls showing their useless candidate slipping further behind and blindly grasp at straws.
Click on the link, take off your blinders and learn something for once.
So they had 9% more Dems? Who the fuck cares? That doesn't mean you toss out the whole fucking poll. It was a random selection of people. Jesus Christ you guys are thick.
Click on the link, take off your blinders and learn something for once.
So they had 9% more Dems? Who the fuck cares? That doesn't mean you toss out the whole fucking poll. It was a random selection of people. Jesus Christ you guys are thick.
I don't care but it does go to show you that the results are not neutral, they should favor obama. If the poll was 54% conservatives and 46% liberals I would expect either a tie or a slight lead for Romney.
DO you disagree with my assumption?
Click on the link, take off your blinders and learn something for once.
So they had 9% more Dems? Who the fuck cares? That doesn't mean you toss out the whole fucking poll. It was a random selection of people. Jesus Christ you guys are thick.
I don't care but it does go to show you that the results are not neutral, they should favor obama. If the poll was 54% conservatives and 46% liberals I would expect either a tie or a slight lead for Romney.
DO you disagree with my assumption?
Click on the link, take off your blinders and learn something for once.
So they had 9% more Dems? Who the fuck cares? That doesn't mean you toss out the whole fucking poll. It was a random selection of people. Jesus Christ you guys are thick.
Anyone who cares about honesty and integrity.
Clearly not you
To be fair there are a good number of batshit crazies on this board. Plymco_Pilgrim isn't one of them. He was simply making an inquiry. We disagree often but he's not looney tunes or a fucktard.So they had 9% more Dems? Who the fuck cares? That doesn't mean you toss out the whole fucking poll. It was a random selection of people. Jesus Christ you guys are thick.
I don't care but it does go to show you that the results are not neutral, they should favor obama. If the poll was 54% conservatives and 46% liberals I would expect either a tie or a slight lead for Romney.
DO you disagree with my assumption?
If the poll went the other way you fucktards wouldn't be saying a fucking thing. That's how I know you're acting like this is a travesty of polling science. It's not. It's just one fucking poll that shows your guy getting his ass handed to him is all.
I get it. The pain in your pussies will go away one day, I'm sure. Probably whenever it is the black guy in the White House leaves.
So they had 9% more Dems? Who the fuck cares? That doesn't mean you toss out the whole fucking poll. It was a random selection of people. Jesus Christ you guys are thick.
Anyone who cares about honesty and integrity.
Clearly not you
So pollsters are supposed to go out of their way in a blind sampling to make sure they get a 50/50 split? What if people lie? What if in this poll, people lied about how they're registered?
Seriously. You're making a mountain out of a molehill. Because your guy is getting beaten like a red-headed step child. All that money spent on a fucking TURD of a candidate.
Hey, how come Mittens hasn't spent any of that $43 million of his own money he spent last time? Think it's because it made him look like an out of touch rich bitch trying to buy the Oval Office?
Your guy sucks, and the polls are showing it. Sorry, Bagtards.
So they had 9% more Dems? Who the fuck cares? That doesn't mean you toss out the whole fucking poll. It was a random selection of people. Jesus Christ you guys are thick.
I don't care but it does go to show you that the results are not neutral, they should favor obama. If the poll was 54% conservatives and 46% liberals I would expect either a tie or a slight lead for Romney.
DO you disagree with my assumption?
If the poll went the other way you fucktards wouldn't be saying a fucking thing. That's how I know you're acting like this is a travesty of polling science. It's not. It's just one fucking poll that shows your guy getting his ass handed to him is all.
I get it. The pain in your pussies will go away one day, I'm sure. Probably whenever it is the black guy in the White House leaves.